And our darling Italian submarine...well, for now, I can neither confirm or deny things.
I am not asking you to confirm this until the update, buuuuut... could it be the Marconi class Leonardo da Vinci?
And our darling Italian submarine...well, for now, I can neither confirm or deny things.
Wasn't hood classed as a battlecruiser rather than a battleshipYeah I'm definitely guessing HMS Hood then as none of the others fit the bill with the Prince of Wales excluded, the extra info cements it even further I think considering how it matches up with HMS Hoods fate.
Whilst this makes me think...Please note that as a consequence of this fight (you fought against an enemy that proved even more formidable than yourself and paid the price of the pyrrhic victory) this British lass sank, and quite quickly at that, in the cold frigid waters of the Northern Atlantic, unfortunately precluding Prince of Wales, who went under in the Indian Ocean. More I cannot reveal, unfortunately.
Yeah, the Hood, there's one big problem with the idea. HMS Hood is a battlecruiser. So she can't be the Battleship option.Yeah I'm definitely guessing HMS Hood then as none of the others fit the bill with the Prince of Wales excluded, the extra info cements it even further I think considering how it matches up with HMS Hoods fate.
I am not asking you to confirm this until the update, buuuuut... could it be the Marconi class Leonardo da Vinci?
Hmm you're technically right but there's a major issue with that in that it's the only ship that fits what Ojou has described and given away. None of the Royal Navies true battleships per say fit the bill at all and Hood is close enough/get's misidentified enough that she probably counts. Also I find myself bemused to this day that the Royal Navy classed the largest warship in the world a Battlecruiser.Whilst this makes me think...
Yeah, the Hood, there's one big problem with the idea. HMS Hood is a battlecruiser. So she can't be the Battleship option.
I think it means a British ship of the first WW. The blockade of Germany, then convoy schuz and then the first battle against the German Imperial Navy, this battle was a pyrrhic victory for the RN.The pride of the Navy, a battleship without compare, you were spent on the distant blockade before being assigned to escort convoys. In the end, you fought against an enemy that proved even more formidable than yourself and paid the price of the pyrrhic victory:
Yes, I also believe that all are WW1.I've also got a feeling all of them are ww1 era rather than ww2
To be honest I think they are all WW1 ships. It can't be the Hood, because she was only finished after WW1.
Scharnhorst was a battleship. While it is possible to argue between fast battleship and battlecruiser, mere heavy cruisers are not in the same league as capital ships.German heavy cruiser is probably Scharnhorst, given she was a raider, fought for the Kaisermarine, and was sunk by two battlecruisers that were faster and better armed than her.
…one of the King George V fast battleships? OTL only the Prince of Wales was lost and that was in the Pacific. However it is plausible that if Tirpitz had deployed one or more of the KGVs would have been part of the squadron sent to fight her.4. Battleship - ????? - (Not yet guessed)
- Fast, compared to prior ships of her nation.
- Post-Escalator Clause.
[X] The pride of the Navy, a battleship without compare, you were spent on the distant blockade before being assigned to escort convoys. In the end, you fought against an enemy that proved even more formidable than yourself and paid the price of the pyrrhic victory: Against this rot the Abyss seems to be however, history will change - your efforts and skills will ensure total victory, irrespective of everything thrown your way, burning away the shame of that defeat.
"A representation of what never was in this cursed world, you are a true aberration."
Closest fit would be HMS Hood… except Hood was a battlecruiser, not a battleship.
Scharnhorst was a battleship. While it is possible to argue between fast battleship and battlecruiser, mere heavy cruisers are not in the same league as capital ships.
…one of the King George V fast battleships? OTL only the Prince of Wales was lost and that was in the Pacific. However it is plausible that if Tirpitz had deployed one or more of the KGVs would have been part of the squadron sent to fight her.
I was referring to the SMS Scharnhorst of the Imperial German Navy, an armored cruiser that was sunk off the Falklands during WW1 by two British battlecruisers. The battleship Scharnhorst was part of the Kriegsmarine and wouldn't fit with the for God and Kaiser part of the hint.
All five of the King George V ships finished after 1939, which means they don't fit due to only the Submarine and Light Cruiser finishing during WW2. However, the problem is that there was no British Battleship which finished construction post-Escalator Clause yet before WW2.…one of the King George V fast battleships? OTL only the Prince of Wales was lost and that was in the Pacific. However it is plausible that if Tirpitz had deployed one or more of the KGVs would have been part of the squadron sent to fight her.