That's true but this leaves development to the nomads, who I don't really trust when it comes to creating sustainable pastures in a very different environment from the steppes they originate from. I'd rather ensure it is done properly by our people to prevent potential troubles in the future. It could turn particularly ugly if the Nomads unwittingly damaged the land given to them by us, since that'd practically be sacrilege to our people.Going by the wording, welcoming them would have us automatically expand our pastures to accommodate their animals
Not particularly but I like the write-in by @FriedIce and will vote for it if it gets approved by AN.Do you have a plan for them rejecting the offer if we choose to make them half-exiles?
Yeah, it's a little disheartening to see so many people vote with little to no discussion. I kind of wish AN would add a moratorium on voting for a couple of hours after he has posted a chapter. I really think it would improve the discussion, since people don't have to rush so much to get their ideas out there.
If it was honour and chivalry I will be very disappointed@Academia Nut Out of curiosity, what would the Martial advancement have been?
He was offering fealty to the High Chief in exchange for protection, which practically meant that he and his people would have to be resettled somewhere. There was probably enough land that could be safely turned over to pasture that it could be done...
It isn't leaving the pastures to the nomads? We're expanding the pastures, on our land. There's no way that we won't be overseeing the settlement's development.That's true but this leaves development to the nomads, who I don't really trust when it comes to creating sustainable pastures in a very different environment from the steppes they originate from. I'd rather ensure it is done properly by our people to prevent potential troubles in the future. It could turn particularly ugly if the Nomads unwittingly damaged the land given to them by us, since that'd practically be sacrilege to our people.
Not particularly but I like the write-in by @FriedIce and will vote for it if it gets approved by AN.
Yeah, it's a little disheartening to see so many people vote with little to no discussion. I kind of wish AN would add a moratorium on voting for a couple of hours after he has posted a chapter. I really think it would improve the discussion, since people don't have to rush so much to get their ideas out there.
We are the Borg
Oh, I've been wanting to vote like I did for a few turns now, it's just now we actually have circumstances that let us do it.Yeah, it's a little disheartening to see so many people vote with little to no discussion. I kind of wish AN would add a moratorium on voting for a couple of hours after he has posted a chapter. I really think it would improve the discussion, since people don't have to rush so much to get their ideas out there.
Well yeah, but it makes sense. The spirits of the land are happy when you live in harmony with them, so people farming improperly means that they aren't just damaging the land, they're angering the spirits.It never ceases to amuse me that one of the central tenants of the People's religion is intolerance of poor farming techniques
How do you know that. It just says: "There was probably enough land that could be safely turned over to pasture that it could be done"It isn't leaving the pastures to the nomads? We're expanding the pastures, on our land. There's no way that we won't be overseeing the settlement's development.
How are we assimilating them? We're not teaching them farming techniques that revolutionize their society, we're turning over a field of grass and saying: "Put your herds here and tend to them." How exactly will we be interacting enough with them to assimilate them? What incentives do they have to adopt our ways? Will they even adopt our religion, which is mostly based around tending the fields, the forests and the rivers? They're tending their herds and are likely to feel alienated by our strong focus on the forest as a sacred place.Also, the nomads are being assimilated by us. They won't be independent.
I want to absorb the people because they would essentially open the path of absorbing future enemies in the future and as we are surrounded if we ever want to spread then we have to do this.
Academia Nut said:Expand Places to Spirits - The current places dedicated to the spirits and wisdom are nice, but they could be bigger and grander, especially after seeing the Spirit Talkers...
...
Study Forests - The holy site within the sacred forest is the repository of lore on the forests and the things within them, but could the shamans learn more?
The land we're letting them settle on is in our territory (which are the coastal, valley, lower valley, and northern hill villages). If we let them settle outside our territory, we can't protect them from the northern raiders. Since they're in our territory, they're going to be under our supervision.How do you know that. It just says: "There was probably enough land that could be safely turned over to pasture that it could be done"
This means it's not certain there's enough land for the nomads. It also means that while we can safely turn the land over to the nomads so they can tend it, there's no guarantee that they won't ruin the land over time because of a lack of supervision. They're totally unfamiliar with this terrain/climate and they're going from being nomads to semi-sedentary. I'm just not sure that leaving them to deal with it on their own is a good idea.
How are we assimilating them? We're not teaching them farming techniques that revolutionize their society, we're turning over a field of grass and saying: "Put your herds here and tend to them." How exactly will we be interacting enough with them to assimilate them? What incentives do they have to adopt our ways? Will they even adopt our religion, which is mostly based around tending the fields, the forests and the rivers? They're tending their herds and are likely to feel alienated by our strong focus on the forest as a sacred place.
What is your point? Just because it's within our territory doesn't mean we'll continue to tend the area after we've turned it over to the nomads.The land we're letting them settle on is in our territory (which are the coastal, valley, lower valley, and northern hill villages). If we let them settle outside our territory, we can't protect them from the northern raiders. Since they're in our territory, they're going to be under our supervision.
Protection+fealty=/=assimilationWe are assimilating them. They came to ask us for our protection, in exchange for swearing fealty to our High Chief. All the points about incentives to adopt our ways could be pointed at the Lowlanders, which had settled outside our territory, and only had a few people teach them to farm. They had very different cultures too, but they still got assimilated.
Not how it works.I'm pretty sure our northern settlement is walled.
Just realized this, but if we take the Nomads in, we'll get a free social value!
Same as when we assimilated the lowlanders (that became our lower valley village). PS is definitely useful in a pinch...
This only means we get to have one social value which is linked through Love Thy Neighbor; if a new value were to overtake it, it would replace Pioneering Spirit, not tack itself on also.
Your argument is based on a misinterpretation of "turn over to pasture." You're taking "to pasture" as a verb, which thus means "turn over" is a verb wherein we hand off control of land to the nomads. However, "turn over" x type of land use to y type of land use is a way of using the phrase "turn over to", which becomes a compound verb denoting change. @Academia Nut is this a correct interpretation of your grammar?How do you know that. It just says: "There was probably enough land that could be safely turned over to pasture that it could be done"
This means it's not certain there's enough land for the nomads. It also means that while we can safely turn the land over to the nomads so they can tend it, there's no guarantee that they won't ruin the land over time because of a lack of supervision. They're totally unfamiliar with this terrain/climate and they're going from being nomads to semi-sedentary. I'm just not sure that leaving them to deal with it on their own is a good idea.
How are we assimilating them? We're not teaching them farming techniques that revolutionize their society, we're turning over a field of grass and saying: "Put your herds here and tend to them." How exactly will we be interacting enough with them to assimilate them? What incentives do they have to adopt our ways? Will they even adopt our religion, which is mostly based around tending the fields, the forests and the rivers? They're tending their herds and are likely to feel alienated by our strong focus on the forest as a sacred place.