Vote tally - To Struggle and Strive: The Combined Syndicates of America in 1932. A Kaiserreich Quest

Scheduled vote count started by notbirdofprey on May 10, 2021 at 12:38 AM, finished with 34 posts and 10 votes.

Tally configuration

Simple majority
notbirdofprey
To Struggle and Strive: The Combined Syndicates of America in 1932. A Kaiserreich Quest
Post #208
Post #241

Disabled
Disabled
Enabled
Block
Yes
Enabled
Enabled
Enabled
Enabled
10
34

  • [X] Condemn them. These individual police were no threat to the Revolution, but now they serve as a martyr. In addition, with the mechanism of justice largely in control of the people, there were better ways to handle it, ways that would not reflect badly on the movement. Increased relations with the Right, increased support among moderates, temporarily reduced number and effectiveness of militias. +1 Influence
    [x] They are bluffing. Go on ahead. Terrible consequences if you are wrong.
    -[X] Try to explain to him that the strike has become much bigger than the SPA, that you've been getting overwhelming support from cities you merely have a presence in, let alone "control" like Chicago. The best way to protect the strikers now would be to give them official protection, because trying to call off the strike would only weaken them, not stop them.
    -[X] Threaten to make his decision making public, something which will likely see him lose the upcoming election one way or another.
    [X] Condemn them. These individual police were no threat to the Revolution, but now they serve as a martyr. In addition, with the mechanism of justice largely in control of the people, there were better ways to handle it, ways that would not reflect badly on the movement. Increased relations with the Right, increased support among moderates, temporarily reduced number and effectiveness of militias. +1 Influence
    -[X] Threaten to make his decision making public, something which will likely see him lose the upcoming election one way or another.
    [x] Be silent. You cannot judge the oppressed for striking back at their oppressors, and if this costs you the support of some few...were they ever going to support you? Reduced support among moderates.
    [x] They are bluffing. Go on ahead. Terrible consequences if you are wrong.
    -[X] Threaten to make his decision making public, something which will likely see him lose the upcoming election one way or another.
    [x] They are bluffing. Go on ahead. Terrible consequences if you are wrong.
    -[X] Try to explain to him that the strike has become much bigger than the SPA, that you've been getting overwhelming support from cities you merely have a presence in, let alone "control" like Chicago. The best way to protect the strikers now would be to give them official protection, because trying to call off the strike would only weaken them, not stop them.
    [x] They are bluffing. Go on ahead. Terrible consequences if you are wrong.
    -[X] Just tell him that, and leave the decision up to him.
    -[X] Be firm in telling him, privately censure him if he keeps backing down.
Back
Top