- Location
- Texas
@Telamon, on reading back I'm actually somewhat unsure now, because I get the impression you thought I meant both siege engines and a wall around Nola by "siegeworks", clearly a poor choice of wording on my part. I just meant a stockade with a ditch. Would an action dedicated to this still stretch our manpower impracticably far in this turn, alongside building the Winter camp?
This is as much for curiosity's sake as wanting to base a plan on it. I'm fairly happy with "Bristling Mound, Even Trench", but I'm interested as to what the full extent of our Legion's engineering abilities actually are, as it might come in handy in future.
It sounds more like Telamon thought you were asking "would building a winter camp and siege engines interfere with each other, then realized you meant "would building a winter camp and siege fortifications interfere?"
What it comes down to is that engines require a relatively small amount of very precise, skillful construction, whereas both winter camps and fortifications involve a great deal of earthmoving, bulk construction, and the like. This means that winter camps and fortifications compete for the same resources when it comes time for construction.
By contrast, the siege engines are a product for a few dozen of the legion's most skilled woodworkers out of, say, hundreds. Removing them from the construction of the fortifications won't slow them down much because they can't do much compared to the sheer bulk of the task. Less of a conflict.
Yes, @Simon_Jester has an accurate reading of the situation. Siegeworks would compete for the same time and resources as the Camp, whereas building the siege engines can pretty safely be done simultaneously with camp-building.
Last edited: