Yeah, I'm sorry, @Doctor Squared , but that post is just a list of arguments, like throwing something at the wall and hoping it will stick. So - yes, Ritsuko is the MAGI sysadmin, but that is just the pragmatism argument again. If Misato had used that, okay, I would be considerably more receptive towards it. But that wasn't Misato's argument. Misato's argument was "people can change" and that isn't enough. It really doesn't address what Ritsuko has done, which is not only chemical torture, but contribution to torture, period (not that Asuka knows that yet).

And yes, Ritsuko is or was Misato's friend and is Maya's lover. How does that enter the ethical calculus at any point? Maybe Misato should simply get better at choosing and maintaining friendships... It seems to me the take-away from that argument is that if you have enough social graces, just about everything can be forgiven to you. As someone who isn't exactly a social butterfly himself, I absolutely disagree. And yes of course Asuka wouldn't sit there and let Shinji or Rei be insulted. But then, the difference is Shinji and Rei also wouldn't deserve it.

As for Asuka being an EVA pilot, well, sure. But she is one whether she insults Ritsuko or not. Professionalism isn't a requirement for being an EVA pilot, "can synch with an EVA unit" is. And EVA pilots are rare enough that they have to be accommodated, not the other way round.

In the end, the important point in your post is that Misato's argument is in fact poor, and that Asuka is right to remain dismissive and angry at Ritsuko.

Besides being the better person
It'd be pretty hard not to be the better person than Ritsuko. You'd need to be Gendo or Kiel for that.

Now, I could understand Misato saying that she is annoyed by that, that if it is Ritsuko Asuka hates she should go annoy Ritsuko, not Misato with her constant negative bad comments. Because, yeah, as it is, Ritsuko feels maybe some icy glares at synch tests, whereas Misato always gets to hear Asuka rant. Then again, as someone has posted, Asuka usually starts calmly, so if Misato just didn't comment it... but anyway, that as well is not what Misato's argument was. Misato's argument was "People can change", and to that the obvious counter IS "So what, doesn't change what they've done". Just changing one's mind isn't enough.

Also, wouldn't a direct confrontation go exactly against what others have used in their arguments against me? That Ritsuko at worst feels some icy glares at synch-tests goes to show that Asuka does behave professionally and doesn't torpedo the working relationship with Ritsuko. So, where's the problem? And finally, what would a direct personal confrontation even get either side? There's literally nothing Ritsuko could say to convince Asuka, or at least going by Asuka's attitudes so far, there shouldn't be. As far as Asuka is concerned, she could as well just die, or maybe first help to prevent the destruction of the world she has contributed to and then die.
 
Misato's argument was "People can change", and to that the obvious counter IS "So what, doesn't change what they've done". Just changing one's mind isn't enough.
How about changing one's actions? Because Ritsuko has been actively attempting to improve Rei's quality of life recently and has even been running interference with Gendo to that end.

There's literally nothing Ritsuko could say to convince Asuka, or at least going by Asuka's attitudes so far, there shouldn't be. As far as Asuka is concerned, she could as well just die, or maybe first help to prevent the destruction of the world she has contributed to and then die.
Probably the most effective argument Ritsuko could make to change Asuka's mind is the one I would expect her to actually use: To agree with Asuka that she does, in fact, deserve to die after she's done everything she can to avert Instrumentality.
 
How about changing one's actions? Because Ritsuko has been actively attempting to improve Rei's quality of life recently and has even been running interference with Gendo to that end.
That would be slightly undoing a littly tiny bit of what she has done. It wouldn't even go into recompensation territory yet, not by far.

Probably the most effective argument Ritsuko could make to change Asuka's mind is the one I would expect her to actually use: To agree with Asuka that she does, in fact, deserve to die after she's done everything she can to avert Instrumentality.
"I'll hold you to that."
 
That would be slightly undoing a littly tiny bit of what she has done. It wouldn't even go into recompensation territory yet, not by far.
And here we get into the difference between recompense and redemption. If she has in fact changed, then she will presumably continue to make recompense without further coercion unless future events inspire her to change again.

"I'll hold you to that."
If you want to drag Rei into the argument for why Asuka should forgive (or at least stop antagonizing) Ritsuko, that should do it.
 
If you want to drag Rei into the argument for why Asuka should forgive (or at least stop antagonizing) Ritsuko, that should do it.
Here's a thought: Rei II has forgiven Ritsuko.

Rei-I is still a cute little ball of anger and hatred inside EVA-00, with a particular loathing for the Akagis. In A&T, thrice she has already attempted to kill who she thought as Naoko Akagi, and the third time the difference between Naoko and Ritsuko didn't even matter to her anymore. And Rei I is as much Rei as Rei-II is! Now, if those two ever were to unite again as in canon... well, Rei II's influence might make sure Rei III doesn't just go off and murderize Ritsuko, but Rei I might make sure Rei III isn't forgiving of Ritsuko anymore.
 
I'm just here for the warm, fuzzy feeling of @Strypgia's WAFF. :sad:

I remain entirely terrified of arguments that build off 'she deserves X', because who gets to be the judge and doom someone to torture and death?

Not that Ritsuko isn't terrible, but at least she is willing to change.

EDIT: I mean, I'm a law student; I had to study Draco so I'm quite aware of what a person with the law on his side, can think off to punish those he finds guilty.
 
Last edited:
I remain entirely terrified of arguments that build off 'she deserves X', because who gets to be the judge and doom someone to torture and death?
But this isn't even about that. Nobody in this discussion has called for Ritsuko's head or torture, not even me. I might think she deserves death, yes, but that is incidental, basically. Ritsuko can do whatever. Maybe she is punished or maybe she isn't. But either way, this shouldn't put an obligation on Asuka. Asuka is completely in the right to hate her. There should be absolutely be no obligation on her to understand and forgive. Rather, the obligation would be on Ritsuko to endure. That's the point.
 
Here's a thought: Rei II has forgiven Ritsuko.

Rei-I is still a cute little ball of anger and hatred inside EVA-00, with a particular loathing for the Akagis. In A&T, thrice she has already attempted to kill who she thought as Naoko Akagi, and the third time the difference between Naoko and Ritsuko didn't even matter to her anymore. And Rei I is as much Rei as Rei-II is! Now, if those two ever were to unite again as in canon... well, Rei II's influence might make sure Rei III doesn't just go off and murderize Ritsuko, but Rei I might make sure Rei III isn't forgiving of Ritsuko anymore.
What did Ritsuko ever to do Rei I? Where's the justice in holding Ritsuko accountable for Naoko's actions?
 
What did Ritsuko ever to do Rei I? Where's the justice in holding Ritsuko accountable for Naoko's actions?
She did plenty of bad things to Rei II. That is justification enough. And the synthesis personality of a Rei III that also "includes" Rei I would make Rei III not nearly as forgiving as Rei II about that.
 
But this isn't even about that. Nobody in this discussion has called for Ritsuko's head or torture, not even me. I might think she deserves death, yes, but that is incidental, basically. Ritsuko can do whatever. Maybe she is punished or maybe she isn't. But either way, this shouldn't put an obligation on Asuka. Asuka is completely in the right to hate her. There should be absolutely be no obligation on her to understand and forgive. Rather, the obligation would be on Ritsuko to endure. That's the point.

Asuka should be free to hate, but not free to spout that hate as she wants to.

My mother is a psychologist who works with patients far less suicidal than Ritsuko in this story, and all it takes is a single push.

Like, speaking as a law student; Ritsuko deserves punishment. I could list all the laws she has broken and should be punished for, but she's also suicidal and that deserves consideration.

...that would be the cutest pairing of hate and doom ever. Justice/Vengeance adoping Rei I :3

Adorbs!

What did Ritsuko ever to do Rei I? Where's the justice in holding Ritsuko accountable for Naoko's actions?

Ritsuko should be held accountable for her actions against Rei II; plenty of which deserve punishment.
 
Last edited:
Asuka should be free to hate, but not free to spout that hate as she wants to.
Once again, not the argument Misato has used. Though she might also not use the suicide argument as that could only tempt Asuka... ehem. But Misato very much seems to want Asuka to understand and forgive, and that is too much to ask for. For the line of argument you use as well she should have used the pragmatism argument - "we still need her, and we need to work with her, so please at least tone it down in her vicinity". But for all of Misato's demands to be understanding, does she try to be understanding of Asuka?

And the way I see it, what you propose could happen... that would in my perspective just be Asuka calling out Ritsuko on what she has in fact done, and Ritsuko taking the logical consequence. Not all suicidal states are equal. Though that's just an aside. My core point still is that what Misato demands of Asuka is unreasonable, and that Asuka has folded too easily.
 
Last edited:
<delurks>
Maybe she is punished or maybe she isn't. But either way, this shouldn't put an obligation on Asuka. Asuka is completely in the right to hate her. There should be absolutely be no obligation on her to understand and forgive. Rather, the obligation would be on Ritsuko to endure. That's the point.
I think I am beginning to see what you are getting at. Any forgiveness Asuka grants "Dr. Bitchface" should be an act of grace or mercy on the former's part rather than an obligation for the sake of politeness or at the request of a third party.

Is this close, or am I totally off base?
 
I think I am beginning to see what you are getting at. Any forgiveness Asuka grants "Dr. Bitchface" should be an act of grace or mercy on the former's part rather than an obligation for the sake of politeness or at the request of a third party.
YES! Though even that holds a hint of expectation that Asuka does forgive in the end, on her own volition. No. If she hates Ritsuko forever and shows that, that is totally justified. In any case, she is under no obligation to whatever. Except maybe pragmatic cooperation until the world is saved (and if it isn't, hey, then this all doesn't matter anyway). But that would indeed be pure pragmatism and icy cooperation. Any obligation would be on Ritsuko, not Asuka.

Misato asks for too much. And Asuka folds too easily.
 
@Susano @ManusDomine - I feel like you both have valid points from within the philosophical and moral frameworks you live within. Neither of you is wrong; but I'd argue neither of you is objectively right either.

If I may be mildly impolitic, I'd suggest that Simon Wiesenthal's "The Sunflower" offers an incredibly enlightening look at this, especially if one looks at the fundamental differences on various boundaries - such as faith - in the second half of the book, which is composed of the answers various notables gave to the ethical and moral dilemma (one he actually experienced during the Holocaust, as a concentration camp inmate) he posed in the first half.

In particular, there's a strong trend among some respondents (many Catholic, for example) to see forgiveness as a duty - while among others (including many Jewish respondents) there's a fundamental belief that forgiveness for wrongs can only be granted by those wronged. As in, each and every one must make their own individual choice - no-one can forgive another for what was done to a third.

(Disclaimer: I'm deeply familiar with the book, as it was required reading for the class I served as a madrich (teacher's aide) for at the Synagogue Sunday school.)
 
Last edited:
The greatest punishment that can be visited upon the repentant is their own mind. I mean, by this point in canon, Rits was careening towards a psychotic break in which she destroys all the extra Rei-clones, simply because she feel that Gendo would rather be fucking them. She destroyed one of the two crowning achievements of her and her mother's scientific lives. This is the depths of her desire to be recognized as a person, as a woman, and as a lover, none of which are fulfilled.

That she has made a complete 180 to the point that she probably now "enjoys" her sessions with Gendo as much as him (on a base, physical level only), speaks volume as to the changes she has undergone, and how serious they are.

If she hates Ritsuko forever and shows that, that is totally justified.
I personally disagree. The injured party has made peace with RIts, of her own choice. The good doctor has, for nearly a month at this point, been living with the emotion anguish of recognizing her own faults and wanting (and trying, when appropriate) to make them right (something no other character has done. Their faults may be lesser, but she's actually doing something.)

To refuse to forgive someone for something they regret and have sought to make right is at best petty, and an incredible flaw in any moral system.
 
I personally disagree. The injured party has made peace with RIts, of her own choice. The good doctor has, for nearly a month at this point, been living with the emotion anguish of recognizing her own faults and wanting (and trying, when appropriate) to make them right (something no other character has done. Their faults may be lesser, but she's actually doing something.)

To refuse to forgive someone for something they regret and have sought to make right is at best petty, and an incredible flaw in any moral system.
A month. Oh, how horrible.

Forgiveness can always only be an act of mercy. Otherwise it wouldn't be forgiveness, it would be justice. Forgiveness and mercy are by definition something that is bestowed upon one without deserving it. But that very definition means that mercy and forgiveness cannot expected, can never be expected. And regret is not enough. As I've said above, that is what bothers me - so Ritsuko has changed her mind, and that's supposed to be that? All is forgiven? To hell with that. Seriousness and commitment also don't matter. So far, Ritsuko has only ever begun to most slightly repair some of the damage she has done. But even if she could rully repair it (she can't), that doesn't undo the years of torture for Rei. She hasn't even begun to make amends and reparations, she is only ensuring the amount of what she owes Rei doesn't grow even larger.

As for Rei, well, as I've indicated, I hold out for Rei I.
 
As for Rei, well, as I've indicated, I hold out for Rei I.
So we should visit the sins of the mother upon the daughter?

You seem to hold that a person cannot redeem themselves. Your argument is that Asuka shouldn't let Ritsuko have any peace because of what she did to someone else (that she didn't even care about all that long ago) who has already decided to let Rits not only be forgiven, but act as an ally. You aren't very convincing, as the stated primary goal of justice (in our society) is rehabilitation, not punishment. You aren't talking about justice, you want vengeance, which is often just as bad as the original crime (sometimes worse).

If you really care about being just, you have to treat a person fairly, and treating them poorly because of something they are actively trying to make amends for is in no way just. It's just childish, really.
 
That would be slightly undoing a littly tiny bit of what she has done. It wouldn't even go into recompensation territory yet, not by far.


"I'll hold you to that."
Getting awful petty here imo. Rei is the final arbiter, and she has chosen to give Ritsuko her second chance. Asuka has no right to forcibly demand and hold Ritsuko to promise to being killed.
 
Last edited:
A number of schools of philosophies/religions (also psychological observations) hold that actively hating/expressing hate/"violence" is damaging to that person's soul/psyche, which is why "letting go of negative feelings" is so emphasized. Asuka in essence harms herself, if she holds on to her anger.

Personally, I hold the view that the death of a person that has commited crimes doesn't do anything to mitigate the harm done- it doesn't actually "heal" those that were harmed. It serves at best, to give those wronged/society at large the certainty that the "criminal" can do no further harm. That I can understand would be a great relief to some. Those people that are determined to be incorrigible, and are an everpresent threat- those I would reluctantly agree might be executed "for the greater good".

Recompense can often not be made directly anyway, actions and their consequences often cannot be undone if the damage is pschological, or physical (wether bodily harm, or material). If possible though, it would be fitting in my opinion, for the Criminal to at least perform actions that would alleviate a victims "pain", or contribute to their wellbeing (i.e., monetary, material, or labor), and/or contributing in some way to society at large.
 
...

Right, morality discussion time, it seems.

First and foremost: What has Ritsuko Akagi done?

Answer: Torture; wilful mistreatment of a child; conspiracy to Domesday.

Reasons For Actions: Delusional envy and spite.

Is this remotely justifiable? No.

At this point, Akagi really doesn't deserve much beyond a very painful, ironic death. Her change of heart was primarily motivated by a need for Maya's approval as opposed to genuine redemption. By this point, she seems to have at least understood that she was in the wrong and is working towards an attempt at redemption.

However.

Until such a time as she manages to sufficiently rectify her fuck-ups, she frankly doesn't deserve to be treated with common decency - this is where the concept of mercy comes in.

The driving thing about mercy - and what makes it so powerful - is that the receiver of it does not deserve it. It is not something that is expected or mandatory, it is in and of itself above and beyond what can reasonably be expected of a person. Asuka is entirely within her rights to refuse showing it to Akagi. The same is true of forgiveness.

And Misato's attempts to coerce Asuka into it is an overstepping of her bounds. If Asuka decides to forgive or show mercy to Akagi, it must be by her choice and not a result of Misato trying to guilt-trip her. Otherwise it is a disrespect to both Asuka and the entire point of forgiveness and mercy by Misato.

If Akagi dies; nobody should be thought any less of for not giving any fucks - or even feeling satisfaction. Asuka's current attitude is entirely acceptable and reasonable. if she choses to go above and beyond, that makes her a better person, yes. But choosing not to does not diminish her in any way.

My mother is a psychologist who works with patients far less suicidal than Ritsuko in this story, and all it takes is a single push.
I fail to see the problem here.



All this aside, I wish everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and many more.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top