Axis & Allies on the 8th Continent

A question was asked previously why the rich nations of Shamash were not subjugated by the European imperial powers. I have given it some thought and have prepared an answer.

Several factors explain how the Shamash nations preserved themselves.

First, Shamash was generally united under three great kingdoms: Atria, Carmel, and Nod. These kingdoms possessed competent, centralized administration and seasoned professional armies. Both Atria and Carmel had great intellectual traditions that translated well into martial contexts. Shamashi officers were celebrated for their emphasis on personal initiative in the manner of Germans or Israelis. The Carmelite caste society, which took a meritocratic approach to education, meanwhile produced excellent sailors and artillerists.

Second, despite a steep numerical disadvantage, Shamashi kingdoms embraced revolutions in military technology ahead of Europe. In some cases, this helped them conduct imperial conquests of their own. Shamash was first to the ironclad, first to the armored railroad, and first to the armed airship. Liberal attitudes toward European immigration also meant that Shamash had access to a pool of Western talent and perspective.

Third, Shamashi powers cultivated specific Western powers as allies to balance potential threats. Despite recurring problems with Confederate filibusters, the Atrians exploited their commercial relationship with the American South to convince Richmond to intercede for them with London and Paris. Carmel similarly courted the Federal (American) and especially the Austro-Hungarian leadership.

Fourth, until the early twentieth century, "Old Worlders" suffered badly from Shamashi diseases to which they had neither immunity nor reliable remedy. This limited the extent to which would-be invaders could be successful.
 
Still working on this. Got a bit of a timeline going, accessible on my Google Docs, here.

I'm starting The Great War series and listening through from 1914 forward.

Looking for feedback on the first major challenges:
  • If the Germans swing wide through Belgium and the Netherlands unopposed (because Belgium did not gain independence early in the previous century), is there any way that France holds out? I could always say they rushed troops to the front from their expanded colonial holdings on the new map.
  • What if the Germans don't find the Russian battle plan on the body of a dead officer after Gumbinnen? Is it reasonable to assume that the Russians and Germans could have fought a less conclusive Tannenburg, leading the Germans to rush even more of their troop strength east?
Are you saying that the low countries have literally no mobilized forces?

IDK if the Schlieffen Plan could have worked even with the intended number of troops, which it didn't have anyway, it relied on a lot of things going right including infrastructure being left fully intact by retreating French and Belgian armies.

The Russians had a lot of issues at Tannenburg but there's no particular reason to believe the envelopment had to happen, it almost didn't IRL.

My understanding's that the success at Tannenburg was thought to have encouraged Germany to send troops east, they committed to a campaign to take back east Prussia that might not have been seen as reasonable otherwise. Before the success in the east the plan was to knock out France since Russia can always trade space for time.
 
Last edited:
In this setting, the United Netherlands, which has problematic relations with the British, decides not to oppose the Germans. Probably some Belgian Fran's tireurs do resist, tearing up track or sabotaging engines and rolling stock, and perhaps some German reprisals shock world opinion, but overall they are not much impeded.

Eventually, the Russians are smashed, but they start the war with a decent enough showing that the Germans are distracted from France. Austria-Hungary ends up having more success than they did IRL.
 
I'm kind of wondering at this point whether, without the Belgian impediment, the Germans would roll right into Paris in August, or at least inflict so many casualties on the French as to cripple their war-making ability.

The more research I do, the more I become convinced that it will be much easier to explain superior Russian performance than French.
 
Back
Top