I get the impression it could be her hungry ghost.
Like, despite her still being alive.
How could Vesper exalt as an Abyssal when she's already a Dragonblooded? The scene includes her controlling her own blood to keep herself alive, a very Water Aspect capability.Ah, it seems she was meant to exalt as an Abyssal, but her life was saved in defiance of her fate, perhaps? leaving her sort of Between
That's not quite how that works - your lower soul is representative of the baser desires of your body, while the upper soul is what traditionally gets considered the person proper. So a person can conceivably leave behind both a regular ghost and a hungry ghost (which is typically feral and thirsts for blood). In fact, hungry ghosts can conceivably arise while the owner still lives - that's the story of the example Hungry Ghost in the 3e corebook.If our souls are separated that means we literally can't Exalt by definition, because the Exaltation would not recognise us as a suitable target.
No no no, that's a completely different direction to what I'm saying. The facts are that Exaltations will only choose people with complete mortal soul hierarchies, are at least somewhat 'mortal' with lineage from humans and if someone stops qualifying thusly - which is analogous to death or becoming an akuma - the Exaltation leaves. Now if the soul is still connected and in the same vessel, just alienated from one another, this is salvageable, but if at some point one soul just ups and leaves our body, we should according to canon, lose our Exaltation.That's not quite how that works - your lower soul is representative of the baser desires of your body, while the upper soul is what traditionally gets considered the person proper. So a person can conceivably leave behind both a regular ghost and a hungry ghost (which is typically feral and thirsts for blood). In fact, hungry ghosts can conceivably arise while the owner still lives - that's the story of the example Hungry Ghost in the 3e corebook.
Terrestrial exaltations are different than Celestial ones too, they're not exactly something that latches itself onto your soul like a Celestial one does. I'm not 100% clear on the metaphysics, but even if Crumplepunch were working off of the more rigid 2e interpretation of things (which I don't think he is), then this is fair game. And we already are an Exalt - jokes about what type she is aside, Vesper is almost certainly a Water Aspect Dragon-Blooded.
All that said, yes, potentially having your soul split is not a good thing in any sense. In fact, if we assume this is the lower part of our soul, that'd... actually very easily explain why Vesper behaves like the protagonist from Disco Elysium: unable to think terribly long-term, taking decisions on the first impulse she gets, being barely aware of herself, etc.
Well, we're still alive, and still an Exalt, so either I'm wrong, and there's something else weird going on here, or Crumple is doing what he thinks would make for a fun story regardless of pesky canonical details.No no no, that's a completely different direction to what I'm saying. The facts are that Exaltations will only choose people with complete mortal soul hierarchies, are at least somewhat 'mortal' with lineage from humans and if someone stops qualifying thusly - which is analogous to death or becoming an akuma - the Exaltation leaves. Now if the soul is still connected and in the same vessel, just alienated from one another, this is salvageable, but if at some point one soul just ups and leaves our body, we should according to canon, lose our Exaltation.
Yeah, I am greatly concerned about us doing something unspecified to them. We are not blessed with a surfeit of people ready to put up with our nonsense.This is all feeling very ominous. I hope Logris and Fincher are okay and we just like, spaced out.
No no no, that's a completely different direction to what I'm saying. The facts are that Exaltations will only choose people with complete mortal soul hierarchies, are at least somewhat 'mortal' with lineage from humans and if someone stops qualifying thusly - which is analogous to death or becoming an akuma - the Exaltation leaves. Now if the soul is still connected and in the same vessel, just alienated from one another, this is salvageable, but if at some point one soul just ups and leaves our body, we should according to canon, lose our Exaltation.
I may be running off of fan-written rules then. I wasn't saying 'damaged or incomplete' vaguely but 'hun or po is completely missing making the structure too different'. For some reason I have it in my head that Exaltations are keyed to human-ish beings that way, and it's why Dragon Kings and pureblood Lintha don't Exalt - or any other pre-human races - because they have a different soul structure, and disengaging if things change too much - which is why ghosts can't exalt or keep their Exaltation, because they're just a hun or just a po. But again, there's been so much fanwork around Exalted I probably got the idea from that.I'm not going to make any statements on what bearing this discussion might have to the current scene, I just want to say that, by way of canon, this is definitely not true in Ex3 and I'm 90% sure it has never been true in any edition. Having your souls removed (or part removed) is not the same thing as death, and does not trigger some kind of automated Exaltation shutdown. People with damaged or incomplete souls (like the dream-eaten victims of the raksha) can Exalt just like everyone else.
I may be running off of fan-written rules then. I wasn't saying 'damaged or incomplete' vaguely but 'hun or po is completely missing making the structure too different'. For some reason I have it in my head that Exaltations are keyed to human-ish beings that way, and it's why Dragon Kings and pureblood Lintha don't Exalt - or any other pre-human races - because they have a different soul structure, and disengaging if things change too much - which is why ghosts can't exalt or keep their Exaltation, because they're just a hun or just a po. But again, there's been so much fanwork around Exalted I probably got the idea from that.
It's probably not quite that linear, but I would be entirely unsurprised all the same.Vesper spent an entire day standing in front of the tree having visions while everybody just awkwardly watched?
They would probably find something better to do after an hour. It can't be that much fun to watch us.The last time when we drew a card (when we were showering on the beach), we lost an hour. We drew multiple cards now. Does this mean that Vesper spent an entire day standing in front of the tree having visions while everybody just awkwardly watched?
The last time when we drew a card (when we were showering on the beach), we lost an hour. We drew multiple cards now. Does this mean that Vesper spent an entire day standing in front of the tree having visions while everybody just awkwardly watched?