I mean, maybe, but I'm more focused on the metaphysical repercussions of a vampire trying to birth a regular child the regular way. The whole thing about becoming/being a vampire is, as noted in the Liber Necris, your every essence and being is cut off from the Aethyr. You know, the soul-place? With soul-bits? And even if you 'reactivated' your sperm and eggs, and the organic portion of the life is created, the soul question is the issue at hand. I mean, we know that its possible in Warhammer for souls to be ripped out and messed about with, but even the lizard robots that are the Lizardmen come complete with soulstuff in 'em, its like...super necessary. Magic aka Aethyr aka sorta kinda soul-stuff adjacent things are needed to activate most golems and the like, even dwarf rune-based golems and what not. But...then you do have the steam lightning clockwork horses...but those aren't children.
You know what I mean? It's wild to try and figure that. Or maybe that's just child-bearing in general, with soulstuff seeping in from the environment, but again with vampires being self-contained Dhar batteries, give or take in certain cases, or otherwise devouring sustenance from said soulstuff by way of blood most of the time...I'm just having trouble imagining how it could work metaphysically.
Because again, physically? Yes, I can totally see it working. A bit of magic juicing the old organs and muscles, manipulating them, lubrication and so on and so forth as part of the physical act, sure. But its the birthing a somehow regular sapient person who is also, themselves, not a vampire that lives a normal-ish lifespan with no other changes or alterations in their being that should probably be super notable?
Might have to be a case of just...maybe just dismissing something ridiculous, or handwaving it, as we do with other things in Warhammer that are just not workable sometimes.
Because Pavel also gave his name to a vampire hunting society, but if he was born of her, and wasn't a vampire, then...whugh? Shouldn't he have been? Maybe? Sort of? Or have any other sort of ingrained loyalty? Maybe?
But maybe not, I guess?
Thank you very much for the source! And now that I can examine that section myself...
Yeah, nah, she took the throne a long time ago, sure, but she also spent some years working to recreate the Elixir, so she had some regular children the regular way who went on to do other stuff, I'm going to rule that as...
EDIT:
Now that is some interesting language. Through their own blood. See, that doesn't say regular children to me, necessarily. When Neferata tried to vamp Khalida, she fed her cousin her own blood by biting her tongue and frenching her to give her the Kiss, i.e. passing on the gift of eternity through her own blood. The other first generation vamps I can easily see not wanting to pass on their gift, or curse in the case of Abhorash, early on.
And vampire-born children could be seen as the usual language regarding vampires and their gets i.e. as their children. Vampire-born children, rather than regular born children, you know what I mean? As in Neferata passed off raising and corralling her vampire-born children i.e. her gets to others rather than fully deal with it herself.
Hmm. I need to think on how I'll be approaching this.
Hmm. I also need to think on this as well.
Ah, wait, figured it out.
3rd Generation Rogue i.e. not going by her Vamp Generation, but literally a Third of a Generation of Rogues.
As in Melissa, Chandanac, and now her. All three annoying rogues, whereas Belda might have been a loyalist with some weird freaking tastes given his thing said 'he wanted more than money' when he came and killed her parents and turned her.
So...not sure if I really adjusted her true pedigree or not, yeah? Seems like it was the same as canon, just...with certain other things, now, that weren't present before.