I'm saying that some of the specific complaints that you made weren't compelling. You know, the same thing I've been saying for 3 posts now. Or is your position that while you can find thing not compelling, other people are forbidden from finding any of the vomit you spew forth that way? Are you that much of a hypocrite?
I think you're going out of your way to manufacture issues with the story, more than it already has. I was basing my opinion off what you presented originally, which was largely not compelling in substance or style. Your second post adds more information, and I can't fault what you say there, though it doesn't make your first post any more compelling.
Really? So then I take it someone else posted this?
Because I'm not sure how you read that and don't take away the idea that he's calling it bluntly moronic. I mean, he all but uses that terminology in there.