Endorfinator
Awkwardly Social
- Location
- California
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Stellar Dynamics to round out our scientific facilities, and I think now is the time to take cargo and round out our tertiary engineering portfolio.
That's not a D6 that's a damn D7!anyway, for people who have been wondering why I am... let's say, concerned, about Klingon Battlecruisers, this is a D6 next to a Sagarmatha:
The Klingon D6 is a very substantial ship. It is, in point of fact, used to being the Big Fish in this era. This is why I sincerely doubt the assertion that it will be half the connie's mass. I, in point of fact, assume that it is going to substantially oughweigh any ship we can produce for some time
Subclass | Designation | Ship Name | Translation | Source | Official |
---|
Battle Cruiser | D-7 | Klolode | Destruction | Bibliography | Yes |
I mean aside from any schematics, if the QM says it's half the mass of this ship, it's half the mass. A QM's ruling overrides anything else.That's not a D6 that's a damn D7!
Per starshipschematics.net
Subclass Designation Ship Name Translation Source Official
Battle Cruiser D-7 Klolode Destruction Bibliography Yes
Title: Star Trek (Original Series)
----- "Day of the Dove"
Author(s): Gene Roddenberry, Jerome Bixby and Marvin Chomsky
Publication Date: 1968
View Related Ships:
Well there's your answer, it's a long-range explorer meant to be the first, but not last ship we send into unexplored territory. The Chemistry Lab is more for follow-up of something that's already been discovered, while Stellar Dynamics might enable the ship to identify interesting systems in the first place. Stellar Dynamics might also be an unexpected help with diplomacy by potentially identifying stellar civilization by unusual emissions at range, allowing the ship to go in knowing there's a civilization there before accidentally violating someone's territory. The chem lab is basically for getting more science out of things that have already been found, so it's better saved for follow up ships, rather than the first explorer.It's because it's really easy to make a cargo compartment, so the option is open. Tarsus IV was already resolved by an Archer showing up in less time than canon.
I'd like to get Crew Quarters and one of the two Science options. But I'm having a hard time deciding between them because they offer two different flavors of bonus.
Stellar Dynamics would be good for spotting stuff at long-range that a Kea can then be assigned to investigate thoroughly.
Chemistry lab lets the Connie do more when it pulls up to a planet and starts taking samples
Sizes in this quest have been very wonky, with at least one major recon for how big things are.I mean aside from any schematics, if the QM says it's half the mass of this ship, it's half the mass. A QM's ruling overrides anything else.
I'm not contesting mass, I'm just contesting the idea that that's a D6 compared to one of our Sagarmatha's when it's one of their successors next to it.I mean aside from any schematics, if the QM says it's half the mass of this ship, it's half the mass. A QM's ruling overrides anything else.
Mass, but yeah.Sizes in this quest have been very wonky, with at least one major recon for how big things are.
It's more about mission priority. An Explorer needs to be able to kick large amounts of ass, because it's going out into the interstellar wilds all on its onesy and has to be able to get out of any trouble it gets in to, but "kick large amounts of ass" isn't the main focus of the design. In point of fact, Explorers generally aren't tightly focused on any single role, because the mission they're build for might require them to fight off Krenorbian attack ships on Monday, solve the mystery of the Disappearing Moon of Galtraxia on Tuesday, build a long-range communications relay on Wednesday, cure the Dedrotirte Plague on Thursday, negotiate a peace settlement between the Krenorbians and the Xanaxians on Friday, and survive accidentally ending up in the Mirror Universe over the weekend. An Explorer has to do it all, and do it all well, because of how its mission profile works.
A warship, on the other hand, is tightly focused on exactly one thing: killing other people's warships, as quickly as possible, as efficiently as possible, and with as little risk to itself as is manageable. Everything other than that is frippery.
anyway, for people who have been wondering why I am... let's say, concerned, about Klingon Battlecruisers, this is a D6 next to a Sagarmatha:
The Klingon D6 is a very substantial ship. It is, in point of fact, used to being the Big Fish in this era. This is why I sincerely doubt the assertion that it will be half the connie's mass. I, in point of fact, assume that it is going to substantially oughweigh any ship we can produce for some time.
That's not a D6 that's a damn D7!
Per starshipschematics.net
Subclass Designation Ship Name Translation Source Official
Battle Cruiser D-7 Klolode Destruction Bibliography Yes
Title: Star Trek (Original Series)
----- "Day of the Dove"
Author(s): Gene Roddenberry, Jerome Bixby and Marvin Chomsky
Publication Date: 1968
View Related Ships:
I mean aside from any schematics, if the QM says it's half the mass of this ship, it's half the mass. A QM's ruling overrides anything else.
Still about half an hour early to vote, I'm afraid.
Well there's your answer, it's a long-range explorer meant to be the first, but not last ship we send into unexplored territory. The Chemistry Lab is more for follow-up of something that's already been discovered, while Stellar Dynamics might enable the ship to identify interesting systems in the first place. Stellar Dynamics might also be an unexpected help with diplomacy by potentially identifying stellar civilization by unusual emissions at range, allowing the ship to go in knowing there's a civilization there before accidentally violating someone's territory. The chem lab is basically for getting more science out of things that have already been found, so it's better saved for follow up ships, rather than the first explorer.
darn it, sorry
The D6 and D7 are damn near identical, the show used the exact same model for both. the difference is all in her innards and bits too small to be visible on the model.That's not a D6 that's a damn D7!
Per starshipschematics.net
Subclass Designation Ship Name Translation Source Official
Battle Cruiser D-7 Klolode Destruction Bibliography Yes
Title: Star Trek (Original Series)
----- "Day of the Dove"
Author(s): Gene Roddenberry, Jerome Bixby and Marvin Chomsky
Publication Date: 1968
View Related Ships:
She has two decks in the front little pug-saucer bit. It's sized off of that.In fairness D6 and the D7 have a fairly similar hulltype IIRC, and are probably around the same size.
The bigger (no pun intended) issue here is that @Mechanis' image has the D6/D7 about twice the length it should be for some reason, which is why it is appearing so crazily big. If you simply Google and look at the results, a variety of sources ([1], [2], [3]) put the length somewhere a bit above two hundred metres. Actually one of the estimates I saw is 228 metres, which would (rather pleasingly) make it almost exactly the same length as the Saga's 227 metre length, making it easy to compare.
I am going to have a bath, but someone in thread should go and redo those comparison images with the D6/D7 and the Saga having the same nose-to-tail length.
That's your mission to complete for when I get back, there will be a shiny Meow rating for whoever manages to do it.
My comment was really referencing the claim in the post you were responding to, since it was being brought up again.I'm not contesting mass, I'm just contesting the idea that that's a D6 compared to one of our Sagarmatha's when it's one of their successors next to it.
Not exactly my best work, though I've got to say that even using JPEG this art is really smooth, but I believe this should be about right. Beam for the D7 is 160m so it might be a bit much.That's your mission to complete for when I get back, there will be a shiny Meow rating for whoever manages to do it.
The D6 has never appeared on screen, to the best of my knowledge, even though the D5 has. The values are as follows for the D7, per 'generic official information':edit: or, in short, that little bit that sticks out the front is the same thickness as a Saga's main saucer (~7 meters). D6/D7s are VERY LARGE SHIPS and anyone saying different is huffing copium about the Klingon Empire.
[X] 0: Small Arboretum (+2 Science)
[X] 1: Secondary Computer Core (+2 Science, Advanced Computing)
[X] 2: Dilithium Analysis (+1 Science, Dilithium Prospecting)
[X] 3: Science Labs (+4 Science)
[X] 4: Astrometrics (+2 Science)
[X] 5: Biosciences (+1 Science, Biosciences)
[X] 6: Geology Lab (+2 Science)
That said I'll probably drop one of the Science Facility options to make sure we get Extra Crew Quarters.Kea-class Science Cruiser [2211]
Engineering: 4 (Type F Shuttles, 3 Cargo)
Science: 19 (Monotronic Computer Core, Wide-Band Astrometrics, Advanced Mineralogy, Exobiology)
Science Rating: S
Archer-class Light Cruiser [2225]
Science: 4 (Duotronic Computer Core)
Science Rating: D-
edit: or, in short, that little bit that sticks out the front is the same thickness as a Saga's main saucer (~7 meters). D6/D7s are VERY LARGE SHIPS and anyone saying different is huffing copium about the Klingon Empire.
Not exactly my best work, though I've got to say that even using JPEG this art is really smooth, but I believe this should be about right. Beam for the D7 is 160m so it might be a bit much.
View: https://imgur.com/a/olvOpyf