Remove ads

Nations of Steel and Sabre

Reader mode
At this point it's done, the mods probably need to catch up on faction fallout.

And considering the Covenanters there's gonna be fallout.
 
Remove ads
I'm not saying it's not possible - recall I outlawed Nobility last turn - just not smooth sailing.
 
Crilltic said:
Alright so new thing. Each turn, please post your Turn Post in this thread in addition to the IC post that you have been doing thus far. This is to help the mods and other players keep a better grasp of what everyone is doing without having to constantly flip through the IC thread to find someone else turn post.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Do we throw 1685 turnposts in there or is that just for next turn?

Also I don't know how many times I've nearly put 1865 instead of 1685. Why is that so hard for me to do.
 
Look I'm not saying that an Anglo-Scottish Union is impossible, merely that no matter how you pull this off you're certain to bring some of your factions to the brink of rebellion. As it currently stands, I can't see either the Brittanics or the Covenanters supporting this arrangement, and the Scottish Royalists whose thing has always been reclaiming the thrones of all the Isles for Charles II under the divine right of kings are probably also going to be pretty peeved. Some of the Unionists may go for this arrangement, but more radical ones will still probably be skeptical given that it's at least publicly grounded in subjugation to France.

If France turns against this Union then the Brittanics may be onboard and the Unionists definitely will be, but that means you lose the Fracophiles in Scotland and the Sub-Bourbonites in England, respectively. England is factionally somewhat better off, but Scotland gets an even shorter end of the stick

The Puritans, obviously, are always going to be against anything.
 
Last edited:
Estro said:
I'm not saying it's not possible - recall I outlawed Nobility last turn - just not smooth sailing.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
ChineseDrone said:
Look I'm not saying that an Anglo-Scottish Union is impossible, merely that no matter how you pull this off you're certain to bring some of your factions to the brink of rebellion. As it currently stands, I can't see either the Brittanics or the Covenanters supporting this arrangement, and the Scottish Royalists whose thing has always been reclaiming the thrones of all the Isles for Charles II under the divine right of kings are probably also going to be pretty peeved. Some of the Unionists may go for this arrangement, but more radical ones will still probably be skeptical given that it's at least publicly grounded in subjugation to France.

If France turns against this Union then the Brittanics may be onboard and the Unionists definitely will be, but that means you lose the Fracophiles in Scotland and the Sub-Bourbonites in England, respectively. England is factionally somewhat better off, but Scotland gets an even shorter end of the stick

The Puritans, obviously are always going to be against anything.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Oh, i totally know this will not end pleasantly, but this is most likely the most action Scotland will get this game, or at least action they can handle. I'm gonna be honest with you guys (kind of hoping France turns on us) but I'm pretty sure that's just me.
 
Also, did nobody get the pun there?

Sub-Bourbonites?

Geddit?

I'll show myself out...
 
Bismarck said:
Oh, i totally know this will not end pleasantly, but this is most likely the most action Scotland will get this game, or at least action they can handle. I'm gonna be honest with you guys (kind of hoping France turns on us) but I'm pretty sure that's just me.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Just so long as you accept the consequences.

I'm not going to put out an official statement right now: that's something that needs team discussion. I will say, however, that an alliance was always meant to be possible, I just never expected this level of peaceful integration to be attempted.
 
Dekutulla said:
Formally requesting that the Shorn Ones squads (10 men each) be made Legendary, to reflect their in-game purpose.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
......

I don't think you should be able to just get Legendary Experience units.

Legendary Experience units are a reward for truly epic battles or truly famous units.

At the very most, I think you should just be able to get Veteran units in your elite special forces. More than that is pushing it for me.
 
THatWhichWillBe said:
......

I don't think you should be able to just get Legendary Experience units.

Legendary Experience units are a reward for truly epic battles or truly famous units.

At the very most, I think you should just be able to get Veteran units in your elite special forces. More than that is pushing it for me.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Dahoney has a legion or thereabouts of Legendary units for god knows why. These are units that were assigned their training level at the beginning of the game. These are, explicitly, the best of the best that Mexico has, to the point where they work entirely alone in-combat.

There are also 20 of them. 20.
 
Anyone who has a trade agreement please tell me, because there was a bunch the NPC Netherlands signed.
 
Dekutulla said:
Dahoney has a legion or thereabouts of Legendary units for god knows why. These are units that were assigned their training level at the beginning of the game. These are, explicitly, the best of the best that Mexico has, to the point where they work entirely alone in-combat.

There are also 20 of them. 20.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Yeah, buuuut the Dahomey had the Amazons as an explicit bonus in their writeup. I don't think the Shorn Ones were explicitly given to Mexico in it's writeup.

Then again, its all up to the GMs.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top