There is tactical voting and then there is that.

When do the votes close? I ask because you're basically condoning what feels like rigging the votes. At this point anything but the true magic votes should win off principle.

Edit: Like how does this even translate? Which vote wins if you refuse to split the vote? Do both win?

No. True Magic should die as a plan right now. It's disqualified or OP is exposed as bias.

Okay seriously. What is your problem?

I guess this proves you will never be satisfied with any attempt at compromise because the only reason the True Magic vote is splitting is because you keep whining and complaining that it's not your vote.

"Oh it's OP! Oh it's OP! Waaahhh! People want to make use of a trait that the QM themselves offered up as a viable choice and I don't like it! I'm going to keep pestering and bothering everyone until the voting system itself breaks and my choice wins by default! Yaaaaay!"

The reason I'm not voting for magnificent bastard is because we're playing in the middle of a Death Game where our bullshit can get people killed! I'm not voting for sunshine because role-playing in the middle of a Death Game is kinda fruity. I mean, it's not as bad as the bastard one, but I would still prefer the option that gives a mechanical advantage to saving everyone's lives.


Hell, if given the option, I'd gladly vote for something like.

[] "True Magic" first choice, "Sunshine in a bottle" second choice.

Because otherwise I'd have to keep watching everyone else's tactical voting to keep bastard from winning.

We haven't even left char gen and even seen how the actual game and setting look for god's sake.
 
Yeah, I'm going to sleep. It's way too late for me to be up for one, and I don't want to accidentally double, triple, or quadruple down.
 
I am all for True Magic. I don't care which version.
I thought we had to change to V2 because there was something wrong with the last version.

I have been in Quests where the GM finds something they don't like with a plan and cancels it so another version has to be made, but that does not seem to be the case here.
 
My problem is that being able to vote like that ruins the integrity of system. One voter, one plan.

That's it.

Especially in cases like this where the only difference between the plans is one thing and voters are voting for both of them so at least one of them wins. That pings alllll kinds of red flags.
 
I accept being called fruity. It kind of is, but it just seems more like a thing a normal videogamer would do when playing a game, and it amuses me that's a Kayaba watches and rewards that behavior.

I think most people could find comfort in being a person that isn't themself, once in a while. Or always, if it comes to that.
 
My problem is that being able to vote like that ruins the integrity of system. One voter, one plan.

That's it.

Especially in cases like this where the only difference between the plans is one thing and voters are voting for both of them so at least one of them wins. That pings alllll kinds of red flags.
I would love to offer brilliant insight but I am not awake enough for this. I'll leave patching this situation up to you guys and when I'm back tomorrow and I see someone arguing about something still, then I'll try to defuse the situation.

I am off to sleep now.

EDIT: I wrote "sober" there on accident to describe what my state is not and realized it was a mistake. Haven't been drinking I'm just exhausted and I think this proves it. Fixed it now.
 
Last edited:
The reason I'm not voting for magnificent bastard is because we're playing in the middle of a Death Game where our bullshit can get people killed!
Again, it kinda depends on what our goal or objective is?

If its 'Be a selfish bastard and let everyone else do the work' then yes, we are indeed an asshole. If we want to form a strong raid group (because thats the only feasible way to 'win' the game) and get rid of the gankers / PKers? Then not so much.

Looking at it from a more pessimistic / cold viewpoint, lives are very much a finite resource in a deathgame. And no good chessmaster would foolishly throw away their own pieces when the opponent has an unending supply of pieces. (Kayaba and his floors / the entire game being the opponent)
 
Last edited:
[X] Plan Sunshine in a Bottle

Wow, okay my choice would have been for the true magic path. The ability to glitch the system so unique effects could occur like permanent aoe spells, healing potions that tame monsters, spoke to me.

Due to the rewrite dividing the vote, I don't like the rewrite. I choose strategic voting.

I hate Magnificent Bastard because it is similar to sunshine, and mocks parodies of dungeon crawls and open worlds.
 
Last edited:
Similar but not identical. You can't even fairly say which vote wins in that case. The one with more votes, even though they seem to be counted together? Like, legit what is this fuckery?
Is this really such a problem? I'd let you do the same if you asked. Oh, well. @Trondason. You've got to choose. People are getting mad at me.

Votes close tomorrow, because I don't want to rush things at character creation.
That would only happen if every single person voting for V1 changes their vote to include a vote for v2, AND if every single new person who might vote for V2 decides to vote for V1 as well.

Approval voting of plans is basically what this is, and in the slim chance that a tie DOES result, then there is a tie break. Because splitting the vote is just as bad. Dooming a plan that might have otherwise won to failure, simply because not everyone who voted for 1 got the memo that 2 was made.
My problem is that being able to vote like that ruins the integrity of system. One voter, one plan.

That's it.

Especially in cases like this where the only difference between the plans is one thing and voters are voting for both of them so at least one of them wins. That pings alllll kinds of red flags.
It would only ping red flags if only one side was allowed to use approval voting. To bring in politics because that is the only situation I'm familiar with involving voting, it'd be like if the Democrats could vote "Democrat", but the Republicans had to vote specific people, so the generalize "Democrat" won over any specified people.

This is not the case here. You are allowed to vote for several plans as well, if there are other plans you would like to support alongside your main plan. You could vote for ALL of them if you want (though that would render such a vote useless), or vote for all except one, giving that plan an effective -1 vote.
 
I hate Magnificent Bastard because it is similar to sunshine, and mocks parodies of dungeon crawls and open worlds.
...How? Also, people trying to paint me as an unreasonable asshole, bro, that wasn't a compromise. It was a full out sweeping of the board. \

Notice I have no problem with anything except that. Sunshine is fine. I prefer Magnificent Bastard but I wouldn't mind Sunshine.

I just feel like it'd be more interesting playing an actual adult main character in one of these quests for once and I'm interested in seeing if Birdie can show the difference in mindset that there would be.
 
[X] Plan Sunshine in a Bottle

Wow, okay my choice would have been for the true magic path. The ability to glitch the system so unique effects could occur like permanent aoe spells, healing potions that tame monsters, spoke to me.

Due to the rewrite dividing the vote, I don't like the rewrite. I choose strategic voting.

I hate Magnificent Bastard because it is similar to sunshine, and mocks parodies of dungeon crawls and open worlds.
How does the rewrite not have everything you said?

I am OK with you choosing another plan, but I am not sure what you dislike in the TM2 plan and am a little confused.
 
Because splitting the vote is just as bad. Dooming a plan that might have otherwise won to failure, simply because not everyone who voted for 1 got the memo that 2 was made.
You must also take into consideration that some people just vote and then leave until the GM updates, despite the fact that another plan may come along that they like better.
It would only ping red flags if only one side was allowed to use approval voting. To bring in politics because that is the only situation I'm familiar with involving voting, it'd be like if the Democrats could vote "Democrat", but the Republicans had to vote specific people, so the generalize "Democrat" won over any specified people.

This is not the case here. You are allowed to vote for several plans as well, if there are other plans you would like to support alongside your main plan.
Pretty sure this is only allowed for True Magic and True Magic v2 due to their similarity. Though I may be wrong.
 
I was voting for Sunshine and magic
You must also take into consideration that some people just vote and then leave until the GM updates, despite the fact that another plan may come along that they like better.

Pretty sure this is only allowed for True Magic and True Magic v2 due to their similarity. Though I may be wrong.

And last I checked, there is no rule againt that.
 
You must also take into consideration that some people just vote and then leave until the GM updates, despite the fact that another plan may come along that they like better.
That was what I was refering to, so I'm not sure if you are agreeing with me, or completely misunderstand what I was trying to say.
Pretty sure this is only allowed for True Magic and True Magic v2 due to their similarity. Though I may be wrong.
Well, I think it should be allowed for all plans. We'll have to wait for @Birdsie to wake up in a couple hours however, since he is too sleepy to give a ruling as of yet.
 
How does the rewrite not have everything you said?

I am OK with you choosing another plan, but I am not sure what you dislike in the TM2 plan and am a little confused.
The rewrite nerfed the extremes to 'nope, nope, nope'. The original gave the extreme of 'cheat death' for limit scale of ability. The rewrite became 'very minor changes the system will never notice, and hacks that are more trouble to set up than worth the effort'.
 
The rewrite nerfed the extremes to 'nope, nope, nope'. The original gave the extreme of 'cheat death' for limit scale of ability. The rewrite became 'very minor changes the system will never notice, and hacks that are more trouble to set up than worth the effort'.
The request was "the same. But without respawn and with everything else better" and that is supposingly what glitchcrafting does.

And apparently, as there is resurrection items and we can duplicate them, we do still have respawn as a eventual goal that we can make.
 
The rewrite nerfed the extremes to 'nope, nope, nope'. The original gave the extreme of 'cheat death' for limit scale of ability. The rewrite became 'very minor changes the system will never notice, and hacks that are more trouble to set up than worth the effort'.
But in exchange we won't have the homicidal lunatic who runs this game (in character) breathing down our neck as much. Admittedly, him breathing down our neck at all still kind of stinks...
 
No-one want play my character... *Sigh* Why do I brother
Sorry, your character looks interesting, but having no defense at all is out of character for SAO, being a death game, and strikes me as a bad idea. In a game with lower stakes (like a real MMO) it would be really awesome, but here I just see us either immediately killing everything in the room (not a bad thing at all, but also perhaps not as riveting to read) or getting killed almost immediately.
 
Back
Top