In the dreaded year of 1997, a new Marvel is born from the brink of financial collapse. And from it, a new age of entertainment, one bound to shake the world in its own way!
User | Total |
---|---|
OogahBoogah | 7 |
Hmm... I don't think 1997 is quite at the tech level to make an Iron Man film, and I'd rather not retread old paths anyways, although I do want to do a Shared Universe.
But let's see. No X-Men, No Fantastic Four, most popular Avengers aren't options...
Ant-Man probably wouldn't draw a crowd, but I do want him in the original line-up. Luke Cage is a bit too street level for early Marvel, he's a few levels of deconstruction into it. Thor might get mistaken for a regular adaptation of myth by those not in the know.
Hrm... The original avengers were Iron Man, Hulk, Wasp, Ant-Man, Thor and... Captain America, later.
Would it be too gauche to open with Cap? The opening hit of a franchise needs to be recognizable, and the late 90's was hardly lacking for muscled action guy actors that could play the boy scout.
Well, I pointed this out in the SB version, but we still have almost all the magic people, with Ghost Rider being the only major mystic man we're missing. If we start with Thor, and lean more into the God than alien, we could do a kind of inverse of the IRL MCU, with more supernatural and less technology. It'd feel a lot closer to urban fantasy at the start, but that might not be a detriment.Hmm... I don't think 1997 is quite at the tech level to make an Iron Man film, and I'd rather not retread old paths anyways, although I do want to do a Shared Universe.
But let's see. No X-Men, No Fantastic Four, most popular Avengers aren't options...
Ant-Man probably wouldn't draw a crowd, but I do want him in the original line-up. Luke Cage is a bit too street level for early Marvel, he's a few levels of deconstruction into it. Thor might get mistaken for a regular adaptation of myth by those not in the know.
Hrm... The original avengers were Iron Man, Hulk, Wasp, Ant-Man, Thor and... Captain America, later.
Would it be too gauche to open with Cap? The opening hit of a franchise needs to be recognizable, and the late 90's was hardly lacking for muscled action guy actors that could play the boy scout.
I kinda like that, but Marvel's magic scene isn't really as well-developed as DC's, in my opinion. There isn't a real equivalent to the Justice League Dark.Well, I pointed this out in the SB version, but we still have almost all the magic people, with Ghost Rider being the only major mystic man we're missing. If we start with Thor, and lean more into the God than alien, we could do a kind of inverse of the IRL MCU, with more supernatural and less technology. It'd feel a lot closer to urban fantasy at the start, but that might not be a detriment.
I can't think of a single person that likes Inhuman comics outside of Kamala Khan, but it's fair to consider Iron Man's own inpopularity before the films. Might be cool to have a timeline where they outshine the likes of the X-Men.There is also whole cast of Inhumans if we look for more Superhero candidates.
It is like X-men school only for magicians and mythic creatures instead of mutants. More teen focused as opposed to older mutants battling between each other like most X-men films were. Not that many really recognizable characters, although we should have at least Scarlet Witch available.I can't think of a single person that likes Inhuman comics outside of Kamala Khan, but it's fair to consider Iron Man's own inpopularity before the films. Might be cool to have a timeline where they outshine the likes of the X-Men.
What's Strange Academy like? I haven't read their run.
I wouldn't mind Cap being the opening. Really, it's best left up to whatever you guys are interested in, but be wary of what you pick. While someone like Cap and Thor is recognizable, the opposite can be said for those like Iron Fist and Moon Knight.
But this is a social experiment to see what new ground can be broken in 1997, and how far you guys are willing to take it.
I kinda like that, but Marvel's magic scene isn't really as well-developed as DC's, in my opinion. There isn't a real equivalent to the Justice League Dark.
There's some stuff to get into there, but as much fun as having the Avengers punch out the literal devil could be, we'll probably dry out soon.
Besides, I always felt the strength of comics was in how many genres they blend, and how it results in the alien hero chilling with a wizard, or YWHW throwing hands with a killer cyborg from the future.
I don't really like how the MCU rejected the campy ridiculousness of comics in favor of snarky eyerolls and all that. Superheroes should wear spandex, and I will die on that hill.
I'm thinking the the big pillar for our early cosmic stuff should be a combo of of Captain marvel and Adam warlock. Captain Marvel can fit in the military political scifi cosmic involving the Kree and skrulls while Adam Warlock while explore the philosophical cosmic side into it while also introducing Thanos into the picture. I'm thinking we add Nova later as our third character occupying the role of the rookie whom eventually develops into the big hero when we do some take on the annihilation saga arc he stars in. Mind I could be convinced to swap marvel and nova as they have similar niches and Nova is sorta a audience surrogate but I'd honestly like a Female MC and there is precedent in the Alien fanchise so audience might be accepting of it.[X] Let's do it.
Looking at the releases of films in the 90 and early 00s. No cap since where going to be compared to Saving private Ryan and a fair few other good war movies.
Strange academy only if we get it out fast since Harry potter is just around the corner.
Batman and Robin are coming out this year and killing the superhero genre for everyone. So a classical superhero film will not be well received.
BUT. STAR WARS. We all know how hype people where to see that and how disappointed they where. There isn't any other sci-fi fic going on now.
So I'm thinking fun campy space adventure. Marvel cosmic is big enough and it is not what people think of superheroes.
Implying we own him. For street level we have lets see hmm Moon night(this is pre 2006 moon night who is a somewhat different character and something of a "Has been" since his 80s glory days) Luke Cage, Iron Fist, Cloak and Dagger, Shang-Chi(he held the longest continuous ongoing of a asian lead in marvel actually at one point maybe still does to this day), those are the "big" street level names we have. Read the only ones we have who held a solo for a decent amount of time. We could also do a runaways movie whenever we hit the 2000s and they end up being invented, we'd only be able to make something around 2005ish though,same with Jessica Jones as her stories only really begin to be popular in the early 2000's with Bendis's solo in 2001, slim pickings indeed.[X] Let's do it. To hell with what everyone else says, a connected universe can work and you've got the right tools ready to make it happen!
I wouldn't mind a bit of magic focus, honestly. There's not a lot of urban fantasy work in this time period and it plays to our strengths in thriller movies.
Thought we could maybe do something with a more niche superhero like… Spider man? Lovable, street level punching up, solid gimmick, and a coming of age as a departure from "normal" superhero stuff. Really get the teenage audience. And the "smalltown hero" idea might work on other crowds too.
Its called the post credit scene, we shouldn't need to tie anything together until then. Shared universe is more for team up films then anything else.If we do a shared universe, I think we shouldn't go too hard on it from the beginning. It might be best to just sprinkle hints in our first film that there could be spinoffs, instead of actively using our script to set up further movies.
Otherwise, if our first film bombs, we kill all interest in a cinematic universe - and likely damage the very idea of shared universes going forward.