Postcards From Eternity: a Narrative Paradox Megacampaign AAR

The Kingdom of Italy, 1900-1904: The War Land
Excerpt from 'The Great War: a History', written by Bettino Rattazi (Napoli: 1983)

The end of the War did not end hostilities. New borders had been laid down, but not all those living within them agreed with the vision of the victorious Powers. The region of Elsass-Lothringen had been left with France after a September 1898 plebiscite showed overwhelming pro-French sentiment. This plebiscite was not accepted by Bavaria, which marched its forces across the border shortly afterwards and demanded the territory's annexation into Bavaria as a 'historically German region', a claim of dubious veracity at best. (...) France, crippled and disarmed, received no sympathy from the Central Powers; the government was bound to agree, and Elsass-Lothringen was ceded to the Bavarian invaders. (...)

The German Question was cause of other conflicts as well. The new Rhenish Confederation had not received the claimed Gelrean enclave of the Saarland when it had come into being in the Warsaw Conference. In August 1899, adventurous 'Freikorps' made up of demobilized veterans and volunteers eager to have a taste of the wartime 'glory' attacked Gelrean forces in the region, but were beaten back and eventually withdrawn by the Confederation government, which was not prepared for full-scale war. (...)

In the North, the island of Saaremaa off the Estonian coast sparked fighting in September. The Warsaw Treaty had mandated a popular plebiscite in 1900 to determine whether the island would remain part of Sweden or join Estonia. The Estonian government claimed that the Swedes planned to interfere with the vote in October 1899. The nation craved an easy victory to quiet domestic unrest, and Saaremaa looked like a likely candidate. In September 1899, Estonian forces occupied the island, and the Central Powers granted their tacit blessing by canceling the plebiscite as unnecessary. Sweden could only comply. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)


(...) The Serbian royal regime fell in January 1900. (...) The situation in Serbia was chaotic from the beginning. The new Communist government was never able to fully extend their authority over the countryside. The revolution appeared to offer little for the peasantry; they had suffered under Wallachian rule for decades and had little desire to now toil for what appeared the old iron fist, only this time painted red. The Communist power base was in the cities and in the rank and file of the military. For the party theorists, the rural peasant was something suspect and alien - superstitious, reactionary and ungrateful. He would have to be beaten into line. The forced collectivization programmes proclaimed from the cities met with waves of resistance.

(...) Regardless, revolution was in the air all over the Balkans. The collapse of Wallachian power and the carving out of new nations from its borderlands had left the region alive with dreamers and adventurers of all stripes. The revolutionary cause had only been emboldened by the wretchedness of the Great War, which made plain the unmasked horror of the imperialist world order. (...)


Socialist revolution appeared to offer a pathway to national independence for many stateless peoples worldwide. (...) Berber nationalism at the turn of the century was increasingly intertwined with left-wing ideology. Failed uprisings and campaigns had turned the peoples of the Maghreb away from the promises of liberals and reformers. Only complete systemic change could provide autonomy and independence for the oppressed. Similar developments could be seen in Italian sub-Saharan Africa and in the Italian Indies. (...) Some of these activists should be classified more as fellow travelers or opportunists than true believers, of course. The socialist cause merely offered them the international support and funding they required to further their own nationalist aims. (...)


The situation remained precarious. In Buenos Aires, the authoritarian Communists had provoked border hostilities with the neighboring nation of Argentina. In August 1901, Argentina's liberal-democratic regime announced that it would no longer 'allow the insidious Red Scourge to grow unchecked' and mobilized for a full-scale invasion of its old rival. (...) Buenos Aires defeat was swift and humiliating. To avoid a total collapse of their own power, the Communist government pleaded with Argentina for peace. (...) The price would be the loss of central Buenos Aires and the partition of the nation into geographically isolated halves. (...)


September 1901 provided the spark for the powderkeg of Java. Pramudya Soerjo, a Javan poet and union leader, was attacked and beaten by enforcers of the Italian administration for his vocal criticism of Italian business interests on the islands. Erroneous news of Soerjo's death soon circulated in Serang to the outrage of local workers and intellectuals. Tens of thousands flooded the streets in protest and besieged administrative offices in the city centre. After local gendarmes attempted to disperse the crowds with gunfire, enraged workers rushed the shooters and lynched them on the spot. Violence broke out across the city and quickly spread into the countryside. (...) Ironically, these developments caught the leaders of the Javanese revolutionary movement unawares. The revolutionary parties now hurried to climb astride the wave of History before it passed them by, flashing the signal for long-awaited Liberation with red lanterns over the city's rooftops. (...) By the week's end, all of western Java was rising up in revolt.

(...) The response in Firenze was one of despair. Reports had just been received by the government which suggested that any attempt to deploy elements of the Army to the Indies would likely spark mass mutinies among the war-weary troops. An alarming percentage of Italian soldiers were estimated to be 'socialists or socialist-leaning'; the last thing that should be done was to give them an excuse to show their colors to a frighteningly restless home front. (...) As a result, the following year would see the Italian colonial government essentially cede almost all of Java to the rebels. Only the ominous presence of the Italian Far East Fleet on the shores of Java kept the insurgents from storming the last bastions of Italian rule. Revolutionary sympathies had not yet reached Italian sailors to any great degree, but that would change. (...)


With the rule of King and Capital falling everywhere, or so it appeared, fears of revolution did not seem unfounded. The French Communists began their uprising in November. Council republics were declared in communes across northern France, but the wartorn nation proved resistant to the charms of the Left. The reduced French Imperial Army was still capable of defending the capital and winning any pitched battles the revolutionaries were driven to. In the end, the uprising faded into a persistent campaign of guerilla warfare and civil disobedience centered mostly in the urbanized north. (...) They would soon be followed by 'Jacobin' revolutionaries seeking to create a liberal-democratic republic, as well as reactionary nationalists and separatist fighters, but for now the French state still held the reins of power. (...) France was headed for its darkest hour. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'The War Land: Europe in the Aftermath of the Great War', written by Lars Emil Nilsen (Kobenhavn: 1990)


(...) The constitutional crisis would likely have been settled peacefully in any other time. The post-war madness was strong in Denmark as well, however. On December 19, the King entered the Christiansborg Palace to address the parliament. Infamously, the left of the Folketing immediately began jeering and cursing at their monarch. The King's speech began half an hour late and did not proceed far before renewed shouting drowned it out. The convened representatives of the left then began chanting 'Give Up the Crown' until the defeated King was escorted out of the Palace. (...) In the morning, the government ordered royal forces out onto the streets of Copenhagen and decreed the arrest of key opposition politicians for lèse-majesté. (...)

The King and his ministers had miscalculated. Massive demonstrations gripped the city and resisted attempts by the police and military to restore order. (...) On the 22nd, the order was given to use lethal force to disperse the rioters outside the Royal Palace. For a chilling moment, the future of the nation hung in balance. Then soldiers all across the lines began throwing down their weapons and walking into the crowd. The royal gambit had failed. The common servicemen of the military were defecting to the 'enemy'. (...) Military elements loyal to the opposition arrested the royal government in the evening of the 23rd. The King, preparing for Christmas festivities, was escorted out of the Palace in a state of shock and confusion and taken into custody. (...) On Christmas Eve, 1901, the new government addressed the riotous crowds from the balcony of the Palace to proclaim the abolition of the monarchy and the foundation of the Republic of Denmark. (...)

***​

Excerpts from the memoirs of Nandana Manola, the 'Red Marshal of Ceylon', written in 1930; describing experiences in the Ceylonese Revolution


(...) Those years were a waking dream, a constant state of delirium. The government had ceased to govern. I had resigned my commission and retired to the family home. Even in the country new ideas and new slogans rang out from every mouth, most of them anarchist, socialist, or a little bit of both. (...) We'd assumed that the peripheries of the nation were happy pieces in the great machinery of state, but these hungry and chaotic years shattered that foolish illusion. The moment our Chinese conquerors departed, the Bengal erupted in flames. The Bengali people had enough of Ceylonese rule; they fought now for nothing less than full independence. In January 1902, that's exactly what they claimed. That grand dream collapsed soon into rule by tyrants and old world backwardsness, but then the cause was just. (...)

I was back in the Party by March. In the quiet life, I'd foolishly assumed that all the talk of impending Revolution was just that - brave words and little else. I would soon discover that actions were not long behind for my comrades. Indeed, while I'd labored in irresponsible isolation, millions of my countrymen had already taken up arms for the cause. The Revolution had indeed already begun. (...)


If you had told me five years earlier that an army of hundreds of thousands would rise up on the side of the workers and triumph against royal forces, I would have called you mad - and likely reported you to the political police. Fortunately, I was no longer that spineless lackey of Crown and Church. The most rewarding time of my life began then. I was doing what I did best - the ugly business of warfare - but I did it at last for a cause I could truly believe in. Our Liberation was at hand. (...) We swept government forces before us like a tsunami. Thousands defected rather than fight us at every turn. We seemed to advance as if weightless, lifted up by the sheer joy and pride we felt in what we were accomplishing. (...)


Victory gets you noticed. I was made Colonel in April, Lieutenant-General by July. I suddenly found out that I had a great deal of voice when it came to local Party business and made a foolish speech about the dangers of giving too much weight to the opinions of military personnel in matters of Revolution. Strangely enough, that stunt was the exact thing that ended up catapulting me to the attention of the Three Heroes and the Party leadership. (...) In August, we dug out the King from his hole and finally got to put him on trial. I won't waste words on that sordid business. Needless to say, the crimes were many, and they made even hardened military men sick to hear them. The lot of the royals faced a firing squad by the end of the week. The same day, we declared the Kingdom abolished, and the Union of Indian Socialist Republics as its sole and legitimate successor. (...) Every day, the world seemed to be spinning faster. I was realizing that's just how I liked it. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)



(...) The reins were slipping from Italy's grasp. In July 1902, the Chinese Empire flagrantly violated the terms of its containment by annexing Mughal Qinghai, a region it had annexed in the later stages of the Great War. Rather than stand up for its ally in Central Asia, Firenze failed to even condemn the aggressive act. Mughalistan would not acknowledge the loss of Qinghai until 1950. (...) Only four years after instituting the most ambitious geopolitical web of power the world had ever seen, Italy was spiraling towards isolationism as problems at home threatened to overwhelm the resources of the government. The economy was continuing its downwards crash, the government's heavy-handed recovery measures proving utterly ineffective against the shock of demobilization and wind-down from wartime production. (...)


In public, of course, government showed no signs of panic. Calm assurances filled every state paper. The unrest would fade away and the economy would stabilize. The people only needed to be patient. (...) Indeed, some measure of normalcy did return by 1902. The subsidization of Italian industries and businesses kept hopelessly unprofitable companies upright and millions employed, even as government profits trickled away to nothing. (...) The colonial empire came to the rescue of the metropole for once - at least for a brief time. Exotic imports and natural resource extraction in the colonies stimulated the Italian economy and resulted in a growth period at the beginning of the century.


Soon use was found for the surplus factories and shipyards of the War as well. Though the Italian Navy had dominated the seas throughout the Great War, it had made itself obsolete as well with a wide variety of advances in shipmaking, naval armaments and doctrinal refinements. As a result, the government began in 1902 construction of hundreds of new warships, chief among them heavyweight cruisers and battleships that alone accounted for tens of thousands of new jobs. (...)



1903 also saw an agreement of military alliance with the Republic of Canada in North America. This alliance was born out of a desire to expand Italian influence into the Americas as well. (...) Canada proved a difficult partner from the start. The ultranationalist Restauration Nationale party had ambitions of its own, and Italy's promises of assistance were taken at face value. (...) In August 1903, Canada declared war on the small republic of Columbia in the Pacific Northwest, publicly calling upon Italy for support. While this was of little consequence to Italy - the war against the poverty-ridden republic needed no outside assistance - but it revealed a troubling tendency in the Canadians to go off wildly on their own without consulting the Italian government. (...) A nationalist fervor and desire to redress the balance of power in North America had gripped Canada as well. Millions of young men demanded a chance to prove their mettle in battle as the millions of Europe and Asia had in the Great War. (...)



Such fervor can blind even men at the highest levels of government to what is possible and wise. On October 1903, the Republic of Canada made the stunning demand to the American ambassador that all Canadian territories were to be at once returned to the Republic, or else the Republic would consider the two nations to be in a state of war. This would have meant ceding all states that had once been part of French Canada; an outrageous demand, though one which suited the nationalistic fury raging across the globe and in the high halls of the Northern Republic. (...) Canada had modest armed forces, dwarfed even by just the US Northern Army. The Canadian government can only have expected for Italian forces to wage their war for them. The US refused and began to mobilize. Another public announcement was made by the Canadian government, this time claiming that Canada and its ally, the Kingdom of Italy, had declared war on the United States of America.

Firenze could only watch in horror. The Italian ambassador is said to have been reduced to tears when summoned by the US President in his attempts to absolve the Italian Crown of blame for the debacle. Frantic telegrams both to Canada and the US assured that Italy was not part of any war and indeed was a neutral party in any conflict on the continent. A public apology was made by the King himself. (...) Italy's humiliation before the eyes of the international community would go a long way in further weakening its hold on the 'Continental System'. Canada, for its part, fared very poorly in the 'War of Empty Promises', with peace made quickly after American forces crossed the border in November and a swift change of power to the Canadian opposition. (...)


For all its troubles, the period saw a considerable flourishing of culture. Both radical and traditional forms of Italian art and expression gained great attention across the globe. The famed tenor Enrico Caruso's performance at the Covent Garden in London is even thought to have directly resulted in a strengthening of Italo-British relations, with British King Harold III announcing (controversially at home) that the Italians were truly 'the most cultured people on God's green Earth'. The rise of jacobinism and socialism across Europe was bringing the two monarchies closer together, with the monarchs of both nations exchanging active correspondence on the means to deal with the situation. (...) In this atmosphere, Britain also supported Italy's bid for host of the Olympic Games in 1904 - though as the 'master of Europe', this was already perhaps to be expected. (...) For Italy, the 1904 Games were not only a chance to showcase the nation's glory and athletic prowess, but also a welcome distraction from the ravages of the War and from the ever-present unrest on the streets. (...)


Demobilization and disarmament did not prevent wars, though it left them mostly in the hands of local free corps and volunteer forces. The Svealand War of 1903-1904 between Denmark and Sweden was fought with makeshift armies which only incorporated small cores of regular troops. The international community looked to Italy, the new global enforcer, to end the fighting. The conflict was too distant to nudge the government into action, however, especially as both Denmark and Sweden were merely defeated enemies and could be allowed to 'whack each other senseless' if that was what they wished. (...) The Swedish victory finally allowed relations to stabilize in Scandinavia. (...) But a crisis was coming where Italy could not simply sit and watch. (...)



The First Czechoslovak-Polish War had been fought in the final years of the Great War and ended swiftly by Italian intervention. In the years since, Czechoslovak revanchism and resentment had only grown. Though both nations remained Italian allies, Poland was by far the more valued partner in the 'Continental System'. (...) Italy's prolonged inaction emboldened the Czechoslovak military establishment. They proposed that with a 'lightning war', the matter of West Galicia could be resolved without Firenze having time to intervene. In January 1904, the government gave its blessing for the operation. Czechoslovak forces flooded over the border into West Galicia, where they met a prepared and vengeance-minded Polish defense.

This was not some overseas squabble or skirmish on the periphery. Italy's allies had began a full-scale war right across the border from Italian Austria. With Italian demands for an immediate ceasefire and negotiation falling on deaf ears, the government finally agreed to act. Czechoslovakia was the clear aggressor and had always been a troublesome friend. On January 10, 1904, Italy denounced the Czechoslovak invasion and began mobilizing forces for a 'peacekeeping operation' in Czechoslovakia. The surprised Czechoslovaks now faced a war on two fronts.


For many soldiers on both sides, it was a bitter day. Veterans who had fought side by side for years were thrown back into the grinder to murder old friends and comrades. For others, it was a chance for one last taste of glory, or for testing the new weapons from the final year of the War which had not seen true use in battle then. Even to most contemporary accounts, the War appeared a savage, senseless thing - the final proof of the death of the genteel old world, and the coming of a time of madness and death. (...)





The war effort was unsustainable for Czechoslovakia, despite its early successes against Polish forces in Galicia. (...) With the southern Czechoslovak front crumbling, Italian envoys shifted from asking for merely white peace to reparations and further demands. The chief Italian demand became the liberation of Pommerania, the small Czechoslovak satellite state on the Baltic coast - thus removing its last marginal access to the sea and suitably 'humbling' the upstart nation. (...) Instead, a pro-Italian party was to be put in power at court and a suitable Italian match found for the Duke of Pommerania. (...)


***​

Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)


(...) Argentina's anti-Communist crusade was now fully and decisively underway. The 1904 elections in Chile saw a popular front left-wing government thrust into power. Within two days, Argentine forces were marching over the border and began to drive the Chilean Army south. (...) The crushing Santiago Accords of 1904 saw the annexation of the vast majority of the Chilean Republic's territory. These 'wars for liberty' had coincidentally created the Greater Argentina which Argentine right-wing authors had advocated for decades. In the collapse of South American socialism, the age of Argentine Hegemony was being born. (...)


in Estonia, the Winter Campaign of 1903-1904 was beginning to show results. Royal forces had defeated most of the Estonian anarcho-communist forces by March, though it would take a good decade until the last bastions of these autonomists had been pulled up and returned to government control. The Russian provinces in particular were becoming increasingly hard to govern without resorting to constant excesses of brutal force. (...) The tide of Revolution had been halted in places, but it was far from over. Indeed, its greatest victory was still to come. (...)
 
The Kingdom of Italy, 1904-1910: The Revolt of the Masses
Excerpts from 'The War Land: Europe in the Aftermath of the Great War', written by Lars Emil Nilsen (Kobenhavn: 1990)


(...) June 1904 found the Czechoslovak position in danger of imminent collapse. While the Galician offensive still enjoyed some modest success, the war at home was being lost. The Battle of Brno on June 17-19 brought with it the operational destruction and surrender of the Czechoslovakian Southern Army. This meant that Italian forces could now operate unhindered within Czechoslovakia proper. The Czechoslovak conscript infantry had crumbled in the face of Italian combined arms. The desperate gambit of the 'White Thousands' strategem had failed; now the only remedy appeared to be to withdraw all offensive forces from Galicia and use them to repel the Italians, forfeiting West Galicia entirely. (...) But with Italian soldiers closing in around Prague and the fortification lines occupied, was this even a viable change of course? (...)


By August, the war was effectively over, but continued resistance fighting by militias and free corps units continued hostilities until September. The Peace of Katowice in late September 1904 at last ended the conflict. As part of the brief military occupation of Czechoslovakia, the pro-Czech government in Pommerania was overthrown. The Czechoslovak Prime Minister Stefanik was forced to admit the end of Czechoslovak overlordship over Pommerania and thus the loss of the final remnant of its Baltic Sea empire. Italian interests would from now on dominate in the small Baltic state. (...) The Second Galician War was over, but how long would the peace last?


(...) In France, chaos unfolded. Administrative records show constant pleas by provincial law enforcement for aid and resources. Strikes, terror bombings, lynchings, assaults on estates and other small-scale acts of rebellion were rampant. The death toll from this unrest and the brutal government crackdown is hard to pin down, but must be in the hundreds of thousands over a twenty-year period. (...) This disintegration of the Imperial state can also be seen in the emergence of myriad alternative structures of power and administration within France, ranging from the self-government of rogue provincial governors and authorities, to local military coups, to mutual-aid movements and anarchist takeovers in many townships, to the rule of workers' and peasants' councils in Communist-supporting areas. (...)

With wages in severe arrears, the loyalties of the military could not be counted upon. Soldiers and police would sell their equipment or even their services to the highest bidder, or join rebel movements outright out of ideological sympathies. The French government relied increasingly on free corps of volunteer militias, since the terms of the 'Defiler Peace' harshly limited the regular Army. For these units, and even some of the Imperial Army, it was charismatic leaders or ideological doctrines that held their loyalty, not the Emperor in Paris. While apparently loyal to the national government, these bands of soldiers essentially ruled themselves - and by doing so, they ruled much of France.


(...) We may trace the origins of the Jeune Nation in this chaotic period. Born as a reaction both against socialism and against the government's surrender in the Great War, the 'Young Nation' movement was at this stage still an awkward amalgam of different groups and ideologies. Rabid, militant nationalism provided an unifying factor, but attitudes to things such as religion, eugenics, race, women and the institution of the monarchy had yet to stabilize. Indeed, the Jeune Nation does not stand out from the mass of small reactionary and proto-fascist movements active in the war land of France.

(...) Even so, the group's 'Manifesto of Rejuvenation' in November 1904 circulated widely in reactionary newspapers. This thematically confused and ideologically muddled screed describes a France 'made decrepit and degenerate' by aristocrats, pacifists, socialists and foreign subversives, calling for a 'revitalization and rejuvenation' and an end to the rule of 'old cowardly men from their country estates'. Instead, France needed the dynamic and forward-thinking rule of the young; namely, the millions of resentful and out-of-work veterans of the Great War, who had through their struggle and sacrifice reached the ideal state of humanity. Only through them could the nation be saved from its present state of decline. (...) Similar developments were ongoing across Europe. The crash demobilization of the belligerent powers had left millions of soldiers adrift and traumatized, unwanted by homelands which now sought to embrace peace with zeal and where economic conditions were almost universally dire. The military establishment sponsored and incubated such movements, unwilling to let go of the power it had gained during the wartime years. The global Fascist system was beginning to take shape.




(...) Bavaria had sat the War out. Though it had made considerable gains with the acquisition of French Tirol and Elsass-Lothringen in 1898, many within the Kingdom saw the past years as a missed opportunity. Even as a neutral observer, Bavaria had been hit hard by the disruption of trade and arrival of countless refugees from every cardinal direction, situated as it was in the very heart of the conflict zone. To the nationalist press, the cataclysm that had passed them by had been the proving ground through which Italy and its allies had shown their national and racial supremacy. Was it not the duty of every Bavarian man to do the same, and indeed revive the dream of an united Germany?

On August 4th, 1904, the Bavarian Landtag convened in a special session. The issue on the floor was whether a new German Federation should be formed under the Bavarian King and Landtag, essentially proclaiming an intention to claim all of Germany under their banner for all the world to hear. With a 162-20 vote in favor, the Landtag accepted the resolution. Only the radical socialists of the USPB, two dissenters and a handful of independent representatives voted against the measure. It is telling that even the formally anti-war and anti-nationalistic Social Democrats voted overwhelmingly for the measure; as the unification of Germany would almost certainly demand military conflict, the SDs put aside their party principles in the overwhelming mood of war hunger. (...)

Two months after the formation of the German Federation, a final ultimatum was made to the government of Gelre - join the new union state, or face the Federation military. (...) The choice of Gelre as the primary target of any unification war had been obvious from the start. The Grand Duchy governed a majority-German population, but its society life and the administration were essentially in the hands of a small ethnic Dutch elite. The perceived of oppression of Germans under foreign rule provided an easy pretext for aggression. Gelre was also in the unenviable position of having no allies in Europe. Remaining ethnic German lands were in the hands of stronger opponents, with powerful backers: the Rhinelanders and the Sorbians were allies of Italy, and Czechoslovakia still boasted a large if recently defeated army. (...) Thus, on the 2nd of November, the German Federation issued a declaration of war against the Grand Duchy of Gelre. The War Land had come to Bavaria in full. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)


(...) November 2 1904 has been codified in liberal historiography as the day of triumph for women's rights across the globe. It is true that on that day women were given the right to vote and run for elections in the Republic of Venezuela, a first for a liberal democratic system. This narrative blatantly ignores a wide array of advances achieved by women and for women in proletarian states worldwide long before 1904. Council elections in Aotearoa had been open to women from their first inception, granting women far greater relative weight in their respective democracies. (...) Rights to abortion, divorce (indeed, the Serbian Supreme Soviet banned the institution of marriage entirely in 1901), work and leisure had been guaranteed across the Socialist sphere. Exceptions existed (especially in authoritarian centralist systems and occasionally on a local level for council republics), but on the whole the 'Red Scourge' was far ahead of the liberal world in 1904 when it came to the 'Question of Women'.


(...) The crippled Chilean nation failed to stabilize after its disastrous loss to Argentina. The popular front government had collapsed into infighting already during the war. The postwar era unfolded in distrustful, uneasy peace between its right and left wings. On the right the Chile Labor Party, which made up the social democratic majority of the coalition, resented the growing pressure from its minority partner of the Communist Party, which advocated for extreme changes and a reconstruction of the economy in a fully Socialist model to combat the financial crisis. (...) The Labor Party had run out of time. In the summer of 1905, high-level military officials met with the President and issued an ultimatum: remove the Communists from government, or be toppled by military coup. (...)

To say this move backfired would be an understatement. The Communist Party demanded an immediate general strike in protest at this interference by the Army in the nation's government. The call was taken up, with radicalized workers going further and seizing factories from their owners. Military defections bolstered their forces, with mutinous soldiers refusing to attack their class comrades. (...) In August, much of the country was under the control of Communist-dominated councils. President Nielsen stepped down in October with Communist militias swarming the capital during his final speech. The Revolution was complete, with the Chilean Council Republic declared on October 28 1905. The new Communist regime was now faced with the task of reforming a nation marked by widespread poverty, corruption, illiteracy and reactionary opposition. Like so often was the case in South America in this period, these challenges would call for sacrifice - and democratic ideals would the first to go here all the same. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'The War Land: Europe in the Aftermath of the Great War', written by Lars Emil Nilsen (Kobenhavn: 1990)


(...) The Great War had witnessed periods of trench warfare, but for the most part it had been a war of mobility and maneuver. Now Europe was to experience the first true 'trench war'. The German-Gelrean conflict had begun in November with a strong push by Gelrean forces into the Federation. Three days of swift advance were stopped at Würzburg, and for six long months no significant ground was gained by either power. Temporary, makeshift fortifications made roots and grew into extensive systems of trench and bunker. Destructive artillery barrages reduced the picturesque cultural and natural splendor of the war zone into a lifeless mulch of no-man's-land. Bombing attacks with incendiaries by airships torched miles of pristine forest and burned down dozens of towns and settlements.

The stalemate gnawed at the public support for the war. (...) Two much-needed breakthroughs had been achieved by the spring, but not on the frontlines. First, the entrance of Britain into the war as German ally - if a distant one, promising only a naval blockade and monetary aid to the Federation - pushed the balance of power in the Federation's favor. Secondly, a Federation delegation arrived in late March in the Rhineland and was received by the Rhenish counterparts, who proved cautiously willing to offer their own assistance. Such talks could only be held in secret. The Rhineland's foreign policy was slaved to Italian desires, as the 'nation' was still effectively a satellite of Italy and its Continental System.

(...) Finally, in May 1906, the secret negotiations paid fruit. The Confederation of the Rhine, on the pretext of invasion by Gelrean forces, declared war upon Gelre and marched its forces across the much longer Rhenish border. Italy showed no interest in intervening. With its defenses circumvented in this manner, the fortified Gelrean line was made irrelevant within the week. (...) The co-belligerents - no official alliance was ever formulated - concluded the war in September 1906, dictating harsh terms to their defeated foe. Gelre would cede Hessen to the German Federation and disputed areas of the Rhineland to the Rhenish Confederation. In addition, Gelre would admit German hegemony over the region and institute wide-ranging reforms ensuring autonomy and exemption from the draft for all ethnic Germans within Gelre; a massive international humiliation and the beginning of the end for the Grand Duchy. (...)

German unification was one step closer to reality - but what would become of the two German nations who had fought side by side against Gelre? In private, the Rhenish government expressed its sympathies towards the idea of one German nation, but also made it clear that no union could be contemplated 'while the Man in Firenze still holds our reins'. (...)


***​

Old Norse inscription in the doorway of the 'Mount Erebus Vault' in Antarctica, discovered and translated in 2021


This refuge took a great deal of time, effort and lives to build. You need not be concerned about skeletons in the foundations. The lives were mine, spent one after the other.

I arrived here in the Year 1906, one of the lost souls of the Grimaldi Expedition. I had enlisted as a Norwegian veteran of the northern polar expeditions. When the ships ran aground in the Imperial Bay, I went overboard with the clothes on my back and a handful of tools. It is with these that I began to build this place.

I came here to sate my own curiosity, and to prepare the way for another. The Wanderer shall find his way here in the end.

If you find these words, I rejoice! As I carve them, the Hunt for the Southern Pole has given the world nothing but madness and doomed lives. Yet the world changes at a loathsome pace. When your ships and flying things and whatever else at last arrive here, they will be as the chariots of the gods to me and my time.

In the name of the old gods, who I alone now recall,

Ragnar

***​

Excerpts from 'The Imperial Histories: Vol XII, High Imperial Persia', written by Akbar Ali Khatami (Tabriz: 1942)


(...) The Shah had moved too quickly in the campaign to modernize Somalia. Mohammad Khan's ambitious reforms had stripped the old landowning classes of their power and replaced them with a system of rational administration by provincial governors. The poorly educated local imams had been suppressed with the arrival of learned Persian teachers in the territory, whose efforts to root out syncreticism and heterodox doctrine were at last starting to bear fruit by the early 1900s. Investment in the country's railways and port infrastructure had opened Somalia up as a modern market, and land enclosures and urbanization lifted the Somali people out of fundamentally inefficient traditional forms of economic activity. (...)

The anti-Persian movement was composed of various bandit groups and displaced warlords driven into the hinterlands by Persian gendarmes and garrison forces. These throwbacks to a more savage age were supported by the remnants of the old social elites and their followers. Rebellious religious leaders also aided the rebellion, inciting ignorant peasantry into revolt against their benefactors. (...) In September 1906, these conspirators banded together and launched their revolt, claiming to be fighting on behalf of the abdicated Emperor Abdiweli III - who presently enjoyed a luxurious life in Tabriz as a guest of Shah Mohammad Khan.


(...) Atrocities against loyalist Somalis were common and rebel forces ruled through brutal repression rather than with any real degree of alleged popular support. (...) The Revolt's military forces were small and inferior in every respect to local Persian auxiliaries and regular troops. Misguided and deceived peasants formed militias which proved difficult to bring to direct engagement. As a result, Persian authorities were forced into mass executions of suspected collaborators in afflicted areas to demoralize these guerillas. (...) All engagements between Persian and rebel forces resulted in swift Persian victory. Light infantry armed with new Nikzad bolt-action rifles could eliminate insurgents long before their opponents reached combat range with their obsolete foreign-supplied rifles. The Nizkad cemented its place as the primary rifle of the Persian Imperial Army. The glowing appraisals written by foreign observers smoothed the way for the Nizkad's introduction to foreign markets as well, and ended any misapprehensions about Persia's capabilities for war. (...)


In late December, the leaders of the rebel movement offered their surrender. Sporadic guerilla attacks continued for some time after, but these were of little consequence. (...) Some misguided Somalis today choose to see the Revolt in a positive light and portray it as a struggle for freedom. It is the hope of this author that their narrative of the conflict will be enough to show these malcontents the truth and make a full account of the benefits that Persia has brought to Africa throughout the turbulent century. (...)


The Persian Empire had not dirtied its hands in the Great War, which unfortunately had led to many in high positions to doubt the supremacy of Persian arms on the battlefield. The Somalian conflict eased these concerns: the remaining doubts about the Imperial Army would be fully disproven in the Macedonian War of 1908. Acting in support of their Wallachian allies, Persian forces would be mobilized against Greek aggression and reclaim the Caucasus in a successful liberation war, as detailed in the next chapter. (...)


***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)



(...) It was the Golden Age of Firenze. The most recent Golden Age of Firenze, many at the time would say, given the rich history of the capital. In retrospect, it was certainly the last Golden Age of Firenze before the present day. The nonstop flourishing of architecture, literature, painting, music and theatre by both bourgeois and radical authors was staggering. The recently relaxed press restrictions allowed for an unprecedented growth in publications. The sheer volume left state censors, who had been tasked with suppressing everything dangerous to the status quo, helpless. Rather than seek to control the deluge, the censorship bureau engaged in crass distortion and fabrication of their own records to appease their masters, only striking out at the most public of new releases. (...)

Wealth flowed into the city as the heart of an empire. Twin spheres of economic domination - one over the colonies, the other over Europe in the form of the Continental System - were making Italian businessmen and corrupt government officials rich beyond their wildest dreams. (...) The government's desperate need to reduce unemployment and redirect the energies of radicalized veterans led to countless monumental constructions and public works projects, funneling treasury money into the expensive beautification of the capital. (...)



But such 'bribes' could not delay the inevitable forever. The expansion of freedoms for the press, a concession to powerful liberal interests, sparked a counter-reaction among the already volatile reactionary right. Appalled aristocrats and officers saw the deluge of 'jacobinist, socialist, anarchist and pacifist trash' in the newspapers and bookstores and knew that something had to be done. The Cogni Conspiracy was born. (...) This association of aristocratic military officers and bureaucrats intended to 'save' the King from his poisonous liberal advisors and restore what they thought of as the 'disciplined' culture of pre-War Italy. A mass purge of liberals and socialists was in order, followed by the restoration of the old penal code and all its draconian punishments. A cabinet of military officials would form to oversee these necessary evils. (...) Cogni and his allies sought to use proto-fascist veterans' organizations to agitate and organize troops to supply the manpower to suppress any socialist and liberal militants in the country during this 'restoration'. In secret, these new Italian free corps were also expected to battle regular units of the Italian Army if necessary.

(...) The plot came to light on December 20 through the investigative journalism of reporter Gabriella Torriani, ironically a feat which would have been impossible before the relaxation of press censorship; while Torriani's articles offered only circumstantial evidence and failed to identify Cogni as the mastermind of the plot, its publication sent the conspirators into a panic. Cogni attempted to flee the city and was apprehended by suspicious police. The letters found in his possession incriminated him and his closest allies beyond any reasonable doubt. (...) Despite these grave setbacks, Antonio Gramaglia, a junior Italian Army officer of no great standing within the conspiracy, gave the signal to begin an uprising to the plot's supporters.


The conspirators had expected perhaps 20,000 men at their disposal, but their agitators had overdone themselves. A series of riots and revolts broke out across Italy and spread quickly into the colonies; many with confused motives beyond an opposition to 'the socialists', who had been 'allowed to forment anarchy' by the treacherous liberal government for too long. Most significant of these was the March of the Forty Thousand in Rome - an occupation of the Eternal City by a division of the regular Army and its free corps allies. (...) However, the hoped-for support within the Italian Army failed to materialize. A communications blackout was quickly put into effect by loyalist leaders and troops generally failed to learn of this 'veterans' uprising' before it was already over. Even where word slipped through, sympathies for the revolt were modest - unlike the demobilized veterans, the self-perceived elites of the Army enjoyed stable pay and proud traditions. What reason could they have to join what appeared to be an attempt at overthrowing the King's rightful government?

(...) By January, the Revolt was over. The aristocratic conspirators were disgraced and their families put under close supervision. The Crown surmised that the danger was past and that the rot in this respect was now gone. The real lesson was not heeded. The Winter Revolt was not a show of force by aristocratic power and traditional conservative elements, but rather a display of just what a mass movement of the radicalized masses were capable of. The veterans' organizations and gangs which had provided the 'muscle' for the uprising were not weakened in the slightest. Indeed, they had gained a new awareness of their own strength. (...)


Foreign entanglements drew the attention of government in October 1909. The defeat of Gelre in the First German Unification War had plunged the Grand Duchy into a 'permanent crisis', a situation which its neighbors sought to take full advantage of. King Goffredo of Italy had considered Gelre an useful balance in the region, but its present weakness convinced him to end Italian support for Gelrean sovereignty. Representatives of the Sorbian government quickly approached Italy to ask for a blessing for an invasion of Gelrean Hannover, a region which some modest Sorb populations. These envoys left with guarantees of Italian support in any conflict. (...)



One reason for this quick Italian approval of the plan came from the active Socialist insurgency within Gelre. Revolutionary guerillas had engaged in low-intensity yet constant attacks on government forces and institutions since the previous summer. The inability of the Gelrean government to put down this rebellion suggested that a Red takeover was likely. With Hungary undergoing its own Socialist revolution at the same time, Italian interests were in checking the expansion of this revolutionary fervor where they could. (...) Italo-Sorbian forces penetrating into Gelre thus were forced to contend not only with the armed forces of Gelre's government, but equally with Socialist Red Guards in much of the country. (...)



Gelre offered its surrender in February 1910, ceding the disputed region. Sorbia had won itself land, population and a profitable industrial center and port. Gelre's state forces lay in disarray. Having suffered its second defeat within a short time, faith in the bourgeois-democratic government and the constitutional monarchy collapsed. The very Socialist takeover that Italy had sought to suppress now appeared almost certain to succeed. (...) The Gelrean Revolution was completed in the following year, thrusting yet another state into the rapidly growing Socialist fraternity of nations. (...)
 
The Kingdom of Italy, 1910-1920: Warning Shots
Excerpts from 'The Failure of Liberal Democracy: an Argument', written by Pavel Konstantinovich Kornilov (Vladimir: 1970)




(...) That there was a crisis is undeniable. It was a crisis of the jacobin cause; of liberal democratic internationalism; of revolutionary liberalism as a whole. The destructive rise of Communism around the world was a bitter pill to swallow for the veterans of the jacobinist struggle. Their gentlemen's clubs and secret societies could not compete in numbers or appeal with the Left. Senseless devotion to reformism within absolutist systems of government had sapped the revolutionary potential of these parties. The popular masses they might have mobilized had been subverted and co-opted by the extremists of the Left. (...)

In Italy, the last desperate gasp of the old guard of Italian jacobins - the so-called Radical Republicans - came in 1910. This revolutionary liberal faction was led by the secret society of the Carbonari, a comfortably middle-to-upper-class institution with elaborate occult-esoteric practices and high-minded ideals. (...) Its popular support came mainly from the Napoli-based Masaniellist organizations, which owed their success to deep-seated regionalist pride and long history of republicanism in the South, the heritage of the failed 1640 Neapolitan Republic. These populist-liberal organizations had off-shoots in most major cities of Italy. (...) In the colonies, educated elites also supported the revolutionary liberal cause in the hopes that it would win their homelands representation in Firenze. (...)

The 1910 Risings began with anti-war riots in February 1910 in northern cities. Italian support of Sorbia in the Sorb-Gelrean War of 1910 had been unpopular and fears of renewed conscription now sent thousands into the streets. Composed largely of students and lower middle-class activists, these demonstrators demanded an end to absolutist rule: a constitution, universal suffrage, an elected senate, an independent judiciary, freedom of speech, expression and religion, guarantees to the rights of property, and reform of the military to cleanse it of 'causeless tyranny and draconian justice'. (...) The brutal government crackdown of February 15 sparked even wider demonstrations in previously unaffected cities. The Republicans saw their chance to act. The long-neglected weapon stores and bomb-making depots were opened back up as thousands of fervent jacobins took to the streets. (...)


Naples inevitably became the revolutionary heartland. The republicans framed their revolt in nationalist terms, which won them broad popular support in the South. Resentment at 'Northern Tyranny' had always fueled unrest in the region, now more than ever. Mechanization and commercialization of agriculture had caused widespread unemployment and poverty in the largely agrarian South. Naples itself was an industrial center, but one which had resisted the siren song of the extreme Left and instead largely supported the Italian Social Democrats. The Rising in Naples thus saw an alliance of liberal republicans and social democrats. The Revolutionary Socialists, on the other hand, were considered just as much an enemy as the tyrannical state. There would be no support from the communists for the Risings.

(...) The New Republican Army swelled to nearly 65,000 men in February-March 1910. They began extending their control over the city and its environs. Leaders in the city itself declared 'the Second Neapolitan Republic' on March 4th. With news of uprisings across the nation, the success of the revolution appeared only a few steps away.(...)


The illusion could not be maintained. The Risings had been small and fragmented in the North. The Army failed to manifest any liberal sympathies. Indeed, it appears to have leapt at the chance to crush the rebel forces. Brutal repression and state terror followed in the wake of republican defeats. (...) On March 10th, the loyalist III. Army swept into Naples and engaged the New Republican Army. Now the obsolete armaments and poor organization of the republican forces was made evident. (...) The surrender of the rebel command did not end the bloodshed. Executions of suspected republicans continued for over a week, with a death toll of at least 80,000 people. (...)

In mid-March, the Risings were over. Colonial disturbances continued until May, but only to meet similar ends. The liberal revolutionary cause was in shambles. (...) Indeed, for the Crown this destruction of militant liberalism was necessary for the advancement of liberal reforms in Italy. Change could and would only come from above - the lesson had surely been learned, and the leash on the reformists could be loosened. (...)



The tumult in Italy did not go unnoticed beyond its borders. The Hungarian civil war had de facto ended in January with the fall of Budapest to Communist Red Guards, but fear of Italian reprisal had kept the Hungarians from touching Italian business interests within Hungary. With the 1910 Risings, this last obstacle was removed. The Hungarian Communists moved ahead with a takeover and nationalization of foreign companies and deported indignant Italian businessmen en masse. (...)

Even after the dust had settled in Italy, nothing stronger than formal censure and economic sanctions targeted the new Hungarian regime. The Hungarian Revolution thus continued the collapse of the Continental System. (...)


The broader crisis of liberalism and the seemingly unstoppable rise of global communism sparked another reaction. Men and women around the world were seeking for answers to the questions of their age. They could not swallow the pampered idealism of the liberals, which had proven its weakness time and time again, nor could they accept the class divisionism of socialism. A third way would have to be forged. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)


(...) Everyday life in post-1910 Italy changed in many, often subtle ways. The forces of reaction began to modernize the tools of their control. The political police grew tenfold from 1910 to 1914 in both numbers and funding. Foreign experts were brought in to train officers in subversion, infiltration and terror as tools of law enforcement, fundamentally shifting the nature of policing in Italy. Italy's first modern secret police was born. (...) An atmosphere of conspiracy and paranoia fermented in the nation, with informants and spies expected on every corner. Neighbors and even family could become objects of intense distrust. Revolutionary Socialist groups and unions were broken up and their leaders arrested, inspiring a counter-evolution of secrecy. This 'age of the conspiracy' has been plenty depicted in popular media, but a non-sensationalist investigation remains incomplete. (...)


The Colombian Revolution of 1911 brought new overseas concerns. The South American nation bordered the Italian crown colony of Nicaragua in Central America, its sole remaining holding in the New World. The governor's office pleaded with additional forces to reinforce the border in case of Communist invasion or revolutionary movement at home. These fears were likely largely unfounded: the Colombian socialist project was unsteady from the start and native support for revolutionary socialism was non-existent in the undeveloped colony state. The United States occupation of the Panama Canal Zone effectively prevented any feasible offensive war in the region regardless.

Nationalist opposition by locals - who were a colorful mixture of Italian, Sorbian and native heritages - was on the rise, but this scarcely concerned officials in Firenze who considered Nicaraguans 'overseas Italians'. The independence movement styled themselves 'Costa Riccans' instead of Nicaraguans to distance themselves from the colonial state. (...)


The Communist regime in Gelre proved just as unable to prevent national humiliations as the liberal one preceding it. Citing atrocities by Communist forces in ethnic German territories of Gelre, the German Federation invaded once more in 1914. German unification was progressing, but Münich knew very well that sooner or later conflict against Italy was coming if they intended to truly complete the task before them. Anti-Italian sentiments in the Federation were strong in this period, bolstered by the brutal repression of the liberal-democratic uprisings of 1910. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)


(...) The Serbian experiment veered from disaster to disaster. The rural revolts had proven beyond the Party to contain. The underestimated and disdained rural proletariat had gone over to the enemy, while the urban workers resented new restrictions on the power of the councils. (...) The purge of the royal officer corps had been thorough, but the Red Guards could not provide equal talent to replace the men imprisoned and executed. (...) In June 1916, the important political prison at Uzice was overrun by peasant militias, who released a great many imprisoned 'reactionaries' and 'class traitors' within - experienced and well-motivated military men who would go on to form the core of the White Serbian army. (...)

By Spring 1918, the Civil War was over. The Red government had fallen, its last-minute reforms coming too late to make any difference to its fate. White Terror devastated the heartlands of the Red cause. (...) Government negotiations ended in the compromise formation of a bourgeois Republic. Conflicts with the conservative military establishment crippled the ability of the new Serbian state to govern. (...) In September 1918, the Hungarian Soviet Republic declared that it would no longer sit and watch White Terror murder their fellow workers in Serbia. War was declared and the powerful Hungarian Red Army marched over the border. A divided bourgeois Serbia with its smaller forces moved to repel the invaders. (...)

The Hungarian victory and occupation of northern Serbia was finalized in March 1920, with the surrender of the Serbian government. Now the ranks of international socialism could only stare in shock. Rather than restore the 'fraternal socialist republic' the Hungarians had claimed to go to war for, the Hungarian Supreme Soviet agreed to terms with Serbia where the ethnic Magyar northern territories of Serbia would be ceded to Hungary, with no further interference in 'internal Serbian affairs'. In essence, the grand promise of renewed liberation was tossed away for a nationalist landgrab. (...) The Serbian workers would never forgive this perceived betrayal. (...) For the socialist cause, this was embarrassing proof that the scourge of selfish nationalism could not so easily be removed from even a revolutionary state. (...)


The Internationale faced another conundrum in April 1919 with the announcement of the Seventh Olympic Games in Italy. Could Socialist states engage in such nationalist contests, especially on the soil of a nation they were avowed enemies of? It was unclear whether they would even be allowed to participate - indeed, for nations such as Colombia and Norway, exiled white governments were invited as the 'legitimate' representatives of their peoples. In the end, the Internationale agreed to form an opposing athletic contest in similar vein, the Spartakiad, open to workers around the world. The first Spartakiad - often described as 'the Shadow Olympics' - was held in 1921 in Oslo, with representatives from thirteen nations; the proletarian states of Hungary, Norway, Gelre, Seville, Alarcon, Colombia, Chile, Buenos Aires, Aotearoa and Ceylon, as well as teams from the social democrat-governed nations of Denmark, Croatia and Pagarruyung. A group of anarchist athletes also participated under their own flag. Further athletes joined as independents from nations and peoples around the globe for a truly international contest. (...)

The First Spartakiad ended as a success, for the most part. New records were made, though they are hopelessly modest when compared to modern equivalents. Hungary emerged as the most successful participating nation, a feat attributed in the local press to the 'rationalized and scientific Socialist training regimes' of their athletes. The anarchist and internationalist teams took the second-most medals when counted as a whole. Aotearoa emerged as an unlikely third; the small Oceanic nation had the benefit of decades of peaceful growth and widespread public enthusiasm for the Spartakiad to explain the general high performance of their team. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)



(...) The Italian speculative bubble burst in June 1919. The economy, barely recovered from its wartime exertions, promptly went into a nosedive. The Florentine Exchange convulsed in outbursts of panic as crashing prices prompted frenzies of selling. Fisticuffs broke out in the Exchange hall itself, necessitating police intervention. (...) As financial panics went, it was far from the worst of the period, but it was certainly the most significant. The government, as always, stepped in to take on the cost - and found out it simply could not afford to do so any longer.

The minutes of the emergency government meeting on June 28 reveal a startling picture. The state treasury had been hemorrhaging money since the beginning of the Great War, a tendency only made worse with the brute-force subsidization of industries after the conflict. A review of the Financial Ministry's reports shows that the unprofitability of many Italian industries was well known long before 1919. However, the King and his closest ministers deemed these economic concerns secondary; first and foremost, the state had to consider what would become of millions of Italian industrial laborers should these factories be allowed to close down. The turbulent nation simply could not bear a mass unemployment crisis and the radicalization it might set off.

It was a disaster which had only grown worse with every delay and half-measure. Now the buck could no longer be passed forward. Estimates showed impending bankruptcy for the state unless the course was turned at once. (...) The radical changes thought necessary were not ones that the ruling government could stomach. The di Verona cabinet offered its resignation on June 30, and the King accepted.



One could call the government of July 1919 the most liberal to ever take power in Italy. Headed by Count Francesco di Modrone, a moderate reformist liberal, it was thrust into power with the mandate of both stopping the economic crisis and quelling unrest among the masses. While it could not hope for success in respect to a constitution or representative assemblies, the new ministers were given practically free rein with economic, religious, administrative and social policy.

The first strike was at discriminatory laws and practices within the government and the military, swinging the gates wide for Catholic and Muslim applicants who had previously been allowed almost no opportunities for advancement. Citizenship of Italy and its legal guarantees was extended to millions who had before lacked the language skills or literacy to enjoy them. A thorough purge of the military began with the aim of removing 'brutish and backwards' practices of corporeal punishment and disciplinary hazing from the Army and Navy. The military budget was slashed into a fraction of its former self, most significantly by dismissing dozens of surplus officers from the payrolls where they'd lingered without any concrete duties since the War.

Some of the wildest hopes of the liberal cause were realized only 9 years after the failing of the 1910 Risings. But of course, the political system would remain just as absolutist as it had always been. (...) These reforms pale in comparison to the total about-face in economic policy overseen by the di Modrone cabinet. Starting from July 1919, the government withdrew all subsidies to unprofitable fields of industry and began privatizing the vast majority of all state-operated factories. Industrial subsidies had grown to be the largest single expense of the Italian national budget. Now, in one terrible swoop, the wealth stopped flowing out. The intent was to crash-restart the Italian economy according to liberal principles of free laissez faire enterprise.

(...) Entire fields of industry collapsed overnight. Managers and state executives floundered, baffled by the new reality they found themselves in. For decades they had run their factories with little care for profits or efficiency - now they were faced with the impossible task of meeting the standards of the market instead. While the ruined factories would go on to be replaced by others in more profitable industries, by and by, this was scarce consolation for the millions of working men and women thrown out to the wolves. The single greatest wave of unemployment in Italian history was about to begin. (...)

Excerpts from 'Black Hundreds: the Birth of Fascism in the 20th Century', written by Hans Brenner (Münich: 1977)


(...) It would be incorrect to characterize the emerging fascist sphere as something resting primarily upon the backs of radicalized veterans. Indeed, much of the Arditi street-level membership in particular was a generation removed from the scarred and traumatized men of the Great War. It was those who had been just too young to enlist or who had avoided the draft due to health or workplace exemptions who now flocked to its banners. Certainly the fascist parties and gangs held a greater appeal for them than it would have for their pre-War elders; Italy had left behind its century of prosperity and was now tumbling headlong into the abyss, at least if one asked the populist right-wing papers. (...) Mass unemployment and bleak prospects made for restless souls. An experience of having missed out on the glorious test of the War united these youths: they could not prove their manhood as their elder brothers and cousins had, nor could they show their worth in the often-boisterous masculine arena of the factory floor, so they leapt at the chance to enter the militant and active life of the Italian fascists instead.

(...) That is not to say war veterans did not make up a significant faction of the Arditi. The very name of the organization referenced Italian elite shock infantry of the Great War. Higher echelons of the party organization were almost solely junior officers and ambitious soldiers left causeless by demobilization. The ex-soldier population was divided between many other groups, however; they were courted in turn by militant socialists and anarchists, traditional conservatives and minority separatist groups all the same.

True success only lay in their ability to mobilize Italian society outside of the veteran masses, however. (...) By now the Arditi, which was by 1919 the largest fascist organization in Italy, had found a guiding vision of sorts, a rudimentary set of shared ideals and doctrinal points. These included the glorification of youth, a love of futurism and technology and a rejection of tradition, a belief in the necessity of state-practiced eugenics and racialism, militant atheism, extreme nationalism and social darwinism, and devotion to the 'state as legionnaire' - the nation imagined as a disciplined soldier with a ruthless clarity of vision and the submission of individuals to operate as part of this 'machine'. In practice much of this esoteric and highly conceptual doctrine manifested on the street level as little more than base racism and arbitrary acts of violence by member youths. (...)


One should not overstate the success of the fascists in this period. The chaos of liberalization and the labor crisis played far more into the hands of the extreme Left, whose numbers swelled by millions in the shock of 1919. Social democracy faced a crisis as a result. The 1910 Risings had not been able to threaten the Throne, and now the last hopes of gradual, peaceful social reform appeared crushed. With all the efforts of the moderates seemingly ruined overnight by the whim of the King, there was nothing that could be done to counter the accusations and promises of the Revolutionary Socialists. With reactionary governments falling left and right around the world, the time for reformism was surely past. Everywhere a drive to act and move faster seemed to be overtaking the people. (...)


The right and the left thus battled for the hearts and minds of the Italian masses. Industrial workers generally followed the Socialist banner, though in some areas conservative unions offered their beds to the Arditi and regional equivalents. Sailors and soldiers made for a more divided audience; leaders on both sides rightfully concerned themselves with securing the loyalty of the military, or else coming up with the means to defeat it in battle. The loyalty of much of the Royal Army to the King and the State had led to the defeat of the 1910 Risings and past, abortive attempts at revolution such as the Cogni plot. (...)

The new battleground now became the countryside. Generally conservative, rural Italians often viewed these radical movements with distrust. In the 1910s, the relaxed press code allowed for articles to be published on the dangers of agricultural work and the dismal fate of injured agrarian workers in the absence of state aid. Calls for a pension system and modern state-sponsored healthcare came from socialists and fascists alike in the papers. The Great War had brought millions of Italians into the sphere of the Royal Aid, the system of 'marching physicians' which offered state healthcare to all soldiers, veterans and their dependents. Unfortunately, the system had not received the necessary funding to accompany this vast expansion. Indeed, it was funded through the military budget, and the general staff rarely made it a priority when it came to their budget of the year. (...) In practice only those with the best connections and greatest bribes could secure the services of these state physicians. (...)

(...) The widespread coverage of these issues sparked unrest in rural Italy. In the face of tepid government response, farmers and agrarian laborers turned their ears towards the agitators of the left and the right, and they did so en masse. Landless tenant farmers and hired, nomadic laborers in particular experienced an awakening in class consciousness. Unions of agricultural workers grew in membership by leaps and bounds - as did organizations such as the Arditi, who promised a lifestyle of pride and self-reliance once more after years of exploited toil and alienation. (...)


The rise of labor did not go unnoticed in the high halls of Firenze. Trade unions were already illegal, but this ban had been selectively enforced. The new government renewed suppression efforts against organized labor and tacitly lended its support to the many local union-busting campaigns by industrialists and landowners. The Arditi were found to be an useful tool for these purposes. Rather than risk deploying potentially left-sympathizing Army units and waste government revenues on crackdowns, the Crown could simply encourage the vigilantism of the Fascist underground. (...) Brutal street battles and atrocities were common in these years as the Arditi and their regional counterparts assaulted Socialist strongholds where they could. Paramilitary forces were formed in response by unions and the left-wing parties. (...)

The Revolutionary Socialist coalition had by 1920 developed into two competing factions. The first followed the example set by the Communist parties of South America and the Balkans. The struggles and losses of this battlefield period had convinced this centralist wing that Italy was hopelessly infested by reactionaries and fascists, and that this rot would need to be excised from the marrow by the disciplined rule of a vanguard party elite; a proletarian dictatorship which was to use any means necessary to destroy the remnants of the bourgeois-aristocratic societal order. The Party and the State would seize total control over all aspects of the nation, so as to best put it on the path of a Communist society. Factionalism and internal disputes could not be tolerated; discussion could be held within the Party to find the right course forward, but all Party organs and members would then submit to its decision and see it to the end. (...)

Against this centralist doctrine arose a faction of libertarian socialists, syndicalists and anarcho-socialists, for whom the principles of uninterrupted democracy at every level were sacred. For them, political parties were inherently suspect and power could not be trusted in the hands of a 'vanguardist' few. The state that would follow the Revolution would be stripped to its bare minimum - replaced by the nested structures of democratic councils or empowered unions. Only through a total awakening of the proletariat, which could not be forced by heavy-handed state measures, would the future be won. Dynamism and anti-bureaucratization were necessary - the Revolution would need to always be reinventing itself. This faction was in the end far less unified than its rival, but with a far greater influence over the countryside where it spread through the preaching of radical Waldensian Socialist priests. This unlikely alliance certainly helps understand its prominent hopes for a 'final reformation of the Church' and incorporation as part of a socialist society. (...)

In 1921, this split was made official with the formation of the Partito Comunista Italiano, the voice of the former faction, and the reluctant creation of the opposing Fronte Socialista di Unita, which emphatically refused the label of a political party and indeed struggled to maintain internal coherency. The Revolutionary cause now competed within itself for support, though for now disagreements remained on the level of acerbic articles and vindictive debates. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)


(...) Italian influence in the Netherlands waned in the late 1910s. The monarchy in the Netherlands had undertaken a series of liberalizing reforms and established a parliamentary system in 1916, though the King still retained strong executive powers. The Dutch parliament however was sharply critical of Italy and its reactionary politics. Perhaps more critically, observers in the Netherlands were uneasy with the apparent unwillingness of Italy to maintain the post-war system it had helped create. How could the Netherlands continue to put their faith in such an ally?

Germany presented both a potential ally and a threat. As a neighbor - as of the most recent Gelrean war - it appeared to be a more natural ally to the Dutch than distant Italy. However, the Kingdom governed ethnic German territories and many Dutch politicians were rightfully suspicious of German motives in seeking to pull the Netherlands away from its strongest ally, Italy. (...) All in all, Italo-Dutch relations were growing increasingly fragile. (...)


The anti-war di Modrone government received the unpleasant task of planning and overseeing further investments into the Italian Army. The development of new, larger battleships - called dreadnoughts - necessitated investments into the Navy, which proved tremendously expensive to the national budget. Fortunately, state revenues had rebounded after discarding the weight of the bloated industrial subsidies. Di Modrone and his allies would certainly have found better use for this wealth than military spending, but they could not go against their sovereign. (...) To cut costs, the majority of new regimental foundings and military investments were given to the Colonial Office to handle. Tens of thousands of new Askari forces were raised up for the security of the colonies, for the first time led by local elites rather than white Italian officers. (...)



The opening of the 1920 Olympics in Rome provided an opportunity for Italy to showcase its greatness. Vast pavilions were constructed around the new Olympic Village to display Italian riches and technological developments. The Righi telephone became the defining symbol of the Olympics, a concrete example of the more interconnected world and Italy's modernity. At the same time, military forces guarded the entire area against incursions by homeless and unemployed workers living in tent cities outside the city. This division did not go unnoticed by foreign press, but most reporters were blinded by the sheer wealth and sophistication on display where they were meant to see it. (...) The same certainly applied for many Italians. The liberal winds encouraged carnivalism and festivities after years of discipline and austerity; but while the bourgeois classes danced and drank the night away, the foundation of the nation was rotting away. (...)

Here's another case in which some of my screenshots mysteriously did not materialize. The affected period was 1912 to 1917; nothing very spectacular happened according to my notes, but very annoying.
 
There was some interest in having the EU4 and V2 starts for your own enjoyment, so here they are. The HoI4 part will be a full-on mod, but these are just the mod files. Plop them in your EU4/V2 mod folder and they should show up in the launcher.

EU4 mod (likely not compatible with Leviathan and on)
V2 mod

Let me know if they don't work for some reason! Next update coming as soon as I drag myself away from modding the HoI4 scenario, whoops.
 
Last edited:
The Kingdom of Italy, 1920-1926: Barbarians At The Gates
Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)


(...) 1920 saw a series of uprisings across Italy's empire. They were notable for being composed almost entirely of colonized peoples armed with new Revolutionary Socialist organization and weapons smuggled by contacts within the FSU and PCI. Neither of these Revolutionary parties were willing to commit to the revolts, however. In the imperial core, white Italian socialists deemed the time not yet ripe for revolution. Support in the Army was low in Italy proper, though colonial units were much more sympathetic to the anti-imperialist creed of socialism. As such, the overseas branches of the two parties were essentially abandoned - when they had risen expecting the full might of the Revolution to follow. (...)

While the revolutionary forces in Africa and Asia were crushed by loyal Italian troops, the 1920 revolts mark the end of de facto control of the Italian colonial territories by their administrations. Hundreds of local councils and assemblies were formed during the fighting, modeled after the socialist council but also drawing from age-old local traditions. Even after the end of active hostilities, these alternate power structures remained, allowing a way for colonized Italian subjects to assert self-rule in the face of colonial oppression. (...)


The unrest did spark scattered uprisings in northern Italy as well despite the plea for patience by the FSU and PCI leadership. Strikes overtook many factories and grew in places into something more. These hopefuls mustered roughly 30,000 fighting men in total, but the twin Revolutionary parties prevented the 'rogue elements' from using their weapons stores and hidden depots. (...) The largest of these revolts, just north of Firenze, was the 'Romagnan Council Army', which stormed government buildings and occupied parts of the province before being put down. A brutal crackdown followed, with thousands of supporters imprisoned or executed. (...)

At the same time, the government scrambled to offer some concessions for the workers. A broad healthcare expansion was pushed through amid much fanfare only days after news of the revolts broke. This guaranteed state-sponsored care for all Italians and led to the establishment of hundreds of new hospitals across the Empire. (...) From here on, there was a decisive thrust within the di Modrone cabinet towards creating something like the British 'Royal Handshake' - a system in which the Crown would take on a mediatory role between labor and capital, 'protecting' the workers from exploitation with a paternalistic hand. While this solution found success with British trade unions, it was too little and far too late for Italy. (...)


In the end, the revolts were perhaps more significant for the development of Dutch socialism than for Italian. With the Italian Empire distracted by the colonial risings, the German Federation saw a chance to advance its Greater German unification project. The annexation of Gelre in late 1919 had left the Federation with a long land border against the Netherlands. The Dutch Rhinelands were considered rightful German territory and a necessary next step in the unification process. Indeed, ethnic German populations within the Netherlands agitated for German 'liberation' and union. (...)

The Landtag voted on December 10 1920 to mobilize for war against the Netherlands. The declaration of war followed on the following day, and German divisions marched into the Dutch Rhinelands. They were preceded by a wave of reconnaissance aircraft, a first in the history of warfare. Armed attack planes soon followed, deploying crude bombs against entrenched Dutch forces. While in practice these tools were still primitive and ineffective, the shock of them demoralized the Dutch defense.

Far more demoralizing, of course, was Italy's apathetic response. King Goffredo was gripped by a terror of a Red Rising should the Army march out of Italy proper. The colonial revolts could not be allowed to spread. (...) No aid was forthcoming to their Dutch allies. This was certainly the final nail in the coffin of the Continental System. The Netherlands was left to fend for itself; Italy abandoned what was generally considered its most reliable and important ally. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)


(...) It is easy, in retrospect, to see the Italian Empire in the 1920s as a decrepit and crumbling institution. To contemporaries, it was even so a hub of culture and technological innovation. Italian scientists pioneered breakthroughs in electricity and magnetism in this period. Electric lights soon illuminated the endless sprawl of Italian factories, mines and refineries. King Goffredo's 1922 'Electric Empire' speech captures the excitement and eagerness with which the Italian intelligentsia and government embraced these new technologies. The King's closing remarks promised a brighter and happier age under electric lights, suggesting technology itself would in some manner calm the tensions that threatened to break the nation apart. (...)


First and foremost, it was the Italian military establishment which enjoyed the fruits of these labors. The naval expansion led to the development of new, heavily-armored and lethally-armed battleships. The popularization of stainless steel refining and these guaranteed state contracts allowed for the growth of Italian metal and weapons industries; with mass unemployment and the suppression of organized labor, wages could be driven into the ground to generate truly massive profits. (...)


Italian liberalism in the 1920s was in an interesting place. The 1910 Risings had killed off and discredited the old guard of the jacobin cause, but at the same time had indirectly led to the unprecedentedly liberal di Modrone government taking power. To be sure, di Modrone and his compatriots were moderates by necessity, always struggling against the Crown's reactionary politics. Yet they appeared sympathetic to deeper reform, and with the King supposedly pleased by their success with the economy, perhaps true political change was also possible?

At the same time, a new popular basis for revolutionary liberalism had formed out of young Italians radicalized by the aftermath of 1910. In the absence of the old secret societies, these new Revolutionary Republicans formed public-facing literary and athletic societies which adopted many organizational methods of their Socialist rivals to attain far greater popular support than ever before. (...)

The rapid growth of the Republican movement surprised the old liberal leaders and intellectuals. (...) In July 1923, the di Modrone government proposed to the King that a representative constitutional assembly to be formed as an advisory body - a tempered, extremely limited reform, but one refused outright by the King nevertheless. The proposal was - perhaps intentionally - leaked to the press. When news of the King's refusal broke, they provoked widespread outrage. (...) Mass demonstrations and riots took over the streets in most major cities. The government answered with bayonets and rifle butts - sparking only greater resistance. July 27 saw open calls for revolution. The ideological aims of this 'Revolution of the Starving' were muddled at best, but desperation drove thousands to take up arms nevertheless.


(...) As civil wars go, the 1923 Uprising was brief and swiftly crushed. Nevertheless, it was exceptionally bloody, with poorly-armed and disorganized militias gunned down in their tens of thousands by the Army. (...) By this point, the Revolutionary Socialists of the FSU and PCI had come to enjoy a considerable degree of support within the rank-and-file of the military, though this had not stopped them from putting down the 1920 revolts. The liberals could not say the same. The soldiers who marched to disperse the crowds and defeat the forces of the Uprising either swore obedience to the King and the autocratic state, or scorned bourgeois democracy as an enemy of the working class. The FSU-PCI coalition advised its membership against supporting the 'rich man's coup'. Very few within the military establishment acted in support of the Republican movement. (...)


The failure of the Uprising further discredited the liberal cause. The Socialists absorbed most of the revolutionary groups and militias left behind by the collapse of the Republican Front. An estimated 6 million people were active members of the FSU-PCI in this period, which by definition made them potential combatants - membership included a pledge to take up arms against the Italian state and undergo guerilla training sessions. (...)

***
Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)



(...) The post-war crisis paralyzed Dutch politics. The War had come to a crushing end with the loss of Westphalia to the Federation, a humiliation made worse by war indemnities and ravaged infrastructure. Early 1924 saw weak bourgeois governments flounder and collapse one after the other. Industrial production ground to a painful halt amid shortages and strikes, putting hundreds of thousands out of work and crippling the value of the guilder. (...)

Socialism had been a great power in Dutch politics for decades, with its last great hurrah as the heart of the anti-French resistance in the Great War. (...) In April, the Communist Party of the Netherlands swept elections with a 48% plurality share; taking this as a sign of its popular mandate, the Communists dissolved the States-General and assumed total power over the nation. Armed Red Guards seized government buildings and mutinous regiments prevented the Army from intervening. (...) The long, winding road to a Dutch socialist state was at an end. (...)

***
Excerpts of the autobiography of Helmut von Plotho, German politician and final President of the Rhenish Confederation (1915-1924); describing the annexation of the Rhineland as a Federal State by the German Federation in 1924


(...) On the 12th of April, I convened the Confederation Landtag for the last and most significant session of its existence. In attendance were twenty-seven most honorable gentlemen from the federal districts. The issue on the table was union with the German Federation. I presented opening remarks that were necessarily moderate. We discussed for some time and recessed around five in good spirits and in general agreement. By seven we had come to the inevitable conclusion that given the situation in Italy and the implications of Dutch debacle, we could no longer put our faith in the security of Italian friendship. Any future French revanchism presented an existential threat to our young nation. Strong allies were necessary for our small nation to stand against such aggression. As such, it was necessary for us to consider the Federation's offer.

I will not pretend that this was not my desire from the beginning. The spirit of the age called for a great union of the German peoples. I believed we would be happier and safer as part of the German nation than we would be alone. Everything that has happened since has only strengthened this belief. (...) In the end we voted 27-0 in favor of unification. I will never tolerate those crude and churlish claims which one has heard ever since, which suggest that the Confederation was a mere artificial construct of the Continental System, a house of cards waiting to topple. Indeed not. We were a proud, strong, industrious state, one of the finest expressions of the German spirit - and we made our own choice in joining the Federation. (...) Yet on 18 April 1924, the deed was done. The story of our strange little nation was over. (...)



***
Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)



(...) The Dutch Union faced immediate threats. Any hope of enjoying the protection of a Great Power was severed by the Revolution. Neither the liberal-democratic bourgeois powers such as the United States nor the autocratic empires like Britain could stomach supporting the very cause they fought to suppress within their own borders. (...) Recovery proved slow and the purged military establishment suffered from incompetence and lack of education. The clear weakness of the regime did not go unnoticed.

The Wars of Survival, as they are referred to in orthodox Dutch historiography, began with the declaration of war by the German Federation in June 1924. This was followed only days later by the French declaration. While both nations claimed an anti-Communist liberation motive as their rationale for aggression, German interests were chiefly in the remaining ethnic-German territories under Dutch rule. France, on the other hand, sought to stabilize its internal politics with an external victory that could also return past French territories into the empire. (...)



The Dutch revolutionary government was all too aware of its present weakness. The unprepared Red Guards met the professional armies of Germany and France on the border and were slaughtered. Pieter Banning, the chief of staff of the new Red Army, claimed ten years later that he had fed these units to be destroyed intentionally, striving to purge unreliable bourgeois elements from his forces. While the grievous losses suffered by the Dutch military certainly did the trick, it came at a terrible cost. (...)

Even before these defeats, the Communist regime had offered generous terms to their opponents in the hopes of retaining what they considered truly vital, the continuation of the revolutionary government. Any other losses could be reclaimed in later time. (...) The French and Germans, for their part, found the prospect of occupation and government-building politically far too costly. The Netherlands also served as a valuable buffer state: in the words of the French Foreign Minister Jean-Joseph de Sacy, it was "better to have the Dutch be Red than German." (...)

As a result, Dutch Hanover was ceded to Germany and Vlaanderen, the economic and population hub of the Netherlands, to the French Empire. Yet the Dutch state itself was allowed to remain. Perhaps the victors hoped that its Communist regime would fall on its own after the defeat, but they would be disappointed. (...)



A great deal of debate raged on in the French court over what to do with these new acquisitions. That they would be celebrated and propagandized was to be expected, but had France reclaimed rightful French territory or merely carved out a satellite state to lord over? Nationalist resistance in Flanders broke out almost immediately. The Walloon provinces were more amenable to the idea of union with France - indeed, they had been French territory not so long ago - but here foreign pressure frightened the French Emperor. A diplomatic condemnation had arrived promptly from Italy, which accused France of breaching the terms of its disarmament after the Great War, and soon after the British ambassador made it clear that Britain would not tolerate outright annexation. (...)

The end result was the creation of two new states, Flanders and Wallonia. On paper they were independent nations 'liberated' from Communist terror, but in practice they were puppet monarchies under the French Emperor. Though small, their position in one of the richest areas of Western Europe meant they were fairly populous and, more importantly, heavily industrialized. The unequal relationship to France guaranteed their patron generous resource rights and lopsided trade agreements. (...) At once, harsh repression of organized labor began, in an attempt to root out the revolutionary spirit of the Flemish and Walloon proletariat. (...)

***
Excerpts from 'Italy and the World: the Italian Empire in the Modern Period', written by Hugo Fourier (Firenze: 1977)


(...) Di Modrone's dream of an Italian 'Royal Handshake' with the unions was becoming more real by the day. The period of 1923-1925 saw the advance of ambitious social reforms. The Public School Act of 1924 guaranteed state education for Italy's millions. The Fair Labor Laws of 1923 and 1925 instituted a legal minimum wage all Italian workers. The Organization of Labor Act allowed for non-political and state-approved unions to function and recruit. Measures relating to homelessness, superstition, inheritance law and many other issues were drafted and executed. Tax rates decreased across the board in the hopes of stimulating the economy further, though most significantly for propertied persons. (...) All in all, these new reforms hoped to stabilize Italy far better than the unsustainable means of the old industrial subsidies. (...)

There is evidence that these reforms had some real effect. The growth of the Revolutionary Socialists began to slow down and the decline of the conservative trade unions stopped. Their new legal status - as opposed to the still-outlawed status of militant unions - allowed them a new aura of respectability and appeal. (...) Some within the FSU-PCI held real fears of what these reforms could do for the people's revolutionary spirit. Gradual, limited improvement in the material conditions could steal away their support far better than any campaign of oppression and state brutality.


(...) The government also tacitly patronized the Arditi fascist movement, which was finding new support with its charitable works such as food aid for the poor. Though many in di Modrone's cabinet opposed any support of the fascist cause, the Prime Minister himself considered them too valuable a tool to lose. Fascist militias continued to assault suspected 'Reds' and provided a significant share of recruits into the secret police. (...)



The 1920s were the dawning of the aerial age. The German display of early aerial warfare in its Dutch invasions had captured imaginations across the globe. Airplanes were not unknown to the Italians, but their unreliability and weight-usage problems had stopped short any attempts to weaponize the temperamental machines. German innovations now allowed for the first practical combat aircraft. In Italy, the SIAI-Marchetti company pioneered several types of aircraft for the Army Air Service starting from 1925, including recon aircraft, fighters and bombers, with particular achievements in armed sea-planes.

(...) The popularization of heavier automobiles in Italy also led to the development of tankettes, early armored vehicles that began to be produced in significant numbers after the mid-20s. The Dutch Wars had seen early tanks deployed in small numbers to great effect. The potential of tanks excited the Italian general staff, who believed they would allow for a new age of the doctrine of maneuver warfare practiced by Italian forces. The Italian plans were overambitious from the start - the lack of production facilities for these new machines in Italy or elsewhere made any rapid expansion of Italy's armored corps difficult; most Italian vehicles acquired in the mid-20s were American 'land-ships', huge and slow metal monsters that were poorly suited for the rapid mechanized assaults that Italian tacticians dreamed of. (...)




In January 1926, the di Modrone government met with representatives of select trade unions and social democrat leaders in northern Italy. These 'social patriots', the conservatives and moderates of the left, were treated with generous hospitality, with both personal favors and legal reforms offered should the honorable gentlemen on the other side only promise their loyalty to King and Country. The soon-to-be-proclaimed Health and Safety Act - set to provide some basic form of safety standards for industrial work - was presented as a gift for the gathered men to take home to their supporters as a free victory. (...) In essence, this meeting represents the beginning of forging a 'labor peace' between the Crown and organized labor in the hopes of neutering the revolutionary proletariat. (...)

Concerns over the state's labor and social reforms had dominated discussions in the FSU-PCI for some time, but news of this sealed the deal in the minds of the Revolutionary Socialists. They risked all their decades-long work and preparations being undone. There was only so long they could promise the workers that utopia was coming before they had to act. (...) An air of desperation drove the RS camp forward into the autumn. They still held the loyalties of millions, but millions also had forsaken the cause in the past year, content with concessions now offered by the King. The unemployment crisis was coming to an end at long last and stable work ate away at the 'starvation zeal' of their would-be revolutionary army. (...)



The time was now or never. The point of no return came in September. The political police had noted the unusual quiet of the Revolutionary Socialists in the past three months, but their concerns had been dismissed by government. The silence was one of anticipation. On midnight of the 20th, after an arduous campaign of preparation, red searchlights stabbed the skies all across the nation as the predetermined sign. The Italian Revolution had begun. (...)




Best estimates of the number of active combatants in the Red Guards and various militias sit somewhere around 1.1 million. This staggering force 'set Italy alight' overnight, seizing control of cities and rural communes in an unprecedented explosion of proletarian rage. (...) Yet numbers alone do not win wars. The Royal Army operated on an entirely different scale of firepower, with tanks, aircraft, heavy artillery and modern machine-guns facing the rifles and improvised explosives of the Reds. This indisputable fact had broken the 1910 Risings, the abortive 1920 revolts, and the Uprising of 1923, alongside countless smaller revolts, strikes and riots of the period. Without the support or at least apathy of the Army, no uprising could succeed. The leaders of the Revolutionary Socialists were well aware of this, and had worked tirelessly across the long decade to agitate and subvert the Italian armed forces. Now, the next few days would show how well they had succeeded. (...)
 
The Italian Union, 1926-1927: The Rose Revolution
Excerpt of radio interview of Giancarlo Valente, an infantryman in the Italian Royal Army in 1926-1927, given to local radio station in 1938


(...)

INTERVIEWER: Would you tell us of how that day [September 21 1926] began? We understand you were an enlisted man in the XI. Guards Regiment at the time. When did you first hear of what was happening?

VALENTE: Thank you. [a pause] How should I begin? We were stationed in Vienna, in Austria. That day began as any other, I think. We had just come back from the mess when we got orders that the Regiment was going to full readiness. Now that got us thinking, but we'd had plenty of smaller, uh, local revolts and riots and that sort of thing, by then, you understand. So we didn't think it would be anything bigger.

INTERVIEWER: Were you already a member of the PCI at this time?

VALENTE: I was, yes. So I'd heard, on the grapevine, that something big was being planned. Revolution, we assumed. But no-one knew just what that would look like. The Grey Coats [secret police of the royal period] had taught us to be secretive. So we didn't know what the Party central intended, or even who was a Socialist and who was not, outside our own small cell. So you could only test the waters best you could in your own unit. The regimental staff knew many of the men had revolutionary sympathies, I think, but they didn't want to rock the boat, you see? So everyone kept very quiet about what they maybe knew.

INTERVIEWER: So you didn't know who would join you.

VALENTE: Yes. I could hope, but in that situation, you can only be sure of yourself, you know? I was sure, of course. But I wasn't going to start anything before I got the Party's go-ahead.

INTERVIEWER: What happened then?

VALENTE: Well, it was the telegram office. We didn't have radios everywhere back then. It was very crude, in some ways. So it turns out the telegraphers' union went over to the Revolution all at once. And so they stopped sending anything useful to the government, only propaganda and, uh, calls to action. So that's how we first heard about it. The young man we had at the telegraph office, he came running in, the blaze of glory in his eyes, waving a telegram all around. I remember it very clearly. He'd folded up his regimental sash so it only showed the red [of the green-white-red of the Italian flag] and wore it as an armband. Crazy fool. I hadn't even known he was a comrade. So he runs around the barracks, screaming about rising up, and he says the Revolution has begun. And to prove it, he shows us the telegram, which is from the Party.

INTERVIEWER: Do you remember what it said?

VALENTE: It was fairly matter-of-fact. "Soldiers of Italy, stand up or stand aside --- The Day of Change is here --- All proletarian soldiers to their rifles!" Of course there was going to be more, but the line from Verona office was cut shortly afterwards by the royalists, so we only got part of the message. But that was enough for us. I remember looking at the faces of my companions, trying to catch the subtle reactions, looking for signs of approval and, you know, understanding. A few I could discount right away. We had our share of reactionaries and fascists in the ranks. But I was surprised by many. All this while, they were looking at me the same way, trying to figure out who was with them and who was not.

INTERVIEWER: What then?

VALENTE: Then Major Bocchini arrived with the military police. They took the boy, the one with the telegram, they took him out back and I think they shot him there. And then they ordered us back into our quarters and locked down the barracks. The rifle cabinets we had in the hallways, they were put under guard. They were afraid, we could tell. And we got to talking. I felt I had to act, so I put my feelings and my loyalties out there for everyone in the room to hear, and hoped for the best. Around sixty, seventy percent of us were of like mind. The rest went along with it or stood aside out of fear, save for a few true believers we had to subdue.

INTERVIEWER: What was your plan?

VALENTE: We'd rush out and overwhelm the officers keeping guard. Of course, they were armed, we were not, so it would have been a slaughter. I'm glad it never came to that. One of the junior officers, a Lieutenant Venturi, he came in maybe half an hour later with some of his people, and he disarmed the guards at gunpoint. Then he brought us out and addressed us - and this was strange to hear - as comrades, and asked for our aid in seizing control of the regiment. So the gun cabinets were opened and we armed ourselves. And we couldn't know it, but the same things were happening all over the regiment, you know, as word spread. We captured Major Bocchini and shot him when he tried to run. That was a pity. I would have liked to see him on trial. But tempers were hot and we were driven by a kind of desperation. We had no idea what was going on in the outside world, so we could only hope that our comrades in other regiments were acting likewise.

INTERVIEWER: It must have been a heroic struggle.

VALENTE: It was, but there was very little action, only a lot of nervous waiting and trying to find out where anyone was and what they were doing. We seized most of the regimental staff and had the armory in our hands first thing, so that covered most of our bases. Lieutenant Venturi and the other Party-loyal officers - mostly lieutenants like him, a few captains, and the colonel turned out to care more for his life than the cause - rode out to make contact with other revolutionary soldiers and find out what the situation was outside our base. Meanwhile, I and a few more educated soldiers gathered up the men and explained to them the concept of soldiers' councils. And, well, the basic principles, how we should be organized. And you know, we had our first elections that very evening.

INTERVIEWER: Yes. You were the first entire unit to declare for the Revolution.

VALENTE: Yes, I've heard that. At the time we didn't think we were doing anything so special. We voted on it and that was that. But once that red flag went up over the HQ, I suppose there was no hiding our loyalties anymore. (...)

***​
Excerpts from the 1965 memoirs of Habib Mokaddem, Tunisian-Maghrebi revolutionary leader and later nationalist hero


(...) Six years we had waited for the men in Firenze to finally judge that 'the time was right'. We were rightfully wary of empty Italian promises by this time. The Italian Revolutionary Socialists, Ascari foremost among them, had left us to die in our thousands in 1920 when we'd made a vast united front against imperialist oppression. Now they called upon us to act again, this time promising we would carry the day - side by side - to Revolution. It easy with the benefit of hindsight to judge us overtly cautious or even cowardly, but we had all cause to distrust our White 'comrades'. (...)

But in the end we voted to join the uprising. What else were we to do? And the humiliated masses of Africa and beyond rose up once more to cast out foreign tyranny. We brought out a fraction of the force that had been ready in 1920, but if our numbers had been greatly reduced, our army was far better prepared, organized and armed. Only days after we'd raised our banners, half of the Army of the Maghreb was in open mutiny and the rest too paralyzed by saboteurs and sympathizers to act. We seized the countryside, leaving them to occupy their bases, and everywhere we went the people embraced us and gave all that they could give to the Liberation. (...)


We of course feared that the risings in Italy itself would collapse, as they so often had, but we found to our pleased surprise that this was not the case. News arrived daily of more victories and more mutinies in the Army. The general strike seized even the conservative-reactionary unions in its grip. The momentum was with us. A 150,000 Italian soldiers stood just outside a besieged Firenze and refused to move in support of the government. When called upon to disperse strikers, local soldiers had instead stood aside as roses were planted within the barrels of their rifles by local women, in that much-propagandized symbol of a moment. (...) Of course there were royalist forces and defeats for the cause, but not where it mattered. The center was collapsing. (...) In October, the royal family and the government fled the city. The Revolutionaries wasted no time announcing the change in government. The proletariat was declared sovereign over Italy, with all institutions outside the revolutionary councils and the Revolutionary Armed Forces committee now illegitimate.

The Kingdom of Italy was dissolved, with its empire from that moment on liberated for its component peoples and workers. But consider the name of the new state. On October 25th, the Italian Union of Council Republics came into being. Even then, we recognized that the key word in that was still, and would always be, 'Italian'. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'The Rose Revolution: A New History', written by Angelina Rossi (Firenze: 1970)


(...) The proclamation of the new Union of Council Republics galvanized the remaining neutrals in the fight. The majority of the Social Democrats had declared for the government at the beginning of the uprising, but cracks had quickly appeared with the growing success of the Revolutionaries. Many local chapters and SD-controlled unions had gone over to the Revolution already by October. What was left of the party saw the way the wind was blowing. Together with an unsteady coalition of hopeful liberals and progressives, the Social Democrats declared for the new government and offered their services. With this change in tune, thousands of their militants joined the Revolutionary forces as new Liberty Brigades.

(...) These developments have been dismissed as craven opportunism in the orthodox historiography. While it is true that these 'Jacobins' came very late to the fight, it can be argued that the defection of so many 'salon socialists' and 'civilized' politicians to the Red cause put an end to immediate foreign plans for intervention. The base of support for the King and his government now seemed far too thin to support such an effort. (...) Regardless, the PCI-FSU saw and has always seen this support from these 'bourgeois elements' as unnecessary and even dangerous to the success of the Revolution, tarring them with a broad brush as reactionary saboteurs and secret-police plants. (...)


The King's abdication in January 1927 shocked the entire world. Much of Italy outside the heartland remained in royalist hands, guarded by parts of the Army far less sympathetic to the idea of a new Socialist regime than those in the North. It was expected that the royal family would rally support in the countryside and continue the fight from there. Now the autocratic system showed its last, fatal flaw. Despite assurances to the contrary, the King considered the situation lost and took the lack of visible royalist support in Toscana as a certain sign that he had been abandoned and that further resistance would be futile. Sinking into the depression that would in the end take his life, King Goffredo gave a short and disordered speech on January 4th in which he bid his guard to surrender, his ministers to resign and his family to leave him. Reportedly, as his demoralized audience then began to trickle out of the room, the King further cast down the crown from his brow and announced his abdication. (...)

With the King's surrender, the White front in Italy collapsed. On January 7th, 1927, the Italian Revolution was complete. Goffredo and his retinue found their way into the safety of Britain. The rest of the royal family scattered across the face of the globe in a peculiar royal diaspora. (...) In Firenze, the new provisional Revolutionary Convention of the Italian Union convened to assume complete control over the state. Thousands of new councils established across Italy's cities, Army units, Navy ships, workplaces, unions and rural communes now began the arduous task of holding free, direct socialist elections - the first such triumph of popular will and democratic socialism in the history of Italy.


It was far from perfect. The PCI declared that 'bourgeois elements' could not stand for or vote in the elections as a guarantee against 'backsliding' into Reaction. This broad category disenfranchised millions of Italians and was interpreted as including the membership of the social democratic and liberal parties. The Jacobins considered this, quite truthfully, an assault on their liberties. Their agitation and demands to be included in government offered the PCI the excuse needed to move against them. (...) Despite some protests from the FSU, the Revolutionary Armed Forces committee was on January 15th sent orders to disarm and dissolve the 'Liberty Brigades' of the Jacobin cause. Their small forces were crushed without question by the most zealous of the Revolutionary Army in what was the first purge of the Union's history. It would not be the last.


(...) In the Crown Colony of Nicaragua, the news of the Italian Revolution were received with glee. The small socialist movement in the agrarian Central American state could not offer a credible alternative to the imperialist royal government, however. Instead, the Royal Crown Governor offered his resignation to nationalist forces and bid them to form a new government. The long-suppressed underground Partito Nazionale now found the reins of power thrust into its lap. The new government wasted no time. On January 20th, they proclaimed the nation's independence and renaming as Costa Ricca. The new name served to make a clean break with the past and the pan-Italian sentiments of the colonial elite, which had considered Nicaragua a mere overseas part of the nation.



The new regime in Italy was recognized by the Socialist Internationale by the end of January, but few nations outside it joined them. The embarrassing collapse of the legitimate government, as the international community saw it, made difficult to recognize a successor to the Kingdom, however. A dozen different claimants arose in the chaotic days of the Winter of 1927. Italy's ambassadors at large floundered, some choosing to recognize the authority of the Union, others picking and choosing new masters to answer to, and some simply embezzling the wealth of their embassies and disappearing. (...) What is certain was that the Italian Empire no longer existed to honor its agreements and alliances. The Continental System was long dead by this point, but now the threat of Italian intervention was gone completely.

Czechoslovakia was the first to pounce. The weaker Polish state had weathered the past two Czechoslovak-Polish wars with Italian assistance. The sudden collapse of their most important ally spelled the end of these 'Years Without Fear'. On January 18, Czechoslovak forces mobilized and invaded Poland with the same aim as before - the annexation of Polish West Galicia. This time, they would not be deterred. (...)

Iberia would be the next to mobilize. On January 27th, the Bejan-Catalonian wars resumed with the invasion of Beja by the latter. Bereft of its Italian patron, the Bejan military was broken in three months of warfare and the state forced to give up its eastern provinces to Catalonia. (...) The remaining states of the peninsula observed the conflict with concern. Would this be the beginning of a new Union War, the first step in unification of Iberia under one flag? If so, whose flag would it be? (...)




Now began the work of dismantling the Empire. Italy's colonies had not waited patiently to be handed their freedom - they had been eager participants in Revolution. Local councils had seized power across Africa and the East Indies. Their representatives to the Supreme Council made clear that they were now independent peoples and expected immediate recognition of this fact by the government in Italy. (...) In Java, de facto rule by socialist militias had been in effect since 1901; the Rose Revolution had merely banished the Italian Navy from the island's shores and allowed for the capture of the final bastions of imperial occupation. In contrast, Italian Brunei and Malaysia had remained in the hands of the colonial administration until now and had a far more difficult project before them. (...)

This goes to explain the differences in their post-Revolution situation. Whereas Italian involvement in the Javan Council Republic was light, constituting only material and technological aid, the new 'Malay Union' was essentially built up from nothing by Italian party 'experts' and advisors, with Malaysian policy dictated to a great degree from Firenze. (...)






In Italian Africa, the multitudes of colonized peoples and the arbitrary nature of borders drawn up by the imperial powers in the Scramble for Africa guaranteed a troublesome reorganization. The Revolutionary Convention recognized three federal African Unions in 1927. The first was formed out of Italian possessions in the South-West and recognized ethnic republics of Khoisans, Namas, Hereros, Ovambos and other significant local peoples, with the decentralized and bottom-up system of councils meant to ensure representation and autonomy for all tribes and ethnic groups. The transition to socialism would naturally wash away such differences and tensions in time, or so the dogma went. (...)

The second Union was carved out of Italian Equatorial Africa and encompassed a staggering variety of peoples, many of whom were illiterate and uneducated, with little idea of what the new government offered them. (...) The third became the so-called Nigerian Union, formed out of Italian West Africa, with Akans, Hausans, Igbos, Mossis and many other peoples represented. (...)

These pan-African dreams were incredibly idealistic, but 1927 seemed a year for dreams. Certainly many African Socialists believed in proletarian brotherhood surpassing all lines of race, language and origin. But proletarian internationalism and socialist ethos had not penetrated deep enough into Africa to offset centuries of Italian-fueled ethnic conflicts and sectarian violence. Local power soon fell into the hands of the largest and most influential groups. Lawlessness and rule by warlords spread in outlying territories. (...) By 1928, the internal conflicts within each of the three Unions had led to political deadlock and widespread instability. Italian advisors carried news of this to the Revolutionary Convention. The PCI concluded in the spring of 1928 that the African Unions could not be allowed to go on 'without guidance'; within the year, all power in Africa had been concentrated in the hands of local PCI chapters - in essence, a series of coups - which soon began to rely on force and state oppression as part of its campaign for 'Socialist Education in Africa'. (...)


The old colonies of the Empire had been promised independence and equality; at most, with the exception of Java, they had gained limited autonomy. But what of the Maghreb? The North African coast had been part of the Italian Empire for hundreds of years. Nationalist propaganda had instilled in the minds of all Italians that the Maghreb was an integral part of the Italian nation. Large populations of white Italians lived in the Maghreb and considered it their homeland. The native Arab and Berber populations had not fought for existence as an Italian province, however. In March 1928, the 'Maghrebi National Council' - an assembly of indigenous revolutionary leaders in the Maghreb - demanded that the Convention clarify what was to become of the Homeland. (...)

In the 'February Betrayal', the Convention declared the Maghreb a territory of the Italian Union, to be governed as part of Italy. Language rights and local councils would guarantee the freedoms of ethnic Berbers and Arabs; however, these assemblies would vote representatives into the Italian Supreme Council like those in Italy proper, which by definition would hold a majority of ethnic Italians and hold its sessions in the Italian tongue. (...) The PCI, generally atheistic, also denied any protections for religion in the Maghreb. The FSU minority offered platitudes at most; suspicion towards Islam as opposed to 'proto-socialist' Waldensian Christianity made FSU representatives indifferent to the fears of Muslim comrades. (...)

The National Council condemned this resolution in the harshest of terms. In response, the PCI declared the 'nationalist-reactionary' organization illegal and moved to suppress it. The long history of Maghrebi resistance against Italian rule had not, in fact, come to its end. The February Betrayal merely opened a new chapter within it, and revealed that the New Socialist Man was, perhaps, not quite above the prejudice and pride of his predecessor. (...)


Negotiations with the Internationale bore fruit very quickly in February. The Tripartite Pact between Italy, Ceylon and the Netherlands came into being on the 2nd of February, tying the three foremost Socialist nations in a pact of mutual defense. (...) Foreign observers reacted with horror, assuming the alliance to be a pretext for a general war by the Socialist bloc against the rest of the world. The Revolutionary Convention was far more concerned with internal affairs at this time, but these were not unrealistic fears. Already in 1927, the representatives of the Internationale held a secret session in which the prospect of a truly global Liberation War was discussed. (...) But for now, the Italian Union knew well it would have to be on the defensive. Intervention by the agents of global Capital and Tyranny could not be too far away. (...)



***​

Excerpt of radio interview of Giancarlo Valente, an infantryman in the Italian Royal Army in 1926-1927, given to local radio station in 1938


(...)

INTERVIEWER: That's a rapid rise in the ranks. Impossible in the old order, but the new democratic and meritocratic system served you well, yes? So you were made Captain.

VALENTE: It was a close election. Many other worthy comrades were nominated. But of course I accepted. We consider it a duty in the service, to take on that role, if you are elected. And of course then we had the right of recall, so a poor leader would not stay in his position for long. I was pretty hard on the men, I admit - drilling and training them - and I know some grumbled and wanted to see me out of the job. But most of them knew it wasn't for nothing. We were all expecting war soon enough. Men will go to extremes when they know it's for a worthy cause, you understand?

INTERVIEWER: You did not have to wait for long.

VALENTE: No. So it was February, late February, 1927. We'd returned to our old base near Vienna again and set up as we had before. I can't go into too much detail about our order of battle, can I? Well, suffice to say, we were there to watch the North. So we were right in the thick of it from the start. I remember it started in the early hours, on the 17th. It was still half-dark when the air raid sirens started to scream. We all scrambled out of bed to get to our positions. We didn't have any AA there, not then, but Hell if we didn't climb up into the towers with our rifles and MGs to watch the skies. And they arrived pretty promptly. I recognized them from my studies, of course; Federation Gotha-III's, bomber planes. I suppose they had informants in the area, because they had our coordinates fixed pretty damn well.

INTERVIEWER: Did you realize you were at war?

VALENTE: They flew pretty low, so we could see the German markings. But we didn't know the scale of it then.


(...)

INTERVIEWER: We can't discuss operational matters in too much detail, you understand.

VALENTE: Of course. I'll just give a general overview, yes? So by midday we knew the Germans were invading. And that we were also at war with the British, the Sorbs and the Wallachians. All the forces of international capitalism arrayed against us, it felt like. We received orders to withdraw to the Judenburg-Maribor line and dig in there. It didn't feel right to give up territory, but we knew the odds. We didn't have the numbers to hold the border as it was. But we made a damn quick march of it, and reinforcements came in pretty quick. And we were all ready to fight for it.

INTERVIEWER: The odds were certainly not in our favor.

VALENTE: We were on the defensive from the start, yes. But the Alps make a pretty damn tough wall to breach, so we could focus our forces in Austria, where we knew the heaviest blow would fall. And we had good communications set up, so we knew fresh forces were coming up to support us. But we knew the Germans wanted Austria most of all; so we didn't want to give it up entirely without a fight.




INTERVIEWER: Did you hear of the other fronts at all?

VALENTE: Only a while later. The Navy went out to the Aegean and destroyed the Wallachian Navy, and set up a blockade. And in the north, the Dutch answered our call, but they had an impossible task before them. But every Dutchman I've talked to has told me the same thing: they gave their lives willingly for their comrades and for the dream. We would have done the same. And they fought damn well, when you consider the numbers they faced, on two fronts.


INTERVIEWER: Right. So, you mentioned you fought at Judenburg.

VALENTE: Yes. The Germans pushed hard from the start there. Artillery day and night, turning the earth into a liquid muck; bombers in the air, sappers under the ground; dozens of tanks, and better ones than our old landships. But we gave it as hard as we got. And we had bigger, better guns - it was an artillery fight most of all. So we just let them come at us and bled them pretty bad there. And for every man we lost, ten more came in to replace him. Women, too, from the militias, and that was a bit of a shock for many of us.

INTERVIEWER: And you had the gas.



VALENTE: Ah, we can...? Yes, we tried the gas weapon there, and then in the south, at Klagenfurt. It's... something else. The poor bastards - the Germans and the Wallachians - didn't have any protection against it. No masks, no nothing. We found hundreds of them with wet rags around their mouths afterwards, which they'd put up to try and... well. At Klagenfurt the Sorbs charged right into the cloud as it rolled down, mouths open, roaring their war cries, nothing in the way. 50,000 men dead in one attack, didn't even reach our lines. It was butchery. But who could fault us? We were under attack. A cowardly, unprovoked attack, seeking to break the power of the workers, you understand? We used what weapons we had.



INTERVIEWER: It was a struggle for survival.

VALENTE: At that time, it truly was. The French granted free passage to the enemy and so they began to come in across the French border, where we had little troops ready to face them. And the Wallachians were arriving in force to Croatia. It looked like we were going to lose Austria after all; if we could even hold the rest of the country after that. But we were making it a pretty expensive endeavor for them. That's not something to be happy about: those we killed should have been comrades, you understand? But their damned governments had thrust them to be killed for no reason at all. And we'd killed 200,000 of them by that point. Now, that's a rate of attrition that no army can sustain. We could see it in the faces of the enemy. I saw that same desperation in the mirror in the days before the Revolution. They didn't want to be here. But we thought, were their leaders going to see that in time, or would the homefront in Germany break first? (...)
 
The Italian Union, 1927-1936: Years of Terror
Excerpts of the autobiography of Helmut von Plotho, German politician and Federal Minister of the Interior (1926-1930); discussing the Italian Intervention of 1927


(...) Sometimes wars are lost at home. Our brave boys did everything they could on the frontlines and bought every mile we gained in those two months with their blood. They faced a foe with superior armaments; a savage foe, one which knew no mercy, but they marched fearlessly into that terrible maw of battle regardless. Everywhere their brother Germans welcomed them as heroes and flew long-hidden black-red-and-golds from their windows. Such tales of Communist terror and savagery that they told us! By any way of looking at it we took Austria and should have won ourselves a new Federal State.

But the press cared little for our victories. Every day they spread fresh gruesome photographs and stories of our losses; every week they raved treacherously against the conduct of our generals. The left of the SPD and the USPD spread sedition in the noble halls of the Landtag - formed as they were of the most unsuitable collection of criminals and collaborators, soon to separate into the treacherous KAP - and stirred the unions into misguided strikes and agitation. (...) I will not claim it was an easy war for the people of Germany. 200 000 dead in two months is a gruesome butcher's bill - but that was all the more reason to commit fully into the struggle and strangle the Communist beast in its crib. What happened instead? All those lives lost for nothing; the Austrian people given false hope of their liberation! (...)


177K men lost in less than two months; ouch.

That day of shame is the 23rd of March. On that day, we lost the best chance we had to end the scourge of global Communism at its most contagious. The British handled the negotiations; the Prime Minister had made his promises never to acknowledge the Red regime, and we did not wish to grant legitimacy to their barbaric mob by a formal meeting. (...) Status quo ante bellum - all refugees from 'Italian Austria' to be repatriated to the Union. You will not be surprised to hear that the government collapsed only days after signing this travesty of a peace. (...) We could not crush the Italian Union. The SPD called for peaceful co-existence, but the realists among us always knew that was a vain hope. We had merely signed an armistice. They would not rest until they had painted the entire world red. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'A Primer to Economic World History', a British textbook from 1988


(...) What happens when one of the largest world economies cuts itself off from the market? Such a scenario had been entertained in only the wildest fantasies of radical economists, yet in 1927, that very possibility almost became reality. The formation of the Italian Union of Council Republics in 1927 and its subsequent repudiation of its international debts, agreements and payments thrust the world economy into chaos. Ideological, not practical, concerns drove the early Union's economic policies. Market economics were the enemy, and many actively harmful policies were adopted in 1927-1930. Though later moderated as the problems in transitioning to a truly socialist economic system became apparent, the damage was by then done.

(...) Dramatic shocks devastated stock markets. Desperate states undertook desperate measures - in many cases, extremely incompetent and dangerous measures, such as unrestricted printing of their currency for short-term liquidity. This naturally led to staggering inflation growth, known as hyperinflation. The French state, already plagued by strikes, corruption and political deadlock, fell especially badly into this trap. The total collapse of the French economy in the 1930s is often thought to be the primary driver of the renewed French Civil War. (...)


The Union was not immune to these shocks, but it's isolationist economic doctrine did to some degree allow it to withstand them better. Its efforts to decouple itself from the markets, while costly in other ways, did allow for some stability in a chaotic time. (...) The Union sought to strengthen economic cooperation within the Internationale and invested heavily into its old colonies, the Asian and African satellite states. Local industries were given a chance to expand, no longer rivals as under the logic of capitalism. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Roads to War: Europe in 1926-1940', written by Jeanne Zimering (Paris: 2002)




(...) The post-Revolution power vacuum continued to fill. The Polish surrender in 1927 saw West Galicia annexed to the Czechoslovakian state, the culmination of decades of belligerent nationalism. The weakness of the Polish state immediately drew in other predators. (...) The Sorbian invasion of Bramborska lasted from September to December 1927. Polish forces, crippled by the Czechoslovak invasion, struggled to put up any meaningful resistance. (...) Bramborska was annexed into Sorbia as its easternmost province. (...)


In Iberia, the Bejan-Catalonian War had concluded with Catalonia standing supreme over the peninsula. Pan-nationalist voices in Catalonia now called loudly for the unification of all of Iberia. (...) Economic and political chaos seized Iberia in its grip in the 1930s. (...) In Seville, a 1931 coup led to a short-lived Revolutionary Socialist regime, replaced a year later by a fragile republic soon overtaken by the Falange, an alliance of ultranationalist fascists who wasted no time in purging their political opponents through violent extrajudicial killings. (...) The small state of Alarcon, centered around the industrial city of Ávila, deposed its centuries-old monarchy in 1932 and reformed as an anarcho-socialist commune. (...) Even the KIngdom of Galicia faced a Catalonian-sponsored insurgency modeled after the Young Spaniard pan-nationalist movement. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'A Primer to Economic World History', a British textbook from 1988


(...) Questions of state planning versus localist autonomy dominated the Italian Revolutionary Convention from the start. The PCI advocated for top-down state planning and management of all industries, bypassing and restricting the power of councils when necessary. The dangers faced by the Revolution at the juncture of 1927 necessitated such methods in the short term. This degree of intervention would require an extreme level of control, which in turn demanded that the revolutionary state expand its reach into every aspect of production, employment and economic activities. (...) The FSU resisted these developments as per its libertarian ethos, but its minority in the Convention made the efforts doomed to failure. (...)

Economic control soon broadened into control of leisure time, culture and political life. The totalitarian project of the PCI was taking shape. (...) The neutering of the councils and the paralyzing of local economic initiative plunged many recovering regions of Italy back into turmoil. Local, council-planned collectivization efforts had not proceeded fast enough for the PCI; now an accelerated programme began, with Revolutionary Guards crushing opposition wherever it was found - or imagined. (...) This naturally led to an upswell of reaction and resistance, especially among the rural populace. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'Red Rose of Freedom: the Birth of Modern Socialism', written by Marco Francesco Scalzi (Monte Baldo: 1982)



(...) The French satellite states had been built on a foundation of anti-Socialist purges and crackdowns, but the continued presence of the Dutch Union to their north made continued suppression of the left a difficult prospect. Flemish revolutionaries simply operated out of the Netherlands and Dutch propaganda came across the border in a constant torrent. In Wallonia, ethnic tensions fueled anti-Dutch sentiment and made for a fairly stable polity; in Flanders, closer cultural ties and a more powerful working class presented a severe threat to the royalist government. (...)

France withdrew its garrison forces from the Low Countries in early 1928, with domestic unrest mounting. The satellite states found themselves on their own. In Flanders, May Day demonstrations exploded into a Dutch-funded uprising, which overthrew the Grand Duke on the 17th and reestablished socialist government. On the 23rd, the Flemish councils voted to rejoin the Dutch Union. The most populous state of the Netherlands had been restored to it. (...)


No French reprisal was coming. The French Civil War resumed in earnest in November with a failed coup attempt by the French Communists. (...) Chaos erupted in the capital, with the independent-minded Marshal Rouquet marching his troops to both evict the Communists and to then arrest the royal government for 'inciting rebellion'; a pretext to place the Emperor under direct military supervision. (...) In the following days, the Jeune Nation fascist movement mobilized against both the Communists, the Royalists and the military, demanding a national awakening against all these 'entropic forces'. (...) A chaotic collection of would-be warlords, opportunists, anarchist armies and unorganized revolts followed in its wake. France had seemingly climbed out of its morass of unrest in the 20s, but the events of November 1928 revealed that as an illusion. The deck of cards was tumbling once more, and this time there would be no unlikely return to normality. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'The Rose Revolution: A New History', written by Angelina Rossi (Firenze: 1970)


Conflicts within the young Javan Council Republic centered around the ex-colony's relationship with Italy. The dominant pro-Italian faction advocated a closer relationship with the 'senior partner' of the Union and hewed close to the doctrinaire line of policy 'suggested' from Firenze. The so-called Popular Front opposition in turn desired a more independent outlook and a freeze on the more radical reforms planned. (...) For the council elections of 1929, the opposition made a coalition with the suppressed Liberty Party of Javan liberals and intelligentsia; a symbolic gesture interpreted by many as the first step towards broader democratic representation of presently disenfranchised 'bourgeois classes'. (...) The opposition swept the capital's elections and established its own loyal guards to control the capital and much of western Java. (...) Italy's advisor to the Republic, Matteo Rosselli, suggested to the Javan Convention of Councils to use military force against the empowered opposition; the Convention refused, but at the same time left the door open for independent Italian action on Javan soil.




In June, warships of the Union Navy appeared off the shore of Batavia. In their wake arrived a transport fleet of heavy-going cargo ships, which soon unloaded a frightening force: the 7th Revolutionary Armored Division, a cutting-edge formation generally considered a proof of concept for a new kind of armored warfare based on speed and maneuver. The 7th brought with it hundreds of new tankettes - mobile, lightweight vehicles intended to carry lightning attacks through enemy lines and create breakthroughs for motorized infantry units to follow through. (...) The fleet also deployed some hundred fighter and recon planes built by the recently rechristened People's Northern Aeroworks (pre-Revolution SIAI-Marchetti). The commander of the Javan 'expeditionary force', General Martaci, used the air superiority these craft presented him effectively to support the advance of his armored elements. (...)

But who were the Italians to fight? No hostile force existed until the Union expedition made landfall. The Javan opposition considered this, quite correctly, to be a provocation and a clear threat to their own existence. On June 12th, the pro-Italian faction ordered the arrest of several opposition members. The opposition demanded its forces take up arms and defend themselves as necessary. In an embarrassing turn of events, almost all Javan forces near Batavia turned coat and joined the reluctant rebellion. Thousands of liberal-minded students and intellectuals flocked to the banner, seeing in it the foundation of the liberal-democratic bourgeois republic they desired. (...) Now the Italian force had the excuse and the enemy it needed. On the 18th of June, the 7th Armored and its aerial support launched an assault at the Popular Front forces in and around Batavia. (...)

Tank shock, constant strafing attacks and the bombardment by off-shore Union warships broke the Javan defense within hours. Captured 'rebels' were summarily executed and bulldozed by the division's tanks into mass graves. After the end of open hostilities, the pro-Italian faction systematically destroyed the Popular Front and purged the Republic's councils of its opponents and rivals, thus beginning the period of one-party rule in Java. (...) The dominant PCI had orchestrated this campaign without consulting the Revolutionary Convention in Italy. At home, when news of the 'Javan Expedition' broke, outraged FSU councillors organized a mass walk-out in the Supreme Council and key urban councils. Tensions had finally come to a breaking point - but before the Revolution could fall upon itself and tear the new state apart, a new, unifying enemy appeared. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'On Revolution, Reaction and the Necessities of Terror', a 1931 treatise by Augusto Ascari, Communist theorist, chairman of the PCI and the leader of the Italian Union



There have been outbursts, from both within the Revolutionary forces and without, regarding those developments in the present crisis that some have with predictable bourgeois myopia nicknamed Red Terror. I shall not endeavor to make this into a defense, since it will be plain to the reader that there is no cause for defense. All instances of Terror are justified for their own sake. The necessities of revolutionary action and the dogma of bourgeois morality will always be at odds. (...) In 1927 we had repulsed the assault of the foreign bourgeoisie. Yet we had been gentle with the bourgeoisie in our own country. Voices calling for lenience and reconciliation with class enemies had prevented revolutionary reconstruction of society and hindered efforts to achieve the material conditions of socialist transition. (...)

In January 1930, as you will know, this policy of laxness bore its poisonous fruit. The forces of Reaction put aside their polite pretensions and armed themselves against the government of the workers and the people. Once more the Italian nation was plunged into destructive civil strife. (...)

The bourgeois liberal loves pithy aphorisms of peace and tolerance, but when the institution of Capital is threatened, is all too happy to join arms with the pitiless fascist. So are the two revealed as one and the same at different stages of their evolution. Consider the leaders of the so-called Whites. What makes one an Italian Republican, the other an Ardito, the third a New Royalist, the fourth a Social Democrat? In the grand scheme of things they become one and the same. (...)

Everywhere they struck at us, the liberal-fascists murdered, plundered, savaged and defiled the people. Yet it is not White Terror that the writers of German and American newspapers gasp and shake their fingers at. White Terror is the symptom and manifestation of base savagery; it serves no purpose. The Terror we have been forced to pursue has been for the conquest of key aims: to destroy the power of the enemy, purge counter-revolutionary and foreign subversion from the social state, and most importantly, to eliminate the very class of the bourgeoisie and thus pull the danger out by its roots. The bourgeoisie cannot be reformed; they say so themselves; they shout and rave it loudly, proudly, scorning the misguided aims of some of our comrades to re-educate them into proletarian citizens. (...)

***​

Excerpts from 'The Rose Revolution: A New History', written by Angelina Rossi (Firenze: 1970)


(...) The Italian Civil War is generally thought to have lasted from January 1930 (the original 'Jacobin' uprising) to March 1932 (the capitulation of the last remaining White forces). The final battle of the Civil War is conventionally the defeat of the Hausan National Army on March 28th in the West African Union, though this was a nationalist rebellion only indirectly aligned with the Italian Whites. (...) The Whites never achieved the popular support they desired - bereft of an unified political message to offer the people - and faced an entrenched and established foe, rather than the unsteady regime of 1927-1928. In a sense their defeat was thus already assured from the start. (...) The war saw regular council elections and the democratic functions of the Revolutionary Convention suspended indefinitely under the Wartime State of Emergency Act, essentially concentrating all political power in the hands of the PCI to an even greater degree than before.

The FSU agreed to a policy of 'loyal opposition' for the duration of the Civil War, which led to a rapid hemorrhaging of popularity and membership (though this would mostly reverse with equal speed after the War). (...) The classical historiography of the Union downplays the war crimes and atrocities inflicted as part of the Union's Red Terror, while revisionist voices have subsequently downright demonized the conduct of Union soldiers. The critical analysis of available primary sources allows for this study's more nuanced view of Terror on both sides, as well as highlighting the interesting strain of occult panic among soldiers and leaders in the War, which centers around the age-old myth of the Seven. Such irrational fears in part fueled the atrocities of the Terror, (...)


(...) Increasing numbers of White Italian émigrés were now arriving in Costa Ricca. The Civil War had been brief, but it had resulted in a mass movement of people; hundreds of thousands of White veterans and displaced citizens sought shelter beyond Italy's borders. The colonial elite opened their doors to the influx of Italian nobility, businessmen, military officers and other political exiles from the Union. The wealth they still possessed and the armed free corps of White soldiers they brought with them made it difficult for the young nationalist government to deny this mass immigration. (...) The political danger of the Italian elites had strengthened considerably in 1928, when several scions of the royal house had arrived in the young republic. Each immediately formed a makeshift court around them. The princes and princesses of House Guerra styled themselves rightful heirs to King Goffredo, who had abdicated without a clear successor. (...)

In March 1931, the Costa Riccan government moved to place the paramilitary forces within its borders under its own control. The White Italian community resisted; in a chaotic sequence of events, General Angelo Savoia seized control of the nation and established a fascist military dictatorship built on the support of the White Italian émigré community. This 'Republic of Exiles' now styled itself the legitimate government of Italy. From the summer of 1931 onwards, it began to receive the recognition of some sympathetic countries. (...)


The White forces had been defeated, but the State of Emergency remained. The PCI had obtained total power, and saw no reason to release it. The FSU, always in the minority within the Revolutionary Convention but rivaling the PCI in key councils, had agreed to timid cooperation for the duration of the War. With the reason for that gone, the FSU began to shift back to its sharply critical opposition role. Augusto Ascari, the PCI strongman and wartime leader of the Union, still desired to maintain the image of an united front and thus refused to move openly against the FSU. (...) The centralization of media and establishment of new Party-led bureaucracy over the council system meant that few in the Union could hear the FSU's political messages any longer. Radio became an especially important tool in the PCI's arsenal, with Ascari's speeches broadcast in all major cities weekly from 1933 onwards. (...) There is clear evidence that these speeches lost as many supporters as they won. For example, the PCI's vicious anti-religion dogma drove away religious Italians and the influential demographic of radical Waldensian clergy from the regime. (...)



The post-Civil War stability was tested in February 1934 in the so-called Bornean Crisis. The Chinese Empire's decades-long doctrine of isolationism after its 'Peace with Honor' exit from the Great War began to come to an end, as the threat of Socialist expansion in its backyard became increasingly more acute. Nationalist revolts in Brunei, a part of the Malay Union, drew the Chinese to rattle its sabers against a seemingly unstable Italy. The Empire demanded independence for Brunei and new protections for Chinese minorities in Java and the Malay Union. (...) The Revolutionary Convention chose to call the Chinese bluff by deploying its primary battle fleet into the South China Sea. The Empire failed to obtain foreign support for its ambitions; painfully aware of its continued naval inferiority and shackled by the trauma of Great War losses to Italy, the Chinese chose to back down. The Crisis marks a shift in Chinese foreign policy in the period, however. (...)

***​

Transcript of 'The Wanderer's Speech: a Cinemagraph', an unreleased film by an unidentified studio, dated around 1936, reels found by private collector in 1996


(Film opens; interior shot of cellar-like space; a Southern European man in his 30s enters into view)

WANDERER: Greetings. Modernity is a strange thing, is it not? A machine captures likeness and voice through sorceries born of science. Kings and princes scatter from their homeland like so many rats in the face of the wrath of the common man. I planted a seed so many centuries ago. It sprouted into a nation, then a people. Now the flowers that bloom of its ancient growth cut away at the roots that hold it upright. Or perhaps a gardener merely prunes away the weeds that have choked its growth for too long. I am far too detached to indulge in the politics of today. All I know is that on the streets of my Firenze, the children of the revolution curse and spit when they hear the name I too once bore. How strange!


(A model airplane is passed into the frame; the man takes it and considers it)

WANDERER: These are dangerous tools you play with. More dangerous than we have ever known. The world ever dances on the edge of a war far greater and more destructive than even the 'Great War' now four decades past. The children born after those harsh years have grown into men and women and had children of their own, who know nothing of their terror. You fill a powder-keg and claim it is for eternal peace. Who shall provide the spark? Italy, with her dreams of global Liberation? The selfish profiteers and robber barons of the capitalist world, never satisfied by their acquisitions? Perhaps the fascisti or the royalists trying to hold back the inevitable? But perhaps the true danger is in the shadow that grows once more in Wallachia; and elsewhere, I fear. What horrors have passed unseen in that relentless tide of hopefuls and dreamers who have migrated into the nations of the New World? How far has their insidious touch spread?

(The man crushes the model plane in his hands and drops the pieces out of frame)

WANDERER: I thought to create this cinemagraph as a warning. But writing these words, I have realized that the vastness of this terrible new age pushes even those like myself into insignificance. The Seven feasted on the lives of millions in the White Plague, growing stronger and crueler from it. Are these coming days not simply a new, more savage kind of plague - another sacrifice into the endless maws of the true ruler of this universe? Who can steer the world from such a fate? What can any one man, however unusual, do?

(The man shakes his head and walks off-screen; indistinct parting words are heard)

WANDERER: I will be there, Dracul. One of us shall die their final death yet. One of us.

***​

So that's the end of Vicky 2. HoI4 awaits... in due time. I'm not finalizing the HoI4 mod until NSB and the accompanying converter update drop, but in the mean time, I will start showcasing the world as it is in 1936 and the content the mod will have for the major players...
 
State of the World, 1936: The French Empire
Let's start off the HoI4 section of this AAR! Like I said, it will take a long time before we get to the actual AAR, but we'll be looking at the world in 1936 and the ways it can go in the mod.


To start with... everyone's favorite punching bag and the weakest Great Power of the lot in 1936, the French Empire.


This is how we left France at the end of Victoria 2 (well, actually even worse than in this picture). Literal decades of nonstop uprisings have left it in a pretty bad shape, with much of its territory under the control of fascists, reactionaries or communists. How do we represent this in HoI4? Why, with a three-way civil war, of course!



THE FRENCH EMPIRE, 1936

Population:
est. 48.87M (+5.33M from 1866)
Capital: Paris
Government: Semi-Constitutional Monarchy
Head of State: Emperor Louis X Guerra (disputed)
Military Estimate: ? divisions, 35 warships, 1 air squadron

Industry Estimate: 32 Civilian Factories, 12 Military Factories, 5 Naval Dockyards​

The French Empire is on its last legs. It has gone through misfortune after misfortune in the past one hundred years, losing most of its territories outside France proper and suffering decades of constant civil unrest, a state of affairs known as the Anarchy. For the last two decades, France has been trapped in bloody civil war between Fascists, Royalists and Communists. This destructive conflict has caused severe damage to French industry and reduced its population by millions. At times the central government has managed to assert its authority over most of the nation and seemed on the cusp of recovery, but such triumphs have always been only temporary. Now, in 1936, the French Civil War is entering its final stages. The belligerents mass for renewed assaults, bolstered by support and volunteers from overseas...


The 'legitimate' government of France rests in the hands of Emperor Louis X Guerra, an unremarkable monarch for a time requiring men and women of far greater caliber. He styles himself an autocrat, but Louis is an absolute monarch in name only. The French Parlement, a representative assembly formed nearly a century ago as a neutered 'advisory body' to the Emperor, has used the crisis to claim greater political power for itself and has won promises of future concessions from their sovereign; if the royalists can emerge triumphant, Parlement hopes to seize control of the nation and establish a true representative democracy, perhaps even a Republic.

Potentially even more dangerous is the military. The Imperial Army obeys itself first and foremost. Ambitious generals rule as warlords in their own territories, cooperating with the Imperial Throne as long as it benefits them. The influential Marshal Rouquet, Supreme Leader of the Imperial military, has a strained relationship with his sovereign, with many whispering that he does not intend for Louis to live long after their victory. For now, the Emperor is an unifying symbol, and may remain at the Army's sufferance.

The Royalist cause is in dire straits. It has been driven into the interior, holding on to the Île-de-France and the centre-west only. Paris and its outskirts are threatened with encirclement as Fascist and Communist militias cut off the roads west. If there is any hope of victory for the Royalists, it is in allowing the other two factions to weaken each other while Paris conserves its forces. The old order has not entirely abandoned France, either. The British King and the Persian Shah have both recently sent word of volunteer corps on the way; vital expeditions that may very well provide the Royalists with a fighting chance.


The French Communists have been fighting for a very long time. The past decades have bled their forces heavily, and their opposition now outnumbers them in fighting men. Regardless, the industrial hubs of the nation are in Communist hands, and a prolonged fight will be in their favor. With the Internationale promising aid - perhaps even expeditionary forces - the Communist outlook can only improve as time goes along.

The Communists are faced with a challenging frontline as the intensity of the War increases. The Fascists mass in Toulouse and Aquitaine in the south, seeking to unite with their northern brethren and take the center in one fell swoop. Scattered Communist forces in the north in Picardie and Champagne are cut off from support and likely to be defeated in detail by the Fascist and Royalist forces in the region.

The many parties and movements making up the Communist cause present an united front to the enemy, but tensions are high within. The dominant faction of Andre Blas and the Parti Ouvrier Francais has subordinated the council socialists, anarchists and hardline centralists that make up his rivals; when the War is over and France in Communist hands, a power struggle is certain. Getting to that point will take a great deal of fighting still, however.


Raymond Fontaine leads the third faction of the Civil War, the Fascist cause. His party, the Jeune Nation ('Young Nation'), has recently gained the upper hand in the long conflict. Defections from the Imperial Army have swelled his ranks, giving the Fascists the largest army out of the three belligerents. Where their opponents are supported by the great powers of the world, though, Fontaine and the Jeune Nation are almost alone. Those few kindred nations that exist in the world may provide what aid they can, but no volunteer corps are coming to fight on their side.

Fontaine's party has grown to dominate the French Fascist movement. Professing an ideology mixing eugenic and racialist thought, anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, futurism and ultranationalism, the Jeune Nation appeals to many of the disaffected and traumatized souls born out of the long French decline and the Anarchy. The Fascists wage brutal war on their foes, convinced as they are that they are fighting for the very souls of the French people, against the 'degenerate' and 'entropic' forces of the aristocrats and the socialists alike.


It's anyone's game, in the end. Whoever triumphs and unites France once more shall face a herculean task. The war-ravaged nation will need fundamental reforms and total reconstruction. All of the four potential winners have their own idea of how French society should be transformed...




The lessons of the Civil War will not be enough in the aftermath. France has a lot of catching up to do if it hopes to equal its stronger neighbors. Crash industrialization and economic revitalization will be needed. The military needs modernization as well; there's no real air force, the Navy may not survive the Civil War, and the army is badly lacking in heavy armaments and motorization.


Of course, in time France too must look outwards. It seems that the world is headed for a terrible, global war once more. France must recover quickly if she intends to play any great role in the grand conflict to come. The military and the Fascists would certainly wish for France to restore its empire and redress the humiliations of the past century, while the Communists and the Democrats are more interested in 'higher' pursuits, however destructive they will prove in the end.

There we go. Some things are still placeholders and France's focus tree will expand a little bit more still, but this is how it'll look in general. What are your thoughts?
 
There we go. Some things are still placeholders and France's focus tree will expand a little bit more still, but this is how it'll look in general. What are your thoughts?
I'm amazed the France is even still a Great Power. Who do its colonies answer to? Also, ouch, not much hope for the king, is there? Surrounded on all sides, with no sea access... not a pretty picture.
 
I'm amazed the France is even still a Great Power. Who do its colonies answer to? Also, ouch, not much hope for the king, is there? Surrounded on all sides, with no sea access... not a pretty picture.

It's very generous of the game to call it a Great Power, yes. France certainly has a challenging start to overcome. France's colonies were stripped from it after the First Great War, so it essentially starts like Germany in OTL. Just worse.

Appearances can be deceiving. A smart Royalist leader can rush to secure the north, where the Communists only have a few light brigades, and then form a solid defensive frontline in the north-west. The arrival of British and Persian expeditionary forces certainly won't hurt their chances either!

That said, the King has no chance even if his side wins - the French monarchy as an institution is done for.

It's looking neat. Did you make the focus trees yourself?

Indeed I did. There is going to be a proper mod for this part of the AAR, with new ideas, events, political parties, leaders and focus trees for Great Powers and interesting secondaries.
 
Last edited:
State of the World, 1936: The Socialist Republic of the Netherlands
I'll be moving through these in a semi-logical order. Today, we take a look at the Netherlands, aka the Dutch Union!

Near the end of Victoria 2, in 1920, an Italy preoccupied by internal unrest abandoned their Dutch allies to German invasion. The Netherlands took a beating and soon fell to a Communist uprising in 1924. In the decade after, it faced several invasions by France and Germany, the so-called Wars of Survival. The provinces of Flanders and northern Wallonia were ceded to the French Empire, while what remained of Dutch Hanover went to Germany.

The revolutionary government was left intact to serve as a mutually hostile buffer state, however. In 1928, the French satellite states carved out of Flanders and Wallonia became de facto independent with the beginning of the French Civil War, and Flanders soon fell to Communist revolutionaries and rejoined the Dutch Union. As the most industrialized and populous part of the Union, it's return was very welcome.

So how do the Netherlands look in 1936? The Netherlands is a Secondary Power, which means it gets a decent-sized focus tree, unique ideas (a whole lot of them, in this particular case), some events and so forth.




THE DUTCH UNION, 1936

Population:
est. 13.65M (+3.23M from 1866)
Capital: Amsterdam
Government: Socialist Republic (Authoritarian Dictatorship)
Head of State: President Victor Hoensbroeck
Military Estimate: 14 divisions (est. 80,000 men), 7 warships, 40 aircraft

Industry Estimate: 16 Civilian Factories, 5 Military Factories, 3 Naval Dockyards​

The Dutch Union, or more precisely the Socialist Republic of the Netherlands, remains in a dangerous position. It barely survived the bloody Wars of Survival of the last decade, when the great powers of Germany and France assaulted it one after the other, seizing much of the nation's territory. New winds are blowing, however. France has fallen to civil war, which has also allowed Flanders to rejoin the Union, while the German Federation has adopted firm isolationism after its humiliating and politically devastating failure to invade Italy in the Austrian War of 1927. The Netherlands thus has breathing room once more, and an ally in the Italian Union - if the Italians can be trusted.

Internally, things are relatively stable. The Communist Party of the Netherlands has adopted an authoritarian course, marginalizing rival parties and factions and consolidating power to itself in the name of national unity and survival. The new Constitution - to be unveiled in the coming months - is said to be an elaborate document legitimizing and justifying the leading role of the Party over that of council democracy. Unlike in Italy and France, no credible opposition exists to turn back the course. The new Party leader and President of the Socialist Republic, Victor Hoensbroeck, believes in the necessity of a strong, totalitarian state to forge the path towards a true communist society - the many sacrifices that have to be made on that path are only necessary.


The Dutch borders possess considerable fortifications constructed during the past five years, and indeed Dutch military strategy is built on the principle of stubborn defense until allied forces can rush to the nation's aid. As such, Dutch soldiers are provided with the training and equipment to dig in and fortify whatever piece of land they find themselves fighting upon. With hostile great powers on every side - France to the west, Britain to the north and Germany to the east - such a doctrine is perhaps a natural one.


The Dutch Red Army itself is small, made up of only some 80,000 men, with no motorized equipment or tanks to support them. The Dutch Navy has been essentially rebuilt from scratch after its destruction in the Wars of Survival and remains tiny - two cruisers and five destroyers. There is no air force to speak of, though 40 old Italian-made CR.32 fighters at least forms the foundation of one. As the economy grows and military recruitment expands, the Dutch can come to field a formidable force; but in 1936, it's military is in no shape to stand against its more powerful neighbors.


If the Dutch government bides its time and plays its cards right, it has the potential for greatness. The frequent and intense battles of the Wars of Survival have forged a generation of Dutch military thinkers who intend to revolutionize European military doctrine. They advocate for extensive reforms that would favor independence and initiative for leaders on the field, improved recon and intelligence usage, rapid, reactive tactics and strategic flexibility. If they succeed, such reforms might allow the Red Army to punch above its weight.

Economically, the State planners intend for a mix of local initiatives and workplace democracy supporting heavy-handed but potent state-directed industrial expansion. The Dutch economy is to be made rational, scientific and efficient like never before. At the same time, the Party seeks to consolidate ever more power and control into its own hands, and to transform Dutch society on every level. World-famous radical artists find themselves drafted as state propagandists, citizens are encouraged to inform on their friends and family and ideals of minimalism and self-sacrifice are encouraged in the hopes of cutting consumer production in favor of military needs.


A linchpin of the economy are the state companies - some of them nationalized pre-Revolution powerhouses, others novel inventions for the new age. Their factories and research wings are highly valued by the State. With luck, their expertise will allow the Netherlands to catch up with its more technologically advanced and wealthier foes.


In foreign policy, the Netherlands follows the line of the Italian Union and the Internationale at large. It has its own aspirations, however, which may indeed be the spark of the terrible Liberation War to come. The Dutch seek to reclaim their lost territories of Wallonia and Hannover-Nordrhein; a nationalist pursuit that no self-respecting socialist state should risk its fortunes chasing after, perhaps, but one which the Dutch are committed to. Should they succeed in occupying these regions and finding enough collaborators to legitimize their rule, integration back into the Netherlands will likely soon follow.

Feel free to ask questions and so forth. I'm not sure what things I should show in these little updates. Next up, probably either Sorbia or Finland, since they are Secondaries I've finished work on, but who knows! You can put in a vote for a nation you'd like to hear about next.
 
While kinda disappointing and boring to see every communist state be "the USSR but X nationality" this is still a very interesting update and can't wait to see more.

Hmm seeing what Finland is doing would be nice but if I had to choose I would go with Persia.
 
I for one am very interested how Italy's internal politics will go. Personally I hope the more authoritarian socialists are able to hold on while getting rid of some of the bad parts about them (liking keeping the colonies), but presumably they'll unfortunately stay as the bad faction with the other socialists being the good ones

Overall very exited for everything!
 
Last edited:
A strange assumption. It was even implied in this very update (and in the French one) that authoritarian communism is not the only way forward for the socialist bloc!
Must have missed it since I only recall the balkans having non-authoritarians in power; still glad to be wrong in this case, can't wait to see what happens next
 
I for one am very interested how Italy's internal politics will go. Personally I hope the more authoritarian socialists are able to hold on while getting rid of some of the bad parts about them (liking keeping the colonies), but presumably they'll unfortunately stay as the bad faction with the other socialists being the good ones

Overall very exited for everything!
*grumbles in Bordiga quotes*
 
Must have missed it since I only recall the balkans having non-authoritarians in power; still glad to be wrong in this case, can't wait to see what happens next

To be sure, they have gotten much less focus in the narrative. Aotearoa (New Zealand-Australia) has the honor of being the first revolutionary socialist state in this world's history, and to this day is a peaceful agrarian socialist 'red soil utopia'. Alarcon is a small anarcho-communist commune in the middle of Iberia. Colombia has had a rough and bloody start, but its new leadership has enacted broad responsive and peaceful reforms proposed by popular initiatives. And so forth.

There are also libertarian/democratic strains in Italian and French socialism. If they take power, they can apply pressure against the more authoritarian states of the Internationale - though for now the tense situation demands an united front.

It's not always so clearcut either, naturally: some states have established genuine democratic practices while still disenfranchising large parts of their population for their class background and limiting many rights. That said, most liberal democratic countries in this world don't have women's suffrage either, for example. Nobody's looking great to modern eyes.
 
Back
Top