Scientists re-domesticate wild tomato into a healthier fruit through genome editing

Pioneering biologists create a new crop through genome editing
From wild plant to crop: CRISPR-Cas9 revolutionizes breeding, New tomato contains more valuable antioxidants

Date: October 1, 2018
Source: University of Münster
Summary: For the first time, researchers have created, within a single generation, a new crop from a wild plant -- the progenitor of our modern tomato -- by using a modern process of genome editing. Starting with a 'wild tomato' they have, at the same time, introduced a variety of crop features without losing the valuable genetic properties of the wild plant.

FULL STORY
Crops such as wheat and maize have undergone a breeding process lasting thousands of years, in the course of which humankind has gradually modified the properties of the wild plants in order to adapt them to his needs. One motive was, and still is, higher yields. One "side effect" of this breeding has been a reduction in genetic diversity and the loss of useful properties. This is shown, among others, by an increased susceptibility to diseases, a lack of taste or a reduced vitamin and nutrient content in modern varieties. Now, for the first time, researchers from Brazil, the USA and Germany have created a new crop from a wild plant within a single generation using CRISPR-Cas9, a modern genome editing process. Starting with a "wild tomato" they have, at the same time, introduced a variety of crop features without losing the valuable genetic properties of the wild plant. The results have been published in the current issue of Nature Biotechnology.

"This new method allows us to start from scratch and begin a new domestication process all over again," says biologist Prof. Jörg Kudla from the University of Münster (Germany), whose team is involved in the study. "In doing so, we can use all the knowledge on plant genetics and plant domestication which researchers have accumulated over the past decades. We can preserve the genetic potential and the particularly valuable properties of wild plants and, at the same time, produce the desired features of modern crops in a very short time." Altogether, the researchers spent about three years working on their studies.

The researchers chose Solanum pimpinellifolium as the parent plant species, a wild tomato relative from South America, and the progenitor of the modern cultivated tomato. The wild plant's fruits are only the size of peas and the yield is low -- two properties which make it unsuitable as a crop. On the other hand, the fruit is more aromatic than modern tomatoes, which have lost some of their taste due to breeding. Moreover, the wild fruit contains more lycopene. This so-called radical scavenger, i.e. an antioxidant, is considered to be healthy and, as a result, is a welcome ingredient.

Pioneering biologists create a new crop through genome editing: From wild plant to crop: CRISPR-Cas9 revolutionizes breeding, New tomato contains more valuable antioxidants

Sooo we are re-domesticating the wild tomato with a side order of modern gene editing.

Nothing can go wrong here. Nopenopenopenope.

Solanum pimpinellifolium


:confused::o
 
Last edited:
I wonder what other animals/plants should be re-domesticated with modern knowledge to catch the pitfalls.
 
Sooo we are re-domesticating the wild tomato with a side order of modern gene editing.

Nothing can go wrong here. Nopenopenopenope.

And what really can go wrong? The only thing I can think of is that this new species will outcompete local flora and heavily impact local biosphere (i.e. it will become invasive species). But that is an already existing problem with any introduced plants and not with gene editing itself.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what other animals/plants should be re-domesticated with modern knowledge to catch the pitfalls.
Teosinte into corn, less to get more traits (although the nitrogen fixation would be awesome), and more to prove that's how it really happened the first time because holy shit how do you get the one out of the other.
 
I first read the title as "scientists re-domesticate wild tornadoes" and had to do a double-take...
 
And this is all because y'all weirdos want to have those perfectly round tomatoes that taste like cardboard. Here in South America I actually grew up on the wild, deformed, aromatic and freakin' tasty tomatoes that grew on the countryside and I didn't know y'all maniacs had all but driven them to extinction elsewhere because "duh, ugly non-round tomato".

Actually, you don't even need to make crazy genetic engineering ridiculousness if you simply started breeding tomatoes the good 'ol way but focusing on taste rather than freaking shape.

Hell, next you'll tell me people also forgot there's like million variants of potatoes and corns with all the colors of the rainbow down here in this continent too.
 
And this is all because y'all weirdos want to have those perfectly round tomatoes that taste like cardboard. Here in South America I actually grew up on the wild, deformed, aromatic and freakin' tasty tomatoes that grew on the countryside and I didn't know y'all maniacs had all but driven them to extinction elsewhere because "duh, ugly non-round tomato".

Actually, you don't even need to make crazy genetic engineering ridiculousness if you simply started breeding tomatoes the good 'ol way but focusing on taste rather than freaking shape.

Hell, next you'll tell me people also forgot there's like million variants of potatoes and corns with all the colors of the rainbow down here in this continent too.

Not only over there.
Over here, in Ukraine, domestically grown veggies - tomatoes, potatoes, onions, you name it - are always more tasty and flavourful than ones bought in the supermarket.
Thus, buying them from random grandma on the street or street markets is actually preferable if you are sure those are safe, because for some utterly inane reason supermarkets seem to think shape matters more than taste, aroma and flavour? Which is asinine.
 
I will note that all to often it isn't that they wanted to remove the taste from the various materials. Instead you get in to a series of trade-offs, like how long does a particular breed last in storage, if you can't ship it far that's a problem after all. Then you also have that even today in plenty of consumer markets people can't afford something all to expensive, so you'd probably prefer something with a reasonable cost per kg. And it would of course be nice if it isn't very demanding in being grown.

And well, these various trade-offs thus end up often with less tasty fruits and vegetables. Though it's not always like that, some times it kind of works out, especially when price becomes less of a concern and the type tends to store well in many different varieties.
 
I will note that all to often it isn't that they wanted to remove the taste from the various materials. Instead you get in to a series of trade-offs, like how long does a particular breed last in storage, if you can't ship it far that's a problem after all. Then you also have that even today in plenty of consumer markets people can't afford something all to expensive, so you'd probably prefer something with a reasonable cost per kg. And it would of course be nice if it isn't very demanding in being grown.

And well, these various trade-offs thus end up often with less tasty fruits and vegetables. Though it's not always like that, some times it kind of works out, especially when price becomes less of a concern and the type tends to store well in many different varieties.
Also how easy to grow out of season, because people MUST have the same stuff year round.
 
Back
Top