What is that exactly?What I would give for Approval-Task-based voting in this quest...
[X] Plan Sulla Redux
I'll vote for this, but I would prefer to go for the mid-level looting, for no other reason than to punish someone for the killing of our messenger. If the chief hadn't killed himself, we could have crucified him or something and been satisfied, but I feel like we can't do nothing to these people.
Good luck worshipping properly without the priesthood or an actual temple, though. And that's assuming that the pools don't become the site of a Roman temple afterwards.[X] Plan Sulla Redux
Yeah, the pools themselves are the focus of worship, so Grand Theft Deity won't be as effective as it could otherwise be.
Honestly I'd probably vote for Sulla Redux, you bring up a good point about the write-ins. But I agree that Sulla is too lenient. I think going with Looting most of the towns wealth is the best choice here. While it will slow us down, I can't imagine it would do so too much, compared to all the benefits it offers - wealth for us is obviously good, wealth for the Cohort helps with the obvious chafing they have being under an untested commander, and it punishes the town somewhat but not too harshly.That is a point. We could specifically sell his family into slavery, I suppose, but this does bear thinking about. Thoughts, guys?
Check my vote again It says redone.@ThatGuyWithIdeas @Shador @Bullmoose @ZephirTheWind @Falliant @Oshha @Spacegnom @Godwinson @Die Forelle @Harpsichord @Tasoli
Sorry for the mass tag guys, but I don't want to alter the plan without consulting with those voting for it. Would you object to changing from minimal to medium looting? I'm coming around to the idea that the plan as is is too lenient, and it would probably help with managing the cohort.
Check my vote again It says redone.
Edit: NVM I will change the name
Truthfully I think even this is still light. We should have done something about temple least it becomes a local rallying point for any future rebellion. But other options don't appel either.
@ThatGuyWithIdeas @Shador @Bullmoose @ZephirTheWind @Falliant @Oshha @Spacegnom @Godwinson @Die Forelle @Harpsichord @Tasoli
Sorry for the mass tag guys, but I don't want to alter the plan without consulting with those voting for it. Would you object to changing from minimal to medium looting? I'm coming around to the idea that the plan as is is too lenient, and it would probably help with managing the cohort.
Edit: Sorry Tasoli, only caught a glimpse of your vote as I was typing this.
Truthfully I think even this is still light. We should have done something about temple least it becomes a local rallying point for any future rebellion.
@Caesar I'm opposed since the quick punishment was the reason I preferred it to the other plan. So, I will switch back to my original plan.
That said under this voting system I will probably still back your plan, if the vote gets close near the end.
@ThatGuyWithIdeas @Shador @Bullmoose @ZephirTheWind @Falliant @Oshha @Spacegnom @Godwinson @Die Forelle @Harpsichord @Tasoli
Sorry for the mass tag guys, but I don't want to alter the plan without consulting with those voting for it. Would you object to changing from minimal to medium looting? I'm coming around to the idea that the plan as is is too lenient, and it would probably help with managing the cohort.
Edit: Sorry Tasoli, only caught a glimpse of your vote as I was typing this.