Carrnage
Human
- Location
- New Zealand
Spirit channel march.So, speaking of marches, any clue on what the name will be? I kinda hope it's not a "Boring Ymaryn Name" but other than that I have no clue.
Spirit channel march.So, speaking of marches, any clue on what the name will be? I kinda hope it's not a "Boring Ymaryn Name" but other than that I have no clue.
Why would they be boring? Valleyhome and Redshore are fine names.
It's the Spirit Channel, and the people who lived there were the Thunder Speakers.
Together that'll be ... the Spirit Talkers!
And the circle is full.
I honestly don't know, but we at minimum need to take some territory this time, so they no longer hold that critical pass into turkey, and we can plop down a March to watch whatever's left on the land we took from them.So, I think by this point we can all agree that war with the HK is something of an inevitability. But how decisive are we willing to go with this? Mass Levy rooting them out of their homes and outright conquest? Pushing them back and throwing some Terrifies at them to try and get them to bend the knee?
Because as tempted as I am to say going all in and finally putting the screws to them is worth it... if we've seized all their holdings outside the hills/rough terrain and then proceeded to consolidate our hold on the Lowlands like we're intending, it might be worth not completely trying to ruin their parade in favor of consolidating our gains in the Lowlands more rapidly.
Simply put, how much do we honestly think a turn of Mass Levy will cost us in terms of opportunity elsewhere? I'm not even going to pretend I have a good enough grasp on the numbers by that point to say anything with certainty.
Also it seems like they think they can win, maybe it'd be a good idea to learn why.
current running theory is religious fervor, but we don't know for sure yetAlso it seems like they think they can win, maybe it'd be a good idea to learn why.
Small nations beating larger ones is not unheard of.
Conquest is a bad idea. We're at 21 roads and already capped on cent tolerance increases until we evolve our government. We are way too overextended and taking over a hostile population who doesn't like you will play havoc with our administration. It'll also force us to be repressive if we want to keep control of the area, turning us into assholes.So, I think by this point we can all agree that war with the HK is something of an inevitability. But how decisive are we willing to go with this? Mass Levy rooting them out of their homes and outright conquest? Pushing them back and throwing some Terrifies at them to try and get them to bend the knee?
Because as tempted as I am to say going all in and finally putting the screws to them is worth it... if we've seized all their holdings outside the hills/rough terrain and then proceeded to consolidate our hold on the Lowlands like we're intending, it might be worth not completely trying to ruin their parade in favor of consolidating our gains in the Lowlands more rapidly.
Simply put, how much do we honestly think a turn of Mass Levy will cost us in terms of opportunity elsewhere? I'm not even going to pretend I have a good enough grasp on the numbers by that point to say anything with certainty.
All I am hearing is that accidently purging the entire place and leaving a desolate wasteland is in order?/sConquest is a bad idea. We're at 21 roads and already capped on cent tolerance increases until we evolve our government. We are way too overextended and taking over a hostile population who doesn't like you will play havoc with our administration. It'll also force us to be repressive if we want to keep control of the area, turning us into assholes.
But can we really afford to let the HK go yet again? How many times have they pulled this shit? How many more times would it happen if we don't bring them to heel one way or another?Conquest is a bad idea. We're at 21 roads and already capped on cent tolerance increases until we evolve our government. We are way too overextended and taking over a hostile population who doesn't like you will play havoc with our administration. It'll also force us to be repressive if we want to keep control of the area, turning us into assholes.
I honestly don't think we need Mass Levy to push them out of the Lowlands.So, I think by this point we can all agree that war with the HK is something of an inevitability. But how decisive are we willing to go with this? Mass Levy rooting them out of their homes and outright conquest? Pushing them back and throwing some Terrifies at them to try and get them to bend the knee?
Because as tempted as I am to say going all in and finally putting the screws to them is worth it... if we've seized all their holdings outside the hills/rough terrain and then proceeded to consolidate our hold on the Lowlands like we're intending, it might be worth not completely trying to ruin their parade in favor of consolidating our gains in the Lowlands more rapidly.
Simply put, how much do we honestly think a turn of Mass Levy will cost us in terms of opportunity elsewhere? I'm not even going to pretend I have a good enough grasp on the numbers by that point to say anything with certainty.
So the mass levy should be relatively sustainable so long as we enter it with high econ.
But can we really afford to let the HK go yet again? How many times have they pulled this shit? How many more times would it happen if we don't bring them to heel one way or another?
We're going to have to push them out of anything besides their hills as is- anything less is practically congratulating them. Is absorbing another province or two and dealing with the strain so much worse than simply letting them fuck with us yet again?
No their pulling this bullshit because we spread our religion to them at the start of the plague.They are pulling this shit because the priests upslurp the King's authority and because they were too isolated for so long.
Conquest is a bad idea. We're at 21 roads and already capped on cent tolerance increases until we evolve our government. We are way too overextended and taking over a hostile population who doesn't like you will play havoc with our administration. It'll also force us to be repressive if we want to keep control of the area, turning us into assholes.
1) We will likely expel the Highlanders from their lowland territory, and hopefully the pass, so there's no revolt issues to deal with.
2) We will probably let Txolla have the fun of administrating the new land. They like being big.
The problem would be less with building them up, and more with integrating an extremely Xenophobic group of people who were insular for hundreds of years and likely hate the Ymaryn and everyone around them.Regarding the difficulty of, (what is the word? Digesting?) Digesting the Highlander Core: They have been stuck in a little tiny space for a very long time, they have most likely built up as tall as they could. Getting them up to the Ymaryn Standard should be cheaper than normal.
True, but we currently have a net positive wealth income. Net negative wealth/econ incomes give us a hard timer for how long we can afford to be under the mass levy policy or risk destruction. Whereas net positive wealth/econ incomes limit the number of opportunities that we can pursue while under said policy.It does also block Wealth-generating actions, which with increased costs will lock us out of almost all Wealth-spending actions for the duration too.
ftfy.We frankly do not have the time or resources (or ruthlessness) to properly deal with them, and if we ate them they would just fester until they could break away at an inopportune moment.
*For reference, a main raise army would cost 3 econ and 10 wealth, and would generate 9 martial. Which would be a 4 point decrease to our effective martial score under a mass levy.