Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
A friendly reminder to new questers to read the Informational threadmarks and FAQ specifically before asking a question. Links below:

Frequently Asked Questions
Here is the Detailed Rune List
Discord.

On Thread Etiquette:

I'm not going to weigh in on the logic of either side's arguments, but I will ask that everyone read over what they write and really consider if the words they used are polite and won't be inflammatory intentionally or not. You cant account for people's tolerances perfectly but at least try to say your piece without saying things that can be easily construed as overly dismissive of the other side of the argument, thank you.

Please endeavour to be cordial. :^)
 
Last edited:
Been skimming this conversation so I don't know if anyone's brought it up yet, but Vragni and Snorri have exchanged letters, which is about as private as you can get for dwarves. My statement thus is that private conversation some want happened in some sense - it was an insult fest. Any other conversation face to face is going to be an insult fest. (Point of historical fact, the last time Vragni and Snorri interacted in person during the war was an insult fest, just a subtle one)

I don't think a private conversation would do anything, because the fundamental problem is Snorri's beliefs and actions and those are not going to be changing. I very much doubt this thread is going to backpedal on the things we've been doing or are planning to do.

If our actions and behavior are not going to change, then we have to convince him that the potential future consequences of our actions are not as threatening or as possible as he thinks. And we have no evidence whatsoever for that - not even enough to convince a human. What we're doing could end in disaster and we have no idea if it will or not. It will probably be good, but we don't have any actual hard evidence for it.
What was the purpose of those letters? Were they actually trying to discuss something or were they just exchanging insults for the fun of it?

I'm just not willing to completely skip trying to moderate this fued because the thread assumes it's past the point of no return. Even if the core issue cannot be resolved, at the very least we should try to put limits on how far the fued can go so that we don't create an actual schism in the Guild.

Even Wars have rules after all. At the very least I want to establish with him what constitutes a 'War Crime'.
 
Last edited:
@soulcake, now that we have such an insane amount of adamant production, can you give us some voting options next turn about dedicating some of it to our apprentices?

I could see a lot of us electing to build an additional smelter and use its proceeds to give our apprentices an ingot per decade adamant allowance, or maybe voting to give them the reagents to make their own UltraSmelter.

Would it be possible to have some options like that next update?

Our former apprentices were taught the adamant maker combo and presumably have their own smelters.
We know Karstah has several because she has been making a ton of adamant gear without touching our stash.

On Vragni:
I feel he is crossing a line here.
If runesmiths of differing views keep leaving his hold it affirms his position of quasi-guildmaster which is a big no for the guild at large.
Might be in for a private censure by Thungnisson or even a formal one at the next conclave.
 
@soulcake, now that we have such an insane amount of adamant production, can you give us some voting options next turn about dedicating some of it to our apprentices?

I could see a lot of us electing to build an additional smelter and use its proceeds to give our apprentices an ingot per decade adamant allowance, or maybe voting to give them the reagents to make their own UltraSmelter.

Would it be possible to have some options like that next update?
Our eldest living apprentices are close to 600 years old.
And Snerra is a Runelord.

If they want Adamant, they are perfectly capable of making some.
 
Been skimming this conversation so I don't know if anyone's brought it up yet, but Vragni and Snorri have exchanged letters, which is about as private as you can get for dwarves. My statement thus is that private conversation some want happened in some sense - it was an insult fest. Any other conversation face to face is going to be an insult fest. (Point of historical fact, the last time Vragni and Snorri interacted in person during the war was an insult fest, just a subtle one)

I don't think a private conversation would do anything, because the fundamental problem is Snorri's beliefs and actions and those are not going to be changing. I very much doubt this thread is going to backpedal on the things we've been doing or are planning to do.

If our actions and behavior are not going to change, then we have to convince him that the potential future consequences of our actions are not as threatening or as possible as he thinks. And we have no evidence whatsoever for that - not even enough to convince a human. What we're doing could end in disaster and we have no idea if it will or not. It will probably be good, but we don't have any actual hard evidence for it.

As I've thought of it, the best comparison is both Vragni and Snorri are devout, but to Vragni the methodology that Snorri has adopted would be in another Ancestor God's context would be like learning to let Grudges go. To Vragni, Snorri is performing actions that are anathema to the dictates given by Thugni and an insult to the very profession of Runesmithing.

The difference of how the two of them see things is the fundamental questions of how should things continue now that the Ancestor's are gone?

It's a schism on such a deep and utterly opposing matters that it honestly mirrors the foundational disagreements that resulted in the schisms of Christianity into Catholocism and Protestentism, or Islam into Shia and Sunni. Vragni's beliefs will never line up with Snorri's because the two of them aren't even approaching Runelore from the same mental space in the first place.
 
Last edited:
- +(4 +4) =8 Progress to Monolith Mastery Pt. 1, new totals: [Cost: (24 -18) =6 actions]

- +2 Progress to The Mind of Things Pt. 6, new totals: [Cost: (20 -2) =18 actions]

- +1 Progress to Extra-sensory Pt. 1, new totals: [Cost: (16 -1) =15 actions]

- +1 Progress to Chimaera Autopsy, new totals: [Cost: (4 -3) =1 action]

- New Combo compressed! Brotherbound
-- New Rune understood! Master Rune of Fraternity
-- +2 Progress to The Mind of Things Pt. 6, new totals: [Cost: (20 -2) =18 actions]

- New Rune understood! Master Rune of the Eagle-Eyed
-- Determining how Runes decided where the user or target ended and began isn't new to you, but in reviewing this Rune's particularities help you think of a few other ways of tackling the issue.
-- +1 Progress to Extra-sensory Pt. 1, new totals: [Cost: (16 -1) =15 actions]
So is this math wrong or are we seeing the same progress twice?
 
Thinking about the next turn, given that at least two of the dragons are learning magic, I wonder if they'd join us for Aonoquean lessons, given that it's the magical language of the elves, and a lot of their magical education would presumably come from the elves who shape their spells with that language.

On apprentices, I'd say the dragons are currently partially filling the narrative role of apprentices. Karstah has a quite different position in the narrative. Apprentices show us how 'regular' dwarves perceive both Snorri and wider dwarven society in a way that we don't usually see.

The latter becomes particularly true when they go journeying. We have a much narrower view of the wider Karaz Ankor than we did when we saw vignettes of what our journeymen were up to.
 
The point isn't to line up the beliefs. That's just extremely unrealistic. I'm advocating for meeting with Vragni personally to moderate the conflict, which I think is something Snorri can reasonably persuade Vragni into doing. Let it be said that everyone here is running on assumptions. You have no hard truth, nor evidence or future sight which would 100% determine the outcome of this sort of talk. I think it's shortsighted to discount this course of action because of people's assumptions. We should not try to limit our own options in dealing with the Vragni conflict.
 
The problem is that, from what little I've seen of Vragni, he wants that to happen. He wants things to get extremely clannish and just short of a full-on grudge or cold war. He wants to stop people from going to our school, and has been applying (or at least allowing) heavy social pressure to do so at least in his home hold.

There isn't a way for any bridges to be built in any form. His starting position leaves no room for that.

He might be an elder dwarf, but he's an elder dwarf priest of Thungni who literally believes Snorri has overturned everything about their shared religion to the point of heresy. How do you go from there? The only time Snorri has ever approached cooperation with Vragni is when they were facing down enemies of dwarvenkind. Outside of that....absolutely nothing.
I don't think so, not exactly anyway.

What Vragni wants is to win because he cares about the fate of the guild. He doesn't want to see it destroy any more than Snorri does, and was pragmatic enough to effectively bite the bullet on parts of Snorri's ideas in order to have the influence to help as he sees it.

Being a runelord means being responsible for making sure the guild stays healthy, and issues like the ones we had with the prosthetics are handled cleanly.

I don't think we could convince him we're right via personal appeal, but I do believe he'd see the necessity of keeping things above the belt to avoid destroying the institution he's fighting for.

As long as we only propose things that aren't biased one way or the other I think he'd take it.
Been skimming this conversation so I don't know if anyone's brought it up yet, but Vragni and Snorri have exchanged letters, which is about as private as you can get for dwarves. My statement thus is that private conversation some want happened in some sense - it was an insult fest. Any other conversation face to face is going to be an insult fest. (Point of historical fact, the last time Vragni and Snorri interacted in person during the war was an insult fest, just a subtle one)

I don't think a private conversation would do anything, because the fundamental problem is Snorri's beliefs and actions and those are not going to be changing. I very much doubt this thread is going to backpedal on the things we've been doing or are planning to do.

If our actions and behavior are not going to change, then we have to convince him that the potential future consequences of our actions are not as threatening or as possible as he thinks. And we have no evidence whatsoever for that - not even enough to convince a human. What we're doing could end in disaster and we have no idea if it will or not. It will probably be good, but we don't have any actual hard evidence for it.
I don't recall the letter exchanges, but I think it's fair to say that the context has changed enough to warrant a different conversation. Resolving the personal dispute is probably not happening, acknowledging their mutual responsibility as runelords to stop the beadlings from making a mess while we duke it out for the fate of guild is different.

We don't need to convince him to stop hating Snorri or his ideas to mutually agree to some harm mitigation. Especially if the points we raise are in both of our interests.

Vragni and Snorri (to an extent) want to convince the guild at large to take certain mutually exclusive positions. As long as each of them is convinced they're right and persuasive about it they benefit from more chances to convince the people leaning in the opposite direction and minimizing the fallout they'll need to clean up after winning.

So things like squashing exclusionary policies or encouraging journeymen to visit different political strongholds are to both of their benefits as long as the other party is also following through.

Vragni can hate Snorri all he likes, all we need him to do is be genuinely invested in his position and be able to loosely plot the consequences of his actions.

He's an old dwarf too, this almost certainly isn't the first time he's had to deal with thorny cult politics either. Working out understandings like this is how the dwarves avoid exploding in the first place. See the prosthetics stuff and how we basically had to come to an understanding about how to distribute the rune without forcing the cults to fight each other.
 
As I've thought of it, the best comparison is both Vragni and Snorri are devout, but to Vragni the methodology that Snorri has adopted would be in another Ancestor God's context would be like learning to let Grudges go. To Vragni, Snorri is performing actions that are anathema to the dictates given by Thrugni and an insult to the very profession of Runesmithing.

The difference of how the two of them see things is the fundamental questions of how should things continue now that the Ancestor's are gone?

It's a schism on such a deep and utterly opposing matters that it honestly mirrors the foundational disagreements that resulted in the schisms of Christianity into Catholocism and Protestentism, or Islam into Shia and Sunni. Vragni's beliefs will never line up with Snorri's because the two of them aren't even approaching Runelore from the same mental space in the first place.
Pretty much.

The point isn't to line up the beliefs. That's just extremely unrealistic. I'm advocating for meeting with Vragni personally to moderate the conflict, which I think is something Snorri can reasonably persuade Vragni into doing. Let it be said that everyone here is running on assumptions. You have no hard truth, nor evidence or future sight which would 100% determine the outcome of this sort of talk. I think it's shortsighted to discount this course of action because of people's assumptions. We should not try to limit our own options in dealing with the Vragni conflict.
What was the purpose of those letters? Were they actually trying to discuss something or were they just exchanging insults for the fun of it?

I'm just not willing to completely skip trying to moderate this fued because the thread assumes it's past the point of no return. Even if the core issue cannot be resolved, at the very least we should try to put limits on how far the fued can go so that we don't create an actual schism in the Guild.

Even Wars have rules after all. At the very least I want to establish with him what constitutes a 'War Crime'.
Vragni lobbed a letter at Snorri decrying what he did, Snorri responded back to defend himself and his honor.

These suggestions to do something are understandable. It'd be nice if the option you all are suggesting existed.

It doesn't.

There are no write in general actions - never have been. Our best course of action is to frame it as an actual question and request of Soul to add that action of "set up a meeting with Vragni" in, but I'm not going to hold my breath that he'll actually grant it.

@soulcake, me and other folks in the thread are essentially requesting you to add in an action to try and talk to Vragni for the explicit purpose of setting limits on this feud so it doesn't actually rise to the point of schism in the North.
 
Last edited:
I don't recall the letter exchanges, but I think it's fair to say that the context has changed enough to warrant a different conversation. Resolving the personal dispute is probably not happening, acknowledging their mutual responsibility as runelords to stop the beadlings from making a mess while we duke it out for the fate of guild is different.

-From Turn 48, Results Pt1.

The last twelve are an eclectic mix of local and foreign figures. One is an insult filled rant from Vragni, of which you've sent an equally insult filled critique back about his own Radicalness with an equally petty remark about his own little project that he's starting because of you.
 
@soulcake, now that we have such an insane amount of adamant production, can you give us some voting options next turn about dedicating some of it to our apprentices?

I could see a lot of us electing to build an additional smelter and use its proceeds to give our apprentices an ingot per decade adamant allowance, or maybe voting to give them the reagents to make their own UltraSmelter.

Would it be possible to have some options like that next update?
Snorri and Karstah are probably going to teach them to make their own super smelters, presumably they already know the old design.
What was the purpose of those letters? Were they actually trying to discuss something or were they just exchanging insults for the fun of it?

I'm just not willing to completely skip trying to moderate this fued because the thread assumes it's past the point of no return. Even if the core issue cannot be resolved, at the very least we should try to put limits on how far the fued can go so that we don't create an actual schism in the Guild.

Even Wars have rules after all. At the very least I want to establish with him what constitutes a 'War Crime'.
It occured just after the world learned about Khazagar, Vragni wrote Snorri a letter full of insults presumably to let off some steam before his megaproject was a giant middle finger on the hill opposite Snorri's house.
Anyway, notice you're talking about different things here. "Moderated" isn't private letters, its a third party intervention. This would be difficult as it requires both Snorri and Vragni to be willing to cooperate, and a third party they're both willing to listen to.
So yeah, this isn't going to happen until the grudge gets bad enough a runelord conclave needs to be summoned to manage it, at which point it's going to have escalated beyond any mutually agreeable settlement if there ever was one.
Even if moderation occured at an earlier point, as I said earlier in this conversation earlier: What concessions are you willing to make to Vragni in order to close this issue? Change our interpretation of deeply held IC religious strictures? Close down Khazagar? Because even if we do both of those, and I don't think anyone is willing, we still have to contend with the issue that he's probably irrationally seething after holding a small g grudge in his heart for centuries.
 
Last edited:
(joking here) Man, Vragni will live basically forever by being the MC rival. Getting a 'level-up' every single time the MC does.


xxxxx

Still, the guy is a 'high priest' like the MC is. So, I hope he adjust his actions if he see stuff like 'junior priests' never returning home because they were afraid of his (or their fellow) reaction.
 
It occured just after the world learned about Khazagar, Vragni wrote Snorri a letter full of insults presumably to let off some steam before his megaproject was a giant middle finger on the hill opposite Snorri's house.
Anyway, notice you're talking about different things here. "Moderated" isn't private letters, its a third party intervention. This would be difficult as it requires both Snorri and Vragni to be willing to cooperate, and a third party they're both willing to listen to.
So yeah, this isn't going to happen until the grudge gets bad enough a runelord conclave needs to be summoned to manage it, at which point it's going to have escalated beyond any mutually agreeable settlement if there ever was one.
Even if moderation occured at an earlier point, as I said earlier in this conversation earlier: What concessions are you willing to make to Vragni in order to close this issue? Change our interpretation of deeply held IC religious strictures? Close down Khazagar? Because even if we do both of those, and I don't think anyone is willing, we still have to contend with the issue that he's probably irrationally seething after holding a small g grudge in his heart for centuries.
Again it makes no sense to assume that there is no way to de-escalate the conflict without even trying. Is your interpretation possible and potentially even likely? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn't even try? Hard No.

Also, just because Vragni will never approve of Snorri's methods doesn't mean that he's entirely irrational and willing to start a civil war over it. Maybe he is, but until we have a frank face to face discussion about things assuming that is just turning him into a caricature.
 
Snorri and Karstah are probably going to teach them to make their own super smelters, presumably they already know the old design.
I mean, we've never seen them use Adamant in even their best stuff and we have been completely monopolizing the reagents they would need to make their own….

Plus, it'd be pretty difficult for Nain, Dolgi, or Fjolla to source the stuff. Not to mention there's no way even Snerra has the required Adamant to make her own UltraSmelter.
 
Could we show Vragni the 'Judgement Withheld Pending Results' gromril wafer that was sent by Thungni? No Runelord would presume to claim greater wisdom than the Ancestors, so it might get him to at least simmer down a little.
 
@soulcake, now that we have such an insane amount of adamant production, can you give us some voting options next turn about dedicating some of it to our apprentices?

I could see a lot of us electing to build an additional smelter and use its proceeds to give our apprentices an ingot per decade adamant allowance, or maybe voting to give them the reagents to make their own UltraSmelter.

Would it be possible to have some options like that next update?
I can add a vote. sure.
 
We uh do kind of need all that production till we hit 250 bars for the dragon but after that sure might as well. I'd rather just give them the voidstone and let them figure it out from there though I'm still surprised the others don't have their own smelters at this point. They've known how to do it for like 200 years at this point.

Of course a small loan of 10 bars to be paid back in a couple turns is all good since that won't mess with anything.
 
Last edited:
Even if moderation occured at an earlier point, as I said earlier in this conversation earlier: What concessions are you willing to make to Vragni in order to close this issue? Change our interpretation of deeply held IC religious strictures? Close down Khazagar? Because even if we do both of those, and I don't think anyone is willing, we still have to contend with the issue that he's probably irrationally seething after holding a small g grudge in his heart for centuries.
That's missing the point. Vragni hates Snorri, or at least what Snorri does if we care to make a distinction, but hate isn't his only concern and isn't even necessarily the biggest one behind this conflict.

As far as I can see he hates Snorri's actions because he believes they're fundamentally bad for the guild and their shared faith. Mediating that conflict away is a pipe dream.

However, done right mediating how that conflict will play out invokes the same thing motivating it to happen in the first place - protecting the guild. Both believe they'll win in the end, and therefore will have to deal with the fallout of how they do so. Harm prevention of this type is part of a runelord's job description and perfectly in line with both parties' interests.

A decent start would be agreeing to grumble at anyone being exclusionary and shutting down the other side with pressure tactics. Essentially agreeing to fight by convincing people to listen instead of splintering into factions to choke each other out, because doing that would set the guild on fire.

Even just getting a single one of those terms in the table would be enough to signal to the younger members that they shouldn't be lining up to take shots at the other side. Which is important because it's better to head these things off before something big happens.
 
Again it makes no sense to assume that there is no way to de-escalate the conflict without even trying. Is your interpretation possible and potentially even likely? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn't even try? Hard No.

Also, just because Vragni will never approve of Snorri's methods doesn't mean that he's entirely irrational and willing to start a civil war over it. Maybe he is, but until we have a frank face to face discussion about things assuming that is just turning him into a caricature.

I mean you are kind of assuming that attempts at de-escalation can only either succeed or do nothing. What if they make things worse? What are the odds of making things worse opposed to making them better. I mean lets assume Snori makes a good faith attempt to set limits and boundaries. Vragni rolls something for the response misunderstands our point to some grievous insult, trying to tempt him from the path of honest Thungi worship and delivers his own significant insult in exchange, We do not have total and absolute control of Snori's mindset or responses, we have seen that in the past. So how low does that Vragni roll have to be to make things worse? How high does it have to be to make it better? (I am simplifying of course there may be multiple rolls involved, but you get the point).
 
I mean you are kind of assuming that attempts at de-escalation can only either succeed or do nothing. What if they make things worse? What are the odds of making things worse opposed to making them better. I mean lets assume Snori makes a good faith attempt to set limits and boundaries. Vragni rolls something for the response misunderstands our point to some grievous insult, trying to tempt him from the path of honest Thungi worship and delivers his own significant insult in exchange, We do not have total and absolute control of Snori's mindset or responses, we have seen that in the past. So how low does that Vragni roll have to be to make things worse? How high does it have to be to make it better? (I am simplifying of course there may be multiple rolls involved, but you get the point).
...All you're arguing is "The dice can fuck us over", which is always true. Can it fail? Sure, but it can also succeed by the logic of your own argument. Not trying things because they can fail is a bit of a silly idea when we're looking into actual fucking magic.
 
...All you're arguing is "The dice can fuck us over", which is always true. Can it fail? Sure, but it can also succeed by the logic of your own argument. Not trying things because they can fail is a bit of a silly idea when we're looking into actual fucking magic.

I am using the dice as a proxy to make people think of the odds of success versus a failure state that is worse than not acting. If, for the sake of an example, the odds of something working are 1% and the odds of making things worse are 50%, then one should reasonably not do it
 
Last edited:
I am using the dice as a proxy to make people think of the odds of success versus a failure state that is worse than not acting. If, for the sake of an example, the odds of something working are 1% and the odds of making things worse are 50%, then one should reasonably not do it

I realize this is sort of the point of your hypothetical/hyperbole but I think you're catastrophying to the point of paralysis I don't believe that talking with Vargni is that risky of an option mostly because both parties involved have a genuine respect for the other, Snorri because Vargni is a full and proper runelord of equal age who sticks to his beliefs and takes action in the pursuit of them; Vargni because of Snorri's achievements and skill even if he despises the way Snorri does things, as others have stated we aren't hoping for a complete cessation of hostilities but rather something limiting the damage caused by one another's actions in the fashion that two reasonably mature 1000+ dwarfs ought to, futher if we can't then it provides a launching point for a proper mediation via the guild itself
 
Back
Top