Friendly Foreign Exchange Student Spiderman! (My Hero Academia x MCU)

You're leading really heavily into "Well the source material doesn't specifically say she didn't!" here.

Says the guy heavilly leaning into "The source Material doesn't specifically say she does" :/

So pot meet kettle I suppose.

...Why? I seriously just don't understand why you would bother doing this.

Why not?



"We're trying to improve your speed and agility with using your quirk so here, we're going to train you in a method which is excessively complicated and has tons of unnescessary steps."

Great training.

Yes. It is actually.

For example, I can teach you how to punch. "Cock back your fist, and swing away leeroy."

Or. I can teach you how to punch *properly* as in

Learn your footwork, learn how to drive the punch forward, understand the torque of your upper torso, the weight of your body, how to utilize weight and balance to make the punch impact the area with maximum force, how to use the first punch to set up for the next punch, or a kick and so on.

All that might sound like "Excessively complicated and tons of unnecessary steps" next to the simple "Just swing away Leeroy"

But guess which guy has the greater chance of winning the punching contest???

If you know the ins and outs of your quirk and all its functions and all the things about it you have greater mastery over your quirk and thus greater master mastery over your chances of winning the battle.
 
Says the guy heavilly leaning into "The source Material doesn't specifically say she does" :/

So pot meet kettle I suppose.

This is, I'm finding, the most frustrating aspect about your writing (Assuming you actually write the story, I cannot keep track anymore). You get ideas in your head about how stuff MIGHT work, and then just go with it as if the rest of us already made that same assumption. Why is Shigaraki a misogynist in this story? Because the author thinks they would be based on their own imagination. Why can Momo suddenly create tools in a manner that she is never demonstrated to have done so? Because the author just assumes she could.

This is the sort of thing that requires explanation. You can't just lay it out and assume your audience will have followed the same logic you did.

Yes. It is actually.

For example, I can teach you how to punch. "Cock back your fist, and swing away leeroy."

Or. I can teach you how to punch *properly* as in

Learn your footwork, learn how to drive the punch forward, understand the torque of your upper torso, the weight of your body, how to utilize weight and balance to make the punch impact the area with maximum force, how to use the first punch to set up for the next punch, or a kick and so on.

What you are describing is learning proper technique, which this is not. You are instead teaching her "Cock your fist back and then do a jig, try a few spins, and then throw the punch. It's really complicated so you'll get really good at it!"

Actual proper combat technique is about trimming away the fat. It's about eliminating unnecessary motions and economizing the application of power, torsion, leverage, impact. It's about taking all those extra steps involved in "Swing away Leeroy" that you didn't think were in there and getting rid of them so you can punch someone really efficiently. There's no efficiency in carrying around a sword handle and then producing a blade in a really really awkward fashion. You're burning in bad habits, not cultivating good ones.

And, you know. You're basically having her practice a single motion which she will never use in any practical scenario, and then imagining that it will somehow make her better at doing other, unrelated motions. As if learning how to dance-punch someone will somehow make her really effective at wrestling. You can't generalize practice in that way.
 
Last edited:
This is, I'm finding, the most frustrating aspect about your writing (Assuming you actually write the story, I cannot keep track anymore). You get ideas in your head about how stuff MIGHT work, and then just go with it as if the rest of us already made that same assumption. Why is Shigaraki a misogynist in this story? Because the author thinks they would be based on their own imagination. Why can Momo suddenly create tools in a manner that she is never demonstrated to have done so? Because the author just assumes she could.

This is the sort of thing that requires explanation. You can't just lay it out and assume your audience will have followed the same logic you did.



What you are describing is learning proper technique, which this is not. You are instead teaching her "Cock your fist back and then do a jig, try a few spins, and then throw the punch. It's really complicated so you'll get really good at it!"

Actual proper combat technique is about trimming away the fat. It's about eliminating unnecessary motions and economizing the application of power, torsion, leverage, impact. It's about taking all those extra steps involved in "Swing away Leeroy" that you didn't think were in there and getting rid of them so you can punch someone really efficiently. There's no efficiency in carrying around a sword handle and then producing a blade in a really really awkward fashion. You're burning in bad habits, not cultivating good ones.

And, you know. You're basically having her practice a single motion which she will never use in any practical scenario, and then imagining that it will somehow make her better at doing other, unrelated motions. As if learning how to dance-punch someone will somehow make her really effective at wrestling. You can't generalize practice in that way.
I'm going to be blunt: if you don't like it you are free to stop reading, as it stands this is approaching derail and you are bothering other people who are enjoying a story
 
I'm going to be blunt: if you don't like it you are free to stop reading, as it stands this is approaching derail and you are bothering other people who are enjoying a story

Ha ha ha. Yeah, same to you buddy. If you don't like it when people criticize something you like, you can just not read it. Nobody's making you read my posts, I'm here because I'm a reader too, and you don't get to tell me how I enjoy my fanfiction. And like four posts does not a derail make.

At this point, I'm willing to just say "Okay, so Momo's quirk in this story is just not the same one she has in canon." It doesn't work the same way. So now all I need to know is how it DOES work, and if it's consistent, then fine. I don't have a problem with stuff being different from canon, I'm just frustrated because it is not being made clear that they're different, and in what ways that they're different.
 
Last edited:
This is, I'm finding, the most frustrating aspect about your writing (Assuming you actually write the story, I cannot keep track anymore). You get ideas in your head about how stuff MIGHT work, and then just go with it as if the rest of us already made that same assumption. Why is Shigaraki a misogynist in this story? Because the author thinks they would be based on their own imagination. Why can Momo suddenly create tools in a manner that she is never demonstrated to have done so? Because the author just assumes she could.

This is the sort of thing that requires explanation. You can't just lay it out and assume your audience will have followed the same logic you did.

Not writing, editing.

As for the Shigaraki question and why Momo can do this, I don't assume anything. It just doesn't fall into the realm of *impossibility* in my eyes so I do not object overmuch and you can ask both of the authors here, when I find something impossible, or even unlikely, I don't move on it or give the green light til its removed completely full stop. I have outright deleted *whole sections* of this story on numerous occasions. But just the same, if I wanted everything to be "exactly as canon" I'd go and read "canon" and stick with that.

This isn't canon. And that's fine.

Shigaraki being a mysoginist, no, we have no direct evidence of it but it wouldn't surprise me if he was. Given his obsession with games and how many gamers treat women they encounter on line it wouldn't surprise me. So when Zaru/IKN put that in there, I let it happen because a Fanfiction is about exploring a *possibility*. Its not canon, it doesn't have to be canon, it just has to be *possible* And from everything we've seen in canon, its not impossible.

Same thing with Momo in this instance. Is it *possible* for her to be capable of producing a blade in this manner? Yes. So that is enough for me to see where the two authors decide to expand on this. They are exploring a *possibility* A plausible one.

What you are describing is learning proper technique, which this is not. You are instead teaching her "Cock your fist back and then do a jig, try a few spins, and then throw the punch. It's really complicated so you'll get really good at it!"

That's *your* view of it. I do not share it, neither do the authors or other forum goers given that you're the one primarilly objecting to this particular issue.

Actual proper combat technique is about trimming away the fat. It's about eliminating unnecessary motions and economizing the application of power, torsion, leverage, impact. It's about taking all those extra steps involved in "Swing away Leeroy" that you didn't think were in there and getting rid of them so you can punch someone really efficiently. There's no efficiency in carrying around a sword handle and then producing a blade in a really really awkward fashion. You're burning in bad habits, not cultivating good ones.

Again, that's *your* interpretation. The way I see it Momo is learning:

A) To make an offensive weapon in the span of time it takes her hand to swing from the ready position, to the strike itself.

B) She is learning/practicing *How* to swing that same weapon with proper technique in the span of that time for a damaging cut

C) She is learning how to utilize her quirk from a *specific point* (the slit on the handle) and nothing but that point, isolating her usage which could potentially be a massive boon down the road in multiple situations.

And yes, she's using a sword handle, the same way a guy who wants to learn how to do a proper pull up would probably start with resistance band training NOT the pull up by himself. Or someone who wants to learn to ride a bike would use training wheels. I highly doubt she'll be keeping that sword handle forever as you imply. But for now, the speed of the blade creation is paramount, eliminating the handle from her mind eliminates that particular distraction.

As I said. That's *your* interpretation. Mine and others varies greatly.

And, you know. You're basically having her practice a single motion which she will never use in any practical scenario, and then imagining that it will somehow make her better at doing other, unrelated motions. As if learning how to dance-punch someone will somehow make her really effective at wrestling. You can't generalize practice in that way.

Its not entirely useless either.

If I know my swing speed in that motion is say .7 seconds and I master creating the blade in that time then I know any other swing I make with the same intent of making a weapon between point A and point B will need a bare minimum of .6 seconds for it to be useful.

So if I'm gonna make an upper cut, or an overhead swing, or a kick, I know the point from which I start to make the blade to the point of impact needs to be .6 seconds ergo, I master the timing and I can thus, apply it to other areas of my fighting style Whatever fighting style that might be.

And that's just one aspect, learning how to manipulate her center of gravity, how to drive a blow using her leg power and several other aspects are applicable almost universally to any fighting style or move.
 
As for the Shigaraki question, he's a super sore loser, so he associates insults to those who wronged him. He called the boys insults too. Just Momo gets the whore treatment since her attire and she was the reason Noumu was killed. The Noumu crafted by his father figure and patron that was made to kill All Might. Specifically.

And it got killed by a bunch of snot nosed little shits.

He's gonna be salty. This is pre character development Shigaraki after all. All Might isn't just his ire anymore. It's the kids who caused him humiliation galore.

Oh and Deku took away a piece of his Father. In some twisted way he misses his Father, his grip around his face. And he took away a piece of family.

He's gonna be out for blood. He's taking to drinking too, as you can tell as well. Don't think canon has explored that even though he's in a bar. So add in alchohol and you have one explosive decaying cocktail.
 
One thing I have to ask you guys is why don't let peter have his own explanation why he talks a lot. You guys bring it up a lot in the story and the characters notices that quirk peter has so why not just have a scene that has peter explaining why he talks and jokes.

Also Did Miriko imply that peter was shit talking during the sports festival?
 
One thing I have to ask you guys is why don't let peter have his own explanation why he talks a lot. You guys bring it up a lot in the story and the characters notices that quirk peter has so why not just have a scene that has peter explaining why he talks and jokes.

Also Did Miriko imply that peter was shit talking during the sports festival?
Aizawa also does that. Both, however, aren't bothering to ask WHY he does it.
 
Aizawa also does that. Both, however, aren't bothering to ask WHY he does it.
Not everyone has to have their heads so far up Peter's ass that they seek to understand every fascet of his personality inside and out and all the hidden secrets and depths of his unfathomably deep Soul.

Writing off his habit as just that, a habit is perfectly in line with... you know, reality. If I have a friend who talks a lot I simply say "He/she just likes to talk. I don't go into the why's and the hows, lay him down on the couch and determine that his speaking habits really derive from neglectful parenting and the desire for attention that came from his deeply wounded psyche at an early age.

Peter is not the center of reality. He is a protagonist but he is a person, utterly unextraordinary beyond the narrative of this story as far as "everyone else" is concerned.
 
Aizawa also does that. Both, however, aren't bothering to ask WHY he does it.
Not everyone has to have their heads so far up Peter's ass that they seek to understand every fascet of his personality inside and out and all the hidden secrets and depths of his unfathomably deep Soul.

Writing off his habit as just that, a habit is perfectly in line with... you know, reality. If I have a friend who talks a lot I simply say "He/she just likes to talk. I don't go into the why's and the hows, lay him down on the couch and determine that his speaking habits really derive from neglectful parenting and the desire for attention that came from his deeply wounded psyche at an early age.

Peter is not the center of reality. He is a protagonist but he is a person, utterly unextraordinary beyond the narrative of this story as far as "everyone else" is concerned.
I can understand why everyone doesn't ask him why he jokes but when it's brought up peter doesn't explain himself at all he just goes all quiet.

But I understand what you're saying not everyone cares enough to know his reasoning.
 
I can understand why everyone doesn't ask him why he jokes but when it's brought up peter doesn't explain himself at all he just goes all quiet.

But I understand what you're saying not everyone cares enough to know his reasoning.

Its for the same reason.

Someone tells you "You like to talk a lot" Chances are you'll either laugh it off or apologise and move on with your day, not psycho-analyze yourself and spill your deep dark childhood traumas to explain why your talking is a coping mechanism/safety blanket or whatever.

The like... TWO occasions I can recall Peter ever actually talking about this was once with MJ when she straight up asked and another as one of those moments where he's pissed and explaining to a target why he should be worried.
 
Last edited:
Its for the same reason.

Someone tells you "You like to talk a lot" Chances are you'll either laugh it off or apologise and move on with your day, not psycho-analyze yourself and spill your deep dark childhood traumas to explain why your talking is a coping mechanism/safety blanket or whatever.

The like... TWO occasions I can recall Peter ever actually talking about this was once with MJ when she straight up asked and another as one of those moments where he's pissed and explaining to a target why he should be worried.
I get what you're saying peter isn't going to have some deep explanation for why he jokes .

But what I'm saying is that peter doesn't need some super deep explanation of why he talks a lot when he fights.

Example : I talk and joke A lot when I fight because it calms my senses down when I fight.

Now that's not why I believe he jokes but it's just a simple sentence that so peter explains himself when It's brought up instead of him going quiet .

But maybe you guys show his reasons later in the story.

It's just feels weird it and it happens a lot people mention his jokes and peter doesn't say anything.
 
I get what you're saying peter isn't going to have some deep explanation for why he jokes .

But what I'm saying is that peter doesn't need some super deep explanation of why he talks a lot when he fights.

Example : I talk and joke A lot when I fight because it calms my senses down when I fight.

Now that's not why I believe he jokes but it's just a simple sentence that so peter explains himself when It's brought up instead of him going quiet .

But maybe you guys show his reasons later in the story.

It's just feels weird it and it happens a lot people mention his jokes and peter doesn't say anything.

But *why* say it? Are Aizawa and Mirko pressing him so relentlessly to *change* this? No. They're commenting on it, and at worst, marking it as a passing irritant. WHY would someone who's psychologically and emotionally predisposed to internalize his feelings and *hide things* from virtually everyone around him at least until he came to this world suddenly decide that for this particular, petty issue he needs to "justify" his actions or "explain himself" to these people?

Frankly, outside of class, he doesn't owe Aizawa anything and Mirko he's known for a grand total of four hours, she's a stranger to him.

Neither of them warrant the emotional pull MJ had over him in the example or have tilted him so far off the edge of the map that he wants to tear their faces off so without that I don't see why Peter would do anything other than "go quiet" or more accurately, shrug it off and move on.
 
Last edited:
But *why* say it? Are Aizawa and Mirko pressing him so relentlessly to *change* this? No. They're commenting on it, and at worst, marking it as a passing irritant. WHY would someone who's psychologically and emotionally predisposed to internalize his feelings and *hide things* from virtually everyone around him at least until he came to this world suddenly decide that for this particular, petty issue he needs to "justify" his actions or "explain himself" to these people?

Frankly, outside of class, he doesn't owe Aizawa anything and Mirko he's known for a grand total of four hours, she's a stranger to him.

Neither of them warrant the emotional pull MJ had over him in the example or have tilted him so far off the edge of the map that he wants to tear their faces off so without that I don't see why Peter would do anything other than "go quiet" or more accurately, shrug it off and move on.
I understand you but we just have different ideas of MCU peter because in my opinion he would just tell them why he jokes and go on to the next thing.

He doesn't have to have a deep connection tell to a person to tell his reasoning in one sentence.
 
Not everyone has to have their heads so far up Peter's ass that they seek to understand every fascet of his personality inside and out and all the hidden secrets and depths of his unfathomably deep Soul.

You know what's also reality? Asking people questions when you want to know about things. They aren't doing anything to understand... anything, really. Understanding your student's behavior is teaching basics 101, because that's one of the things you do in order to be able to plan in how to educate them. Instead, they are making very erroneous assumptions and thinking he's a jackass who isn't taking things seriously, and you should know the "assume" joke by know. Specially since your condescending behavior and erroneous assumptions regarding why I even wrote my comment basically makes you a target for the same joke.

Instead, you just thought I was another idiot scrub that just wants to treat Peter as a very special snowflake character. And engaged in the same sort of attitude that got you banned in the first place. Grow up. You are lawyer, a bloody professional. Treating everyone like an idiot instead of calming down and at least wondering why the person is asking the question should be beneath someone like you. You want to play being a sith lord for fun? Fine. Engaging in behavior that is borderline GIFT, isn't.
 
You know what's also reality? Asking people questions when you want to know about things. They aren't doing anything to understand... anything, really. Understanding your student's behavior is teaching basics 101, because that's one of the things you do in order to be able to plan in how to educate them. Instead, they are making very erroneous assumptions and thinking he's a jackass who isn't taking things seriously, and you should know the "assume" joke by know. Specially since your condescending behavior and erroneous assumptions regarding why I even wrote my comment basically makes you a target for the same joke.

Instead, you just thought I was another idiot scrub that just wants to treat Peter as a very special snowflake character. And engaged in the same sort of attitude that got you banned in the first place. Grow up. You are lawyer, a bloody professional. Treating everyone like an idiot instead of calming down and at least wondering why the person is asking the question should be beneath someone like you. You want to play being a sith lord for fun? Fine. Engaging in behavior that is borderline GIFT, isn't.


I don't know about you, but when I or other classmates spoke in class our teacher simply said/shouted "quiet" and continued with the lesson. He/she didn't pull me aside and if he/she ever did pull me aside I was in trouble, not about to be laid on a couch to start answering questions about my childhood.

And yes I am condescending half the time and you can call me an ass all you want but at this point its not a personality trait that's going away any time soon for a variety of reasons. Furthermore if you believe I *care* about getting banned and that that's somehow going to make me treat people with kid gloves and stop giving my honest view all of a sudden because "Oh noes the banhammer" well... take this as evidence to the contrary.

Furthermore I'm perfectly calm and if you want to stop and debate philosophy with everyone who makes a random comment in a thread you're free to do so, I however do not have the patience for it. Especially when the question is the equivalent of "Why are two canonically obstinate and presumptuous people acting obstinate and presumptuous as opposed to blowing ever more smoke up our Protagonists ass?"

I'll give you a hint; Its because they're obstinate and presumptuous.

I mean Jesus, Mirko isn't suddenly married to the kid. She has him for two weeks and it was an assignment she didn't want in the first place. In Aizawa's case this is the guy that FAILED an entire CLASS after a handful of HOURS and you want him to suddenly start asking why Peter *talks too much*?

Because that's teaching 101?

So's not failing your entire class after the first assignment. I KNOW they must have covered that part in the teaching course, or at least common sense 101.

So yes, given the circumstances and personalities we're working with this is you advocating for special snowflake treatment. If it was say, Momo, or Uraraka, one who's interested in him and the other who is just naturally nice MAYBE that kind of question would be merited. MAYBE.

Relic's question at least bears some objectivity believing through his interpretation of the character that Peter would explain himself. Yours is just you wanting Aizawa and Mirko to realize some great and terrible mistake Ex-Nihilo and deciding that they need to look into something that doesn't merit looking into by virtually anyone's standards 99% of the time.
 
Last edited:
Violation of Rule 3: Be Civil - The insults here and your approach to this argument has not been civil.
I don't know about you, but when I or other classmates spoke in class our teacher simply said/shouted "quiet" and continued with the lesson. He/she didn't pull me aside and if he/she ever did pull me aside I was in trouble, not about to be laid on a couch to start answering questions about my childhood.

And yes I am condescending half the time and you can call me an ass all you want but at this point its not a personality trait that's going away any time soon for a variety of reasons. Furthermore if you believe I *care* about getting banned and that that's somehow going to make me treat people with kid gloves and stop giving my honest view all of a sudden because "Oh noes the banhammer" well... take this as evidence to the contrary.

Furthermore I'm perfectly calm and if you want to stop and debate philosophy with everyone who makes a random comment in a thread you're free to do so, I however do not have the patience for it. Especially when the question is the equivalent of "Why are two canonically obstinate and presumptuous people acting obstinate and presumptuous as opposed to blowing ever more smoke up our Protagonists ass?"

I'll give you a hint; Its because they're obstinate and presumptuous.

I mean Jesus, Mirko isn't suddenly married to the kid. She has him for two weeks and it was an assignment she didn't want in the first place. In Aizawa's case this is the guy that FAILED an entire CLASS after a handful of HOURS and you want him to suddenly start asking why Peter *talks too much*?

Because that's teaching 101?

So's not failing your entire class after the first assignment. I KNOW they must have covered that part in the teaching course, or at least common sense 101.

So yes, given the circumstances and personalities we're working with this is you advocating for special snowflake treatment. If it was say, Momo, or Uraraka, one who's interested in him and the other who is just naturally nice MAYBE that kind of question would be merited. MAYBE.

Relic's question at least bears some objectivity believing through his interpretation of the character that Peter would explain himself. Yours is just you wanting Aizawa and Mirko to realize some great and terrible mistake Ex-Nihilo and deciding that they need to look into something that doesn't merit looking into by virtually anyone's standards 99% of the time.

I'm a professional educator, you arrogant jackass. AKA the sort of person you should be consulting regarding at least some things related to means and methods of how schools are supposed to function. I'm not pulling things out from where the sun don't shine regarding Teaching 101 like you are.

And let me tell the same thing any one like me would tell you about Aizawa. The man is a bigger teaching scrub than Kakashi. And it makes me cringe how much people bend over backwards to justify his bullshit, and there is plenty of that in this story, which is the reason I don't like it more than I do, and I really do want to like it more, because it's been an interesting premise so far, and I enjoy that it started partly because someone wanted Peter to catch a break and I like the interactions between the different characters. I like how at least one version of Peter is finally allowed a break and acknowledgement after decades of the same stupid song and dance of his life sucking because comic book companies think success is a matter of following a formula. But those things, I would rather discuss with I know nothing and Zaru. You have proven both stubborn, ignorant, and very misinformed and naive about the educational process and everything that has to go from behind the desk and don't even have the good sense to ask or look for information on the matter and just try to justify what happens in canon with any idiotic handwave you could think and make Aizawa out to be justified in everything he does.

So what if you don't care about being banned? What you should care is about being taken seriously and listened to. Acting like an arrogant entitled brat like several of my students have been is not going to make me want to take you seriously or treat you like an adult. Respect goes a long way in being listened to. You want to act like an immature brat, I'll treat you like one. You want to converse like an adult and work things out civilly, you aren't doing yourself any favors trying to justify being a jackass.
 
Last edited:
Violation of Rule 3: Be Civil - Your approach to this argument has not been acceptable.
I'm a professional educator, you arrogant jackass. AKA the sort of person you should be consulting regarding at least some things related to means and methods of how schools are supposed to function. I'm not pulling things out from where the sun don't shine regarding Teaching 101 like you are.

Then perhaps as part of your "professional educator" course, they should have covered reading comprehension. I've never, not once in the entirety of this thread, or the thread on SB or this conversation ever said that Aizawa and Mirko"not asking why he talks" had anything to do with proper "teaching 101". I promise you, there's no lesson involved in their lack of curiosity.

Rather my statement is that neither of the two characters in question would BOTHER to ASK given their personalities and that Peter isn't important enough in their lives to WARRANT even the inkling of looking past their presumptions at this juncture.

Nothing to do at all with educational merits, rather, personalities and character traits, which is kind of an important thing in a "character driven narrative".

For example I would be much more pleasant if I wasn't a "condescending arrogant jackass" but at the same time it wouldn't be me behind the keyboard. It would in all due likelyhood be someone much nicer, and likely gifted with a charming smile and a great deal more hair on their heads. Just the same as Aizawa would be a much better teacher if he asked but it wouldn't be him doing the asking rather the hand puppet I'd use to replace him for the cameras just long enough to spit the words out as my hand fiddles about to make him do as I wish.

The ONLY THING I said that was part of teaching 101 was "Not failing an entire class before the first day is done" which admittedly as you accuse, I did infact pull "out of my ass" but perhaps if its not part of the curriculum of "teaching 101" someone should consider adding it in because Aizawa clearly needed the reminder.
 
Last edited:
Then perhaps as part of your "professional educator" course, they should have covered reading comprehension. I've never, not once in the entirety of this thread, or the thread on SB or this conversation ever said that Aizawa and Mirko"not asking why he talks" had anything to do with proper "teaching 101" Rather that neither of the two characters in question would BOTHER to ASK given their personalities and that Peter isn't important enough in their lives to WARRANT even the inkling of looking past their presumptions at this juncture.

Nothing to do at all with educational merits, rather, personalities and character traits, which is kind of an important thing in a "character driven narrative".

For example I would be much more pleasant if I wasn't a "condescending arrogant jackass" but at the same time it wouldn't be me behind the keyboard, someone much nicer, and likely gifted with a charming smile and long hair. Just the same as Aizawa would be a much better teacher if he asked but it wouldn't be him doing the asking rather the hand puppet I'd use to replace him to spit the words out as my hand fiddles about to make him do as I wish.

The ONLY THING I said that was part of teaching 101 was "Not failing an entire class before the first day is done" which admittedly as you accuse I did, infact pull "out of my ass" but perhaps if its not part of the curriculum of "teaching 101" someone should consider adding it in because Aizawa clearly needed the reminder.

Asking questions regarding student behavior is standard operating procedure for teachers, has been for the past 20 years. Peter does something Aizawa doesn't like, yes, he should, in fact, be asking questions to understand his student more because that is part of his bloody duties. Instead, he goes and works off his own assumptions and biases instead of trying to learn more by getting to know his students, and goes doing some criminal investigation type thing on the side because he's too much of a chuuni to do things the sensible way. Him having this sort of flaw? I can roll with that. Because that's the sort of thing that should lead to a moment of realization later on for Aizawa and actually double down and improve his skills as a teacher and look at himself and realize how much he still has to learn, because that would lead to growth for the character.

My biggest issue is that you just jumped to conclussions that I was just fanwanking Peter, and then doubled down on justifying your behavior instead of apologizing for not understanding why I said what I said. You were rude without any reason to be rude, you didn't even think of using "well, we kinda need to use the whole "poor communication kills" gag for some things we have planned for later, so don't worry about it." Instead, you thought I wanted Peter to be super important to them and to center themselves around him., when I was mentioning something that is one of the things we teachers are supposed to do in order to perform our duties.
 
Stop: Don't Do This
don't do this
This conversation that's been happening is now going to stop because it has crossed firmly over Rule 3: Be Civil.

@LD1449 your behavior across the posts on this page with both @RoyalNoises and Dechstreme have come together to convince me you need some time away from this thread because you have been getting far too up in arms about things and crossing over Rule 3: Be Civil, particularly in the way your responses have been driving others to respond. You have received a three day threadban but no points because of your lack of insults and that the intensity of your incivility is relatively minor.

@Dechstreme your post below is a problem.
I'm a professional educator, you arrogant jackass. AKA the sort of person you should be consulting regarding at least some things related to means and methods of how schools are supposed to function. I'm not pulling things out from where the sun don't shine regarding Teaching 101 like you are.

And let me tell the same thing any one like me would tell you about Aizawa. The man is a bigger teaching scrub than Kakashi. And it makes me cringe how much people bend over backwards to justify his bullshit, and there is plenty of that in this story, which is the reason I don't like it more than I do, and I really do want to like it more, because it's been an interesting premise so far, and I enjoy that it started partly because someone wanted Peter to catch a break and I like the interactions between the different characters. I like how at least one version of Peter is finally allowed a break and acknowledgement after decades of the same stupid song and dance of his life sucking because comic book companies think success is a matter of following a formula. But those things, I would rather discuss with I know nothing and Zaru. You have proven both stubborn, ignorant, and very misinformed and naive about the educational process and everything that has to go from behind the desk and don't even have the good sense to ask or look for information on the matter and just try to justify what happens in canon with any idiotic handwave you could think and make Aizawa out to be justified in everything he does.

So what if you don't care about being banned? What you should care is about being taken seriously and listened to. Acting like an arrogant entitled brat like several of my students have been is not going to make me want to take you seriously or treat you like an adult. Respect goes a long way in being listened to. You want to act like an immature brat, I'll treat you like one. You want to converse like an adult and work things out civilly, you aren't doing yourself any favors trying to justify being a jackass.
The staff on SV understand being frustrated at other users. We have also decided in terms of applying Rule 3 that being frustrated is not an excuse to attack as you do in the opening and ending paragraph of this post. The way you went about this argument has not been civil and I see no reason to let it continue. You have received 25 points and a three day threadban.

I hope everyone else has a nice day!

I will now unlock the thread.
 
Yikes, I was wondering why the thread suddenly updated. I didn't expect this.

But seriously, don't bring your personal grudges here. People are here to enjoy the story and the discussion that follows. Keep in mind the words you type and try to not be a douche to others. If you don't disagree with another person's view on things, don't flame them or anything of that nature.

I know I'm not the Mods, but I much prefer everyone has a fun time here.
 
Good grief, what happened while I wasn't paying attention? Let's change the subject.

Thinking about it, I can't remember if Peter ever called it the Peter Tingle in the MCU movies. Wasn't that what Aunt May was calling it? Or am I misremembering that?
 
Back
Top