It is the old "If you are killing it anyway, why waste perfectly good food?" argument. If you gotta kill your stud-muffin, may as well keep their best aspect around, you know?
It is the old "If you are killing it anyway, why waste perfectly good food?" argument. If you gotta kill your stud-muffin, may as well keep their best aspect around, you know?
She's a Lunar. If you agree she's in her rights to kill him, the options at that point are: 1) kill him and that's it, he's just dead, or 2) eat his heart and at least have something to remember the good times, specifically the ability to take his face.Hmm, while we did only get Jasmine's side of the story, it seems at first glance that she might well have been in her rights to kill Cal.
Eating him so she can look like him tho? ehh...
She's a Lunar. If you agree she's in her rights to kill him, the options at that point are: 1) kill him and that's it, he's just dead, or 2) eat his heart and at least have something to remember the good times, specifically the ability to take his face.
It's almost a sentimental thing, not a desecration of the corpse, for a Lunar like her.
This sounds suspect as heck...because that sounds a lot like a paranoid person's worst possible interpretation of events paired with a willful individual who's used to doing things their own way.Jasmine's grip on her knife becomes white knuckled. "He started second-guessing me in public. Going behind my back, undermining me. I tried to talk to him about it — he wouldn't even admit to the way he was pushing me out. I didn't want to fight him. But he wouldn't stop. And then he started conquering neighbouring peoples whose independence I'd given my word to respect. It broke my heart, but I had to—"
So, a thing to keep in mind is that, yeah, this is a situation where Jasmine killed her partner in a way that was obviously premeditated (you have to dedicate a Sacred Hunt to Luna before you start it). Their friends who heard of this but were not present for the conflict are not okay with it!I don't really agree that she was within her rights to kill him, especially given that we only got her side of the story and how she acted in the prelude, and also given how her circle has treated this. 2/3 of their circlemates do not seem to be on Jasmine's side about it.
She would have been in her rights to tell Cal to leave, and if he had refused to do so then she'd have the right to exile him and enforce that, or if he had tried to fight her for the valley then she might have been right to kill him. But in the prelude we don't see him losing a fight for the valley - we see him injured, running away. She chose to pursue and kill him.
Also I just like fateful jewel / lucky stone better.
Add in that Cal's action verge on (or are) treason if Jasmine is the ruler which has traditionally been punished by executon even in modern times. Also, knowing that Dawn Castes specialize in waging war, can you really afford to give him time to build up and return to restart their conflict. Given how their dispute has escalated to violence, you either end it decisively or everyone is waiting on teeterhooks for it to resume.So, a thing to keep in mind is that, yeah, this is a situation where Jasmine killed her partner in a way that was obviously premeditated (you have to dedicate a Sacred Hunt to Luna before you start it). Their friends who heard of this but were not present for the conflict are not okay with it!
What this also is, though, unless you think she's lying, is essentially a ruler's consort repeatedly undermining her to the point of outright demonstrating to their neighbours that her word means nothing. Especially in a pre modern setting like Creation, that sort of thing tends to escalate to violence a lot more justifiably than it does when it's just a marital spat. And once it does, like... Once they manage to drive off the Dawn Caste through force and he's weak and injured, what next? Cal was in bad shape. There's a good chance he'd have died on his own. Did Jasmine know that before she hunted him down to finish it? If she'd let him go and he'd lived, what happens once his wounds heal and he comes back to settle things on his terms?
What this also is, though, unless you think she's lying, is essentially a ruler's consort repeatedly undermining her to the point of outright demonstrating to their neighbours that her word means nothing
This is the biggest bit. The only options at that point are to exile or kill him. And he's a Dawn Caste who seems to specialize in war. So uh, if you exile him he'll probably come back with an army.
This is down to individual interpretation, but I personally do subscribe to the belief that a given Exaltation does seek out people who are similar enough in some ways that memories from their past lives can resonate enough for them to identify with. Jasmine has alluded to this being the case. So far, Aster has only seen a profoundly alienating flashback to Jochim, but this does not mean that he couldn't have had things in common with Aster that she'd be pretty uncomfortable with.And then we have Exalted, where different incarnations of the same divine spark are explicitly different people who just sometimes get glimpses of the previous Champions' lives. Sentimentality should play absolute jackshit of a role towards people who the previous holder of your Exaltation used to know, and on balance, Aster and Jasmine are currently enemies who seem to have pretty different ideas about what exactly should happen to her homeland.
So essentially their exaltations would seek out people who are each other's Type...but these types are going to routinely take actions which piss off the other.This is down to individual interpretation, but I personally do subscribe to the belief that a given Exaltation does seek out people who are similar enough in some ways that memories from their past lives can resonate enough for them to identify with.