- Location
- Texas, US
I was thinking of a prequel starring Nikki Wood.
But it wouldn't be able to run for very long since we know she dies after 7 years of slaying
What about Shepard Book?I'm curious if people consider Whedon to have a good history with black leads.
From what I recall of his career, we have the street-wise Gunn doing a deal with the devil because he felt he wasn't smart enough for Wolfram & Hart, Kendra got killed pretty quick, Triplett didn't amount to much, Avengers didn't feature War Machine, Justice League (not his formulation, but still) had a black lead who was pretty much a quadruple amputee in a mech suit which also goes for Deathlock...
I think Mack from Agents of SHIELD might be his most positively portrayed and pushed character, with Zoe as the no.2? And I guess Mack is more of something his brother worked on...
Regardless, here's an article I read a while back discussing some of Whedon's missteps as a producer...
Would you consider Shepard a lead? He felt more of a supporting character to me in the one season of Firefly. Plus he died from an offscreen attack in Serenity...
What do we even know about this besides it having a black lead?Once, on discord, I discussed the idea of a more modern reboot of Buffy.
Everything we discussed sounds better than this.
What do we even know about this besides it having a black lead?
It's supposed to be 'inclusive'. That's it.
But that's fine. I don't need to know anything else. It'll be terrible. I have foreseen it.
From what I recall of his career, we have the street-wise Gunn doing a deal with the devil because he felt he wasn't smart enough for Wolfram & Hart...
Help my eyes are rolling so hard I'm getting friction burns! Oww and I just cut myself on something edgey!
I kinda think it's probably linked to people not wanting to move on. To get older.Seriously, why do we have to reboot everything? Why can't we just have sequels instead. You know, the Next Slayer, the new team of Ghostbusters, the Enterprise captain AFTER Picard rather than going back and redoing Kirk, etc... I know that all stories are retold, but can we not just keep telling the same part of the story?
Seriously, why do we have to reboot everything? Why can't we just have sequels instead. You know, the Next Slayer, the new team of Ghostbusters, the Enterprise captain AFTER Picard rather than going back and redoing Kirk, etc... I know that all stories are retold, but can we not just keep telling the same part of the story?
As I mentioned, I am not really sure this is a reboot at all. The article seems to conflate any sort of continuation of a series with rebooting it. Prison Break, X-Files, 24. These are not things which were rebooted, but the article has them as examples of reboots.Seriously, why do we have to reboot everything? Why can't we just have sequels instead. You know, the Next Slayer, the new team of Ghostbusters, the Enterprise captain AFTER Picard rather than going back and redoing Kirk, etc... I know that all stories are retold, but can we not just keep telling the same part of the story?
I like the changing of the main, its something that seems to be a new for remaking these 90's shows. I mean they did plan to redo rugrats and we are even having a kim possible live action at the moment.Nerx you've been pulling this "spout crazy shit" in the Titans thread and now you're doing it here. What is your deal?
Um...I feel by choosing a black lead they a loosing a lot of the basic premise. Buffy in the original hadn't had problems before vampires. Not real major ones. She was a valley girl type.
From what I understand, a black person can't live like that in the states because of racism. They are forced to live in ghettos and are shot. By the police all the time. Which means Buffy will already be used to watching for people wanting to kill her. Already used to the idea that life is going to be hell.
Unless they set. It somewhere other than the states, I don't see how it could recapture the feeling of the original Buffy. It might be good, but its all ready loosing a lot of the basic premise.
You mean aside using his position to cheat on his wife with young actresses?I can find out why you want him to stay in the shadows? I understand this is due to the fact that his style is outdated and not quite suitable for this time? Well, as progressive in 50 it is extremely regressive now.
Or did Joss do something terrible and now people want him not to be given work? I just do not follow the news of the industry at all.