- Location
- Covenant of the Councils
You can use the forum's search function to search your posts within the thread. Or you can go back manually through each page and ctrl+f your username until you find your post. Or you can post a second voting slate, which will override your first.I kinda want to change my vote from (Let's Be Reasonable) too (Sverdlov's Plot Suceeds) But have no idea how to find my comment with the vote. 😐
Empowering the trade unions is exactly the sort of thing that will promote an executive bureaucracy. How exactly do you think the trade unions are run? If you want administration by the people, subordinate the engineers to the soviets.We absolutely need to promote worker's power through the trade unions and prevent the formation or executive bureaucracy. To do otherwise would be an utter betrayal of socialism.
I mean, having the executive committee run the department also seems like executive bureaucracy to me. And one that is an extra step removed from the elections of individual councils due to the Soviet structure.Empowering the trade unions is exactly the sort of thing that will promote an executive bureaucracy. How exactly do you think the trade unions are run? If you want administration by the people, subordinate the engineers to the soviets.
But it isn't? The soviet executive is composed of soviet members, unlike a Sovnarkom department or trade union which are staffed by employees.I mean, having the executive committee run the department also seems like executive bureaucracy to me.
I don't think being a member of parliament precludes you from being part of the executive bureaucracy. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your definitions, but the executive committee is a permanently convening body elected by the general council of soviets to take oversee the affairs of the state while they are not gathered. This seems like the people on top of the state's bureaucratic apparatus to me.But it isn't? The soviet executive is composed of soviet members, unlike a Sovnarkom department or trade union which are staffed by employees.
The difference is in the lack of separate powers, and where responsibility lies. The soviet is both a deliberative and working body possessed of both legislative and executive powers, and thus of executive committees, not merely a parliament. Executive committee members are responsible to the soviet and to their electors. To the extent executive committee members employ staff, they stand and fall by their members are not permanent fixtures. The Sovnarkom is a separate executive body which might or might not actually be responsible to the soviet, but its employees are responsible to it alone. The trade unions are corporate bodies responsible to their members, their reach is limited to where they have members (and any given union might not have the majority of members in any given workplace), and their employees are responsible to their respective leaderships chosen according to their respective bylaws. The Sovnarkom is the fount of a separate bureaucracy; the trade unions are an impossible hodge-podge.I don't think being a member of parliament precludes you from being part of the executive bureaucracy. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your definitions, but the executive committee is a permanently convening body elected by the general council of soviets to take oversee the affairs of the state while they are not gathered. This seems like the people on top of the state's bureaucratic apparatus to me.
"The trade unions" are not "the workers," a given trade union probably organizes a minority of workers at any given workplace. And corporate-interest competition is better resolved through political negotiation in the soviet than through on-the-ground union turf wars.Call me crazy, but I think that that making industries directly responsible to their workers is much preferable than subordinating them to some allegedly representative "committee".
To vote for someone's agenda item to be included in Sovnarkom, simply write
[x] (Agenda Item)
Just to note, a valid vote does not have a space after the bracket.1) Votes are to begin with [X], after which, without any spacing, one is to include the name of the agenda item,