- Location
- Te Ika-a-Māui
- Pronouns
- She/Her
I mean, IRL the Brits abolished slavery despite having relied on it for their massively profitable sugar, coffee, etc, plantations throughout the Caribbean.
In such a TL, a compromise could be the "Trinidad solution": abolish slavery on paper, and then replace African slaves with South Asian indentured servants.I mean, IRL the Brits abolished slavery despite having relied on it for their massively profitable sugar, coffee, etc, plantations throughout the Caribbean.
The Commonwealth is only a name - the Revolution took place at the end of the 18th century and is closer in spirit to the French (actually it is its replacement). The first four consuls were Thomas Paine, Edward Fitzgerald, Charles Grey, George Byron. True, there is a nuance - in Scotland there was a Jacobite rebellion, which was suppressed very cruelly (but Ireland received autonomy).Hmm if said republican government was a continuation of the Commonwealth which was brutally religiously oppressive military dictatorship with a totally not a not King in the form of the lord protector, I can't imagine it would have actually been improvement over the RL Great Britain.
There are at least two of these on the English-language wiki - though for some reason there is an alt-positive for Ireland and Scotland, which is not historical.I mean most republican Britain TLs I see have it be an Enlightenment Liberal Republic à la France but presuming British people to be too polite to have a Terror or a Napoleon. Cromwell and the Commonwealth don't seem to get much traction in althist scenarios at all.
There's a good one called "The Bloody Man" which is actually about the English Civil War without Cromwell since he moves to New England instead, and the revolution ends up more radical with the New Model Army and the Levellers in power.I mean most republican Britain TLs I see have it be an Enlightenment Liberal Republic à la France but presuming British people to be too polite to have a Terror or a Napoleon. Cromwell and the Commonwealth don't seem to get much traction in althist scenarios at all.
I think there was a Batman one-shot comic set in the modern day with that setting, Batman: Holy Terror.Hmm if said republican government was a continuation of the Commonwealth which was brutally religiously oppressive military dictatorship with a totally not a not King in the form of the lord protector, I can't imagine it would have actually been improvement over the RL Great Britain.
yeah, and The Dominion of Southern America did puff up indentured servitude as an upgrade from slavery — rather too enthusiastically, I believe
I've never seen such a thing.What exactly do Maoist-Third Worldist Alternate Histories entail and why are they apparently generally marked as cringe?
This is more of a thought experiment rather than a genuine effort I thinkI've never seen such a thing.
It'd be interesting to have ideological timelines not written by whiggish liberals, neocons, or American leftists but that covers most of the English internet with any interest in history.
What exactly do Maoist-Third Worldist Alternate Histories entail and why are they apparently generally marked as cringe?
Maybe I'm stupid, but that doesn't seem unreasonable a take, especially for somebody living in the third world. At the very least it comments on the relationship between the two regions.So basically yes, just with an asterisk. Sounds like primo cringe to me.
Abject rejection of any revolutionary potential in the proletariat of the "first world" is as absurd as it is self-defeating. And to be frank, it is often a figleaf covering ethnonationalism and/or campism. If the proposition was that the proletariat in first world countries has somewhat to greatly reduced revolutionary potential outside of periods of most acute crisis, then I would wholeheartedly agree.Maybe I'm stupid, but that doesn't seem unreasonable a take, especially for somebody living in the third world. At the very least it comments on the relationship between the two regions.
I see.