I thought about it and decided I didn't like my reasons for picking Yes.
Can you explain further? May be i will also switch.
I thought about it and decided I didn't like my reasons for picking Yes.
After JamesShazbond mentioned something on the last page I sat down and thought about how the value may interact in our diplomacy, simulating possible outcomes and decided I didn't want the hassle. Being able to freely punch anyone is relaxing in ways. Plus not taking it lets us more easily drive wedges into our opponents if we so desire, much more easily than if we got the value.
As I understand, adoption of this value, apart from diplomacy, will also increase cohesion of society, "noble" brotherhood of warriors and such things. On the other hand, if we do not take this value, then road to sweet unexpected backstabs value can be open in future, which is also great. We can be almost drow!After JamesShazbond mentioned something on the last page I sat down and thought about how the value may interact in our diplomacy, simulating possible outcomes and decided I didn't want the hassle. Being able to freely punch anyone is relaxing in ways. Plus not taking it lets us more easily drive wedges into our opponents if we so desire, much more easily than if we got the value.
I don't expect to be successful in getting SV to fight everyone.
Mmm, good point. Ehhh. We'll see what wins the vote and how that turns out.As I understand, adoption of this value, apart from diplomacy, will also increase cohesion of society, "noble" brotherhood of warriors and such things. On the other hand, if we do not take this value, then road to sweet unexpected backstabs value can be open in future, which is also great. We can be almost drow!
But in the end, this argument is still applied, i think.
As I understand, adoption of this value, apart from diplomacy, will also increase cohesion of society, "noble" brotherhood of warriors and such things. On the other hand, if we do not take this value, then road to sweet unexpected backstabs value can be open in future, which is also great. We can be almost drow!
But in the end, this argument is still applied, i think.
I fully agree with this statement. Therefore I think adoption of this value will lead to a more "noble" military society. But, frankly, I'm not very interested in the tribe's ethics, as long as it is militaristic, so either way will satisfy me.
Ooooph that's a tricky one... The first couple rounds are before, at least.@OliWhail, does the outcome of a Raid get applied before or after checking Thresholds?