I mean... for me the difficulty lies less in describing romantic love and more in differentiating it from that I feel for close friends. (Incidentally, this is why I consider myself incapable of monamory. The line is blurred to the point of nonexistence for me.)
I can sympathize with that. I'm on the opposite end of that spectrum, where monamory/monogamy is my default and only realm of ease, in terms of relationship-dynamics, but I also have an
immense difficulty navigating social norms to the point that I have difficulty making friends. That's part of why I'm so active (arguably to the point of annoyance) on this thread. Not because I feel any romantic affection for you all (no offense.) But rather, because it's through the written word, I can type out my thoughts and then edit the wording for clarity as necessary. Combine that with the fact thatthis community is so damned accepting, patient, and kind, and I find that I don't feel as anxious as I sometimes do in RL (seriously, the CCnJ hits a bit close to home, lol).
(no, I'm not making jokes out of emotional vulnerability, what?)
Are there any big important decisions we don't want hazoupilot to make? We should instill them in him beforehand
Well, barring a renewed commitment in involving Keiko with family stuff (and a determination in being Ami's brother-in-all-but-name), none that I can really think of.
I'd argue that it's only a "poison" if the relationship itself isn't healthy, equal, or built upon mutually-agreed constraints/rules (made in brutal honesty and good faith).
Personally, I've had to guard my emotions with a level of rationality that was...
difficult at times. For instance, I've never been one to "casually" date, and the way that I am...
built(?) makes the "one night stand" dynamic... well, maybe not "intolerable" but definitely "very much
not preferred." So I've had to approach relationships with the strict "is this something long-term" or "is this person's expectations compatible with my own" rationality. It doesn't sound too bad until you realize that not many undergraduate-aged people are looking for such a relationship --and of those, even less were looking for the relationship dynamic that I was.
That's the sweetness. The poison is the madness that comes along with it in the best cases.
It's only poison if everyone involved isn't on the same page --in terms of relationship "rules," as it were. For example, if one person is wholly committed, but the other party isn't (or if one person wants a specific dynamic but the other doesn't) then it's an absolute
nightmare that the devoted party. That's partly why I was so upset with Hazou when I read through his attempt at an open relationship where he was dating Ino and Akane both. Akane was clearly unhappy in that specific relationship dynamic, but tried to force herself to accept it because of her circumstances (clanless, in love with Hazou who seemed to want such a dynamic, a woman in a sexist world, etc). Obviously it was "before my time" in the quest, but reading it still broke my heart and it's why I privately cheered Akane on when she ended things with Hazou.
I've always thought that it's not "50/50" or even "100/100" but rather, it should be "60/40" with
both parties in the relationship striving to be the one who is the "60." Real life has a habit of causing mayhem and insanity, so expecting 100% from someone simply isn't feasible (for example, a soldier or a firefighter). But seeking to be the one who gives "more" is a way to be instill patience and understanding in yourself while also creating a drive to always "give" more for your partner. Of course, this phrase could also be used to excuse intolerable treatment, but that's where communication about one's satisfaction in the relationship and sticking to your dealbreakers/rules comes in.
The madness is tamed with good self care.
Exactly. A good introspection of your personal needs, expectations, and requirements in a relationship --and sticking to them --is a good way to prevent emotional pain. And a good partner will do their best to meet them. It's your call to decide if they sufficiently do.
I was under the impression that romantic love meant making your partner(s) your top priority with only your children being capable of competing for the least unhealthy relationships.
No romantic love should ever
be truly uninhibited or without constraint. There're always "deal-breakers" and other such caveats. A love that is completely,
honestly conditionless would be a
monstrous thing, indeed. One party could treat the other as horrifically (as
abusively) as they so desired and be confident that the relationship would still persist.
There are the common conditions. The "don't have an extra-marital affair in our mutually-agreed-upon monogamous relationship," the "talk to me in my love language, as I will talk to you in yours," the "respect me enough not to lie" and, of course, the "act and think of each other as moral equals." But then there are the grey areas, the shades of murky confusion that need to be
clarified before the relationship's formation. The "do we want children," the "we have an open relationship, intimacy-wise, but [here] are the mutually-agreed-upon rules surrounding that..." the "I'm a widow/widower and I need you to respect my late spouse's memory" and so on.
That's why I've been so big on "what does Hazou's character
want from a relationship" and "what kind of relationship dynamic would he, as a character, be
most comfortable in." Because if he doesn't know what his expectations are going in, then he's only setting himself up for failure.