1 agent with Fury oversight looks like this:
1-29 Abject mission failure; 30-39 Primary objective met with disastrous failure, but some valuable intel gathered; 40-59 Primary objective not complete, valuable intel/secondary assets gathered toward future success; 60-79 Primary objective complete, some data missing; 80-100 Total mission success
Ah, right. I made a mess of that one. Let me fix it here:
| 1 agent + Fury oversight | 2 agents + Fury oversight | 2 agents including Fury | 3 agents + Fury oversight |
| abject failure | 1-29 | 1 | 1-9 | 1 |
| disaster but intel | 30-39 | 2-19 | 10-29 | 2 |
| intel but assets | 40-59 | 20-49 | 30-59 | 3-39 |
| objective | 60-79 | 50-79 | 60-89 | 40-79 |
| total success | 80-100 | 80-100 | 90-100 | 80-100 |
Okay, then. My new strategy would be to assign all agents to the same missions, and for the next few missions to be for recruiting agents we can stack up again for even more recruitment.
[X] Activate three agents, while Fury runs oversight (One Agent for one of three Missions)
-[X] Comander Hill
-[X] Phil
-[X] Hawkeye
--[X] Falcon was unwilling before, but with new information and a different approach, maybe you can get him to join the Division (if met with abject failure, he will no longer take your calls)
Just a 1% chance of getting abject failure and losing out on him forever, so that's not really an issue, and a 60% chance of outright recruiting him (total success + objective complete but some data missing).
If all goes well, we'd have 4 agents next turn, and we can either keep piling them all on the same recruitment mission (there should probably be either a limit to this, or perhaps a drawback like a time/turn-sensitive deadline, I think), or split them 2 and 2.
