It seems that officialdom cooperated in some way to hide the fact of the problematic adoption:
The thing is they can't. There is not clause that lets someone use their discretion to choose. Just because you are part of the government doesn't mean you can break the law. The law is that she would go to her blood relative or legal relative, or failing that into the foster care system. Carol would have been required to adopt her out of the foster care system. If that happened, Amy has a good case for claiming that the adoption was illegal due to the fact that the state didn't contact her blood relatives. She has grandparents somewhere, or cousins, or someone somewhere.
Just about the only way that this could work legally is if her father was working to facilitate the adoption. He and only he could make this work without being a huge open process that anyone could track.
And if HE decided that she was to be raised by who she was raised by, then that's that. One of Amy's blood relatives would have to sue to get custody, rather than the requirement of the state to try to offer her to them.
*not actually a lawyer, but I am seeking to adopt. It has come up in conversations with people who do actually deal with this kinds of issues.
Last edited: