- Location
- New York
[X] Federalize the Michigan National Guard and order them to stop the Minutemen and scab workers and have the FBI arrest Ford
Ford's actions are very clearly in the purview of the Commerce Clause, he is very literally participating in the movement of tens of thousands of people across state lines for the purposes of working in his factories. Even the narrowest interpretation of the Commerce Clause would surely see moving people across state lines for the purposes of employment in Detroit as within the purview of the Government.
In the infamous Plessy vs Ferguson case which upheld racial segregation, even with a Supreme Court as conservative as in 1896, reaffirmed a similar principle. Plessy vs Ferguson was litigated over a Louisiana law, the Separate Car Act which mandated segregation in rail routes in the state, but even as the Supreme Court in its 8-1 ruling affirmed the principle of Segregation, it also struck down the segregation on train cars that were interstate.
One could argue this as private action, but literally anyone with eyes can see the hand of Long and the AFP in this, and the Court would have to be sympathetic to Long to pretend that this exclusively private action which is just a straight no.
While the NLRA itself has yet to be challenged at the Supreme Court, if the Courts were fundamentally opposed the Supreme Court could have ordered a stay or injunction to prevent us from being able to enforce the law in its current state, but they have not done so.
I also strongly disagree either your assertion of the meaningfulness of the potential to support the Regular Army. Before World War 1, the US Army's standing strength was about 100,000 people of which half was overseas like in the Philippines. With no US involvement in World War 1 I don't think it would be much larger as of 1937. That means there are maybe 60,000 members of the Regular Army spread out throughout the entire United States, even less in terms of actual soldiers most likely.
If we send in the National Guard to try to crush both of them, that's going to happen the next day. I would be surprised if even a full regiment of the Regular Army could be moved in time for that. If the National Guard tries to crush everyone, there isn't going to be a week to wait for the Regular Army to try again, that's the Civil War right there. Even if they could be there on time, what are a stiffener of say 5000 troops be able to do, surrounded in the middle of SPA territory other than die valiantly?
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution is the Commerce clause which gives Congress the power "To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
The Commerce Clause refers to the movement of commerce which has always meant goods and services and the Plessy vs Ferguson case fell under could fall under that clause because it was about a service that was crossing state lines. The Clause has nothing to do with one person or a group of people traveling from one state to another for the purpose of getting a new job or changing their jobs. I could accept a job offer in Colorado and move their from Virginia and the Federal would have no Constitutional grounds on which to stop me. This is not the same as for example a large group of Mexican citizens getting temporary Green cards to work in the US these are American citizens exercising their right to freely move across the country to start a new job.
The NLRA is so new that I can't see how a case could have even gotten to the court yet which would cause them to rule one way or the other on any part of the new law. This case would be one of the first to go before the Court if we are going to use the NLRA as the grounds for the arrest.
We don't know the numbers of people involved but I doubt we are dealing with multiple 10,000 of thousands and even if we are the update was clear that General McArthur and the Joint Chiefs of Staff have plans that we can implement to bring the army in if they are needed. McArthur is not a fool nor are the rest of the Chiefs so if they have plans ready to be implemented then I trust them to have sufficient numbers ready. We have known things could blow up for awhile now so the Army having plans ready to be implemented tells they have the regulars on high alert.
The Red Guards are not a bunch of Innocents they decided to act like a bunch of armed thugs who think they can dictate things at the barrel of a gun and we really should not emboldened them. Reed will take everything he can from it and we will lose support if we only focus on one group when things are coming to a head and we need the strongest coalition we can get.
Not a lot. The US Army is still on a full peacetime footing. While the plans would start the mobalization it would take time and it wouldn't be feasible to deploy a sizable amount of combat ready troops to Detroit within 24 hours. All you have is really the Michigan National Guard which is at most 10,000 men although even that might not be fully mobilized yet.@Jeeshadow How many Regular troops does MacArthur think the Army can have in Detroit by tomorrow morning when another clash occurs in addition to the National Guard?
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution is the Commerce clause which gives Congress the power "To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
The Commerce Clause refers to the movement of commerce which has always meant goods and services and the Plessy vs Ferguson case fell under could fall under that clause because it was about a service that was crossing state lines. The Clause has nothing to do with one person or a group of people traveling from one state to another for the purpose of getting a new job or changing their jobs. I could accept a job offer in Colorado and move their from Virginia and the Federal would have no Constitutional grounds on which to stop me. This is not the same as for example a large group of Mexican citizens getting temporary Green cards to work in the US these are American citizens exercising their right to freely move across the country to start a new job.
The NLRA is so new that I can't see how a case could have even gotten to the court yet which would cause them to rule one way or the other on any part of the new law. This case would be one of the first to go before the Court if we are going to use the NLRA as the grounds for the arrest.
We don't know the numbers of people involved but I doubt we are dealing with multiple 10,000 of thousands and even if we are the update was clear that General McArthur and the Joint Chiefs of Staff have plans that we can implement to bring the army in if they are needed. McArthur is not a fool nor are the rest of the Chiefs so if they have plans ready to be implemented then I trust them to have sufficient numbers ready. We have known things could blow up for awhile now so the Army having plans ready to be implemented tells they have the regulars on high alert.
We have stood by labor these 4 months, and I stand by my view that they were not the escalators in this situation. Their strike was going on, we passed the NLRA, and before any peaceful negotiation could go on that way, Long and Ford threw a grenade into the room. The first day the scabs were turned back by the Red Guard with no deaths. The second day, the Minutemen led the scabs and there was bloodshed.
The Red Guard are not innocent babes swaddled in cloth, but they are joined by the hip to the strikers that we have tried so hard to curry favor with and the reality is that to attack the Red Guard at this juncture is also to attack the strikers. The consensus is already that Ford ought to be arrested, let us not throw away labor as well when it is scarcely needed.
For the record, under no circumstances would I support a vote towards supporting Ford and the scabs straight up, sure we might shore up support amongst the parts of the business community that aren't aligned with Ford and Long, but the only winner in that would be Long, going beyond rendering the entire short term political goals of the NLRA pointless as attempting radical centrism would do, but probably straight up collapsing the coalition as the neuroticism of pulling out all the stops to pass a progressive platform only to then do a 180 would destroy the ideological standing of the Federal government and leave its remaining supporters with naught but rage and confusion.
Not a lot. The US Army is still on a full peacetime footing. While the plans would start the mobalization it would take time and it wouldn't be feasible to deploy a sizable amount of combat ready troops to Detroit within 24 hours. All you have is really the Michigan National Guard which is at most 10,000 men although even that might not be fully mobilized yet.
Its unclear the exact numbers. The pre conflict estimates by the FBI had the Minutemen having low numbers but its clear those FBI numbers are very, very wrong. Its also unclear how well the scabs and strikers will take it if the National Guard starts shooting militiamen. Ford also has corporate security and the Detroit PD are a bit of a wildcard if this gets truly violent.Boss do we have any idea on the number of Red Guards and Minuteman who are on the streets and armed because that would be useful information to have if we have around 10,000 National Guard to work with at the start of this incident.
I think coming out and taking over parts of the city with armed groups is very much a escalation. The NLRA has been passed and yet Reed and his allies have kept the strikes going and are willing to threaten people with death to get what they want. We have been clear about supporting the right to Union and collective bargaining and I don't think we will lose what we have of Labor over this. On the other hand since we have passed a law that is favoring the low level worker over management I really do think we need to show that the Red Guards can't get what they want at the barrel of a gun if we don't want to lose even more business support. Reed is keeping the strike going for politics and not because of economic issues and we really should not give him this.
I also don't think the people who are still tied to Reed are people we can get.
We can have the Guard hold things down for a day and a bit until the regulars can arrive to support them. About 10,000 guys is a lot of fire power and we would have the initiative
Boss do we have any idea on the number of Red Guards and Minuteman who are on the streets and armed because that would be useful information to have if we have around 10,000 National Guard to work with at the start of this incident.
I ask again. We are already arresting Henry Ford, the man who brought the assembly line to America on an industrial scale, the man who created the first practical mass-produced automobile. How many businessmen are going to be swayed by the fact that we shot at the Red Guard too when we are arresting Henry Ford
Detroit is basically the most red of cities in the Union, a city where they gave their votes for the Reed presidency. New York City pales in comparison to the amount of influence the SPA has in this city alone because they don't have Tammamy Hall to blunt syndicalist advances. Besides America First is a dangerous enemy on its own and we have been creating an inciting incident to destroy them utterly over after using the Fair Deal to destroy the filibuster. Destroying the filibuster means we are eyeing the South and fears of how thorough we neuter the South's political influence is real since after the Second Civil War they would wish for the Resconstruction Era to come back.How much support do you think we will lose if we shoot at the Minuteman and also hit guys who have come North just cause they need a job. If we give the impression that we are okay with the Red Guards fluting the law and walking the streets with guns like they own the place I guarantee you we will lose current support and push more people to the AFP. You are worried about losing the labour people that we have been working to sway away from Reed to our coalition when we have been favoring them while I am worrying that supporting one paramilitary group over the other instead of getting both of the streets will lose us members of our current coalition. Doing this would convince even more people that Olsen's flag really is Red.
Blood is going to be spilled one way or the other and we are past the point we could have gotten Reed or Long to roll over so I would prefer to move while we have initiative. I also don't like the idea of just giving up a city as important as Detroit to the Red Guard.
P.S votes decide let's see what we get.
You forget that this is Kaiserreich lore, Reed has immense support in these states and cities (even if much of it would be way to conservative for a socialist guy otl)
How much support do you think we will lose if we shoot at the Minuteman and also hit guys who have come North just cause they need a job. If we give the impression that we are okay with the Red Guards fluting the law and walking the streets with guns like they own the place I guarantee you we will lose current support and push more people to the AFP. You are worried about losing the labour people that we have been working to sway away from Reed to our coalition when we have been favoring them while I am worrying that supporting one paramilitary group over the other instead of getting both of the streets will lose us members of our current coalition. Doing this would convince even more people that Olsen's flag really is Red.
Blood is going to be spilled one way or the other and we are past the point we could have gotten Reed or Long to roll over so I would prefer to move while we have initiative. I also don't like the idea of just giving up a city as important as Detroit to the Red Guard.
I suspect we will lose quite a bit of support! But I do not believe the National Guard has the discipline to simply separate the Red Guard and the Minutemen, so I see a violent outcome as inevitable for all of the actions that involve the National Guard. Shooting the Minutemen means the flat loss of support for massacring people, and the South. We never had the South anyways. Shooting the Red Guard means the flat loss of support for massacring people, but also the Midwest. We have come so far for labor for the purposes of preventing the Midwest from exploding. As it stands, we can conceivably split the SPA and I think it is still possible to prevent the CSA from existing as a mass rising.
I reiterate that since there was consensus on arresting Ford, that the difference of whether or not we fired on the Red Guard was basically meaningless to members of our own coalition proper in comparison to the arrest of Henry Ford.
If you believe that we were already past the point of preventing the CSA from existing, then why would we throw away troops in the deepest part of SPA territory possible? Those troops would be completely fucked. Again, Detroit is over 300 miles from the closest state that voted for Olson. Even if we somehow secured the whole city of 1.5 million plus people with just 10k National Guardsmen, it would be surrounded on all sides by the CSA and all the Federals in the city would have no choice but to surrender.