*after the hugging*
Blaidd became a curse that plagued Lady Ranni, yet in madness, gave himself to her. I've made a grave misjudgement. And I thought myself a capable war counselor… I'll catch up with you soon enough, Blaidd. When I do, I only hope you'll accept my apology.
Blaidd, and Iji both... Art willing to give too much to me.
Yet they both understand. What lieth beyond the dark path...
That I must betray everything, and rid the world of what came before.
Ah, should I add thee to the list?
Ranni is just as much a character in the narrative as us and has no control over it, so I don't think that there's any need for revealing ourselves
I'm interested in character interactions and how we can affect them due to our decisions , not in being a direct character in a story.What I mean by controlling the narrative is that she will be the one explaining to Malenia, therefor, all information in that case will be filtrated by her own prejudices and opinions.
We already have a case of this right there, she is describing pour control in a very negative way, implying that Malenia is but a puppet on strings, and that we are no better or worse than the Greater Will due to that.
Never underestimate how much control you can have on information when only one side gets to tell it. Just a difference of some words can do a lot.*
We are better served by revealing ourselves than by letting her be the sole source of exposition and potentially poison the well for later, a thing that, as I said, she is already doing.
*For example, something I saw recently on the news:
If I tell you: *Thousands of people have manifested against something in a city*, how do you feel about it?
You see the word thousands, you will instantly begin to think that it was several thousands, that it was big.
Now if I tell you: *1 500 people have manifested against something in the capital city of Greece*, how do you feel about that one?
1 500 is not much, not for a manifestation in the middle of a capital, you see it as not that big of an event.
The two headlines are for the same event, and I did see the both of them.
See how that works?
Are you sure you want to let Ranni, a woman we know is hostile to being like us and the very idea of being puppeted, to be the one to explain us?
That's asking for problems, there is a high chance she poison the well and makes some future decision harder to pass, even involuntarily.
Better to show our hand ourself.
I'm interested in character interactions and how we can affect them due to our decisions , not in being a direct character in a story.
Your opinion is your own
No one is pretending that we don't exist, I just think that shoving it into their faces just like that makes little sense.Problem is, the cat is out of the box, we are a character in the story, and nothing can change that.
We have been acknowledged, and Ranni will not remove the fact that we are separate from Malenia by being the one to explain, in fact, she will probably tell Malenia to try and not listen to us.
That's literally one of her main thing, the desire to remove all outside interventions from the world.
You won't get us to stop existing just by trying to pretend we don't.
No one is pretending that we don't exist, I just think that shoving it into their faces just like that makes little sense.
If Malenia needs us, she can ask, and we'll answer.
i think that's what Nyarky is trying to do. if Ranni gets the chance to explain it, she will make paint us in a bad light. to make it so that Malenia won't listen to us, let alone ask in the first place.
just trying to explain "we are just some watcher, not some hostile force trying to control her" rather than whatever Ranni might spin up.
No one is pretending that we don't exist, I just think that shoving it into their faces just like that makes little sense.
I'm interested in character interactions and how we can affect them due to our decisions , not in being a direct character in a story.
I want to put the ball in Malenia's court, not take control as every other vote does.
You did say that you didn't want to be a character in a story, that is saying you don't want to acknowledge we exists.
Malenia is her own person with her own life and she is the one in control, what you're referring to is Ranni trying to paint us as a malevolent force, and that made you try to explain that we're just watchers etc.
That's not what the two posts say.
The fist says that you do not want to be a character in a story, so that you do not want us to be acknowledged in the story.
The second is you telling you do not want to pretend we don't exist.
That is a perfect example of why I don't want to let Ranni be the one the explain, you may well have thought you were talking about only my vote, but your phrasing was not telling that, it was telling that you didn't want us to be an entity at all.
And why do you not want to explain ourselves?
We are going to have a relation with Malenia, no matter what, Ranni made sure of that.
Refusing to acknowledge that is not going to lead to any form of effective cooperation.
You seem to think that my vote is incredibly intrusive, for some reason, it is not, it is just some informations, it's not as if I voted for something like this:
[Nope] Take direct control of Malenia and begin explaining your life goals to Ranni, all the while acting as if her body was naught but a puppet.
That would be what you seem to treat my vote as.
Why are you so insistent that we have to directly influence anything as a character?
It's Malenia's quest, not quest of Voices inside Malenia's head.
I don't pretend that we don't exist, I just don't think that as a character without prior history and being a literal amalgamation of votes for one option or another, we have a logical reason to act like that
Binah quest was the one where we were like that, Ciel's wasn't.Sorry to say, but from experience form Naron's quests, no.
This is not Malenia's story, not directly, this is the story of how we guide her.
Binah quest was the one where we were like that, Ciel's wasn't.
What I'm trying to say is that we don't have to so the same thing.
No point arguing, better to wait for next Monday