Honestly kinda yes as the more accurate data we have the better we can track the spread and the less likely we are to be caught with our pants down by an unexpected interaction between the collapse fluid and Earths geography
Think of it as less a replacement for our methods and more something to have for when our methods fail.[] IDC Tracking Methods (-1 Public Leverage -25 Resources +5 Political Support)
This is not worth our time. If non-technological individuals are in the combat zone we are Doing It Wrong.
Unfortunately both cost PubL which we don't have in unlimited amounts.
I slightly disagree, as I feel we should probably withhold on something like that for now. NOt to dislike of Russia, but the can of worms it'll open.[] ALR-50 Sales (+3 Public Leverage +2 Private Leverage +50 Resources -10 Political Support -10 Public Support) (Substantial Increase in Russian Preparation)
This… could require a bit of political wrangling. I'm all for giving them the current design but our military overlords might need placating.
I mean...the Foundation goal is to save humans? Accurately estimating where danger is and how fast evacuations need to happen is sort of apart of that. I'd say it's something we should look into, and Persica could probably use the information for something. Maybe.
Ah I forgot to mention this. But yes, agreed with it. Our new russian pal is good to turn the other cheek in favor of realizing the dangers posed by this,[] Final Stage ELID (-2 Private Leverage)
We absolutely need this.
I doubt that we're far away enough that we wouldn't be able to do it, otherwise Rukia wouldn't have given the information, or would have said something. And I doubt that it'd be a large unit exchange big enough to make an impactful difference in troops.[] Unit Exchange (-1 Private Leverage)
[] Joint Expeditions (-3 Private Leverage)
Not keen on either of these. If nothing else the sheer geographical distance makes it unnecessary.
Really, their chances of 'winning' (if it can be called that) are slim, and I doubt that the sensible russians would love to see the rest of the world wiped out.After all, if they're the last ones standing, it can be said they've won (after a fashion).
[] Plan Net Neutral, Safety and Data
-[] Public
[] Public Data Sharing (+1 Public Leverage)
[] IDC Visor Licence (+2 Public Leverage +1 Private Leverage +25 Resources)
[] IDDS Technology Sales (+2 Public Leverage +1 Private Leverage +25 Resources)
[] Open Diplomatic Channels (+1 Public Leverage +1 Private Leverage -5 Political Support +5 Public Confidence)
[] ALR-50 Sales (+3 Public Leverage +2 Private Leverage +50 Resources -10 Political Support -10 Public Support) (Substantial Increase in Russian Preparation)
[] Extensive ELID Records (-2 Public Leverage +5 Political Support)
[] Extensive IDC Records (-2 Public Leverage +5 Political Support)
[] IDC Border Treaties (-1 Public Leverage)
[] CFR Shelter Experience (-4 Public Leverage -2 Private Leverage +8 Incremental Increase per Quarter -5 Public Confidence)
[] CFR Data Sharing (-1 Public Leverage)
-[] Private
[] Operational Data Sharing (+1 Private Leverage)
[] The American Question (+1 Private Leverage 1 Public Leverage)
[] Regional Responsibility (-1 Private Leverage)
[] Final Stage ELID (-2 Private Leverage)
Net Public: 0
Net Private: +2
Net Political Support: -5
Net Public Support: -10
Net Resources: +100
Net Public Confidence: 0
The above is what I'm looking at.
While the ALR sale is expensive to us, as long as we can kick out the 51 ASAP we should be able to placate the military and public.
Basically, we do a lot of building bridges and mutually beneficial stuff. Share a lot of data.
But nothing that can really be used against us.
Nope, you forgot to account for the Public Leverage from the American Question.Basically the plan I was making but I think you're spending more public leverage then we have.
I think it's -1. Someone double check me.
For the unit exchange, the problem is our military superiors being paranoid about Russian spies and vice versa.Well I've finally caught up to the thread and at a very interesting juncture as well. One question I have is why unit exchange seems to be off the table? While joint expeditions would definitely be way too much in geographical distance, unit exchange would be quite good for any incidents that occur on or near the border.
While a fair concern, isn't it being a private option mean that this proposal isn't going to be known by our superiors?For the unit exchange, the problem is our military superiors being paranoid about Russian spies and vice versa.
Also on this comment: Why is that the case? Kamikoshi Sorawo is very much a non-technological individual that we've sent into the combat zone. It seems like a mistake to me to completely dismiss this option when our primary expert on IDCs is very much not reliant on technology.[] IDC Tracking Methods (-1 Public Leverage -25 Resources +5 Political Support)
This is not worth our time. If non-technological individuals are in the combat zone we are Doing It Wrong.
Whups, missed that error. It's Political Support and Public Confidence.@Rukia for the ARL sales, is it Public Support or Public Confidence?
Because there's always a chance that our private dealings will be found out by our superiors. The four private options that I picked would probably not be considered treason or all *that* negatively. At least they are options that probably wont get us shot.While a fair concern, isn't it being a private option mean that this proposal isn't going to be known by our superiors?
As we are doing continually reminded our dismal failure to gets dolls up and running is very much Doing It Wrong.Also on this comment: Why is that the case? Kamikoshi Sorawo is very much a non-technological individual that we've sent into the combat zone. It seems like a mistake to me to completely dismiss this option when our primary expert on IDCs is very much not reliant on technology.
Though to be fair the detection is something that can probably be spread easily to the military at large, which is likely why it gains us +5 political support.As we are doing continually reminded our dismal failure to gets dolls up and running is very much Doing It Wrong.
At present we have humans on the front lines because that is all we have to work with. The sooner this is corrected the better.
Also the fact that they want our visors shows that the tech option is at least comparable to whatever they have developed. Given we have limited leverage it is something we can do without.
Frankly, I find myself in a viewpoint that resembles that. The objective is petty politics or paranoia. It isn't about border disputes or who owns what territory. It's about the fate of the human race, and if they can't see it, maybe they shouldn't be in charge of it.There is a real possibility Persica ends up couping the entirety of the EU after getting fed up with their political bullshit, backed by her iron legions and machine intelligences. The only concern, after all, is humanities survival.
I doubt that we'd be shot. Publicly dragged, maybe, but not that. Haven't we extended the 'hand of friendship' so to speak to the military? They'll be able to back us up if need be. Unless I accidentally just confused this for a different quest.Because there's always a chance that our private dealings will be found out by our superiors. The four private options that I picked would probably not be considered treason or all *that* negatively. At least they are options that probably wont get us shot.
Mhm. Can't dispute that, though if I may speak freely, I suggest we put a little more effort into connecting with other nations. They all have something to offer, I'm sure, and making a secret league of those who truly wish to carry out the objective of the Foundation (saving humanity) would be beneficial on an international scale. We already have plans to do so with the United States of America thanks to Russia, so why not extend our reaches.