Proto Galaxy-X would be kind of sweet. I might support it if it wasn't too expensive or we threw the prototype tag at it. I'd also seriously look at a ring. I'm feeling like this ship should be top of the line.
2 neutrals 'works as expected' is ditanium cost/tritanium defence.2 failures would be "tritanium cost, ditanium defense" which is the worst case
2 neutrals is "yeah it works as expected"
2 succeses is "Ditanium cost, tritanium defense" which would ofc be nice
though of course, it could be 1 F/N/S and 1 S/F/N for curiously mixed results
that post was last updated during project NX, the first explorer, literally 20 years ago in-universe, before the War. Yes. Thingsh ave 100% changedUnfortunately the Current Technology informational post hasn't been updated in a while, so I'm not actually sure if this is the case.
2 neutrals 'works as expected' is ditanium cost/tritanium defence.
The reason experimental things get proposed is because the expected result is better then what exists, so a neutral/neutral roll is in fact a win.that post was last updated during project NX, the first explorer, literally 20 years ago in-universe, before the War. Yes. Thingsh ave 100% changed
I'm fairly sure these rolls have three states, right? failure, as-expected, better-than-expected?
The secondary hull should also be a saucer.The last two designs have been sensible. It may be time to push the envelope with something large, wacky, and flashy.
Sooooo, what you're saying is that we need a Trek-i-fied OG Cylon Basestar. I'm on-board with this.
These proponents advocate instead that most critical functions should be moved entirely to the secondary hull to a greater extent than they were on the Cygnus-class, centralising practically all engineering and utility functions there. Smaller saucer, larger engineering hull.
Sooooo, what you're saying is that we need a Trek-i-fied OG Cylon Basestar. I'm on-board with this.