Recent content by jwolfe_beta

Problem is that I think that is the only drive option we have if you don't want to fall back on chemical rockets. Edit: and on a different topic, found some potential images for the exterior of our future moon base. https://www.artstation.com/artwork/dKG3rJ

Oh well, not that much of an issue. On another matter, we're probably going to have to massively expand/upgrade Safe Haven Shipyard now that everything's out in the open. Particularly if we want to produce ships for all the Coalition members and/or larger vessels at any reasonable speed...

Right, finally got around to updating the tech summation. Though does anyone know what the Dissipating Alloy and Penetrating Alloy that we developed ended up getting called? There was a vote but I'm not sure what won.

Well Mules are non-FTL ships so we'll need something for bulk transport between solar systems.

And away from the solar system we'd just need access to a planet with water bodies, and/or processing equipment in our ships to extract water from asteroids. Which we'd want anyway in order to help maintain our life support systems. So on one hand we no doubt won't have the endurance/sheer...

We're actually using something similar to the Death Glider's reactionless engines. In that there no propellant involved, we just need to provide power to the system.

Right, forgot about that. At the same time our H2O fusion still have enough juice to send our spaceships on flights all over the solar system with needing constant refueling so they have to be pretty efficient in terms of power output.

Considering we've been using the things to power our Stargate along with our spacecraft I'd say its power output is pretty good all in all.

Feels like both leaning towards the former for me. Though we do know things are going on in Russia and China that we are not truely aware of. I'd need to double check but I think Ferrocrete already got patented and is being distrubuted. The fusion reactor on the other hand is likely going to...

And there was some invistext regarding our teacher.

Didn't Kinsey want to be President? Throwing the current administration under the bus might be something he'd happily do.

-Polandball Britain sips his tea- "What about our 'special relation'?"

Actually Russia is doing something else and we might be later in the 'IRL timeline' than you think as in turn 27 there is this mention:

So......20 to 50 years from now? :p

Assuming they can reach from orbit. The things are stated to be 'extreme close range' weapons/equipment.