I think we gain legend through feats of battle or diplomacy, and once we have a certain amount we gain perks. Maybe + amount to rolls or something.I am also very interested in how the whole Legend thing can work (especially since we have basically a 4x bonus for it when it comes to combat).
I'd prefer Catholicism (if you prefer a more accurate term for the time period, Latin Christianity), hence my username. I'm not too keen to be part of a religion (even in a fictional quest) that performed child sacrifice and ritual gang rape as part of their religious activities.Oh yeah, and just a question for those that want to convert over Orthodoxy, why would you want to do that?
Umm... Can you please direct me towards where you found this information, cause I only think they did blood eagles on prisoners and that was it. I don't think they did any child sacrifice or rape, if only in looting and pillaging.I'd prefer Catholicism (if you prefer a more accurate term for the time period, Latin Christianity), hence my username. I'm not too keen to be part of a religion (even in a fictional quest) that performed child sacrifice and ritual gang rape as part of their religious activities.
Ahmad ibn Fadlan wrote an eyewitness account wherein he recorded the gang rape and murder of a female slave as part of the funeral of her Volga Viking master. She was then placed on the funeral pyre of his ship and burned with him.Umm... Can you please direct me towards where you found this information, cause I only think they did blood eagles on prisoners and that was it. I don't think they did any child sacrifice or rape, if only in looting and pillaging.
Even so that might just be a small/isolated part of the either the Norse faith or people, or it is a sect that has broken away. Until I get the gist that the whole of Scandinavia and Rus were all doing this, I will assume the position of neutrality. These are either isolated incidents or practices that have evolved due to the region they are living in.Ahmad ibn Fadlan wrote an eyewitness account wherein he recorded the gang rape and murder of a female slave as part of the funeral of her Volga Viking master. She was then placed on the funeral pyre of his ship and burned with him.
The evidence for child sacrifice among the Vikings comes from archaeological findings in sacrificial wells at Trelleborg. The remains of five humans were found in these wells. Of these five humans, four were under the age of ten. Though if you're not satisfied by the archaeological evidence, there are accounts of regular old adult human sacrifices such as those given by Adam of Bremen and Thietmar of Merseburg. The Vikings show by the history channel, as historically inaccurate as it is, actually contains a reference to Adam's account of human sacrifice at the temple in Uppsala.
You keep telling yourself that.Even so that might just be a small/isolated part of the either the Norse faith or people, or it is a sect that has broken away. Until I get the gist that the whole of Scandinavia and Rus were all doing this, I will assume the position of neutrality. These are either isolated incidents or practices that have evolved due to the region they are living in.
Why do you say that? I just want to take an unbiased opinion and look at Norse culture and religion. Is that so bad? I know it might come off as kind of naive, but I believe that all cultures and religions all have their good and bad sides. There is nothing wrong with questioning the world for more information.
Norse paganism is lame, and old news. Bringing back orthodoxy, islam, or something else back home would be fresh and new.Do respect the old Norse cults,they may have some strange and violent sidesteps but such is history,the Baltic faiths,the Greco-Roman faiths have their lights and shadows but they truly felt more genuine and authentic than the Constantine created Christianity.
Converting to those arselickers will single handily pushed me out of the quest,respect our past,honor our ancestors,Battle under the gaze of Odin!
Why do you say that? I just want to take an unbiased opinion and look at Norse culture and religion. Is that so bad? I know it might come off as kind of naive, but I believe that all cultures and religions all have their good and bad sides. There is nothing wrong with questioning the world for more information.
Brushing off historical evidence as "isolated practices" is not unbiased history. I find it odd that you are perfectly willing to acknowledge that the Vikings would perform blood eagles but squirm at acknowledging that they would perform ritual rape and child sacrifice. The problem is not that you're asking questions, but that you're ignoring real world evidence to have a rose tinted view of a savage and barbaric religious tradition. There's a reason that Scandinavia and the Rus became Christian.Why do you say that? I just want to take an unbiased opinion and look at Norse culture and religion. Is that so bad? I know it might come off as kind of naive, but I believe that all cultures and religions all have their good and bad sides. There is nothing wrong with questioning the world for more information.
They became Christians, but not for those reasons. And even if you say all of this is part of the practiced doctrine, it is no different than any other religion in the fact that it has both good and bad practices. For example Catholics, basically taxed the silver out of most kingdoms in the North. This made them weaker economically and made them weaker to invasions and rebellions. There was also the young boy raped by a priest thing. It is a prevalent thing then and still is now. Islam basically taught the Norse to enslave people as it was a way to get rich quick in both Christian and Muslim slave markets. The Orthodox pushed for religious persecution of ALL Hellenic worshippers, and if they didn't wipe them out, then there should be at least a minor sect we would hear some things about, but they burned down a lot of Hellenic temples and persecuted a lot of people.Brushing off historical evidence as "isolated practices" is not unbiased history. I find it odd that you are perfectly willing to acknowledge that the Vikings would perform blood eagles but squirm at acknowledging that they would perform ritual rape and child sacrifice. The problem is not that you're asking questions, but that you're ignoring real world evidence to have a rose tinted view of a savage and barbaric religious tradition. There's a reason that Scandinavia and the Rus became Christian.
The reason Scandinavian and the Rus became christian was constant proselytization by part of the church and kings who either did it peacefully or not. The "vikings" weren't even a people merely an occupation and didn't stop being vikings even after they became christian. On the topic of the blood eagle we are not even sure if it was ever performed, all accounts come form poets hundred of years after these blood eagles were supposedly performed. If you are pointing out acts of barbarism then let me point you to Charlemagne and his Saxon wars in which his whole policy was "you become christian or you die".It took 30 years of constant war for the Saxons to finally give and decide that worshiping Jesus was better than dying. BTW each of his campaigns in Saxony has acts of cruelty and barbarism, for example his response to a revolt was to kill 4500 prisoners in cold blood. By the end of his campaigns he was labeled as the paragon of ChristendomBrushing off historical evidence as "isolated practices" is not unbiased history. I find it odd that you are perfectly willing to acknowledge that the Vikings would perform blood eagles but squirm at acknowledging that they would perform ritual rape and child sacrifice. The problem is not that you're asking questions, but that you're ignoring real world evidence to have a rose tinted view of a savage and barbaric religious tradition. There's a reason that Scandinavia and the Rus became Christian.