- Location
- how about no
I dislike the idea of telling the elders of our intentions before Takahashi brings it up, and also of telling them that we are going to get every elder's backing before taking the trial. I mean, sure, we're ninja, we can lie, but I'd rather us say something to the effect of "We'd rather not have to rely on the merits of majority to grant us a chance at the trial." Also, I'm... unsure that approaching the religious zealotry clan about this at all is a good idea, and would be much happier leaving that up to Takahashi.
I still don't completely trust Takahashi, so I wanted to try to reach out to the other clans as a way to see for ourselves if they really are that opposed to change; after all, during the election Murasaki's platform didn't call for our immediate execution, just indefinite house arrest followed by assimilation on the pains of poisoning. Not great, but the isolationists had accepted that we are a force to be reckoned with rather than pests to step on.
@Dictator4Hire On a more serious note, your plan seems to hinge on the assumption that there will be boiling tensions by Inoue/Aida. But I'm not sure this is necessary since the only real danger is between the vote (to let Keiko undergo the trial) and the actual trial. Yes, damage control is a good idea to do in advance...but I don't see why we need to go this extreme into appeasement.
I have a sneaking suspicion that Takahashi said that the Aida and Inoue would attack us as a pretense for some other nefarious purpose. He did after all say that he had an important plan to setup and did not want us to know what it is. That just screams double-cross to me. Trying to placate the allegedly soon-to-be aggrieved clans seemed like a good way to either:
- convince them not to attack us, or
- ascertain exactly how much of a threat they are and if anyone else plans on helping them attack us
Wait, no! I only want the hill billies for their