Why are you against memorization? It seems like the sort of thing we could probably hammer out in an hour or so in game, yet opens up many possibilities.I want to preemptively vote against any and all "memorising" plans, but I feel like that's a mean thing to do. You guys all seem to like the idea, even if I think it's kind of silly.
I'm not sure why you'd want to rely on fallible normal memory instead of perfect muscle memory? Encoding things into iron nerve allows Hazou to (in theory) go back and check his recall of material.Possibilities like what? I'm having trouble thinking of any scenarios where just reading something and remembering it like a normal person isn't the easier solution.
My problem with memorizing whole books, particularly in the methods described, is lookup time. If we're trying to remember something from the middle or end of a text, we would have to roll through the whole thing. It could be useful for reproducing a text, but we have better things to do than act as sub-par human printing press.
I'm not sure why you'd want to rely on fallible normal memory instead of perfect muscle memory? Encoding things into iron nerve allows Hazou to (in theory) go back and check his recall of material.
This can be solved via indexing. So, don't memorize the whole book in chuncks, memorize it in pages. Then, we can just read the appropriate page.My problem with memorizing whole books, particularly in the methods described, is lookup time. If we're trying to remember something from the middle or end of a text, we would have to roll through the whole thing. It could be useful for reproducing a text, but we have better things to do than act as sub-par human printing press.
Here's a few possibilitiesPossibilities like what? I'm having trouble thinking of any scenarios where just reading something and remembering it like a normal person isn't the easier solution.
This was the reasoning behind my suggestion to start off each "recording session" with a set of verbal "tags" -- allow easier lookup when we need to reference the material later.We could encode each page as a seperate sequence preceded by the page number. If you wanted to find something in the middle of a book just go to a sequence that starts with a page number near the middle.
I'd probably prefer a non-verbal tags for some things, since verbal tags would kind of wreck any chance at stealth in the recording process.This was the reasoning behind my suggestion to start off each "recording session" with a set of verbal "tags" -- allow easier lookup when we need to reference the material later.
In addition to what @Radvic said, it's less about perfectly memorizing a thing and more about being able to guard against mistaken or lost memories.What situations would require perfect memorisation, in your opinion?
Agreed. The point stands, though.I'd probably prefer a non-verbal tags for some things, since verbal tags would kind of wreck any chance at stealth in the recording process.
Context.Possibilities like what? I'm having trouble thinking of any scenarios where just reading something and remembering it like a normal person isn't the easier solution.
I like it. My main concern is that I want to be able to encode things in the field without needing to hide both hands, and I think this would require both. (we'd also need to put the "read" action tag as we record something)Mnemonic Plan:
Use a tree based index for memory lookup.
Each node has a base gesture associated with it.
Each node has the following actions:
1. List children: start the gesture in a particular way cascades into the gestures for each child node
2. Examine value: start the gesture in another way and you mouth out whatever note you stored in the node.
One hand encodes node, the other encodes action. Start the action chain that associates with what you want to do.
Ex:
Start with gesture for root node, modified to list children -> gives you the list of gestures associated with top level concepts.
Hazou has forgotten the meaning of one of the nodes. Does the gesture for that node with the gesture for saying it out. Its the node he wants.
Gets its children, goes deeper.
Well this is another in the pile of "good idea, just not in Leaf". If we get seen doing this (byakugan) then Leaf would realize that we could trivially copy large amounts of intel without physically stealing it (basically a slower sharingan if that has photographic memory here). Our usefulness to Leaf would then outweigh our risk to it and then it'd be non-consensual surgery time. Even if this isn't the case they could record our code and then read whatever we "reread". Oh! And we can also record conversations verbatim. Indexing these transcripts properly would be a huge necessity as well.
Aside from this, it'll take time to create and then memorize such a code. I would argue that it would take at least a day to come up with a code with the logistics involved. I would also argue we would need to write it down at least initially because holding all that in working memory would be terrible. Then there's the time to memorize the code. Ordinary people with jobs who don't speak/read japanese have been able to encode the 2000 most used kanji in 1 month (Heisig method where you associate the kanji with a rough meaning). Going from written/verbal to kinesthetic is probably a similar jump. That puts those 1000 at 2 weeks at 3-6 hours a day, for a total of 42 -84 hours of work. If we assumed the lower end, we would require basically three solid days of work + sleep to memorize the system, making for 4 solid days of work + sleep.
General plan for memorizing things via Iron Nerve:
Spend the evening figuring out every phonetic sound in whatever language Hazou speaks. Assign each of them to a specific hand position. Remember them by saying the sound at the same time we make the hand position in our right hand. Practice reading the book in our head while shaping the signs in our left hand, then, without the book, flashing through the signs and remembering what was said.
This should give us a general method for memorizing any speech or book, that we can do so long as we can hide our left hand.
I mean, we can always make a different, second method once we have time. Though, I'm currently unconvinced if such a method exists.Even just spelling the phonemes by hand is going to take just about the same time as speaking them. We need data compression, and that as I stated will take some significant investment.
I like it. My main concern is that I want to be able to encode things in the field without needing to hide both hands, and I think this would require both. (we'd also need to put the "read" action tag as we record something)
I'm unclear how we can make input and output be different, given how Iron Nerve works (memorize past motion whole-sale).
I mean, we can always make a different, second method once we have time. Though, I'm currently unconvinced if such a method exists.
But even that's still a mediocre scheme. Instead of one character at a time, use the entire state of his hand to encode entire words. If there's 4 positions per finger1, then that's 45 = 1024 positions each hand could be in. Assign 900 of them to the 900 most common words, and split the rest between single phonemes, control characters, numbers, and assignable context sensitive symbols (e.g. large technical worlds that appear a lot in a particular text).
That is probably a good idea. Or we could ask someone to teach us or read a book on shorthand, and just copy the different symbols they have into hand gestures.Here's one:
And if MFD speaks Japanese then we can always encode kanji.
For instance:I stopped after 6 or 8 pages. In that time I saw no arguments that I considered (a) valid and (b) honest. Nor did I see anyone actively and honestly engaging with the people who were on the pro-RF side. So, yes, they were acting like pigeons shitting on the board. Maybe they got brilliant and honest several hundred posts in, but I see no reason I should have had to wade through that much sewage to find a gem.
As to not being conducive to future honest opinions, they weren't doing that now, when they had articulate people engaging with them in reasonable fashion. Why would they decide to change their behavior in the future?
If you meant "not conducive to the pro-RF crowd making honest arguments", that was something they were doing anyway even while wading through sewage. Why would me calling the trolls out change the pro-RF people's behavior?
I'm unclear how we can make input and output be different, given how Iron Nerve works (memorize past motion whole-sale).