Well, that went well. So Phoenix does this mean that the Persians aren't going to fall to the Arabs or is that still going on?
@phoenixfryre Can we go into debt? If so, do we have to pay interest, and are there any other penalties that we suffer?
All we have to do is reestablish defensive lines, destroy that last Arab army and then reclaim our lost territory and we should have this war all wrapped up. It's unfortunate we don't have the infrastructure and funds to pursue an offensive campaign against the Arabians as retaliation though.Holy shit. I can't think of how this could possibly go better, the Islamic offensive is dead.
Ah, so that's not really a decent option then. And are there are any administrative measures and reforms we can take? How about implementing a system of themes, or at least temporarily placing military commanders in charge of our provinces? While that's obviously not going to help stability in the long run, it should help to prevent defection from civilian governors as happened in the OTL.The Persians are safe from the Arabs, though that means jack all when they can barely muster 6,000 men. They're staying behind the Iranian mountain range and hoping to god the Arabs ignore them.
You can't go into debt but you can debase the currency. And suffer like hell, remember debasing currency was vital in the crisis of the third century.
Is there any reason we shouldn't advance into Giza with the Ghassanids? Seems like free real-estate and we should probably capitalize on the utter havoc that must have erupted in the Arab lines.-[X] Split his troops in half, garrisoning both entrances to the Prefecture of Aegyptus, both Suez and Pelusium.
That's a no-shit. Can't see any reason why we wouldn't pick this.-[X] Reorganise the defensive line properly, advance on Azaz and Alexandria (on the Euphrates) to cut off the Infidel's access to the Queen of Oriens.
I'm going to assume that this is placed to enable an offensive in the coming turns.-[X] (10,000) Repair the Infrastructure of Asiana and Pontus completely. [Increase Revenue and Administration cost] [Increase available manpower and population growth.] [Imperator Focus]
That would almost certainly ensure there aren't any problems on that front, although now would also be a good time to pick the option that looks like it eases the emperor's health problems.-[X] Recently there have been rumours of Serbian Activity on the frontier, perhaps you should go and show them why they should fear the Empire? (Take 4 Meros and put an end to their abomination of a state.)
Unfortunately, reforms like this should probably wait until the Empire isn't at war. Causing significant unrest on the home front during a key moment would be disastrous.Ah, so that's not really a decent option then. And are there are any administrative measures and reforms we can take? How about implementing a system of themes, or at least temporarily placing military commanders in charge of our provinces? While that's obviously not going to help stability in the long run, it should help to prevent defection from civilian governors as happened in the OTL.
Also, are there any measures we can make to help deal with rampant tax evasion from the elites? I know that was more of a problem in particular in the 6th century AD under Justinian, and that the major problems affecting the Empire are simply economic devastation and war, but there might be cash to be found there.
That ... that's not actually a bad idea. I mean, it'd be politically painful, and I'm not sure how trustworthy they would be, but we're not getting the land back anytime soon. Better to try and achieve at least somewhat cordial relations with the west, getting recourses out of it would be a neat bonus.Additionally, do we have any recourse to call for aid from any territories in Western Europe? Nominally at least, most of the local rulers should still owe fealty to the Eastern Roman Empire. Perhaps we can offer marriages to our sons, or to recognise one of the Lombards, Franks, or Visigoths etc. as Western Emperor or our Viceroy in exchange for support. Whatever we can do to get money and men, we should.
Ah, so that's not really a decent option then. And are there are any administrative measures and reforms we can take? How about implementing a system of themes, or at least temporarily placing military commanders in charge of our provinces? While that's obviously not going to help stability in the long run, it should help to prevent defection from civilian governors as happened in the OTL.
Also, are there any measures we can make to help deal with rampant tax evasion from the elites? I know that was more of a problem in particular in the 6th century AD under Justinian, and that the major problems affecting the Empire are simply economic devastation and war, but there might be cash to be found there.
As another source of funds, what about the church? Given how the war against the Sasanians resulted in the use of extreme religious propaganda, with Heraclius's army essentially being fundamentalist zealots, we might be able to say that the Church should give up gold and suchlike to help pay for the war, and for reconstruction.
Additionally, do we have any recourse to call for aid from any territories in Western Europe? Nominally at least, most of the local rulers should still owe fealty to the Eastern Roman Empire. Perhaps we can offer marriages to our sons, or to recognise one of the Lombards, Franks, or Visigoths etc. as Western Emperor or our Viceroy in exchange for support. Whatever we can do to get money and men, we should.
Well, by the time they arrive at the front, the front would've stabilized. Furthermore, they would be culturally distinct from the Arabs so they won't work with the enemy. Lastly, their heavy cavalry would do wonders for a surprise charge.Can you recognise the Germans illegally occupying former Roman provinces. Yes.
Can you bring over another 10-20k troops from the West. Yes.
But the question is, should you?
Yeah, I get that a massive legal and administrative shake up of the sort capable of solving huge problems like tax evasion might not be possible. However, I don't see why we couldn't temporarily grant military commanders authority over their civil counterparts. The creation of the Thematic system is usually dated to either the reign of Heraclius, or his grandson Constans II, which demonstrates that more sophisticated reforms based on the concept were also possible even when the Empire was at war. A stopgap emergency policy to stop cowardly governors from surrendering shouldn't be too hard to implement.Unfortunately, reforms like this should probably wait until the Empire isn't at war. Causing significant unrest on the home front during a key moment would be disastrous.
In my view "recognising the Germans illegally occupying former Roman provinces" costs us very little. We wouldn't be able to stage an invasion for a long time, and much like in Justinian's case it might merely weaken the Empire and open multiple fronts as we exchange pliable clients and quasi-vassals for enemies. Even if we won, winning might prove so costly and ruinous that we ought not to have bothered in the first place. It might be seen as humiliating to some degree, but if it won us money or manpower, or simply smoothed tensions and ensured peaceful borders and uninterrupted trade, then that would be worth it as well. Pride won't pay our troops or win wars.Can you recognise the Germans illegally occupying former Roman provinces. Yes.
Can you bring over another 10-20k troops from the West. Yes.
But the question is, should you?