[X] The Jacobins (Left)
-[X] Approve the expansion of the Napoleonic Code.
-[X] Approve the crippling Austrian Indemnity.
--[X] [Legislative] Propose and work with all those willing to pass a bill for modernizing the Army's equipment, especially their main weapons and ammunitions. The Grand Army must be ready at this key moment.
--[X] [Legislative] Propose and work with all those willing to pass a bill for modernizing the navy's equipment. This bill will also form a group to develop the next generation of military vessels. The Navy's readiness is paramount in the wake of the Emperor's death.
-[X] [Legislative] Invest in developing industry across France's Empire, to tie all of her possessions into a mutually-beneficial trade network. This trade will primarily assist the military's modernization.
-[X] [Non-Legislative] [Underground] The Jacobins will start reaching out to soldiers, officers and police to get them involved in civic organizations and politicize them towards their own side
 
@Woltaire I dunno how it happened but you somehow have your votes for Philadelphians, one of the Jacobin planks, & the Constitutionalists all count in the tally.

Maybe you could edit out the two other votes you've switched from to your most current one? Hopefully that fixes the issue.
 
[X] The Jacobins (Left)
-[X] Approve the crippling Austrian Indemnity.
--[X] [Legislative] As a condition of approval, propose diverting the funds thus obtained to the Bank of France so that it may extend credit for the internal improvement and revitalization of France's agriculture, industries, and transport, companies receiving loans from which must offer employment at last resort to the urban poor who obtain the permission of their maireand to veterans who obtain the permission of an officer above the rank of capitaine.
- [X] Approve the expansion of the Napoleonic Code.
--[X] [Legislative] Propose an amendment of the Additional Act to permit plural as well as individual petitions, and assembly of a district's citizens for the purpose of gathering signatures for petitions provided that one week's notice is provided to the district's maire, but without requiring permission.
-[X] [Non-Legislative] [Underground] Establish committees of correspondence between Republican political centers in the cities, and between them and the countryside and Jourdan's army in Spain, to coordinate agitation and action (effect, per Telamon: parties of the Left gain an additional [Non-Legislative] [Underground] plank).
-[X] [Non-Legislative] [Underground] Organize assemblies in Spanish and Portuguese towns where Jourdan's army is billeted, so that the soldiers may protect them from police retaliation, on the model proposed above vis a vis the Napoleonic Code, to petition for universal suffrage to those countries' local and national governments


The Jacobins are currently the dominant political force in the Parliament and as such have an advantage that I think all leftists, even the Constitutionalists and the Philadelphians, should consider. My fellow leftists I beseech you, unite behind the dominant Jacobins for the sake of unity in order to secure the revolution against reactionaries. Only together can we uphold liberty and justice from those who would seek to turn their back on the principles of the revolution. Vive la Révolution! Vive la France!
 
Counterpoint: The Constitutionalist plan allows us to appropriately punish Russia and especially Austria enough to ensure they won't be a continuous threat, and build up relations with our allies to form a sufficient bulwark against whatever Britain has cooking up for us. It can also serve as a way to lay the foundations for a future unified Europe under the banner and ideals of the French Revolution.
 
Last edited:
Counterpoint: The Constitutionalist plan allows us to appropriately punish Russia and especially Austria enough to ensure they won't be a continuous threat, and build up relations with our allies to form a sufficient bulwark against whatever Britain has cooking up for us. It can also serve as a way to lay the foundations for a future unified Europe under the banner and ideals of the French Revolution.

That is a good point, but I would counter that at a time like this unity is required more than anything else. I don't remember how to insert tallies, at least not on mobile, but it looks to me like the Jacobins are currently in the lead. I don't think the Constitutionalists have a real chance of winning, although I may be wrong, and as such if at least a few Constitutionalists switched their votes to the Jacobins that would shore up the left's position better than it being divided three ways.
 
That is a good point, but I would counter that at a time like this unity is required more than anything else. I don't remember how to insert tallies, at least not on mobile, but it looks to me like the Jacobins are currently in the lead. I don't think the Constitutionalists have a real chance of winning, although I may be wrong, and as such if at least a few Constitutionalists switched their votes to the Jacobins that would shore up the left's position better than it being divided three ways.
Well, the Constitutionalist plan helps build unity with our allies by creating a new treaty that lets them be part of a new confederation under the French banner. There's also the non-legislative part of the plan that involves building up more support for our ideals amongst the people. Sounds like we've got the unity part well-covered here.

Also, you might want to double check the vote tally (you can find it under "Thread Tools"), because the Constitutionalist plan is currently and narrowly in the lead. The Jacobin plan you just voted for is one vote behind the Philadelphians, and I don't think any of them plan on switching over when they're only in second place also by just one vote.
 

Well, the Constitutionalist plan helps build unity with our allies by creating a new treaty that lets them be part of a new confederation under the French banner. There's also the non-legislative part of the plan that involves building up more support for our ideals amongst the people. Sounds like we've got the unity part well-covered here.

Also, you might want to double check the vote tally (you can find it under "Thread Tools"), because the Constitutionalist plan is currently and narrowly in the lead. The Jacobin plan you just voted for is one vote behind the Philadelphians, and I don't think any of them plan on switching over when they're only in second place also by just one vote.

I'm not necessarily talking about European wide unity, just unity within the Parliament. It seems to me like Telamon has made it clear that the proportions of our vote is roughly equivalent to the strength of the groups in Parliament, for example if 40% of the people vote Jacobin in the thread then 40% of the votes in Parliament are for the Jacobins, although I could be wrong about that.

I was also under the impression that "Party" voting still has weight, so while the Jacobin vote is split between two plans, they are still a clear front runner with a total of 32 votes I believe. Once again I could be wrong, but that was the impression I got.

Edit: I would also like to suggest for all of the Jacobins voting for the military spending plan to switch over to the infrastructure spending plan. Infrastructure has a few more votes and it seems unlikely to me that the military plan will catch up with the front runners.
 
Last edited:
Just because the Jacobins have more votes total doesn't mean they win in the end if the Government instead decides to cobble the votes together from everyone else's demands.
 
The Regency Parliament: Aftermath
The French Century, the history books will record, began with neither a bang nor a whimper, but with the scratch of a pen. Backed by the constitutionalists and La Maison -- that political coalition which was famously called the 'unflinching column' at the heart of the early Regency -- the lower chamber of the Imperial Parliament passed several resolutions which would shape the future of the continent.

Firstly, they demanded a massive indemnity of 500 million francs be levied upon the defeated Austrian state, to be managed by the Bank of France. Secondly, they approved an expansion of the Napoleonic Code and it's strictures to the forty million souls then living in French-held Europe, from the shores of Gibraltar to the banks of the Danube.

With the signing of a single document, the old order died. Lands across Europe held by nobility and clergy for centuries was stripped and given to the public weal. A hundred hundred years of tradition and ceremony and arcane legislature were vanished in an instant like gunsmoke on the wind.

The doctrinaires of the Parliament, led by the esteemed Pierre Royer-Collard, proposed that this new order should be set in ink and stone, to stand another thousand years. Ministers Maret and Talleyrand agreed, and shortly after Talleyrand's return from Vienna, designed and proposed to the Chamber the face of a new Europe: a political and economic system with France at it's beating heart. The Prime Minister called it the 'Continental Concert', or the 'Concert of Nations' -- but as many in France and beyond were wont to say, it was a concert with but a single conductor. In chained and beaten Austria, where it's effects were felt most heavily and intensely, they called it simply the Imperial System.

It was, simply put, nothing less than the introduction of French direction into every court and every capitol and every market. Under the direction of the Bank of France, a new system of tariffs would be levied across Europe, as Napoleon had perhaps dreamed when he drew up the Continental System all those years past. Paris, the planners imagined, would become the beating political, economic, and cultural heart of Europe, fed by veins stretching to every city on the continent.

They imagined.

News of the new order spread from Paris much as a wildfire spreads on a dry plain -- catching in the wind and rippling out in greater and greater intensity. Sixteen regiments of the defeated Austrian army staged a prison break and marched into the Hungarian wilderness, championing the cause of the imprisoned Francis I. Cities burned. Garrisons were assaulted, governors defenestrated. Europe bucked under the Frankish yoke.

And yet. Marshal Massena marched the VI Corps into Dresden, and that same winter pacified four more of the German cities within the new-formed Kingdom of Westphalia. With Westphalia's King Jerome in Paris and showing little desire to return, the Marshal assumed de facto supreme authority along the Rhine. Escorted by troops under Marshal Jourdan, King Joseph returned in glory to Madrid, and set about reorganizing the nation in the face of fierce opposition. In Austria, Marshal Davout assumed a similar leading role in enforcing the new imperial system, and it was said in Europe in those days that the new order came blazing at the barrel of a gun.

Ministers, Talleyrand among them, urge a lighter hand. Old officers caution that they might break many armies, but they cannot fight a continent. Maret and the Regent dither. They stand their ground. They proclaim iron and blood, as the old emperor might have.

Finally, they yield. Many of the new tariffs are struck from the records with the ink still fresh. The Imperial System is reimagined by Talleyrand, who graces it with the lighter touch he imagined: France, first among nations, not a lord among vassals. Empowered by the Regent, Talleyrand returns to Vienna, and some weeks later, the Schonbrunn Proclamation is issued by Francis I, Emperor of Austria and King in Hungary. His imperial highness recognizes the 'special influence' of his grandson Napoleon II, whom he creates an Archduke of Austria. In so many words he legitimizes the 'leading role' which France will take in Austrian affairs moving forward. In return, of course, the Regent Imperial issues a proclamation from Paris recognizing Francis and his heirs as rulers of the Habsburg realms in perpetuity, now and for always Emperors of Austria and Kings in Hungary.

In one fell swoop, the Habsburgs are saved from the inglorious fate of the Bourbons and the Hohenzhollerns before them. Austria settles, a dog with a new chain but a familiar master. Like cannonsmoke drifting on the horizon, the old order fights the rising wind.

At the end of the fourth month of the Regency, the Emperor Napoleon is buried. A mass of moving humanity follows his corpse through the streets of Paris and under the arcs of the heroes. Old men in their uniforms throw themselves before the casket and weep as babes. A generation mourns. Across Europe, from Cadiz to Montenegro, a thousand thousand cannons fire a thousand thousand salutes.

And then the casket is lowered beneath the dome and the doors of the tomb are shut with a clap like the hand of God and it is done. The emperor is dead. Long live the emperor.

Somewhere in all of this -- amidst the weeping and the tearing of cloth and the beating of chests -- the Regent quietly ends the first convention of the Imperial Parliament.

He does not convene it again for two long years.



The Constitutionalists have emerged the unquestioned victors of the Regency Parliament, alongside with their compatriots of the center, La Maison. With the backing of the Regent, their programs have passed both chambers of the Parliament and become the law of the land: a centralizing and constitutionally enshrined French hegemony -- neither the autocratic madness of the right or the liberalizing lunacy of the left, but a French dominion all the same. Their programs have proven exceptionally popular among the middle class and the lower military, to whom they have promised demobilization and land reform. Europe burns, but it remains to be seen if France shall prosper.

Narrowly defeated by the Constitutionalists and their allies, the Philadelphians are not idle during the long recess. The Philadelphian Lodges spring up across the breadth of French Europe, the cutting edge of continental Masonry. Many a soldier returning home after years at the front finds himself seeking a new sodality to replace the long familiarity of the army -- and the Philadelphians are there. Part social club, part cult, part revolutionary order, they are present in almost every major city, and their reach is soon felt even in the highest halls of power.

The Jacobins do not rest easy either, those old torchmen of the Revolution. More and more correspondence is uncovered by the ministry of security indicating collaboration between republican groups across France, with aid perhaps from the Philadelphian Lodges. Though no names are ever written in ink and no incriminating evidence is ever found, Spain in particular becomes a hotbed for these new committees of correspondence, as troops under Marshal Jourdan -- far from home in a foreign country oppressing foreign men -- seethe and stir to acts unbecoming loyal citizens of the Empire. There are midnight assemblies and clandestine rallies and in the dark there are the many murmurings of angry men.

The Absolutists are enraged by the Schonbrunn Proclamation. Many of the more fervent imperial loyalists see it as nothing less than a betrayal of everything which the Emperor died for, which French men have bled and fought for for so long. They gather to themselves the dregs of the right, the fervent and the faithful, and though their demands grow increasingly absurd in the wilderness, their aim is clear: France, supreme in Europe, and the Emperor, supreme in France by the grace of God. Here and there, drinking clubs and hunting groups crop up among the jilted noveau riche, where men might whisper around coffee tables that the Regency is weak, that the Emperor is surrounded by women and Germans, and that France slides every day towards disaster.

They build their power in the shadows and in the parlors, and when the convention is called again it is a more jaded and shrewd sort of house which assembles. No longer startled men thrust into uncertain power, they are tested and devoted ideologues, men devoted to their constituencies and their missions, who shall shape France's future and know it.

The parties are now FROZEN until the next election. Currently, the center parties (La Maison and the Constitutionalists) have the most power. As the Parliament of 1818 convenes, they are in an uneasy coalition. They are followed by the ultraleft Philadelphians, the left-wing Jacobins (who still control the Presidency), and finally the right Absolutists. All other parties have been merged into these.

Parliament update incoming.
 
Last edited:
And yet. Marshal Massena marched the VI Corps into Dresden, and that same winter pacified four more of the German cities within the new-formed Kingdom of Westphalia. With Westphalia's King Jerome in Paris and showing little desire to return, the Marshal assumed de facto supreme authority along the Rhine. Escorted by troops under Marshal Jourdan, King Joseph returned in glory to Madrid, and set about reorganizing the nation in the face of fierce opposition. In Austria, Marshal Davout assumed a similar leading role in enforcing the new imperial system, and it was said in Europe in those days that the new order came blazing at the barrel of a gun.
...well the European confederation/Continental System proposal was not taken well at all. Tho it was partially due to how the idea was interpreted by the Imperial Regency, there are some minority planks in the past vote which are in line with how it's interpreted in the update AFAIK.

Somewhere in all of this -- amidst the weeping and the tearing of cloth and the beating of chests -- the Regent quietly ends the first convention of the Imperial Parliament.

He does not convene it again for two long years.
>2 years recess
>2 years of Parliament not doing anything

de Beauharnais, damn you!
 
Finally, they yield. Many of the new tariffs are struck from the records with the ink still fresh. The Imperial System is reimagined by Talleyrand, who graces it with the lighter touch he imagined: France, first among nations, not a lord among vassals. Empowered by the Regent, Talleyrand returns to Vienna, and some weeks later, the Schonbrunn Proclamation is issued by Francis I, Emperor of Austria and King in Hungary. His imperial highness recognizes the 'special influence' of his grandson Napoleon II, whom he creates an Archduke of Austria. In so many words he legitimizes the 'leading role' which France will take in Austrian affairs moving forward. In return, of course, the Regent Imperial issues a proclamation from Paris recognizing Francis and his heirs as rulers of the Habsburg realms in perpetuity, now and for always Emperors of Austria and Kings in Hungary.
A betrayal of France, of the Emperor! We must consign Austria to the dustbin of history!
 
Good to see the update, very excited to have Jourdain as our leading figure!

Philadelphians, our goals are not necessarily opposed. Why not work together in the coming parliamentary session?
 
Would pushing through a mandate to hold snap election of the Chamber of Representatives & subsequent re-convening of the Imperial Parliament anytime a Regent or Emperor ends the convention be an agreeable multi-partisan plank for most factions (perhaps aside from the Absolutists)? Such a plank would empower all parties in the Chamber of Representatives (which we play as) edit: by mandating said immediate re-convening in conjunction with snap election.
 
Last edited:
Would pushing through a mandate to hold snap election of the Chamber of Representatives & subsequent re-convening of the Imperial Parliament anytime a Regent or Emperor ends the convention be an agreeable multi-partisan plank for most factions (perhaps aside from the Absolutists)? Such a plank would empower all parties in the Chamber of Representatives (which we play as) edit: by mandating said immediate re-convening in conjunction with snap election.
I would prefer a permanent session of the Imperial Parliament, but this is a good first step. The Jacobin Militarists will support it.
 
Nonsense, if we desire to maintain good procedural order and legislative continuity whenever the Imperial Parliament is in recess the Convention can simply designate some of its leading members to a caretaker role as observers and advisors in a Council of State to bridge the gap between parliamentary sessions. Targeted reforms for a proportional response and further technocratic institutionalization of the empire, its the Constitutionalist way!
 
Doubt the moderate factions would be on board with something that so directly attempts to wrench power away from the Regent and give it to the Parliament. Even those who'd prefer more parliamentary power probably don't want a constitutional confrontation so early in the new system.
 
Doubt the moderate factions would be on board with something that so directly attempts to wrench power away from the Regent and give it to the Parliament. Even those who'd prefer more parliamentary power probably don't want a constitutional confrontation so early in the new system.
(the secret sauce is that the council of state would have only notional and extremely limited powers to actually contradict the Regent, rather than just advising him and doing all the boring administrative minutia of running a legislative body)
 
Doubt the moderate factions would be on board with something that so directly attempts to wrench power away from the Regent and give it to the Parliament. Even those who'd prefer more parliamentary power probably don't want a constitutional confrontation so early in the new system.
Yeahhh, even if the moderates are willing to go into that confrontation, there's the matter of the Senate.

Telamon said:
The chances of getting that past the Senat are very very low. You'd need some sort of incentive which makes the new nobility of France feel that it's worth it to trade their Napoleon-given political clout to the teeming masses
***
while they mostly just act as a rubber stamp for what the Regent has decided, they are happy being a rubber stamp that on paper controls 1/3 of the empire.
 
A dual Hasburg Austrain empire seems to be tallyrands goal, the concert of nations had potential but its far away from being a true instrument of power
 
Back
Top