Rossum
Not a Cyberman
- Location
- Earth
Would you guys be OK with removing the respawn from True Magic?
I'm okay with it.
Would you guys be OK with removing the respawn from True Magic?
[X]True Magic
[X] The Elder Scrolls.
[X] Broke your piggybank, worked part-time and begged your parents for extra pocket dough to buy the game with all DLCs when it came out. Pre-ordering has its perks.
[X] Glitchworking *Proposition by @dunk1010*: You've found several loopholes in the Cardinal System through research and it finds it difficult to detect your abuse because you've found out how its pattern recognition algorithm works. You can exploit the game in various ways, such as making some items last longer, copy items, glitch through walls using items and mechanics. Doing these things tends to be tedious and usually can't be done in fight-or-flight situations but it does put you a shelf above others. As soon as someone finds out, expect lots of attention.
[X] That the game should be one, large, open world.
[X] Name: Altro Nestorum
[X] Age: 16
[X] Username: Aldrich
[X] Avatar:
[X] Mage.
[X]Guy
Can you change the name to True Magic v2, then tag everyone who voted for the original?Trondason, Drepson, KalTheRadiant, Kerfirou, Rossum, Amo, Marlin, Demenos, drake_azathoth, Cawasnow, Blitzkreug, BunnyLord, Card Captor,
I removed the resurrection because everyone seemed really upset at it and it wasn't necessary for my plans 'idea'.
@Trondason, @Drepson, @KalTheRadiant, @Kerfirou, @Rossum, @Amo, @Marlin, @Demenos, @drake_azathoth, @Cawasnow, @Blitskreug, @BunnyLord, @Card Captor.[X]True Magic v2
[X] The Elder Scrolls.
[X] Broke your piggybank, worked part-time and begged your parents for extra pocket dough to buy the game with all DLCs when it came out. Pre-ordering has its perks.
[X] Glitchworking *Proposition by @dunk1010*: You've found several loopholes in the Cardinal System through research and it finds it difficult to detect your abuse because you've found out how its pattern recognition algorithm works. You can exploit the game in various ways, such as making some items last longer, copy items, glitch through walls using items and mechanics. Doing these things tends to be tedious and usually can't be done in fight-or-flight situations but it does put you a shelf above others. As soon as someone finds out, expect lots of attention.
[X] That the game should be one, large, open world.
[X] Name: Altro Nestorum
[X] Age: 16
[X] Username: Aldrich
[X] Avatar:
[X] Mage.
[X]Guy
Trondason, Drepson, KalTheRadiant, Kerfirou, Rossum, Amo, Marlin, Demenos, drake_azathoth, Cawasnow, Blitzkreug, BunnyLord, Card Captor,
@Blitzkreug.@Trondason, @Drepson, @KalTheRadiant, @Kerfirou, @Rossum, @Amo, @Marlin, @Demenos, @drake_azathoth, @Cawasnow, @Blitskreug, @BunnyLord, @Card Captor.
Did this work?
The origional tagging did not, but the new tagging dos.@Trondason, @Drepson, @KalTheRadiant, @Kerfirou, @Rossum, @Amo, @Marlin, @Demenos, @drake_azathoth, @Cawasnow, @Blitskreug, @BunnyLord, @Card Captor.
Did this work?
Apparently.[X]True Magic v2
So we found out about wall glitches, and ways to break the durability counter on items?
Since Birdsie is allowing it, should add on a "[X] True Magic" so as to not risk splitting the vote if not enough people like v2.[X]True Magic v2
So we found out about wall glitches, and ways to break the durability counter on items?
This seems just a little bit hasty? He's only allowing it because the plans are similar anyway, and because someone didn't like the idea of just altering the original one.There is tactical voting and then there is that.
When do the votes close? I ask because you're basically condoning what feels like rigging the votes. At this point anything but the true magic votes should win off principle.
Edit: Like how does this even translate? Which vote wins if you refuse to split the vote? Do both win?
No. True Magic should die as a plan right now. It's disqualified or OP is exposed as bias.
Similar but not identical. You can't even fairly say which vote wins in that case. The one with more votes, even though they seem to be counted together? Like, legit what is this fuckery?This seems just a little bit hasty? He's only allowing it because the plans are similar anyway, and because someone didn't like the idea of just altering the original one.
I assume we'll have a tiebreaker vote. I'v seen a quest or two that are totally fine with action plans being changed in the middle of voting, or even the end, and they seem to work fine.Similar but not identical. You can't even fairly say which vote wins in that case. The one with more votes, even though they seem to be counted together? Like, legit what is this fuckery?
Is this really such a problem? I'd let you do the same if you asked. Oh, well. @Trondason. You've got to choose. People are getting mad at me.Similar but not identical. You can't even fairly say which vote wins in that case. The one with more votes, even though they seem to be counted together? Like, legit what is this fuckery?
Now now, no need to say it should die whilst it still has supporters. Nor should it be disqualified whilst still having focused votes.No. True Magic should die as a plan right now. It's disqualified
There is tactical voting and then there is that.
When do the votes close? I ask because you're basically condoning what feels like rigging the votes. At this point anything but the true magic votes should win off principle.
Edit: Like how does this even translate? Which vote wins if you refuse to split the vote? Do both win?
No. True Magic should die as a plan right now. It's disqualified or OP is exposed as bias.