I certainly agree that this act of Jewel's will have wide reaching implications beyond her intent, and that she could stand to appreciate how sugnificant the improved quality of living for guards can be to them. However, I believe that Jewel's curse only applied to those acting without morals about their duty.
Note that the first four lines specifying who specifically is to be judged are specifically for the guards who did not take any action upon realizing what the girls were being taken in for, save the last which only implicates those who directly killed anyone they were responsible for the safety of (both the late countess and populace). However, Bathory was living on borrowed time for years, so killing her wouldn't exactly be stealing any life even if that line weren't literal. There were some lingering doubts I had about how the wording might implicate some who attempted to act justly, but the following makes me feel like that wasn't the case either.
I interpret this as applying to who the curse effected rather than just what made Jewel decide upon her judgement. Granted, that might not be the case, so feel free to disagree on the grounds of literary analysis. Sith my interpritation, the curse would indeed have spared anyone acting purely out of duty to Bathory or outrage at the unjust things happening to the populace. Given that, none of the cursed would be undeserving of some punishment for their actions under any interpretation of virtue ethics. Adnittedly, virtue ethics aren't really popular in modern times, but at least in this case they aren't so at odds with consequentialist theories.
As for if Jewel is more at fault, her forcefully taking over would have had catestrophic results as I believe is touched upon in earlier chapters. As is, she has less experience and support from her new vassels than would be ideal. If Jewel actively comitted treason to stop Jaska sooner, she would be taking the city with even less experience on how to run it, and effectively declare that she is above the rules, with nothing to stop her siezing others' land. Seeing that, she will have set more or less the entirety of the Viznove nobility against her leaving her only option to be forcefully subjugating them as they fear. I highly doubt that this chain of events would lead to less lozs of life than what Jewel settled upon. She wasn't turning a blind eye to what was happening like the guards she judged did, but rather preparing as best she could to stop it without throwing Viznove into war and chaos as best she can.
As the Countess of Viznove and Lady of Kaeketeh I pass Judgement on the traitor guards of House Bathory.
On all who have turned their eyes from the evil and vile acts done before them.
On all who saw and knew betrayal of the oaths of nobility and fealty and did nothing.
On those whose hands took life they should have guarded.
For every trespass against innocence, for every year stolen, for every drop of blood tainted.
I judge you guilty of all acts vile made under the shield of your complacency and cowardice.
I declare your penance shall be to live and suffer every year stolen under your watch or by your hand.
Note that the first four lines specifying who specifically is to be judged are specifically for the guards who did not take any action upon realizing what the girls were being taken in for, save the last which only implicates those who directly killed anyone they were responsible for the safety of (both the late countess and populace). However, Bathory was living on borrowed time for years, so killing her wouldn't exactly be stealing any life even if that line weren't literal. There were some lingering doubts I had about how the wording might implicate some who attempted to act justly, but the following makes me feel like that wasn't the case either.
You betrayed any right to your duty and dishonored any defense in loyalty when you conspired to murder your liege and countess. If you had done this with righteousness you would have stood before me proudly instead of those you abandoned to suffer the full weight of your dishonor.
I interpret this as applying to who the curse effected rather than just what made Jewel decide upon her judgement. Granted, that might not be the case, so feel free to disagree on the grounds of literary analysis. Sith my interpritation, the curse would indeed have spared anyone acting purely out of duty to Bathory or outrage at the unjust things happening to the populace. Given that, none of the cursed would be undeserving of some punishment for their actions under any interpretation of virtue ethics. Adnittedly, virtue ethics aren't really popular in modern times, but at least in this case they aren't so at odds with consequentialist theories.
As for if Jewel is more at fault, her forcefully taking over would have had catestrophic results as I believe is touched upon in earlier chapters. As is, she has less experience and support from her new vassels than would be ideal. If Jewel actively comitted treason to stop Jaska sooner, she would be taking the city with even less experience on how to run it, and effectively declare that she is above the rules, with nothing to stop her siezing others' land. Seeing that, she will have set more or less the entirety of the Viznove nobility against her leaving her only option to be forcefully subjugating them as they fear. I highly doubt that this chain of events would lead to less lozs of life than what Jewel settled upon. She wasn't turning a blind eye to what was happening like the guards she judged did, but rather preparing as best she could to stop it without throwing Viznove into war and chaos as best she can.