Aerea has Balerion. That means the way she talks isn't just delusion. The Field of Fire showed that armies become almost irrelevant in the face of dragons. As well, she does know she has to work for her goal. That is why she is currently engaged in diplomacy with a bunch of petty lords, after all.
Maybe they just didn't base their claim around it enough?!To be fair so did Maegor. Maegor shows that while Balerion may be tough, the person riding him isn't nearly as so, a lesson that Ulf White and Hugh Hammer would learn well in future days. I'd say its almost a theme of GRRM's writing that the most successful dragon riders were the ones who didn't base their claims on just them riding the biggest baddess dragon around.
2. I think we can afford to dilute our attention to the lords somewhat. The Maegor loyalists are a good bet for supporters. Lord Celtigar has money and can perhaps be flipped if we show we honor him and sooth the slight.
Also @Susano do not focusing on the other lords mean we are not persuading them at all or it just we are not focusing on them? Thank you
To be fair so did Maegor. Maegor shows that while Balerion may be tough, the person riding him isn't nearly as so, a lesson that Ulf White and Hugh Hammer would learn well in future days. I'd say its almost a theme of GRRM's writing that the most successful dragon riders were the ones who didn't base their claims on just them riding the biggest baddess dragon around.
Aegon's claim absolutely came from his and his sisters' dragons and those alone. He had no other justification but right of conquest, and he achieved that conquest with a bare minimum of support in men and weapons. Basically the same tiny houses Aerea is now courting and nothing more. And the Field of Fire showed that he didn't need more than that. So yes, absolutely, having Balerion is by itself enough to consider yourself equipped to take over Westeros. Because, once again, Field of Fire. Of course, the difference is that now the other side has dragons as well, which is a rather large difference.
Currently it is 12-11 in favour of the Heir plan. Closing it in a few hours.
As she said, Jaehaerys is unlikely to willingly step down, which means he and Alyssane would have to be killed for us to take the throne.
There were also times when Jaehaerys should have put his foot down and told his wife no but didn't. Look at what happened to Viserra and Gael.If we ever get the chance to separate Alyssane from Jaehaerys, we should try. I don't know if we can succeed, but if we can isolate Jaehaerys from his very capable wife, we should.
Unfortunately their marriage at this point is still strong; the truly awful things Jaehaerys does to her and to sideline her are still years in the future. But Jaehaerys now is the person who'll be an authoritarian and condescending husband in the future, so there may be cracks we can widen.
There were also times when Jaehaerys should have put his foot down and told his wife no but didn't. Look at what happened to Viserra and Gael.
We'll have to be very canny to do so, and would probably have to try to do it before we make a move for the throne. Removing Jaehaerys from the throne, after all, means removing Alysanne from the position of queen and removing all of her children, both Daenaerys and Aemon, from the line of succession.If we ever get the chance to separate Alysanne from Jaehaerys, we should try. I don't know if we can succeed, but if we can isolate Jaehaerys from his very capable wife, we should.
Unfortunately their marriage at this point is still strong; the truly awful things Jaehaerys does to her and to sideline her are still years in the future. But Jaehaerys now is the person who'll be an authoritarian and condescending husband in the future, so there may be cracks we can widen. They're already disagreeing over their children and female inheritance: Daenerys is their oldest living child right now, and Alysanne wants to name her heir while Jaehaerys is calling her younger brother Aemon the heir.
Removing Jaehaerys from the throne, after all, means removing Alysanne from the position of queen.
I'm not sure we have the stats to cuckold Jaehaerys. We probably would have needed higher Diplomacy for that.
On a serious note, I suggest we marry someone with a magical bloodline who can also give us a strong personal union. Two possible candidates are Eustace Hightower (who is currently supporting our bestie's adventure) and Corlys Velaryon (who is some 8 years our junior).
Two possible candidates are Eustace Hightower (who is currently supporting our bestie's adventure) and Corlys Velaryon (who is some 8 years our junior).
While Blackwoods do have magic genes, politically they aren't the (potential) juggernauts that the Hightowers, Velaryons and Starks are. Marrying their heir wouldn't give Aerea and her progeny as advantageous of a PU.Is there an unmarried adult Blackwood? That risks making an enemy of the Brackens, but we might be able to thread the needle. Both houses are still stinging over Aegon raising House Tully to be their overlord, and House Bracken in particular might be mad at Jaehaerys for sending one of their sons to the Wall for helping him against Maegor.
All those considerations are true, which is why Rhaena does need to be convinced. And even then how far she is willing to go will depend.I do wonder if Rhaena has the will to kill her brother and sister though. As she said, Jaehaerys is unlikely to willingly step down, which means he and Alyssane would have to be killed for us to take the throne. While Rhaena did have some resentment over losing the throne, the writings that we have of her don't seem to me to suggest that resentment is outright murderous. If Rhaena isn't willing to kill her siblings to put us on the throne, than that means the prospect of having to fight a two on one battle between Balerion Silverwing and Vermithor, a dicey prospect. See how in canon Vermithor was killed by the combined efforts of the far smaller Seasmoke and Tessarion.
I mean, considering the vote was to try to take the Iron Throne, I feel like this discussion will still come up a few timesI want to argue with you, but I don't want to derail this quest into a Why Jaehaerys Sucks As A Father, Husband, and Man referendum.
Well, technically by the same dynastic justifications Aerea would use to claim the throne, Jaehaerys would be her heir (assuming Septas are excluded from succession) as long as she doesn't have children herself, and then following him his children. Of course, that would probably only be a temporary state of affairs.We'll have to be very canny to do so, and would probably have to try to do it before we make a move for the throne. Removing Jaehaerys from the throne, after all, means removing Alysanne from the position of queen and removing all of her children, both Daenaerys and Aemon, from the line of succession.
Corlys is 11 years younger than Aerea in canon (born 42 vs 53), with the two additional years of age given to Aerea here to avoid creepiness, it's 13 years. That's completely outside her age range. He is only 3 right now. And Eustace is married.On a serious note, I suggest we marry someone with a magical bloodline who can also give us a strong personal union. Two possible candidates are Eustace Hightower (who is currently supporting our bestie's adventure) and Corlys Velaryon (who is some 8 years our junior).
Couldn't Aerea disinherit him and his line on the basis thay he usurped her rightful inheritence?Well, technically by the same dynastic justifications Aerea would use to claim the throne, Jaehaerys would be her heir (assuming Septas are excluded from succession) as long as she doesn't have children herself, and then following him his children. Of course, that would probably only be a temporary state of affairs.