Do you mean invisi-text for the spoiler title?Also, I am not sure how feasible this is, but could invisible spoilers, like invisatext be possible?
That, and also the spoiler itself being invisible (but I am not sure if that is feasible)
how would we find it?That, and also the spoiler itself being invisible (but I am not sure if that is feasible)
I think that's the point. It would allow devious GMs to hide information from players and they wouldn't be able to tell that there is hidden information. (A long line if inivisitext may make players highlight the area if they doubt the update/response really had multiple line breaks)
I don't see anything.
You're not looking hard enough.I don't see anything.
And honestly, the invisible spoiler is just a curiousity. The bolded and italicized text is more important to me.
*grump* You totally stole that from me.
?
*sigh*
I hardly think URL tags count as obscure.*sigh*
They're using obscure BBCode stuff to hide messages. It's pretty annoying, honestly.
Lement hid text in their post by hiding it in URL tags without attaching a URL. This causes the text to disappear, but it's still contained within the post; thus, the text is effectively invisible.Excuse me, but what are you talking about?
I just went over it and couldn't find anything. (Maybe I am misunderstanding here.)
And I hid some text by taking advantage of the [hr] tag.Excuse me, but what are you talking about?
I just went over it and couldn't find anything. (Maybe I am misunderstanding here.)
Lement hid text in their post by hiding it in URL tags without attaching a URL. This causes the text to disappear, but it's still contained within the post; thus, the text is effectively invisible.
It's pretty easy to check what BBCode someone is using by just quoting their post into the BBCode editor.
I guess you're just not looking hard enough. Either that or you just need more practice messing with people.But there's no URL tags in his post .
Edit: How strange. The URL tages seem to eat the text. I had some in my post, and now they're gone.
Yeah, I've done that before. It doesn't work as you say it does. First one has to disable the rich text editor, then quote the post. Not worth the effort for most "hidden" messages, frankly.Lement hid text in their post by hiding it in URL tags without attaching a URL. This causes the text to disappear, but it's still contained within the post; thus, the text is effectively invisible.
It's pretty easy to check what BBCode someone is using by just quoting their post into the BBCode editor.
Won't work on these:There's an easier way than going through the BBCode quote + disable editor dance: turn on the dev tools (F-12 in Chrome), click the inspect element box at the top left, select the block of text you want to examine, and expand the element to see if the text is just text or if there's something sneaky in there.
It's still a hassle though.
You're right. Weird. It works on this one.