- Location
- USA
[X] [Gender] Egalitarian Society
[X] [Government] Elder Lead
[X] [Religion] Many Gods
[X] [Region] C
[X] [Government] Elder Lead
[X] [Religion] Many Gods
[X] [Region] C
I've seen enough hentai to know where this is goingIt's not a terrible area, but I already think that I can see what will happen if we end up there, in terms of our culture.
I for once would rather not focus on having a massive uniform army that always ends up happening.We could have a goddess as our religious figure, too, even without matriarchy.
And can we please not do Japan?
It's not a terrible area, but I already think that I can see what will happen if we end up there, in terms of our culture.
Because Island nations are best. I love having a strong navy. Eventually.
I for once would rather not focus on having a massive uniform army that always ends up happening.
You mean until we get tired of getting overran by the large armies from Nomads and hire and then train a massive army because SV hates losing.I... don't understand?
I'm just saying that i think Japan isn't the best place. We can be smaller in other areas too. The Tarim Basin, near D, would lead to a smaller population focused around city-states, likely with a high trade focus.
You mean until we get tired of getting overran by the large armies from Nomads and hire and then train a massive army because SV hates losing.
I mean I like to start somewhere like the Nile yes, but SV will determine to go anti slavery and focus on drowning everyone with population numbers, ever single time.And the Tian Shan Mountains are chopped liver, eh? XD
More seriously, I can understand that. But it's not necessarily going to work that way. Plus, I think that the Ganges Delta is a really good location.
Means where going to rip ourselves apart.There is a reason the game information encourages critical thinking. Voting purely on preference can be detrimental to your survival.
I mean I like to start somewhere like the Nile yes, but SV will determine to go anti slavery and focus on drowning everyone with population numbers, ever single time.
Which if the Op is being truthful about this.
Means where going to rip ourselves apart.
[X] [Gender] Egalitarian Society
[X] [Government] Elder Lead
[X] [Religion] Nature
[X] [Region] G
Large populations without good communications tend to be unstable, and most large empires start ripping when they get large populace, now Slavery is of course not an answer for this problem, but it tends to concentrate the power struggles to elites rather then different nations effectively forming inside us and deciding that they don't like each other (in group Vs out group sucks).Just curious (not that I disagree) why do you see being anti-slavery and building a huge population as leading to ripping ourselves apart. I'm kinda confused on your reasoning. Not disagreeing with you, but mind elaborating?
Good SV's love of boats over roads will be helpful when/if we choose that then.Guys, picking Japan means being stuck isolated until you have oceanworthy boats.
Good SV's love of boats over roads will be helpful when/if we choose that then.
Hmm... @Arthellion will there be other tribes in regions we choose? Any purely isolationist locations?
India would be the second best start on the Asia map, middleeast maybe better if we can get the nile dealta but.... I kinda want easy boundaries to defend from for mid game, and an Island is the best thing for that.Why is it so terrible if we choose, say, India? Besides a large population space, and the mentioned assumptions?