7734
Trust and verify.
- Location
- Philmont
Okay, What aesthetic are we going for? This also bears some relevance as to where the rangefinders and fire control directors go as well. Should emulate the British and United States who opted for the office building look with either tripod or lattice masts? Or perhaps the German industrial/Bauhaus (ie Scharnhorst) look? Follow the artistic fads like the Italians and go Art Deco/Futurist curvy tower mast? Or dare we go the Full Pagoda™ and make the Fusos weep with envy?
Pagoda masts are right out: they cause massive strain on the hull and can excaberate keel twist. They also add a mess of concentrated topweight that ruins any bad-weather capability the ship has. Let the Fusous keep their milstones; we need something better. A tripod spotting mast isn't a bad design plan, and we do need a good point to put our rangefinder. Going for a more blocky superstructure would be my choice, something maybe thirty or forty feet tall, running under our mast and back to and around the stack(s) and to a rear point where we taper to the interlock of the rear turret. This gives us plenty of room for personal requirements, fleet staff, communications rooms, backups, and balconies where we can slap on flak later.
Not sure if that area can realistically fit two pairs in the way I C&Ped them in, and I doubt it's a great place to put them, but ... twelve is a really large number of 12cm turrets to stick on a treaty battleship.
Honestly, my recommendation is to just delete the casement deck entirely and adopt the same trick the Americans and Germans used, making a double row where the inboard layer is partially superfiring over the outboard layer. A double 12cm gun would need a turret casement anyway, so it makes a certain amount of sense.
As for the four turrets mounted below the casement deck in the opening pic? Yeah, that spot is terrible due to the amount of spray it gets, plus the issue of cramming the guns in too tight.