Remove ads

Avengers: Endgame

already huh? Seems a bit early.

I don't like how they showed Scott Lang though. It kinda makes his ending in Antman & The Wasp kinda pointless.
 
Last edited:
Kokurokoki said:
already huh?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I mean it makes sense to drop it now, since the first Infinity War trailer dropped late November last year? And unlike with Infinity War there was no leaked footage this time around.

Spartan Altego said:
The part with Tony is quite strong, the rest of the trailer doesn't really offer much.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I think they're holding off on showing anything substantial because it's still several months away from release.
 
Dig the ronin suit for Clint, also I hope the max out on destruction sfx. Time to let loose and give the vs section what they want, I want carol to bust two planets.
 
The trailer's a bit weak IMO, hope the next one does it better.

HALF THE UNIVERSE IS GONE. Earth should be on fire right now.
 
Endgame was hidden in a shot the Russo brothers put out months ago, but nobody thought that was really it and instead spent months theorizing about "Annihilation". Well played.

I'm almost positive that it's going to be Captain Marvel saving the day though given how much she's being hyped.
 
Renewal said:
Eh? I feel like this was the entire point of his ending—to play a part here. The big question is how he got out on his own, but him being in A4 felt like a given.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Yeah but I feel like its a bit unnecessary. Like by teasing Scott Lang this early we already know that he's going to get out, instead of leaving his fate ambiguous like they should have at the end of A&W. Marvel knows people will go out to see their movies no matter what, they don't need to spoil plot details this much at the cost of the impact those details might have on the film.
 
Kokurokoki said:
Like by teasing Scott Lang this early we already know that he's going to get out, instead of leaving his fate ambiguous like they should have at the end of A&W.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don't think Scott's fate was ever ambiguous, most people knew he was gonna get out in time for Avengers 4, and several people saw both A4 set photos and the A4 concept art which had him with the rest of the team.
 
See the real comedy about killing any sort of ambiguity of fate of characters will be when they release the trailer for the next Spiderman movie later this weekend. :V
 
Kokurokoki said:
Yeah but I feel like its a bit unnecessary. Like by teasing Scott Lang this early we already know that he's going to get out, instead of leaving his fate ambiguous like they should have at the end of A&W. Marvel knows people will go out to see their movies no matter what, they don't need to spoil plot details this much at the cost of the impact those details might have on the film.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Is the reveal that minor side character whose many around for light relief and who everyone could assume would be in the film really a spoiler that will impact the movie? It's just Ant-Man.
 
Of note, Scott's appearance is also the only point in the trailer that's remotely funny. They're using the (funny) appearance of the mostly light-hearted side character to indicate that the movie isn't going to be all doom and gloom.
 
In other news, "Endgame" is such a fucking boring title. They had the gall to act like it was some big fucking mystery that would spoil something if revealed and it's just some generic Subtitle Generator word.
 
VolantRedX said:
Is the reveal that minor side character
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'd say he's at the very least a major side character, because I feel like the Quantum Realm is gonna play some part in all of this.

Spartan Altego said:
In other news, "Endgame" is such a fucking boring title. They had the gall to act like it was some big fucking mystery that would spoil something if revealed and it's just some generic Subtitle Generator word.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Hey, it may be a generic subtitle generator word, but it's a generic subtitle generator word that was at least foreshadowed by one line of dialogue. :V
 
chibipoe said:
Sorry, there is no such film. :p IMDB lies. Highlander has one movie that achieved a strong following. That is all. Like hell does that end to Connor's story exist.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

True that. Though I always wondered why they started at 2. Maybe it was like Star Wars Episode IV, where they intended to go back and make a prequel.

On a more serious note, Endgame is a fine name. It's not standout, but I don't know what would be 'standout.' Annihilation wasn't in the cards honestly, since the Annihilation wave would take the focus off Thanos, and... it really isn't time to take the focus off Thanos.
 
Enhas said:
Endgame was hidden in a shot the Russo brothers put out months ago, but nobody thought that was really it and instead spent months theorizing about "Annihilation". Well played.

I'm almost positive that it's going to be Captain Marvel saving the day though given how much she's being hyped.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Well Marvel seems to want her to be their Superman and Sentry will never appear in MCU because, well, look at him.
 
Spartan Altego said:
In other news, "Endgame" is such a fucking boring title. They had the gall to act like it was some big fucking mystery that would spoil something if revealed and it's just some generic Subtitle Generator word.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I heard that even the people making the film realized making the title a secret was a big mistake.
 
Trailers okay, but Endgame is kind of a meh subtitle. I mean, I get it is a reference to Dr. Strange's line in Infinity War, but for the big finale's suntitle it is a little bit of a letdown. Could have used anything else really and it would probably be better.
 
No punching, no jumping, no powers, no explosions, what was even the point?

:V
 
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top