That would make the D7 about 600 feet, or roughly 200 metersish, and most of that neck.I will note that in the top right there is a scale which can be used to ascertain the exact dimensions of the scale models.
That would make the D7 about 600 feet, or roughly 200 metersish, and most of that neck.I will note that in the top right there is a scale which can be used to ascertain the exact dimensions of the scale models.
That feels kind of small, honestly. For the entire Federation? Kind of...jarringly low numbers.Honestly for the Radiant/Newton I'm basically just going off the non-canon/nuTrek designs shapes and figuring out what sort of loadout they were likely to have in the SDB continuity.
I wasn't tracking overall build amount that far back, I think, probably because it was later that there started being a lot of interest in precisely how many hulls of each ship were built.
In total, the Sagarmatha-class consisted of twelve hulls: Sagarmatha, Kilimanjaro, Seleya, Olympus, Fuji, Matterhorn, Denali, Vesuvius, Elbrus, Toubkal, Aoraki, and Sinai.
The first run of the Kea-class consisted of four ships: the Kea, Kakapo, Cockatiel, and Macaw; all built between 2211 and 2214. The Saladin-class was commissioned in a similar timeframe in eight hulls: the Saladin, Hamilcar, Hannibal, Kublai, Temujin, Lysander, Darius, and Xerxes.
For the Cygnus we have Cygnus, Peregrine, Kingfisher, Osprey, and Goshawk.
For the Curiosity there was Curiosity, Spirity, Sojourner, and Pioneer. So Mars probes, basically. But they were decommissioned in 2220.
[X] Extra Crew Quarters
[X] Cargo Bay (+3 Cargo)
[X] Bistro Mathematics Lab/Cafe w/"patio seating"
[X] Ice Cream Maker (+2 Scoops)
Come to think of it, have any of the Klingon ships' interior sets featured windows? I do not recall seeing any in Star Trek IV, TNG, DS9, or anywhere else.
That feels kind of small, honestly. For the entire Federation? Kind of...jarringly low numbers.
It does roughly align with what the writers of TOS probably envisioned, where the Enterprise being of a class of 12 (possibly 14 assuming everything is TOS and not just TOS-R inventions). Though I do agree, even the 7k figure Discovery gives is a bit too low for a polity of (now) 20 full members, unless they have substantial national fleets still.That feels kind of small, honestly. For the entire Federation? Kind of...jarringly low numbers.
Love the idea, but I think the extra crew quarters are less luxurious and more not bunk beds so you actually have your own space.Oh hey, just thought of another thing Extra Crew Quarters could help with:
Leave one or two rooms unused. The ship meets a new polity and wants to convince them the Federation is friendly. The first thing they are going to think is how this is clearly a warship. Their dignitaries get invited onboard. Representatives are confused by Science Labs on warship. Then they get to stay in some fairly luxurious rooms. Apparently the warship has diplomatic facilities onboard? Except no, these are just spare crew quarters, not even officers quarters, which are even more luxurious. So apparently the way the Federation builds their warships also lets them function as science ships and pleasure cruise vessels. So now this new polity is like "Oh, how silly of us. At first we thought the Federation would be a highly militant society that could totally wreck us if provoked, but they are actually just a bunch of chill nerds who happen to be able to wreck us. Wait, there has to be a reason these chill, peace-loving nerds would make their luxury cruise science vessels so badass. What sorts of dangers are out there? Maybe we should buddy up to them for safety."
TLDR: Diplomacy!
And that's just Starfleet (that is, Federation, not including member-world) ships that we (and not San Francisco or other bureaus) have designed.This is only mentioning first production runs. We built a total of twelve Kea class ships and sixteen Saladin class ships, for example. The Newton is similar numbers, and I think we build eighteen Archer class ships overall (although some blew up).
It would be a good idea to actually tot up all the ships in service as of {Current Year}, but I would guesstimate it will be somewhere north of fifty or sixty but a bit less than a hundred.
Iirc we got one was of 2200 and it came out to about 100-150, can't find the post though. Someone made a separate post (from the one it came from) a while ago, before the last tac vote, I think.It would be a good idea to actually tot up all the ships in service as of {Current Year}, but I would guesstimate it will be somewhere north of fifty or sixty but a bit less than a hundred.
It does roughly align with what the writers of TOS probably envisioned, where the Enterprise being of a class of 12 (possibly 14 assuming everything is TOS and not just TOS-R inventions). Though I do agree, even the 7k figure Discovery gives is a bit too low for a polity of (now) 20 full members, unless they have substantial national fleets still.
Found an old post regarding Federation fleet strength in 2200.
Aside from those ships by 2240 we should have Kea's, Saladin's, Radiant's, Newtons, Archers, and Constitutions.
The Kea Retrospective didn't mention any Kea's being lost but it does mention that there are 15 Saladin's at the time of the 2260 Klingon war.
The Archer Retrospective meanwhile mentions 4 Radiant's, 16 Newtons initially up to 2230 and another 14 in the decade leading up to 2240, and 10 Archers built before 2232 when a further 12 were ordered before the War halted any further orders.
That would mean that by the time the Klingon War starts in the 2240s Starfleet likely has the following known ships:
10 Sagarmatha-class Explorers [2175]
22 Cygnus-class Utility Cruisers [2167] [Decommission 2250]
12 Curiosity-class Survey Cruisers [2164] [Decommission 2220]
25 Selachii-class Heavy Frigates [2190] [Refit 2225] [Decommission 2250]
12 Kea-class Science Cruiser [2211]
15 Saladin-class Light Cruiser [2211]
4 Radiant-class Cruiser [2225]
30 Newton-class Light Cruiser [2225]
22 Archer-class Light Cruiser [2225]
Out of those ships, the Sagarmatha's, Selachii's, Kea's, Saladin's, Newton's, and Archers should be capable of matching or beating a BoP with the Radiant likely to be capable of it too as I suspect that it's a Heavy Cruiser given the 4 nacelle investment.
That would give Starfleet roughly 118 combat relevant hulls or 96 if we don't include the Archer's which Starfleet likely doesn't want on the front lines.
I noted during the Kea Retrospective that Starfleet had enough yards to build at least 4 Kea's and 8 Saladin's over the course of 3 years. Given the fact that the Kea takes 2 years to build and the Saladin 1 year that suggests 6 shipyards at a minimum capable of building 180kt or larger ships all the way back in 2212.
Given how desperate for a combat ship Starfleet is I suspect that we'll be seeing at least as many Constitutions in the first tranche with potentially far more given the fact that there should be a good +2 decades from 2212 until the time the Constitutions are laid down.
Edit:
Just remembered that we had cost numbers for the Archer and Newton.
The Archer costed 51 while the Netwon costed 47.
Based on the cost estimates I made for our Connie and the Canon one ours is likely to be twice as expensive as either of those ships while the Canon one is a little under twice the cost.
Given the fact that the Federation is doubling down hard on the Connie and the fact that they were able to build double digit numbers of two different ships at the same time it makes a double digit tranche of Connie's possible even with how expensive they're looking to be.
none of the TOS sets had windows. not on ships, anyway. it was all viewscreens, and not even very large ones. presumably because they didn't have the budget for the needed practical effects, despite the windows being clearly visible on the models.Come to think of it, have any of the Klingon ships' interior sets featured windows? I do not recall seeing any in Star Trek IV, TNG, DS9, or anywhere else.
This is explicitly the case. the vast majority of the Federation members maintain their own fleets entirely independent of the Starfleet. Earth is the main exception, because they basically donated their entire fleet to the Federation on its founding.It does roughly align with what the writers of TOS probably envisioned, where the Enterprise being of a class of 12 (possibly 14 assuming everything is TOS and not just TOS-R inventions). Though I do agree, even the 7k figure Discovery gives is a bit too low for a polity of (now) 20 full members, unless they have substantial national fleets still.
It does roughly align with what the writers of TOS probably envisioned, where the Enterprise being of a class of 12 (possibly 14 assuming everything is TOS and not just TOS-R inventions). Though I do agree, even the 7k figure Discovery gives is a bit too low for a polity of (now) 20 full members, unless they have substantial national fleets still.
14 is the number of ships named in the TOS season 2 bible. Specifically, Enterprise, Exeter, Excalibur, Lexington, Yorktown, Potemkin, Republic, Hood, Constitution, Kongo, Constellation, Farragut, Valiant, Intrepid.
@Skippy
Found this! A combo of an official statement by Sayle from a while ago and what we've built/had built since.
we've lost a couple over the years and haven't built any more (because, y'know, outdated) so the ten listed here are the ones still in service.Republic, Intrepid, or Constellation all seem like great names for this class to me if people want to avoid Constitution, apropos of nothing.
Also interesting that the Defiant from ENT is not mentioned here: implying either some canon divergence (not implausible) or a second tranche of ships at some point.
Oh, neat! More than I thought honestly. We built a lot of Newton and Archer class ships compared to the Kea or Saladin.
Hmmm, I thought there were twelve Sagamartha type ships rather than ten, did I hallucinate that?
USN x8, RN x4, RIF x1, IJN x114 is the number of ships named in the TOS season 2 bible. Specifically, Enterprise, Exeter, Excalibur, Lexington, Yorktown, Potemkin, Republic, Hood, Constitution, Kongo, Constellation, Farragut, Valiant, Intrepid.
@Sayle you could probably do an attack craft/combat shuttle vote as a side, text bit to designing an attack craft tender, and the current 'we're about to get into wars and this is a time where people might do weird shit to try to get a tactical advantage' situation is a good chance for that. Just have the attack craft design votes come alongside the votes for the main tender vessel, and it'd be neat enough, you could probably just draw them as the finalized design without having to deal with internal component layouts.
I think it would be a fun side bit to the main ship design course, a cute divergence from canon (but not quite), and like Skippy says, manifesting the Space Tomcat is a glorious idea, especially because it'll let us grow our next generation of officers from a cadre of extremely competent but cocky mavericks who'll make high speed passes over the space station and the admiralty's collective sons and daughters.
And then force them into cataloguing space gas after the war ends, which is even funnier.
This is explicitly the case. the vast majority of the Federation members maintain their own fleets entirely independent of the Starfleet. Earth is the main exception, because they basically donated their entire fleet to the Federation on its founding.
Iirc it's long be held by fans, but only recently officially become a canon thing. At least as far as maintaining a fleet capable of persecuting a war on behalf of the wider Federation government goes.Given we still see Vulcan ships hanging around in Prodigy and Lower Decks (and I *swear* there was one or two in TNG but I can't find them, so… take that with a shaker of salt), I think it's a decent assumption!totally not biased
I'd say it's a bit low, but I tend to treat the TOS Federation as basically a bunch of napoleonic war era Britain's in space, so I'd have said with our 20 members 4,500 to 12,900 starships would be about right (depending on if you count stuff other than frigates & ships of the line).Oh, neat! More than I thought honestly. We built a lot of Newton and Archer class ships compared to the Kea or Saladin.
Hmmm, I thought there were twelve Sagamartha type ships rather than ten, did I hallucinate that?