- Location
- Chicago
- Pronouns
- She/They
Odd case scenario: Converts, fanboys and in the far future attempts at wolf rustling, cross breeding and more.
Just wanted to call this out because I love the 'wolf rustling' phrase. I have such great images of wolf ranches and wolf drives and two men facing each other at noon waiting for the quickdraw with wolves growling in the background.
Also i have no idea why Johann keeps being brought up. More likely than Belegar because no major reasons why it could not happen. I just fail to see any reasons why it would.
Johann... I like Johann. He's the kind-of-a-jerk-but-actually-nice bro with a ready grin and a quip, that people like right off the bat. He's confident enough to show off to Mathilde and spring surprises on her, and he's totally willing to play back-seat hype man for us, setting us up as the big cheese to the apprentices. I think he's fun, enjoys the time he spends with us, and is someone I think Mathilde could feel... Not silly going to for comfort and protection. The puppy-dad aspect is good too, it shows that he can do care and nurture as a real thing, not just a temporary mask.
And I really liked the moment of flirting where he stripped out of all his clothes with our help and we 'demurely turned away'. That sounds like something Mathilde knows she wants, but is too polite to gawk at.
I am going to be honest. This is quite creepy. Analyzing peoples social position to find ideal partners? Talking about trying to get someone to grow so their a better marriage partner? Let's not.
This is technically a CK2 based quest, right? The relative lack of that mindset is pretty surprising to me.
I'd note that genre wise it would owe way more to Jane Austin and period romances than to adventure novels- I can see it being weird for someone who has avoided that half of the aristocratic-oriented literature. But it is very much a thing in fiction which honestly examine the decisions women got to make with any agency in those periods, so it feels a bit... 'ewww, girls are icky' to write it off as creepy and weird.
Mathilde needs no lover!
When she wishes to pass on her legacy she can do it to an apprentice.
A cute little apprentice who we can teach how to sword and to magic, and to ohhh its so cute
Apprentice is good, but power trio is better. Partner+apprentice and we've got a found family that can adventure together.
The only people who could really understand Mathilde's constant drive to make the world a better place and her commanding nature would be someone who has ruled over at least some form of territory and population. The only people who could understand her relationship with magic or combat experience is someone who has been on similar adventures, and has enough power of their own to at least feel like a peer, if not necessarily a close one.
I don't think Mathilde needs someone who understands her, I think she needs someone who can support her. We never really understand other people: we can't model mind just as completed as our own in our heads, even if experiences and vocab are shared. I put a lot less importance on the idea that you need a partner who has done and felt the same things as you, and a lot more on the idea that they need to trust and understand and communicate a lot. They need to understand not the weight of responsibility, but the effect it had on you and how they can help you still be a person with it hanging on you.
So someone who is a peer is a romantic nice-to-have, not a critical thing. People can be different and find the relationship more rewarding because they get to give each other context.
Like, if he was more interesting character, or had more active screentime beyond work, maybe i could see it.
But as it is, not really.
I kinda get the impression you never pay attention to men as potential romantic partners, and so read stories with female main characters in the same mindset? He's definitely interesting, and the textual hints are there that his is interesting *to Mathilde*.
What you try to explain here and what you wrote back there are two very different things. What you described seems frighteningly close to a Hikaru Genji Plan. I am incredibly leery, and disgusted, of anything even approaching such a plan.
This is revulsion over the idea of manipulating people and running Machiavellian schemes using their emotions and love lives in general, right?
We're probably going to want to avoid the assets and agents side of intrigue then.
I'll be honest, I kinda agree, I felt really shitty about that potential guard captain whose life we blew up selling gossip and then never hired.
But meta-wise? It feels perfectly valid to look at the stats of the thing you are thinking of adding to the character sheet.
Same. No one around Mat inspires me any kind of romance. Moreover, all the shipping, memeing and all has soured me about the very idea of romance.
Welcome to how many of us feel about the discussion around buying another pistol. Or a rifle. Or when we were fighting over the sword. Or Theurgy. Or necromancy.
Those have soured me a lot on the idea of power progression. And so now I vote for research, and social, and city building.
Point being, romance discussions are a bit of a relief from the discussions around getting more killy or 'one weird trick to bring the most powerful EVEH!'.
Let us have this.
Trying to game the system with only social actions to have your slice-of-life cake and eat it too seems to me to be unfair.
That's fair, but poor equivalence: AP spending has payoffs. New weapons, skills, assets. Relationships are ongoing, contingent, and cannot ever be considered 'done' until they fail. (Death or breakup.)
So unless there is a mechanical benefit to having a beau, some number-based payoff, I don't think that we should be weighing 'pointless' actions (because you know that's how they will be labeled) against actions with rewards.
It's a bit meta, but that's a structural setup to prevent friends-and-family relationships. It's the fight that led to social turns in the beginning.
An action that has mechanical social benefit? we have an example with Belegar and his crisis of faith which would require 1 AP to help solve. Any action that would impact our family life significantly would logically require AP, as everything else does.
But Belegar feeling differently is going to change what tasks he selects for us, how much we can wheedle out of him at need, potentially removing malluses to leadership/Diplo rolls.
What impacts do you see family AP spend as having, on a quest-level scale? If there aren't any, I'd argue there should not be AP spend because 'no mechanical benefits'.
Mat has her own weaknesses, being Anti-social and without real friends but work friends and Ranald comes to mind. Someone outgoing and good at socializing would be really helpful to Mat in leveraging all her other work.
Yes! We don't see these things in her internal monologue but it is very important to remember they are real parts of her personality.
I worry she is losing the ability to be honest emotionally with people: all her interactions are from behind a 'smug, all-knowing' mask and that drives isolation like nobody's business. She *needs* someone to ground her, and cover for the places she can't see she needs help.
Talk to me when we go a turn without discussing ways to get the power to rival gods.
Personally, I would have been all for romance with Abelheim, but the current options don't seem that grest. I suppose that can change if something unexpected happens, or simply if someone makes an especially persuasive argument for someone
I'm kinda thinking that it is going to be omake that tip a person into 'interesting'. Like, I'm pretty sure nobody would even consider Soizic for a social if I didn't keep writing her- and I liked the Johann we got in the most recent side story a lot.
So: Pitches for Husbandos should be in omake format! May the best grabber-of-thread's-fancy win!
There will always be the doubt of 'maybe this time he is lying to me' that she won't be able to get over.
That sounds enormously pessimistic. Learning how to trust someone is kinda half of romance, I think, and odds are good that communication (understanding why and when someone feels like lying is the best choice, getting a grip on those circumstances, learning to read and judge them) is enough to build that trust.
I've never understood this sentiment. It just sounds stressful and annoying. Having to watch your back around the person you ostensibly love is the opposite of what you should be doing together.
Watch your back? Yeah, stressful and bad. Know that they are their own person with their own needs who will choose against you if you push them? This is critical. I've seen more relationships fall apart because one side just didn't realize things were going sour until after it exploded than I have where lack of trust killed it.
BTW @Alratan , while it won't effect the vote I feel like you should know that you are currently voting for "Kragg the Grime."
That dwarf can drop some sick beats! You can feel the whole Karak bumping and crashing when the Grimelord smashes that hammer down.
Last edited: