Yeah its Mysticism and Tech most of the time. During Golden Ages its usually Myst, Tech, and Wealth. So, generally speaking its from our priests making lots and lots of art in the amounts of spare time they have.
*wiggles hand*
That's untrue. We did explicitly vote against that sort of bullshit.
No, I am pretty sure that it comes from the gods, AN clarified it after that vote.
We've had eight Secondary actions for a couple of turns now, and it still hasn't been enough for everything we need to do. The point I was making and which you completely neglected was that actions are a premium, and we very rarely have some to spare.
Not remotely. Here is a sample of what we might want to do next turn:
Er... that's not Connectivity cap. That is our government connectivity cent-tolerance-bonus cap, which has nothing to do with the connectivity cap.
Best I can find is here.
But in short, no, we do have divine authority for the king as a thing. We just didn't grab a specific interpretation of it that would have determined who was the 'head' deity by having the deity the king patron's be said deity.
What we need is the ability to burn RA some way or another. "Two libraries and an academy" aren't going to solve the issue; they will merely delay it for a short time until Priest Faction power increases again. Or, hell, until they build their own temple - which they can do, since Factions have independent actions nowadays.
uhh...
I'm reasonably certain the (+7) will be gained after the start of the turn here, since I know like +3 of that is coming from forests and a new settlement from last turn.
There is however a huge gap between the king given responsibility by the gods which we have now AND the king being divine and his word is holy which we all have been opposing
Yeah. This was the big reason, and it's too late to do anything about it, we've lost this control anyway. Making Sacred Forest a Free City might even bind our priests more tightly to the state, because it puts their center of power in a place where we can influence it.
It's exactly because we're getting Culture from overflow that our culture's weak. It means we haven't been taking +Culture actions, and so haven't been getting the innovations that come with them.
I wasn't aware of where it was coming from so I was putting into the end of the mid turn.
We've finally reached the point where not having one is burning us, so we might finally get one after all.
First of all, spamming GPs sounds exceedingly inadvisable. Remember that GPs are a big deal narratively; I would much rather take it slow there.
Note that we've stayed close to the cap of our tolerance ever since the Meteor, despite building almost no temples. In fact, not-having-temples is a distinct problem in our polity, similar to not-having-roads. Given that we are about to get faction actions and priests are likely to like building temples, I don't see how the special RA-spending-options we've had so far would suffice.
Things in the same '+' tend to come at the same time as far as I've noticed, so I'd lump them all together.
First notice that a secondary makes up +2 of that Econ. Second, notice that the econ gained doesn't fill up EE, there is an initial cost of 1 EE though. This is what makes them a net total of +1 LTE. So econ gained from forests is not going to lower the calculation of EE.
If we're planting Cash Crops, can we plant drugs? That may count for the priest's quest.
Maybe?
I hope not. Chances are they are King of the Hill where they live, and I don't want to kick off ANOTHER great power war.
