The internet will belong to America and capitalism and that is a fact.
The internet is too important to let capitalism control.The internet will belong to America and capitalism and that is a fact.
Yeah, it is a little amusing. I hardly laugh though.
If it was JUST the microcomputers getting delayed, well no biggie. But that the backlash was big enough the projects like Academnet got taking off the docket indicates a broader anti-integration luddite problem fermenting in the ministry, one that halts Cybernetic experiments cold when the iron seems the hottest- will proponents like Vorotnikov still be in power by the time the stink dies down and our budget expands enough to say the workload justifies further computerization?
Probably not, majority of the Internet is by the mid next century going to be block dominated and in effect both way firewalled out while the US does the same via preferred flavor of justification. The US network, outside of the very first decade is almost certain to end up smaller.The internet will belong to America and capitalism and that is a fact.
If it was JUST the microcomputers getting delayed, well no biggie. But that the backlash was big enough the projects like Academnet got taking off the docket indicates a broader anti-integration luddite problem fermenting in the ministry, one that halts Cybernetic experiments cold when the iron seems the hottest- will proponents like Vorotnikov still be in power by the time the stink dies down and our budget expands enough to say the workload justifies further computerization?
General Labor: 43+18-14 = 47
Educated Labor: 65+5-10 = 60 [Decreases 1 bracket]
Probably not, majority of the Internet is by the mid next century going to be block dominated and in effect both way firewalled out while the US does the same via preferred flavor of justification. The US network, outside of the very first decade is almost certain to end up smaller.
(I may be over estimating you but I think you'll be somewhat competent)
The ministry has always been a good ally of Comrade Stalin, was it not the ministry that allowed comrade Stalin to rule as well as he did?Like the whole ministry wouldn't be sent to the gulag for rightist deviancy as soon as zombie Stalin was comfortable in his office...
Well where else is he supposed to get the souls to sustain his new undead life, we can't give him the minorities anymore they are needed to make cheap jeans for the City people!The ministry has always been a good ally of Comrade Stalin, was it not the ministry that allowed comrade Stalin to rule as well as he did?
Without our efforts, Comrade Stalin would not have been able to drag the Soviet Union into the 20th century.
As such, if Stalin were to rise from the dead, he would be supportive of the current ministry.
Some lower level bureaucrats might have to be sacrificed to appease him though...
While not wrong generally, I'll note that Educated Labor probably didn't drop a bracket, since almost certainly completed second stage of Central Asian gas and it probably had Educated Labor increase in it.Balakirev just decisively put his foot in his mouth at a time when there's so much competition for educated jobs that wages just dropped a whole bracket:
You keep saying that it is a lower personnel, secretaries and clerks, which is source of discontent, except even now they barely have any power to keep bosses from rolling them over. 1970s USSR, even notably more liberal one than ITTL? Highly unlikely, and they definitely don't have political weight to kill Academnet. This is middle management fighting to preserve their fiefs.Imagine you are a secretary who's just moved to Moscow to take up a job at the prestigious ministry of the economy, your head full of the assurances of your elders that your degree in stenography is a ticket for the gravy train and you get there and... Your pay packet is a fraction of what you expected (overall educated labour wages may only have done down by 8%, but I bet that isn't because people who have had the job for 10 years got a cut, probably new hires are getting paid substantially less), so the bills are all a struggle and now your boss is talking about how the ministry needs to be filled with microcomputers that let each secretary do the work of 20! It's not like it will take you long to put two and two together and decide that you aren't going to be one of the secretaries doing 20 times more work and the boss is an anti-communist wrecker robot and basically the 70s version of Mark Zuckerberg.
Like, sure, this is annoying, but this is just part of having an minister who is just the wrong side of the Dunning-Kreuger graph when it comes to his political smarts. Blaming people for being horrified when Balakirev says something horrific is entirely counter-productive.
And even the worst loss, the Academnet, would be a useful tool that would become obsolete rather quickly. While the delay will suck, the delay also means that when we do get to roll out an academic network and office computers, they will be vastly better than what we could make now and everyone who gets ahead of us during our political delay will have to rip out the old stuff and replace it while we leapfrog them.
Well, yes, that's why Balakirev is not fighting the fight, its stabbing at the Ministry's political power base. Computers don't have friends in the Party or seats in the Supreme Soviet to complain about, our management and bureaucracy though...
I also think that you underestimate how valuable it would've been. Yes, 'net itself would be obsolete fairly soon but it likely would lead to development of TCP/IP-sky and uncovered a lot of non-obvious problems with large-scale networks.
While not wrong generally, I'll note that Educated Labor probably didn't drop a bracket, since almost certainly completed second stage of Central Asian gas and it probably had Educated Labor increase in it.
(Stalin wouldn't do it though, man was practically a pacifist when it came to foreign relations after WW2, put the final nail in the international movement doing it)
Bro thought the UN and IMF would lead to peaceful world socialism lmao
I'd argue his Korea policy was also overly cautious and conciliatory. He abstained the resolution instead of vetoing and mostly left Korea and China to fight on their own instead of aiding directlyWhile Stalin typically had an extremely cautious foreign policy, this seemed to change in the 50s. See Korea. IDK why though. Mental health maybe?
I'd argue his Korea policy was also overly cautious and conciliatory. He abstained the resolution instead of vetoing and mostly left Korea and China to fight on their own instead of aiding directly
There is also a North Korean option. The DPRK is not actually connected to the international network (except for some servers related to work abroad - be it intelligence or diplomacy). They have their own intranet, where all the necessary resources and sites are located and which is impossible to access without connecting to a North Korean device. We know that there are video hosting services, instant messengers, and a search engine - but we cannot work with them.Probably not, majority of the Internet is by the mid next century going to be block dominated and in effect both way firewalled out while the US does the same via preferred flavor of justification. The US network, outside of the very first decade is almost certain to end up smaller.
They were gonna do it no matter what and honestly what we call the start of the war is really just an escalation of the low level fighting that existed. Plus if you read either McArthurs or the guy who lead the south at the times journals they say they shot first, but so did the north, so I think it was just one of those things that happened
The reason for the Korean war has more to do with the goals of the leadership in Korea at the time. The USA had pulled out a lot of its forces and didn't seem to interested in South Korea at that point. So North Korea decided to give it a go and just present the USA with a rapid conquest an Stalin probably gave the ok on that. But then it all didn't quite go to plan and because the USSR at the time was in a policy of not attending the UN, the other members weren't stopped in calling for UN intervention either.They were gonna do it no matter what and honestly what we call the start of the war is really just an escalation of the low level fighting that existed. Plus if you read either McArthurs or the guy who lead the south at the times journals they say they shot first, but so did the north, so I think it was just one of those things that happened
I will not rest until every inch of Soviet land is covered in train tracks!Rail was a mistake every other time, but this time will be different. This time will be different. This time-
I will not rest until every inch of Soviet land is covered in train tracks!