- Pronouns
- He/Him
Well the last time I got injured enough to need stitches I vomited at the sight of my blood spattered on the ground, though its also possible it could be the injurious impact, adrenaline rush, and stress that caused it, though it hardly matters given the subject. Of course if I was an SI I'd probably take the Pacifist Route and probably die horribly in doing so unless its a setting less shitty than ASOIAF.I never can take the scene where the SI vomits after killing serious.
My general assumption is that no you don't intend that and are just baiting audiences. That said, the 'integrity as an author' argument doesn't really work. While you may be obligated to operate within the constraints of what's IC for your SI and other characters, or stick to canon worldbuilding, that still leaves you absolutely immense leeway. The varying interpretations of canon, the parts of canon not explored, and then just the inevitable brownian motion of random events that is life. If you want to railroad your SI into acting, you can, just as you can railroad your SI into not acting.Even if you somehow convince me here of your opinion, it won't matter. The SI is from before this moment and is of an entirely different mindset, and I will right him as such because of my integrity as an author.
I'd also point out, you all are assuming the SI's next course of action, when he hasn't even come to his decision as of yet within the story.
I think most here are of the feeling that not acting would be a significantly less interesting and significantly more frustrating story. In particular, it would most definitely fail to satisfy your imposed goal of "this won't be your usual Self Insert". I mean I have a list right here of usual SI things. SI characters hemming and hawing about butterflies and fate, then doing nothing as the stations of canon roll around, is a very common and annoying pattern. Especially since the author chose to railroad their SI down that path, then chose to railroad the stations of canon happening irregardless of butterflies.
The issue is that it doesn't really insure anything. When people are presented with the Trolley Problem, their usual response is to insist on taking a 3rd option or pretend that inaction is absolution, and the Trolley Problem is a forced and artificial scenario where the stakes are unrealistically clear and of immediate importance. This one, the cost for inaction is huge, personal, and soon, while the benefits for inaction a very distant very nebulous maybe. Overall, if fate is self-correcting, then Jon or whoever is the savior will be born, and if fate isn't self-correcting, then the SI's arrival has already destroyed the prophecy utterly with no way to repair it. The only way to draw an "inaction is best" viewpoint would be if the SI knows the EXACT rigidity of fate and what will/won't knock it off course, then have the border-line omniscience needed to know the specific wills and won'ts, then have the border-line omnipotence needed to ensure the ducks are all in a row.A few thousand deaths and the unhappiness of his brothers and sisters is nothing compared to the possibility of insuring that everyone does not get wiped out by the others in 20 years.