Rocket Design Agency - A Playtesting Quest

Cast and Characters
NASA
Brad L. Whipple - Director, New Alleghany Space Administration

Payload Design - +1
Rocket Design - +2
Engine Design - +3
Mission Planning - +1
Flight Control - +2
Damage Control - +0
Spacecraft Activity - +0
Extravehicular Activity - +0
Experimental Activity - +2

Flight Objectives
- Continue scientific launches, progressing to probes into the space beyond orbit by year end 1959.
- Begin experiments which will allow a progression to human spaceflight before year end 1960.
- Cooperate with the Armed Forces in developing their abilities through the application of spaceflight.

Mission Schedule - Current Date: January 1960
- Low Orbit 1 (Summer 1958) - Hope-2 (Partial failure)
- Re-entry test 1 - Sub-orbital - Full Success, August 1958
- Low Orbit 2 - Partial Failure, Hope-3 , October 1958
- Re-entry test 2 - Failure, November 1958
- Military Communications - Success, ARTS, December 1958
- High Orbit 1 - Success, Hope-4, January 1959
- Re-entry test 3 - Success, March 1959
- Bio-sciences - Launch Failure, July 1959
- Discovery 1, Success, September 1959
- High Orbit 2 - Success, Hope-5, October 1959
- Lunar Probe - Launch Failure, Artemis-Lunar, November 1959
- Bio-sciences - Success, Astrocaphe-Chuck, December 1959
- Discovery 2 - Failure, January 1960
- Astrocathe test - Success, animal in space, February 1960
- March lost due to Artemis redesign
- NAN payload - April 1960 - First Hermes Flight
- Crown 3 - Spring/Summer 1960
- Commercial payload - Summer 1960
- IRVOS 1 - Summer 1960
- NAA Communications - Summer/Fall 1960
- Space Camp test - Summer/Fall 1960
- NAN payload - Fall/Winter 1960
- Commercial payload -Winter 1960
- Astrocathe test - Winter 1960
- NAA Communications - Spring 1961

- Astrocaphe phase 1 (3 crewed flights)
- Astrocaphe phase 2 (3 crewed flights)

Hardware
- Prometheus (1M to LEO)
- Hermes-L (6M to LEO)
- Hermes-B (8M to LEO)

Andre Larkin - Team Lead at EPL
Rocket Design 0
Engine Design +2


EPL Design Team
Antony Miratha, Aerodynamics
Susan Stone, Astrophysics
Michael Cole, Rocket Engineering
Amy Mathews, Trajectory Planning
Simon T. Harrison, Chemical Engineering

+2 Rocket Design, +2 Payload Design +1 Engine Design, +1 Fuel Selection, +1 Flight Planning

Side Characters
Dr. Evan Hart - Research Director at EPL
Arthur Ley, proponent of Lunar flight.
Franz Haber, Doctor and researcher.
Dieter von Markand, Pacifist and astrophysicist.


EPL Facilities
Design workshop
Chemical research laboratory
Launch analysis equipment
(Please note that EPL has neither rocket nor engine manufacturing facilities)
 
Last edited:
[X] We have not launched a weapon. We have sent up an exploration vessel, a mission of science. Not something with which to make war.
 
[X] We have not launched a weapon. We have sent up an exploration vessel, a mission of science. Not something with which to make war.


I like this option. We aren't military types by default - Ajax was our only military project, and served as a test platform for technologies that lead directly into the second stage of our Prometheus rocket.

As for what happened to Hope, I figure it's probably a case of "took longer than anticipated to start up", hopefully.
 
[X] We can't know if it has worked yet or not. No other comment.

We can talk to the press about whether or not it's a weapon or not after we're sure it's in orbit and everything is fine as part of a press conference. Going straight to "it's not a weapon" seems like it would be highly suspicious.
 
C6P5: Thus it is done!
You hold your hands up for quiet, waiting until the reporters finally give you a moment to breathe and to think. They all have such interesting questions and while initially you feel the urge to give no comment and wait for the press conference that you are sure will come later once you know the true results, it is too tempting to say something, anything, to sustain them while you wait.

"Hope-1 is not a weapon and it's launcher, Prometheus, is not a military design. At EPL our mission is one of exploration, not militarism, and this program is no different. If we succeed today, then we are making a difference for the pioneers of the future. And succeed we will, and I see no reason to believe otherwise."

"So you don't have confirmation yet?" One of the reports shouts.

"No, we do not, and we won't for another half hour at least. But I am confident in my team and in the work we have done. I see no reason that you will not have an incredible story to run tomorrow."

"But what about the Europan reaction? Or Caspian?"

"I've got no other comments. You'll have to wait for later, i'm afraid, thankyou." You turn and walk back into the building, frustrated that you haven't managed to take the walk that you were intending. Instead you light another cigarette and head back to the control room.




There will always come a point when a question you don't particularly want to answer becomes unavoidable. Sitting in front of an audience of reporters, rather than just a gaggle of them, you suddenly feel like you've been caught by an entirely unwanted spotlight and are being held in its harsh glare.

You remember the last tense minutes in the control room. The fear. The nerves. The dry, rasping throat of too many cigarettes and too much coffee. It was intensely stressful, to the point that you prayed for an end to things.

And then it came.



The EPL Research head stands and calls for silence, projector remote in hand. After a few moments of hush, he presses a button and announces:

"Ladies and Gentlemen. Orbit!"


Questions are forthcoming;
[ ] Answer efficiently and completely.
[ ] Pass them off onto your colleagues.
[ ] Do not step outside your wheelhouse. Refuse political and other unimportant questions.
 
Last edited:
[X] Do not step outside your wheelhouse. Refuse political and other unimportant questions.

Fuck politics.
 
[X] Do not step outside your wheelhouse. Refuse political and other unimportant questions.


I think this is the best bet - it's not our job to dictate foreign or military policy, but it is our job to help science push the boundaries of what's possible. So we'll answer engineering questions, and scientific questions, and heck, we might even field questions on "what's next", but we aren't going to speculate on politics, or what the military will be doing, beyond perhaps expressing a hope that the peaceful exploration of space will continue.
 
[X] Do not step outside your wheelhouse. Refuse political and other unimportant questions.
 
[X] Do not step outside your wheelhouse. Refuse political and other unimportant questions.
Adhoc vote count started by BungieONI on Jan 21, 2019 at 4:45 PM, finished with 9 posts and 8 votes.
 
C6P6: What do reporters know?
You spend the next forty minutes or so immensely frustrated as reporters attempt to ask you questions that are so far outside your field of expertise that you cannot imagine being able to answer them. You are not a politician and it would not be right for you to answer questions about what other nations will make of this achievement. You are not a diplomat nor a lawyer and it would not be right for you to pass judgement on the effects of orbit on international law. Why, you wonder, will they not ask you about your rocket, your satellite or any of the engineering difficulties you faces? They are, after all, what you are here to answer questions about surely. That is your job, after all.

There are, fortunately enough, a handful of men and women from technical journals who are actually showing an interest in what Hope can achieve and what you have accomplished on a mathematical and scientific level.

"We had three main experiments aboard Hope. A camera, simply to return photography of space, a photometer to return information on solar radiation and a geiger-muller tube to measure other radiation. Sadly, neither radiation counter functioned when we attempted to power them up, but otherwise the launch was entirely successful."

"So you didn't get anything? How can you call this a success if it broke?" A man asks and you smile.

"The experiments were not the purpose of the launch. We wanted to put something in orbit; we did. We wanted to prove our rockets could accomplish that; we did. We wanted to show the world that spaceflight is a plausible endeavour and that private companies could manage it: I would say that we have. Frankly, if they had worked it would have simply been a bonus."

"Okay, we have time for one more question." The moderator says and you thank whatever is watching over you that you can almost escape.

"Yes, last one." A reporter says, looking at you, "Who do you think will lead New Alleghany into space? I understand the presidents are already considering a national body to guide the nation."

Are they? This is the first you're hearing of the matter. But it's an interesting question nonetheless.

Who should lead?
[ ] The military, for strength and confidence.
[ ] The science community, because that is the future.
[ ] Commercial enterprises. What is exploration without exploitation.
[ ] Write-in.
 
[X] The science community, because that is the future.

Space is for being fuckin awesome, not killsats and space wars.

Asteroid mining is okay I guess but I'd rather that not be the focus
 
[X] The science community, because that is the future.


I'd like to try and kick off private spaceflight, but until we get much further along in the timeline, private space-launch is still going to be a pretty solid pipe dream.
 
[X] The science community, because that is the future.

We should absolutely encourage commercial spaceflight when the opportunity arises, however.
 
Back
Top